Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
the study does not need to be conducted because the substance is classified as skin corrosion, leading to classification as serious eye damage (Category 1)
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
01 August 2018 - 02 August 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
2015
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2500 (Acute Dermal Irritation)
Version / remarks:
August 1998
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
May 2008
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Appendix to Director General Notification, No. 12-Nousan-8147. Agricultural Production Bureau, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (JMAFF)
Version / remarks:
November 2000, including the most recent revisions.
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test item.
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River France, L’Arbresle, France
- Age at study initiation: A young adult animal (approximately 22 weeks old)
- Weight at study initiation: 3942 g
- Housing: individually in a labeled cage with perforated floor
- Diet: pelleted diet for rabbits (Global Diet 2030 Teklad, Mucedola, Milanese, Italy), provided once daily. In addition, hay was available during the study period.
- Water: municipal tap-water, available ad libitum
- Acclimation period: the animal was allowed to acclimate for at least 5 days before commencement of dosing

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20
- Humidity (%): 56 to 82%
- Air changes (per hr): at least 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 01 August 2018 - 02 August 2018
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
clipped
Vehicle:
water
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.5 g

NEGATIVE CONTROL: adjacent areas of the untreated skin
Duration of treatment / exposure:
3 minutes, 1 hour and 4 hours
Observation period:
4 days
Number of animals:
1 male animal (no further animals were treated, after considering the degree of skin reaction observed in the first animal).
Details on study design:
The animal was initially exposed to the test item for 3 minutes to consider whether exposure could be continued humanely. Subsequently, the animal was exposed to a 1-hour and a 4-hour exposure period using an identical procedure but two seperate skin-sites.

TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: dorsal area, 150 square centimeters (10 x 15 cm)
- % coverage: not indicated
- Type of wrap if used: Micropore tape, wrapped around the abdomen and secured with Coban elastic bandage.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: after removing of each dressing, the skin was cleaned with tap water.
- Time after start of exposure: three minutes, one hour and four hours

OBSERVATION TIME POINTS:
- Post dose observations: immediately after removal of the dressing and 1 and 24 hours after test item removal.

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize
- Method of calculation: visual scoring
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not specified
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24 h
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Remarks:
due to necrosis
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not specified
Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No severe skin reactions were noted immediately after an exposure period of three minutes or 1 hour and therefore the third bandage was kept on the skin for an exposure of 4 hours. One day after exposure, the 4 hours treatment resulted in an erythema score of 4. Oedema was scored 1 hour after the bandage was removed resulting in a score of 4, oedema could not be scored one day after exposure due to destruction of the skin.
- Full thickness destruction (noted as brown necrosis) was noted for all treated skin areas on the day after dosing.
- Sticky remnants of the test item were present on the 3 minutes treatment site on day 1
- No signs of systemic toxicity during the study period were observed and no mortality occured
Interpretation of results:
Category 1B (corrosive) based on GHS criteria
Remarks:
Category 1B according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Conclusions:
Based on the results of an in vivo skin irritation study, performed according to OECD 404 and GLP principles, N-(Oleyl alkyl)-1,3-propanediamine mono oleate is classified as Category 1B (corrosive) according to GHS and Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.
Executive summary:

The possible irritation or corrosion potential of a single dose of Armolube 211 administered to the intact skin of rabbit was evaluated in a primary skin irritation study carried out based on the guidelines described in OECD 404 (2015)/OPPTS 870.2500 (1998)/JMAFF Guidelines (2000). One rabbit was exposed to three samples of 0.5 grams of Oleyl-diamine mono-oleate applied to separate skin-sites on intact, clipped skin using a semi-occlusive dressing. The exposure periods were 3 minutes, 1 hour and 4 hours, respectively. Skin reactions were assessed on the day of dosing (Day 1) and Day 2. Based on the severe skin reactions, no further animals were exposed.

On the day of dosing, up to grade 2 erythema and grade 4 edema was noted for all treated skin sites. Necrosis was noted for all treated skin areas on the day after dosing.

It is concluded that Oleyl-diamine mono-oleate is corrosive to the skin should be classified as skin corrosive Category 1B under GHS. (CLP: Corrosive Category 1B; H314: Causes severe skin burns and eye damage.)

Data source

Materials and methods

Results and discussion

Applicant's summary and conclusion