Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 238-200-7 | CAS number: 14285-59-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Acute Toxicity: oral
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with national standard methods
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 980
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Section 163.81 of the Regulations for the Enforcement of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (Federal Register, Wednesday, June 25, 1975)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Short description of test conditions:
Administration by esophageal intubation
Sprague-Dawley rats
- Parameters analysed / observed:
All animals were observed closely for gross signs of systemic toxiclty and mortality at frequent intervals during the day of dosage, and at least twice daily thereafter for a total of 14 days. Gross necropsies were performed on the animals that died. At the end of the 14-day observation period the surviving rats were weighed, sacrificed by CO- inhalation and gross necropsies were performed. Statistical analysis of the mortality data was by the moving average method. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- GLP not mandatory at this date
- Test type:
- up-and-down procedure
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Tetrahydrogen [29H,31H-phthalocyanine-2,9,16,23-tetrasulphonato(6-)-N29,N30,N31,N32]cobaltate(4-)
- EC Number:
- 238-200-7
- EC Name:
- Tetrahydrogen [29H,31H-phthalocyanine-2,9,16,23-tetrasulphonato(6-)-N29,N30,N31,N32]cobaltate(4-)
- Cas Number:
- 14285-59-7
- Molecular formula:
- C32H16CoN8O12S4
- IUPAC Name:
- tetrahydrogen [29H,31H-phthalocyanine-2,9,16,23-tetrasulphonato(6-)-N29,N30,N31,N32]cobaltate(4-)
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- The test sample was administered by esophageal intubation to one group, composed of ten Sprague-Dawley (weight range for the male rats was 233 to 240 grams and for the female rats was 200 to 234 grams). The sample was administered as a 25% weight per volume solution in corn oil (Mazola) at a dosage level of 1.25 grams per kilogram of body weight. When the study was repeated, the test sample was administered by esophageal
intubation to one group, composed of five male and five female Sprague- Dawley (weight range for the male rats was 200 to 221 grams and- for the female rats was 150 to 180 grams). The test sample was administered as a 25% weight per volume solution in distilled water at a dosage level of 5.0 grams per kilogram of body weight.
Due to deaths which occurred at this dose, a complete LD50- on the test material was then carried out.
The test sample was administered by esophageal intubation to five groups,
each composed of five male and five female Sprague-Dawley (weight range for the male rats was 200 to 245 grams and for the female rats was 153 to 193 grams).
The sample was administered as a 25% w/v solution in distilled water at dosage levels of 0.464, 1.00, 2.15, 4.64 and 10.0 grams per kilogram of body weight.
Food was withheld from the rats for approximately 18 hours prior to dosage.
Food and water were available ad libitum. The animals were housed
under a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle. The rats were acclimated to the laboratory at least seven days prior to dosage.
The test sample was administered by esophageal intubation to one group, composed of ten male Sprague-Dawley (The weight range : 233 to 240 grams). The sample was administered as a 25% weight per volume solution in corn oil (Mazola) at a dosage level of 1.25 grams per kilogram of body weight.
When the study was repeated, the test sample was administered by esophageal intubation to one group, composed of five male and five female Sprague- Dawley (weight range for the male rats was 200 to 221 grams and- for the female rats was 150 to 180 grams). The test sample was administered as a 25% weight per volume solution in distilled water at a dosage level of 5.0 grams per kilogram of body weight.
Due to deaths which occurred at this dose, a complete LD50- on the test material was then carried out.
The test sample was administered by esophageal intubation to five groups, each composed of five male and five female Sprague-Dawley (weight range for the male rats was 200 to 245 grams and for the female rats was 153 to 193 grams).
The sample was administered as a 25% w/v solution in distilled water at dosage levels of 0.464, 1.00, 2.15, 4.64 and 10.0 grams per kilogram of body weight.
Food was withheld from the rats for approximately 18 hours prior to dosage.
Food and water were available ad libitum. The animals were housed under a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle. The rats were acclimated to the laboratory at least seven days prior to dosage.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Remarks:
- Except for the first experiment (dose of 1.25 g/ kg bw) where the vehicle was corn oil
- Details on oral exposure:
- Administration by esophageal intubation.
1.25 g/ kg bw : The sample was administered as a 25% weight per volume solution in corn oil
5.0 g/ kg bw : The test sample was administered as a 25% weight per volume solution in distilled water
0.464, 1.00, 2.15, 4.64 and 10.0 g/ kg bw : The sample was administered as a 25% w/v solution in distilled water - Doses:
- 1.25 g/ kg bw : The sample was administered as a 25% weight per volume solution in corn oil
5.0 g/ kg bw : The test sample was administered as a 25% weight per volume solution in distilled water
0.464, 1.00, 2.15, 4.64 and 10.0 g/ kg bw : The sample was administered as a 25% w/v solution in distilled water - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 males and 5 females per dose
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- All animals were observed closely for gross signs of systemic toxiclty and mortality at frequent intervals during the day of dosage, and at least twice daily thereafter for a total of 14 days. Gross necropsies were performed on the animals that died. At the end of the 14-day observation period the surviving rats were weighed, sacrificed by CO- inhalation and gross necropsies were performed. Statistical analysis of the mortality data was by the moving average method.
- Statistics:
- Statistical analysis of the mortality data was by the moving average method.
Results and discussion
- Preliminary study:
- 1.25 g/ kg bw : no mortality occurs for both sex
5 g/ kg bw: 2 males died and all five female rats died
Effect levelsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 5 010 mg/kg bw
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- With a confidence interval of 95%
- Key result
- Sex:
- male
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 6 810 mg/kg bw
- Remarks on result:
- other: With a confidence interval of 95%
- Mortality:
- Main study :
All animal died at the 10.0 g/kg dosage
2 female died at the 4.64 g/kg dosage - Clinical signs:
- other: Males : 1.00 g/kg : all rats exhibited blue-colored stools and tails. From the eighth post-dosage day until the termination of the study all rats exhibited normal appearance and behavior. 2.15 g/kg and 4.64 g/kg : From the first post-dosage day until th
- Gross pathology:
- Please refer to the section "Clinical Signs"
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test item has a oral LD50 of 6.81 g/kg in male rats and 5.01 g/kg in female rats. Under tests conditions, results are considered scientifically valid to support a non classification under GHS criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.