Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-787-5 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Further information is included under 'Attached justification' in IUCLID section 13 and 'Cross-reference'. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test was performed following the method of J. Blok, as detailed in the paper A repetitive die-away test combining several biodegradability test procedures, published in the journal Int. Biodeterior. Bull (!SSN 0020-6164) 15 (2) 1979 (57--63), with some modifications
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- not specified
- Details on inoculum:
- Details of the inoculum used are not outlined in the paper, but the test was performed following the previously published Blok method (1979). For the Blok method preparation of the inoculum is reported as follows:
To obtain a polyvalent inoculum, various sources of aerobic organisms are used together. To 70 ml tap water the following are added:
10 ml stock solution A (see below)
10 ml fresh activated sludge
10 ml fresh river sludge
I ml fresh domestic sewage
500 mg fresh compost or garden soil.
Solution A:
KH2P04 2.83 g per litre
K2HP04 7.25 g per litre
Na2HP04.2aq 11.13 g per litre
This mixture is homogenised with an ultrasonic mixer for 10 - 20 seconds and paper-filtered. The filtrate is used as soon as possible, in any event within one hour. 3 ml of this inoculum is added to each 600 mi of mineral medium.
The mineral medium is obtained by diluting 1 : 1000 of equal quantities of the stock solutions A - F of composition given below with distilled water. The constituents suffice for the formation of about 150-200 mg/litre biomass or for the ultimate biodegradation of about 1 g/litre of test compound.
Solution A: KH2P04 = 2.83 g per litre; K2HP04 = 7.25 g per litre; Na2HP04.2aq = 11.13 g per litre
Section B: MgS04.7aq = 75 g per litre; CaCI2 = 9.2 g per litre; FeCI3.6aq = 0.083 g per litre
Solution C: NH4CI = 127 g per litre; Solution D: Allylthiourea = 2 g per litre
Solution E: Yeast extract = 5 g per litre
Solution F: H3B04 = 1.2 g per litre; CuSO4.Saq = 1.2 g per litre; KI = 05 g per litre; MnSO4 = 23 g per litre; NaMoO4 = 23 g per litre; ZnSO4.1aq = 4.7 g per litre - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 20 mg/L
- Based on:
- other: Carbon
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- DOC removal
- Remarks:
- Based on Blok method
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- O2 consumption
- Remarks:
- Based on Blok method
- Details on study design:
- The test was performed following the previously published Blok method (1979) with the following modifications:
- The test concentration was chosen to correspond to 20 mg C/I.
- The ultrasound treatment was done before the inoculation.
- The inoculum was five times that of the OECD Screening Test.
- The test compound was added only once at the beginning.
- The test was run for 28 days.
- The bottles were fastened lying on the trays of the shaking machine.
- The reairation of the culture medium after each intermediate oxygen determination was accomplished by shaking the open upright bottle for one hour.
Details of the calculation of results are not provided in the paper, but the study followed the Blok method, which details that results should be calculated as follows:
The blank value (DOCtb) is subtracted from the measured amount of dissolved organic carbon (DOCt). The added amount of organic carbon (TOCadded) is calculated; for water-insoluble compounds this is a theoretical amount based on the dry weight addition. The results are expressed as per cent elimination of the dissolved organic carbon, calculated as shown:
per cent eliminated = ((TOCadded - (DOCt - DOCtb))/TOCadded)*100.
The oxygen uptake is corrected for that in the blank and related to a measured chemical oxygen demand or to a theoretical oxygen demand (TOD) of the amount added. The maximum oxygen uptake per litre of flask volume is 2/3 of this TOD. The total oxygen per litre of flask volume at 20°C and 76 cm Hg before the incubation is:
- in air 1/3x 1/22.4x (273/293) x32 x 0.21 = 93mg O2
- in water 2/3 x 8.8 = 6mg O2
Therefore the total = 99 mg O2
This figure has a standard variation of + 2 mg because of variations in the atmospheric pressure.
The per cent degradation follows from:
% degradtion = (((DOtb -DOt)*99) /(DOst*2/3TOD))*100
where:
DOtb = dissolved oxygen in blank after incubation
DOt = dissolved oxygen in test after incubation
DOst = dissolved oxygen at saturation (known from the temperature) after incubation.
TOD = Total (or Theoretical) oxygen demand of the substance added at the beginning of incubation (mg/litre water). - Reference substance:
- not specified
- Parameter:
- other: % ThOD
- Value:
- 84
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- The study was also performed following the same method for C8/18 fatty acid, C18 -stearic acid and C22 -behenic acid and the biodegradation was assessed to be 100 %, 79 % and 69 %, respectively.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test item was shown to have degraded by 84% over 28 days by the modified Blok method.
- Executive summary:
The biodegradability of the test item was assessed using a modified version of the Blok method (Blok, 1979) conducted over 28 days. Biodegradation was assessed based on theoretical O2 demand. After 28 days it was determined that the test item had degraded 84% from the starting concentration.
The publication is a near guideline study suitable for assessment of this endpoint with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Further information is included under 'Attached justification' in IUCLID section 13 and 'Cross-reference'. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test was performed following the method of J. Blok, as detailed in the paper A repetitive die-away test combining several biodegradability test procedures, published in the journal Int. Biodeterior. Bull (!SSN 0020-6164) 15 (2) 1979 (57--63), with some modifications
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- None reported
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- not specified
- Details on inoculum:
- Details of the inoculum used are not outlined in the paper, but the test was performed following the previously published Blok method (1979). For the Blok method preparation of the inoculum is reported as follows;
To obtain a polyvalent inoculum, various sources of aerobic organisms are used together. To 70 ml tap water the following are added:
10 ml stock solution A (see below)
10 ml fresh activited sludge
10 ml fresh river sludge
I ml fresh domestic sewage
500 mg fresh compost or garden soil.
Solution A:
KH2P04 2.83 g per litre
K2HP04 7.25 g per litre
Na2HP04.2aq 11.13 g per litre
This mixture is homogenised with an ultrasonic mixer for 10 - 20 seconds and paper-filtered. The filtrate is used as soon as possible, in any event within one hour. 3 ml of this inoculum is added to each 600 mi of mineral medium.
The mineral medium is obtained by diluting 1 : 1000 of equal quantities of the stock solutions A - F of composition given below with distilled water. The constituents suffice for the formation of about 150-200 mg/litre biomass or for the ultimate biodegradation of about 1 g/litre of test compound.
Solution A: KH2P04 = 2.83 g per litre; K2HP04 = 7.25 g per litre; Na2HP04.2aq = 11.13 g per litre
Section B: MgS04.7aq = 75 g per litre; CaCI2 = 9.2 g per litre; FeCI3.6aq = 0.083 g per litre
Solution C: NH4CI = 127 g per litre; Solution D: Allylthiourea = 2 g per litre
Solution E: Yeast extract = 5 g per litre
Solution F: H3B04 = 1.2 g per litre; CuSO4.Saq = 1.2 g per litre; KI = 05 g per litre; MnSO4 = 23 g per litre; NaMoO4 = 23 g per litre; ZnSO4.1aq = 4.7 g per litre - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 20 mg/L
- Based on:
- other: Carbon
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- DOC removal
- Remarks:
- Based on Blok method
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- O2 consumption
- Remarks:
- Based on Blok method
- Details on study design:
- The test was performed following the previously published Blok method (1979) with the following modifications:
- The test concentration was chosen to correspond to 20 mg C/I.
- The ultrasound treatment was done before the inoculation.
- The inoculum was five times that of the OECD Screening Test.
- The test compound was added only once at the beginning.
- The test was run for 28 days.
- The bottles were fastened lying on the trays of the shaking machine.
- The re-aeration of the culture medium after each intermediate oxygen determination was accomplished by shaking the open upright bottle for one hour.
Details of the calculation of results are not provided in the paper, but the study followed the Blok method, which details that results should be calculated as follows:
The blank value (DOCtb) is subtracted from the measured amount of dissolved organic carbon (DOCt). The added amount of organic carbon (TOCadded) is calculated; for water-insoluble compounds this is a theoretical amount based on the dry weight addition. The results are expressed as per cent elimination of the dissolved organic carbon, calculated as shown:
per cent eliminated = ((TOCadded - (DOCt - DOCtb))/TOCadded)*100.
The oxygen uptake is corrected for that in the blank and related to a measured chemical oxygen demand or to a theoretical oxygen demand (TOD) of the amount added. The maximum oxygen uptake per litre of flask volume is 2/3 of this TOD. The total oxygen per litre of flask volume at 20°C and 76 cm Hg before the incubation is:
- in air 1/3x 1/22.4x (273/293) x32 x 0.21 = 93mg O2
- in water 2/3 x 8.8 = 6mg O2
Therefore the total = 99 mg O2
This figure has a standard variation of + 2 mg because of variations in the atmospheric pressure.
The per cent degradation follows from:
% degradation = (((DOtb -DOt)*99) /(DOst*2/3TOD))*100
where:
DOtb = dissolved oxygen in blank after incubation
DOt = dissolved oxygen in test after incubation
DOst = dissolved oxygen at saturation (known from the temperature) after incubation.
TOD = Total (or Theoretical) oxygen demand of the substance added at the beginning of incubation (mg/litre water). - Reference substance:
- not specified
- Parameter:
- other: % ThOD
- Value:
- 79
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- The study was also performed following the same method for C8/18 fatty acid, C16 -palmitic acid and C22 -behenic acid and the biodegradation was assessed to be 100 %, 84 % and 69 %, respectively.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test item was shown to have degraded by 79% over 28 days by the modified Blok method.
- Executive summary:
The biodegradability of the test item was assessed using a modified version of the Blok method (Blok, 1979) conducted over 28 days. Biodegradation was assessed based on theoretical O2 demand. After 28 days it was determined that the test item had degraded 79% from the starting concentration.
The publication is a near guideline study suitable for assessment of this endpoint, with some restrictions (Klimisch 2).
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Further information is included under 'Attached justification' in IUCLID section 13 and 'Cross-reference'. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OTS 796.3260 (Ready Biodegradability: Modified Sturm Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Not reported
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- water (not specified)
- Duration of test (contact time):
- 21 d
- Initial conc.:
- 58 other: mg
- Based on:
- other: Theoretical amount of initial CO2
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: Not stated in paper but test method followed a modification of the Sturm test (Sturm, 1973). The Sturm test uses raw sewage, river water and BOD water
- Test temperature: Not stated in paper but test method followed a modification of the Sturm test (Sturm, 1973). 22 - 24 °C for the Sturm test.
- Aeration of dilution water: Yes, via peristaltic pump
TEST SYSTEM
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: Performed in duplicate
- Method used to create aerobic conditions: Perstitalic pump and magentic stirrer
- Measuring equipment: CO2 absorbers containing 100 mL Ba(OH)2
- Test performed in closed vessels due to significant volatility of test substance: No
- Test performed in open system: Not reported
- Details of trap for CO2 and volatile organics if used: CO2 absorbers containing 100 mL Ba(OH)2
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9,12, 14, 16, 19 and 21
- Sampling method: Not reported
- Sample storage before analysis: Not reported
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Other: Theoretical amount of initial CO2 was calculated as 58 mg
STATISTICAL METHODS: Calculated based on the average of two experiments - Reference substance:
- not specified
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 2
- Sampling time:
- 1 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 9
- Sampling time:
- 3 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 24
- Sampling time:
- 5 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 36
- Sampling time:
- 7 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 53
- Sampling time:
- 9 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 69
- Sampling time:
- 12 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 76
- Sampling time:
- 14 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 83
- Sampling time:
- 16 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 90
- Sampling time:
- 19 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 95
- Sampling time:
- 21 d
- Details on results:
- The results obtained in the biodegradability determination of stearic acid show that this compound is degradable after an initial lag phase, reaching the “pass level” of biodegradation, corresponding to 60%, within 10 days.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test item was shown to have degraded by 95% at day 21 in the Modified Sturm test.
- Executive summary:
The biodegradability of the test item was assessed in a modified Sturm test conducted over 21 days. Biodegradation was assessed based on CO2 production. The test item is degradable after an initial lag phase, reaching the “pass level” of biodegradation, corresponding to 60%, within 10 days and after 21 days the test item showed 95% biodegradation.
The publication is a near guideline study suitable for assessment of this endpoint, with some restrictions (Klimisch 2).
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Further information is included under 'Attached justification' in IUCLID section 13 and 'Cross-reference'. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test was performed following the method of J. Blok, as detailed in the paper A repetitive die-away test combining several biodegradability test procedures, published in the journal Int. Biodeterior. Bull (!SSN 0020-6164) 15 (2) 1979 (57--63), with some modifications
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- not specified
- Details on inoculum:
- Details of the inoculum used are not outlined in the paper, but the test was performed following the previously published Blok method (1979). For the Blok method preparation of the inoculum is reported as follows:
To obtain a polyvalent inoculum, various sources of aerobic organisms are used together. To 70 ml tap water the following are added:
10 ml stock solution A (see below)
10 ml fresh activated sludge
10 ml fresh river sludge
I ml fresh domestic sewage
500 mg fresh compost or garden soil.
Solution A:
KH2P04 2.83 g per litre
K2HP04 7.25 g per litre
Na2HP04.2aq 11.13 g per litre
This mixture is homogenised with an ultrasonic mixer for 10 - 20 seconds and paper-filtered. The filtrate is used as soon as possible, in any event within one hour. 3 ml of this inoculum is added to each 600 mi of mineral medium.
The mineral medium is obtained by diluting 1 : 1000 of equal quantities of the stock solutions A - F of composition given below with distilled water. The constituents suffice for the formation of about 150-200 mg/litre biomass or for the ultimate biodegradation of about 1 g/litre of test compound.
Solution A: KH2P04 = 2.83 g per litre; K2HP04 = 7.25 g per litre; Na2HP04.2aq = 11.13 g per litre
Section B: MgS04.7aq = 75 g per litre; CaCI2 = 9.2 g per litre; FeCI3.6aq = 0.083 g per litre
Solution C: NH4CI = 127 g per litre; Solution D: Allylthiourea = 2 g per litre
Solution E: Yeast extract = 5 g per litre
Solution F: H3B04 = 1.2 g per litre; CuSO4.Saq = 1.2 g per litre; KI = 05 g per litre; MnSO4 = 23 g per litre; NaMoO4 = 23 g per litre; ZnSO4.1aq = 4.7 g per litre - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 20 mg/L
- Based on:
- other: Carbon
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- DOC removal
- Remarks:
- Based on Blok method
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- O2 consumption
- Remarks:
- Based on Blok method
- Details on study design:
- The test was performed following the previously published Blok method (1979) with the following modifications:
- The test concentration was chosen to correspond to 20 mg C/I.
- The ultrasound treatment was done before the inoculation.
- The inoculum was five times that of the OECD Screening Test.
- The test compound was added only once at the beginning.
- The test was run for 28 days.
- The bottles were fastened lying on the trays of the shaking machine.
- The reairation of the culture medium after each intermediate oxygen determination was accomplished by shaking the open upright bottle for one hour.
Details of the calculation of results are not provided in the paper, but the study followed the Blok method, which details that results should be calculated as follows:
The blank value (DOCtb) is subtracted from the measured amount of dissolved organic carbon (DOCt). The added amount of organic carbon (TOCadded) is calculated; for water-insoluble compounds this is a theoretical amount based on the dry weight addition. The results are expressed as per cent elimination of the dissolved organic carbon, calculated as shown:
per cent eliminated = ((TOCadded - (DOCt - DOCtb))/TOCadded)*100.
The oxygen uptake is corrected for that in the blank and related to a measured chemical oxygen demand or to a theoretical oxygen demand (TOD) of the amount added. The maximum oxygen uptake per litre of flask volume is 2/3 of this TOD. The total oxygen per litre of flask volume at 20°C and 76 cm Hg before the incubation is:
- in air 1/3x 1/22.4x (273/293) x32 x 0.21 = 93mg O2
- in water 2/3 x 8.8 = 6mg O2
Therefore the total = 99 mg O2
This figure has a standard variation of + 2 mg because of variations in the atmospheric pressure.
The per cent degradation follows from:
% degradtion = (((DOtb -DOt)*99) /(DOst*2/3TOD))*100
where:
DOtb = dissolved oxygen in blank after incubation
DOt = dissolved oxygen in test after incubation
DOst = dissolved oxygen at saturation (known from the temperature) after incubation.
TOD = Total (or Theoretical) oxygen demand of the substance added at the beginning of incubation (mg/litre water). - Reference substance:
- not specified
- Parameter:
- other: % ThOD
- Value:
- 84
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- The study was also performed following the same method for C8/18 fatty acid, C18 -stearic acid and C22 -behenic acid and the biodegradation was assessed to be 100 %, 79 % and 69 %, respectively.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test item was shown to have degraded by 84% over 28 days by the modified Blok method.
- Executive summary:
The biodegradability of the test item was assessed using a modified version of the Blok method (Blok, 1979) conducted over 28 days. Biodegradation was assessed based on theoretical O2 demand. After 28 days it was determined that the test item had degraded 84% from the starting concentration.
The publication is a near guideline study suitable for assessment of this endpoint with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Further information is included under 'Attached justification' in IUCLID section 13 and 'Cross-reference'. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test was performed following the method of J. Blok, as detailed in the paper A repetitive die-away test combining several biodegradability test procedures, published in the journal Int. Biodeterior. Bull (!SSN 0020-6164) 15 (2) 1979 (57--63), with some modifications
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- None reported
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- not specified
- Details on inoculum:
- Details of the inoculum used are not outlined in the paper, but the test was performed following the previously published Blok method (1979). For the Blok method preparation of the inoculum is reported as follows;
To obtain a polyvalent inoculum, various sources of aerobic organisms are used together. To 70 ml tap water the following are added:
10 ml stock solution A (see below)
10 ml fresh activited sludge
10 ml fresh river sludge
I ml fresh domestic sewage
500 mg fresh compost or garden soil.
Solution A:
KH2P04 2.83 g per litre
K2HP04 7.25 g per litre
Na2HP04.2aq 11.13 g per litre
This mixture is homogenised with an ultrasonic mixer for 10 - 20 seconds and paper-filtered. The filtrate is used as soon as possible, in any event within one hour. 3 ml of this inoculum is added to each 600 mi of mineral medium.
The mineral medium is obtained by diluting 1 : 1000 of equal quantities of the stock solutions A - F of composition given below with distilled water. The constituents suffice for the formation of about 150-200 mg/litre biomass or for the ultimate biodegradation of about 1 g/litre of test compound.
Solution A: KH2P04 = 2.83 g per litre; K2HP04 = 7.25 g per litre; Na2HP04.2aq = 11.13 g per litre
Section B: MgS04.7aq = 75 g per litre; CaCI2 = 9.2 g per litre; FeCI3.6aq = 0.083 g per litre
Solution C: NH4CI = 127 g per litre; Solution D: Allylthiourea = 2 g per litre
Solution E: Yeast extract = 5 g per litre
Solution F: H3B04 = 1.2 g per litre; CuSO4.Saq = 1.2 g per litre; KI = 05 g per litre; MnSO4 = 23 g per litre; NaMoO4 = 23 g per litre; ZnSO4.1aq = 4.7 g per litre - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 20 mg/L
- Based on:
- other: Carbon
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- DOC removal
- Remarks:
- Based on Blok method
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- O2 consumption
- Remarks:
- Based on Blok method
- Details on study design:
- The test was performed following the previously published Blok method (1979) with the following modifications:
- The test concentration was chosen to correspond to 20 mg C/I.
- The ultrasound treatment was done before the inoculation.
- The inoculum was five times that of the OECD Screening Test.
- The test compound was added only once at the beginning.
- The test was run for 28 days.
- The bottles were fastened lying on the trays of the shaking machine.
- The re-aeration of the culture medium after each intermediate oxygen determination was accomplished by shaking the open upright bottle for one hour.
Details of the calculation of results are not provided in the paper, but the study followed the Blok method, which details that results should be calculated as follows:
The blank value (DOCtb) is subtracted from the measured amount of dissolved organic carbon (DOCt). The added amount of organic carbon (TOCadded) is calculated; for water-insoluble compounds this is a theoretical amount based on the dry weight addition. The results are expressed as per cent elimination of the dissolved organic carbon, calculated as shown:
per cent eliminated = ((TOCadded - (DOCt - DOCtb))/TOCadded)*100.
The oxygen uptake is corrected for that in the blank and related to a measured chemical oxygen demand or to a theoretical oxygen demand (TOD) of the amount added. The maximum oxygen uptake per litre of flask volume is 2/3 of this TOD. The total oxygen per litre of flask volume at 20°C and 76 cm Hg before the incubation is:
- in air 1/3x 1/22.4x (273/293) x32 x 0.21 = 93mg O2
- in water 2/3 x 8.8 = 6mg O2
Therefore the total = 99 mg O2
This figure has a standard variation of + 2 mg because of variations in the atmospheric pressure.
The per cent degradation follows from:
% degradation = (((DOtb -DOt)*99) /(DOst*2/3TOD))*100
where:
DOtb = dissolved oxygen in blank after incubation
DOt = dissolved oxygen in test after incubation
DOst = dissolved oxygen at saturation (known from the temperature) after incubation.
TOD = Total (or Theoretical) oxygen demand of the substance added at the beginning of incubation (mg/litre water). - Reference substance:
- not specified
- Parameter:
- other: % ThOD
- Value:
- 79
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- The study was also performed following the same method for C8/18 fatty acid, C16 -palmitic acid and C22 -behenic acid and the biodegradation was assessed to be 100 %, 84 % and 69 %, respectively.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test item was shown to have degraded by 79% over 28 days by the modified Blok method.
- Executive summary:
The biodegradability of the test item was assessed using a modified version of the Blok method (Blok, 1979) conducted over 28 days. Biodegradation was assessed based on theoretical O2 demand. After 28 days it was determined that the test item had degraded 79% from the starting concentration.
The publication is a near guideline study suitable for assessment of this endpoint, with some restrictions (Klimisch 2).
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Further information is included under 'Attached justification' in IUCLID section 13 and 'Cross-reference'. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OTS 796.3260 (Ready Biodegradability: Modified Sturm Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Not reported
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- water (not specified)
- Duration of test (contact time):
- 21 d
- Initial conc.:
- 58 other: mg
- Based on:
- other: Theoretical amount of initial CO2
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: Not stated in paper but test method followed a modification of the Sturm test (Sturm, 1973). The Sturm test uses raw sewage, river water and BOD water
- Test temperature: Not stated in paper but test method followed a modification of the Sturm test (Sturm, 1973). 22 - 24 °C for the Sturm test.
- Aeration of dilution water: Yes, via peristaltic pump
TEST SYSTEM
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: Performed in duplicate
- Method used to create aerobic conditions: Perstitalic pump and magentic stirrer
- Measuring equipment: CO2 absorbers containing 100 mL Ba(OH)2
- Test performed in closed vessels due to significant volatility of test substance: No
- Test performed in open system: Not reported
- Details of trap for CO2 and volatile organics if used: CO2 absorbers containing 100 mL Ba(OH)2
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9,12, 14, 16, 19 and 21
- Sampling method: Not reported
- Sample storage before analysis: Not reported
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Other: Theoretical amount of initial CO2 was calculated as 58 mg
STATISTICAL METHODS: Calculated based on the average of two experiments - Reference substance:
- not specified
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 2
- Sampling time:
- 1 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 9
- Sampling time:
- 3 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 24
- Sampling time:
- 5 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 36
- Sampling time:
- 7 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 53
- Sampling time:
- 9 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 69
- Sampling time:
- 12 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 76
- Sampling time:
- 14 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 83
- Sampling time:
- 16 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 90
- Sampling time:
- 19 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 95
- Sampling time:
- 21 d
- Details on results:
- The results obtained in the biodegradability determination of stearic acid show that this compound is degradable after an initial lag phase, reaching the “pass level” of biodegradation, corresponding to 60%, within 10 days.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test item was shown to have degraded by 95% at day 21 in the Modified Sturm test.
- Executive summary:
The biodegradability of the test item was assessed in a modified Sturm test conducted over 21 days. Biodegradation was assessed based on CO2 production. The test item is degradable after an initial lag phase, reaching the “pass level” of biodegradation, corresponding to 60%, within 10 days and after 21 days the test item showed 95% biodegradation.
The publication is a near guideline study suitable for assessment of this endpoint, with some restrictions (Klimisch 2).
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Results observed in the Sturm Test with Stearic Acida
Days | CO2 produced (mg) | % Biodegradability |
1 | 1 | 2 |
3 | 5 | 9 |
5 | 14 | 24 |
7 | 21 | 36 |
9 | 31 | 53 |
12 | 40 | 69 |
14 | 44 | 76 |
16 | 48 | 83 |
19 | 52 | 90 |
21 | 55 | 95 |
a The theoretical amount of initial CO2 was 58 mg. Indicated values are means of two experiments.
Table 1: Results observed in the Sturm Test with Stearic Acida
Days | CO2 produced (mg) | % Biodegradability |
1 | 1 | 2 |
3 | 5 | 9 |
5 | 14 | 24 |
7 | 21 | 36 |
9 | 31 | 53 |
12 | 40 | 69 |
14 | 44 | 76 |
16 | 48 | 83 |
19 | 52 | 90 |
21 | 55 | 95 |
a The theoretical amount of initial CO2 was 58 mg. Indicated values are means of two experiments.
Description of key information
Biodegradation data are not available for triglycerides, C16 and C18 (unsaturated) but data has been read across from fatty acids with the same chain lengths. The fatty acids stearic acid and palmitic acid are readily biodegradable.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- readily biodegradable
- Type of water:
- freshwater
Additional information
In a modified Sturm test conducted over 21 days, with biodegradation assessed on the basis of CO2 production, it was observed that stearic acid is biodegradable after an initial lag phase, reaching the “pass level” of biodegradation, corresponding to 60%, within 10 days. After 21 days the test item showed 95% biodegradation (Ruffo et al. 1983). Biodegradation of stearic acid was also assessed using a modified version of the Blok method (Blok 1979) conducted over 28 days with biodegradation assessed based on theoretical O2 demand. After 28 days it was determined that the test item had degraded 79% from the starting concentration (Gerike 1984). The biodegradability of palmitic acid was also assessed in Gerike (1984), following the same method as for stearic acid, and after 28 days the test item had degraded 84% from the starting concentration, and therefore is readily biodegradable.
These studies are published in peer-reviewed journals and are well documented, meeting generally accepted scientific principles, and therefore are considered to be suitable for read-across purposes.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.