Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 950-123-7 | CAS number: 97849-65-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 18 June 2019 - 16 July 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 F (Ready Biodegradability: Manometric Respirometry Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.4-D (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Manometric Respirometry Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge (e.g. location, sampling depth, contamination history, procedure): A sample of activated sludge was taken from the aeration tank of Sewage Treatment Plant ”Czajka” , Warsaw, receiving predominantly domestic sewage.
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: The sludge was aerated for 7 days, at the test temperature of about 22 ºC, until application. A sample was withdrawn just before use for the determination of the dry weight of the suspended solids. Before application the sludge was washed in a mineral medium. - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- (67.3 mg/l of organic carbon)
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- O2 consumption
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: 10ml of solution (A) in 800 ml water, plus 1 ml solutions (B), (C), (D) and 11 ml water. The following stock solutions were used, prepared with analytical grade reagents: Solution (A) contains: 8.50 g monopotassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (KH2PO4), 21.75 g dipotassium monohydrogen orthophosphate (K2HPO4), 33.40 g disodium monohydrogen orthophosphate dihydrate (Na2HPO4·2H2O), 0.50 g ammonium chloride (NH4Cl), in 1 L water. Solution (B) contains: 27.50 g calcium chloride, anhidrous (CaCl2) in 1L water. Solution (C) contains: 22.50 g magnesium sulphate heptahydrate (MgSO4·7H2O) in 1L water. Solution (D) contains: 0.25 g iron(III) chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O) in 1L water.
The water used is double-distilled, with measured content of organic carbon below the measuring range of 2.0 mg/L, checked by DOC analysis using spectrophotometer Hach DR 3900 and Hach-Lange reagents.
- Test temperature: 22 ± 2ºC
- pH: 7.4 ± 0.2
- pH adjusted: no
- Aeration of dilution water: continuous stirring
- Suspended solids concentration: 30 mg/L
- Continuous darkness: yes
- Other: volume of test solution in flask, V: 0.164 L
TEST SYSTEM
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: triplicates were used, flasks #14, 15, 16 containing test item (100 mg/l) and inoculum (30mg/L SS).
- Method used to create aerobic conditions: constant stirring
- Measuring equipment: O2 uptake was measured by a closed WTW OxiTop OC 110 respirometer.
- Details of trap for CO2 and volatile organics if used: potassium hydroxide solution.
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: O2 uptake data were read out every 112 min during the 28 day test (40 320 min that is 360 readings) and were recorded and stored in the measuring heads of the sample bottles.
- Sampling method: Readings from apparatus (closed WTW OxiTop OC 110 repirometer).
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: flasks #1, 2, 3, containing only inoculum 30mg/L SS.
- Procedure control: flasks #4, 5, 6, 7 containing reference item (sodium acetate 100 mg/l) and inoculum 30mg/L SS.
- Toxicity control: flasks #17, 18, 19, 20, 21 containing test item 100 mg/L, reference item 100 mg/L and inoculum 30mg/L SS.
- Other: Flasks used for correction in oxygen uptake due to interference by nitrification:
Flasks 0a1, 0a2: Test suspension containing test item (100 mg/L) and inoculum at start.
Flasks 0tox1, 0tox2: Test suspension containing test item and reference item at the same concentrations as in the individual solutions and inoculum at start.
STATISTICAL METHODS: The calculations and the graphs were performed using SigmaPlot 9.0 software of SYSTAT Software, Inc., USA purchased from GAMBIT CoiS Ltd, Poland. - Reference substance:
- acetic acid, sodium salt
- Remarks:
- CAS No: 127-09-3, purity ≥ 99.7%, source: CHEMPUR, Piekary Śląskie, Polska.
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (O2 consumption)
- Value:
- 0
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- - The test item attained 0.0% of biodegradation
- The reference item reached 83.9% of biodegradation and the level for ready biodegradability by 4 days (>60% reached before day 14)
- In the toxicity test the biodegradation was 0.0% in 14 days (<25% in 14 days). Therefore, the test item can be assumed to be inhibitory.
- The oxygen uptake of the inoculum blank was equal to 40.5 mg/l in 28 days (<60 mg/l in 28 days)
- The pH values (7.53-7.68) of all flasks were inside the range (6-8.5) - Results with reference substance:
- The reference item reached 83.9% of biodegradation and the level for ready biodegradability by 4 days (>60% reached before day 14).
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- no
- Remarks:
- See "overall remarks".
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- At the 28-day ready aerobic biodegradability testing the biodegradation of the test item equals 0.0 %. Thus, the test item cannot be deemed to be readily biodegradable.
- Executive summary:
A 28-day ready biodegradability test in an aerobic aqueous medium with manometric respirometry method was performed on the test item, according to OECD 301F / EC C.4 – D manometric respirometry methods, in accordance with GLP principles. 100 mg/l of test item was inoculated with activated sludge (30 mg/L SS) and incubated under aerobic conditions in a closed respirometer flask at constant temperature (22 ± 1ºC) for 28 days. A blank test, a procedure test with reference substance (sodium acetate) and a toxicity test were run in parallel. In the toxicity test, containing both the test item and the reference item, on the 14th test day the biodegradation (based on ThOD) was 0% (less than 25%), after correction for the blank inoculum control and nitrification, and then the test item can be assumed to be inhibitory. At the 28th day of the test the measured aerobic biodegradation of the test item equals 0.0% after correction for the blank inoculum control and nitrification. Thus, the test item cannot be deemed to be readily biodegradable.
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- Internationally accepted method, EPI-Suite, EPA (USA)
- Justification for type of information:
- See attached the QMRF and QPRF for the QSAR model.
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Howard, P.H., Boethling, R.S., Stiteler, W.M., Meylan, W.M., Hueber, A.E., Beauman, J.A., Larosche, M.E. 1992. Predictive model for aerobic biodegradability developed from a file of evaluated biodegradation data. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 11:593-603.
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SMILES: C12cc (O) ccc1nc3ccc (N (CC) CC) cc3n2 (c4ccccc4) OS (=O) (=O) On5 (c8ccccc8) c7cc (O) ccc7nc6ccc (N (CC) CC) cc56
- Key result
- Parameter:
- probability of ready biodegradability (QSAR/QSPR)
- Remarks on result:
- not readily biodegradable based on QSAR/QSPR prediction
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The substance Violet LCC6D was predicted to be not ready biodegradable (EPI-Suite, BIOWIN v4.10)
- Executive summary:
The substance Violet LCC6D was predicted to be not ready biodegradable (EPI-Suite, BIOWIN v4.10)
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 2. Sample oxygen uptake: biodegradability.
|
time, days |
|||||||||||||
1 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
9 |
12 |
14 |
16 |
18 |
21 |
23 |
25 |
28 |
||
Test item O2uptake, mg/L |
a1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
2.6 |
2.8 |
5.6 |
7.9 |
9.0 |
11.3 |
13.6 |
15.2 |
17.2 |
19.4 |
a2 |
0.1 |
1.8 |
3.2 |
8.8 |
13.6 |
19.8 |
23.3 |
28.5 |
34.1 |
40.0 |
42.3 |
47.0 |
51.3 |
|
a3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
3.0 |
2.8 |
5.0 |
5.6 |
5.6 |
7.9 |
8.4 |
8.4 |
10.4 |
12.0 |
|
am. avg |
0 |
0 |
0.3 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
5.3 |
6.8 |
7.3 |
9.6 |
11.0 |
11.8 |
13.8 |
15.7 |
|
Blank test O2uptake. mg/L |
b1 |
5.5 |
11.6 |
14.9 |
17.1 |
19.9 |
22.4 |
22.4 |
26.7 |
29.0 |
31.8 |
33.8 |
35.8 |
41.1 |
b2 |
6.0 |
11.4 |
14.1 |
15.5 |
17.8 |
21.5 |
22.5 |
26.8 |
29.7 |
31.5 |
33.6 |
35.1 |
38.8 |
|
b3 |
6.7 |
10.9 |
14.1 |
16.9 |
17.9 |
22.5 |
25.7 |
28.2 |
31.7 |
35.5 |
36.4 |
37.9 |
41.6 |
|
bmavg |
6.0 |
11.3 |
14.3 |
16.5 |
18.5 |
22.1 |
23.5 |
27.2 |
30.1 |
33.0 |
34.6 |
36.2 |
40.5 |
|
Reference item O2uptake. mg/L |
w1 |
13.9 |
54.1 |
67.0 |
76.2 |
80.2 |
87.8 |
93.2 |
97.6 |
101.1 |
103.2 |
106.6 |
107.7 |
111.7 |
w2 |
9.5 |
51.3 |
67.5 |
75.3 |
81.3 |
85.7 |
88.0 |
90.0 |
92.9 |
93.3 |
95.5 |
97.6 |
99.2 |
|
w3 |
14.7 |
56.0 |
69.0 |
78.9 |
82.8 |
90.2 |
93.2 |
95.9 |
98.8 |
99.6 |
101.6 |
103.8 |
107.2 |
|
w4 |
11.2 |
53.0 |
67.0 |
76.0 |
81.3 |
87.2 |
91.1 |
94.1 |
97.3 |
98.7 |
101.1 |
102.9 |
105.7 |
|
wm. avg |
12.3 |
53.6 |
67.6 |
76.6 |
81.4 |
87.7 |
91.4 |
94.4 |
97.5 |
98.7 |
101.2 |
103.0 |
106.0 |
|
Toxicity control O2uptake mg/L |
a17tox1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
1.7 |
2.8 |
5.1 |
5.6 |
7.6 |
9.3 |
11.4 |
12.3 |
14.6 |
19.3 |
a18tox2 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
2.0 |
2.8 |
5.7 |
9.1 |
11.3 |
14.1 |
16.9 |
19.7 |
22.5 |
25.3 |
28.0 |
|
a19tox3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.9 |
5.1 |
7.0 |
11.1 |
14.0 |
20.8 |
36.8 |
68.9 |
81.7 |
|
toxm. avg |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.8 |
1.5 |
3.8 |
6.4 |
8.0 |
10.9 |
13.4 |
17.3 |
23.9 |
36.3 |
43.0 |
|
a20tox |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.03 |
1.97 |
4.05 |
7.17 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
a21tox |
0.57 |
0.003 |
2.07 |
2.95 |
3.61 |
5.69 |
8.24 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
a20-21toxavg |
0.29 |
0.002 |
1.04 |
1.49 |
2.79 |
4.87 |
7.71 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Corrected test item O2uptake, mg/L |
a1- bm |
-6.0 |
-11.3 |
-14.0 |
-13.9 |
-15.7 |
-16.5 |
-15.6 |
-18.2 |
-18.8 |
-19.4 |
-19.4 |
-19.1 |
-21.1 |
a2- bm |
-6.0 |
-9.5 |
-11.1 |
-7.7 |
-4.9 |
-2.3 |
-0.3 |
1.3 |
4.0 |
7.0 |
7.6 |
10.7 |
10.8 |
|
a3- bm |
-6.0 |
-11.3 |
-14.1 |
-13.5 |
-15.7 |
-17.1 |
-17.9 |
-21.6 |
-22.2 |
-24.6 |
-26.2 |
-25.9 |
-28.5 |
|
Reference item % degradation ThOD = 0.78 mgO2/mg C = 100 mg/L |
R1(w1) |
10.1 |
54.9 |
67.6 |
76.5 |
79.1 |
84.1 |
89.4 |
90.3 |
90.9 |
90.0 |
92.3 |
91.7 |
91.3 |
R2(w2) |
4.4 |
51.3 |
68.1 |
75.4 |
80.5 |
81.5 |
82.6 |
80.5 |
80.5 |
77.4 |
78.1 |
78.6 |
75.2 |
|
R3(w3) |
11.1 |
57.3 |
70.1 |
80.0 |
82.4 |
87.2 |
89.4 |
88.1 |
88.1 |
85.5 |
85.8 |
86.6 |
85.6 |
|
R4(w4) |
6.6 |
53.5 |
67.5 |
76.3 |
80.4 |
83.5 |
86.6 |
85.7 |
86.1 |
84.2 |
85.2 |
85.5 |
83.6 |
|
Rtoxavg |
8.1 |
54.3 |
68.3 |
77.0 |
80.6 |
84.1 |
87.0 |
86.1 |
86.4 |
84.3 |
85.3 |
85.6 |
83.9 |
The obtained test item oxygen uptake for a2, as very different from a1 and a3, was rejected.
The difference of extremes of a1 and a3 replicate values of the oxygen uptake of test item at the end of the test is ((19.4 – 12.0)/19.4)*100% = 38.1% is greater than 20%.
Table 3. Correction for test item oxygen uptake for interference by nitrification.
days |
0 |
28 |
difference |
||
1) Concentration of nitrate (mg N-NO3/l) |
Flask #0a1 |
Flask #0a2 |
Flask #14 |
Flask #16 |
-0.33 |
2.16 |
1.97 |
1.54 |
1.94 |
||
Avg: 2.07 ± 0.13 |
Avg: 1.74 ± 0.28 |
||||
2) Oxygen equivalent (4.57× N-NO3) (mg/L) |
|
-1.51 |
|||
3) concentration of nitrite (mg N-NO2/l) |
Flask #0a1 |
Flask #0a2 |
Flask #14 |
Flask #16 |
difference |
0.521 |
0.481 |
0.39 |
0.47 |
-0.07 |
|
Avg: 0.501 ± 0.028 |
Avg: 0.43 ± 0.06 |
||||
4) Oxygen equivalent (3.43×N-NO2) (mg/L) |
|
-0.24 |
|||
5) total oxygen equivalent 2) + 4) |
|
-1.75 |
Table 4. Correction for toxicity test oxygen uptake for interference by nitrification.
days |
0 |
14 |
difference |
||
1) Concentration of nitrate (mg N-NO3/l) |
Flask #0tox1 |
Flask #0tox2 |
Flask #20 |
Flask #21 |
0.01 |
2.03 |
2.17 |
2.15 |
2.07 |
||
2.10 ± 0.01 |
2.11 ± 0.06 |
|
|||
2) Oxygen equivalent (4.57× N-NO3) (mg/L) |
|
0.04 |
|||
3) concentration of nitrite (mg N-NO2/l) |
Flask #0tox1 |
Flask #0tox2 |
Flask #20 |
Flask #21 |
difference |
0.486 |
0.559 |
0.538 |
0.499 |
- 0.003 |
|
0.522 ± 0.052 |
0.519 ± 0.027 |
|
|||
4) Oxygen equivalent (3.43×N-NO2) (mg/L) |
|
-0.010 |
|||
5) total oxygen equivalent 2) + 4) |
|
0.03 |
Table 5. The pH values of test flasks (no adjustment of pH was conducted).
flask # |
14 |
15 |
16 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
Test item |
Inoculum blank |
Reference item |
Toxicity test |
||||||||||||
initial |
7.55 |
7.63 |
7.64 |
7.65 |
7.62 |
7.53 |
7.51 |
7.51 |
7.61 |
7.63 |
7.63 |
7.65 |
7.55 |
7.46 |
7.61 |
final |
7.53 |
7.65 |
7.68 |
7.36 |
7.38 |
7.32 |
8.35 |
8.94 |
8.70 |
8.67 |
8.12 |
7.84 |
8.26 |
7.81 |
7.89 |
Test item biodegradability:
After correction for oxygen uptake for nitrification and for the blank inoculum control, the following biodegradation calculation is suggested on the 28th day:
(15.7 -40.5 – (-1.75)) mg O2/L / (ThODNH4 x conc. Test Item) x 100% < 0.0 %
Toxicity test biodegradability:
Assuming, as above, after correction for the blank inoculum control and nitrification, the biodegradation in toxicity test on the 14th test day is:
(7.71 -23.5 -0.03) mg O2/L / (ThODNH4 x conc. Test Item + ThOD x conc. Test Reference) x 100% < 0.0 %
BIOWIN1 (Linear Model): 0.4511
BIOWIN2 (Non-Linear Model): 0.0008
Expert Survey Biodegradation Results:
BIOWIN3 (Ultimate Survey Model): 1.1117 (recalcitrant)
BIOWIN4 (Primary Survey Model):2.2284 (months)
MITI Biodegradation Probability:
BIOWIN5 (MITI Linear Model): -1.2842
BIOWIN6 (MITI Non-Linear Model): 0.0000
Anaerobic Biodegradation Probability:
BIOWIN7 (Anaerobic Linear Model): -3.0296
Ready Biodegradability Prediction: NO
Description of key information
Weight of evidence approach:
1. Test method according to OECD 301F / EU C.4 (Manometric respirometry methods), GLP study. At the 28-day ready aerobic biodegradability testing the biodegradation of the test item equals 0.0 %. Thus, the test item is deemed not to be readily biodegradable.
2. Data from EPI-Suite, EPA (USA) / BIOWIN v4.10 calculation method. The substance Violet LCC6D was predicted to be not ready biodegradable.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- under test conditions no biodegradation observed
- Type of water:
- freshwater
Additional information
Weight of evidence approach:
The test substance was investigated in a biodegradation test (OECD TG 301 F) and the measured aerobic biodegradation attained 0.0% at 28th day of the test. Thus the test substance was deemed not to be readily biodegradable. However, in the toxicity test run in parallel containing both the test item and a reference chemical, 0.0% biodegradation occurred in 14 days (it should be higher than 25% as per OECD TG 301 criterion) so the test item can be assumed to be inhibitory. If this happens, the test series should be repeated, using a lower concentration of test substance (if this can be done without seriously impairing the accuracy of the DOC determination) and/or a higher concentration of inoculum, but not greater than 30 mg solids/L.
Taking into account that a high toxicity of the test item to activated sludge was found, a repetition of the test was deemed to be rather ineffective even though very low concentrations are considered to be tested. On the other hand, the test was conducted with a concentration of inoculum of 30 mg solids/L, therefore in order to comply with the guideline’s requirement it would not be possible to increase this concentration in a further testing.
For this reason, the information on the biodegradation provided by QSAR prediction from BIOWIN 4.10 was considered in combination with the experimental result as part of a weight of evidence approach. The test substance was predicted as not ready biodegradable by the BIOWIN models. The same result was obtained with both the experimental test and QSAR prediction, thus it is possible to assume the test substance as not ready biodegradable as a weight of evidence conclusive decision.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.