Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
20 Jul 1981 to 03 Aug 1981
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The vascular freshwater plant duckweed was exposed to the test item for 14 days. The increase or decrease of frond production was determined at various time intervals.
GLP compliance:
yes
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Vehicle:
yes
Remarks:
Acetone
Test organisms (species):
Lemna gibba
Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Reference substance (positive control):
no
Duration:
14 d
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
2.94 mg/L
95% CI:
> 1.26 - <= 2.03
Nominal / measured:
meas. (initial)
Conc. based on:
act. ingr.
Basis for effect:
frond number
Duration:
14 d
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
9.02 mg/L
95% CI:
>= 4.88 - <= 13.18
Nominal / measured:
meas. (initial)
Conc. based on:
act. ingr.
Basis for effect:
frond number
Duration:
14 d
Dose descriptor:
EC90
Effect conc.:
21.87 mg/L
95% CI:
>= 11.72 - <= 40.8
Nominal / measured:
meas. (initial)
Conc. based on:
act. ingr.
Basis for effect:
frond number

Analytical results: Measured concentrations in the samples taken at the start of exposure were ND, ND, 2.54, 6.50, 12.9, 23.4 and 46.9 mg/L at nominal test concentrations of 0 (blank control), 0 (solvent control), 3, 6, 12, 25 and 50 mg/L, respectively. Measured levels ranged from 85 % to 108 % of the nominal levels.


Biological results: Measured concentrations of ≥ 6.50 mg/L significantly affected growth of Lemna gibba after 14 days of exposure. Inhibition of frond production was from 4 % in cultures exposed to 2.54 mg/L to 93 % in cultures exposed to 46.9 mg/L. Flowering was not observed among any of the control plants or plants exposed to the test material during the 14 day exposure period. The 14-day EC10 and EC50 and their 95 % confidence limits were calculated by a probit analysis.

Validity criteria fulfilled:
not applicable
Conclusions:
In a toxicity study on the freshwater duckweed species Lemna gibba, performed without a standard guideline, the 14d-EC10 and EC50 values for frond production were calculated to be 2.94 mg/L and 9.02 mg/L, respectively, based on initial measured concentrations.
Executive summary:

The toxicity of the test substance to the freshwater duckweed species Lemna gibba, was tested without a standard guideline but in compliance with GLP criteria. Triplicate 7-day-old cultures were employed for each test concentration and the controls. The test duckweed were exposed to the test substance in a static system for 14 days. The range of nominal concentrations tested was 0 (blank control), 0 (solvent control), 3, 6, 12, 25 and 50 mg/L. Cultures were incubated at 24 °C under approximately 10,300 lux illumination. Measured concentrations in the samples taken at the start of exposure were ND, ND, 2.54, 6.50, 12.9, 23.4 and 46.9 mg/L at nominal test concentrations of 0 (blank control), 0 (solvent control), 3, 6, 12, 25 and 50 mg/L, respectively. Measured concentrations ≥ 6.50 mg/L significantly affected the growth of Lemna gibba after 14 days of exposure. Inhibition of frond production was from 4 % in cultures exposed to 2.54 mg/L to 93 % in cultures exposed to 46.9 mg/L. Given these results, the 14d-EC10 for frond production was calculated to be 2.94 mg/L with a 95% confidence interval of 1.26 to 2.03 mg/L, and the 14d-EC50 for frond production was calculated to be 9.02 mg/L with a 95% confidence interval of 4.88 to 13.18 mg/L. Effects were based on initial measured concentrations.

Description of key information

14-d EC10 = 2.94 mg/L (mean measured concentration) and 14-d EC50 = 9.02 mg/L (mean measured concentration); frond number; Lemma gibba; freshwater species; no guideline followed; Hollister 1981 

Key value for chemical safety assessment

EC50 for freshwater plants:
9.02 mg/L
EC10 or NOEC for freshwater plants:
2.94 mg/L

Additional information

One GLP study is available for this endpoint and included as a supporting study. Triplicate 7-day-old freshwater duckweed Lemna gibba was employed for each test concentration and the controls. The test duckweed was exposed to the test substance in a static system for 14 days. The range of nominal concentrations tested was 0 (blank control), 0 (solvent control), 3, 6, 12, 25 and 50 mg/L (initial measured concentrations ND, ND, 2.54, 6.50, 12.9, 23.4 and 46.9 mg/L, respectively). Cultures were incubated at 24 °C under approximately 10,300 lux illumination. The 14d-EC10 for frond production was calculated to be 2.94 mg/L and EC50 for frond production was calculated to be 9.02 mg/L, based on initial measured concentrations (Hollister 1981, no standard guideline followed, Reliability 2).