Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 616-995-5 | CAS number: 8018-01-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to birds
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to birds: reproduction test
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1989-09-07 – 1990-04-05
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 850.2300 (Avian Reproduction Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Dose method:
- homogenously mixed into feed (accounts for technical substances)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- Anas platyrhynchos
- Details on test organisms:
- - Source: Whistling Wings, Hanover, Illinois, USA
- Age: 25 weeks at test initiation
- Environmental conditions:
Temperature 19.8 ± 2.4°C
Photoperiod 8 hours light during first 8 weeks 17 hours light from beginning of week 9
Relative humidity 56% - Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration (if not single dose):
- 18 wk
- No. of animals per sex per dose and/or stage:
- one male and one female
- Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Nominal and measured doses / concentrations:
- Nominal: 0, 10, 50, 125 and 1000 ppm a.s.;
Measured: 9.65 ± 0.21 (96.5 ± 2.1%), 50.65 ± 1.28 (101.3 ± 2.5%), 122.25 ± 1.94 (97.8 ± 1.6%) and 956 ± 36 mg a.s./kg feed (95.6 ± 3.8%) - Details on test conditions:
- ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 8 weeks
- Acclimation conditions: same as test
- Feeding: up to 265 g/bird/day of the prepared diet
- Health: Pen-reared mallards (Anas platvrhvnchos) that were apparently healthy and phenotypically indistinguishable from wild birds, were purchased from Whistling Wings, Box 1, 113 Washington Street, Hanover, Illinois 61041. All birds were from the same hatch and were 25 weeks of age at the initiation of the test (first day of exposure to test diet). The birds were approaching their first breeding season and had not been used in previous testing. At test initiation all birds were examined for physical injuries and general health. Birds that did not appear healthy were discarded. Sex of the birds was determined by a Visual examination of the plumage.
- Fasting period before study: no
PEN SIZE AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
- Description: Safeguard Products Inc. Model #5355 measuring approx. 75 X 90 X 45 cm high; pens constructed of galvanized wire grid and galvanized sheeting
- Floor covering: vinyl coated wire mesh
- Compliant to good husbandry practices: yes
- Suitable to avoid crowding stress: not specified
- Caging: batteries of brooding pens
NO. OF BIRDS PER REPLICATE
- For negative control: 1 male and 1 female
- For treated: 1 male and 1 female
NO. OF REPLICATES PER GROUP
- For negative control: 16
- For treated: 16
TEST CONDITIONS
- Temperature incubator (breeding apparatus): 37.4 +/- 0.1 °C (SD)
- Relative humidity incubator (breeding apparatus) (%): 53
- Temperature (hatching compartment): 37.0 °C +/- 0.4 °C (SD)
- Average bulb temperature (hatching compartment): raised to 32.4 °C +/- 1.2 °C (SD)
- Relative humidity (hatching compartment) (%): ca. 70
- Photoperiod: for hatchlings 16 hours light and 8 hours darkness - Details on examinations and observations:
- Adult body weight:
Individual body weight was measured at the experimental start, weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and at termination of the study.
Adult feed consumption:
Feed consumption expressed as grans of feed per bird per day was examined by pen or each seven day period during the study.
Eggs laid of maximum laid:
The number of eggs laid per hen divided by the largest number of eggs laid by one hen.
Eggs cracked of eggs laid:
The number of eggs determined by candling to be cracked divided by the number of eggs laid, per pen.
Viable embryos of eggs set:
The number of viable embryos at day 14 candling was divided by the number of eggs set, per pen.
Live 3-week embryos of viable embryos:
The number of live embryos at day 24 candling was divided by the number of viable embryos.
Hatchlings of 3-week embryos:
The number of hatchlings removed from the hatcher was divided by the number of live 3 week embryos, per pen.
14-day old survivors of hatchlings:
The number of 14-day old survivors was divided by the number of hatchlings per week, by pen.
Hatchlings of eggs set:
The number of hatchlings was divided by the number of eggs set per week, by pen.
14-day old survivors of eggs set:
The number of 14-day old survivors was divided by the number of eggs set per week, by pen.
Hatchlings of maximum set:
The number of hatchlings per hen divided by the largest number of eggs set from any one hen. This transformation was used to convert the number of hatchlings to a percentile value equal to or less than 100.
14-day old survivors of maximum set:
The number of 14-day old survivors per pen divided by the largest number of eggs set.
Egg shell thickness:
The average egg shell thickness of randomly selected eggs per pen, was measured.
Offspring’s body weight:
The group body weights of hatchlings and 14-day old survivors was measured by parental groups. - Details on reproductive parameters:
- please see above
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration (if not single dose):
- 18 wk
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect level:
- 18.6 mg/kg bw/day
- Conc. / dose based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- reproductive parameters
- Remarks on result:
- other: The 18 wk NOEC was recalculated by the Rapporteur Member State under to be 18.6 mg a.s./kg bw/d. For details please refer to the Renewal Assessment Report for Mancozeb prepared according the Commission Regulation (EU) No 1107/2009.
- Mortality and sub-lethal effects:
- There were no treatment-related mortalities at any Mancozeb concentration tested. One incidental mortality occurred in the 1000 mg a.s./kg feed treatment group in week 16 (necropsy showed severe egg yolk peritonitis and regressing ovary), but no mortalities occurred in the control group or the 10, 50 or 125 mg a.s./kg feed treatment groups. No overt signs of toxicity were observed at any concentration tested. Incidental clinical signs were noted in control and various treatment groups during the study. All surviving adults were necropsied at adult terminal sacrifice. At the 1000 mg a.s./kg feed test concentration there appeared to be a treatment related increase in the number of hens exhibiting lesions of the egg yolk peritonitis. There were no apparent treatment effects upon adult body weight at any test concentration.
- Effects on reproduction:
- There was no treatment-related effect upon the body weight of hatchlings or 14-day old survivors in at concentrations of 10, 50 or 125 mg a.s./kg feed. At 1000 mg a.s./kg feed, while not statistically significant, there appeared to be a reduction in the body weight of hatchlings and there was a statistically significant (p<0.05) reduction in the body weight of 14-day old survivors.
There were no apparent or significant treatment-related effects upon reproductive parameters at the test concentrations 10, 50 or 125 mg a.s./kg feed for any reproductive parameter. However at 1000 mg a.s./kg feed test concentration there was profound effect upon reproductive performance. A statistically significant (p<0.01) adverse effect was observed upon the number of eggs laid, viable embryos, live 3-week embryos, hatchability and the number of hatchlings and 14-day old survivors per hen. The onlyparameters not affected at 1000 mg a.s./kg feed were the percentage of cracked eggs and the survival of hatchlings of 14 days of age. While hens in the control, 10, 50 and 125 mg a.s./kg feed treatment groups averaged 20 or more offspring per hen, the average number of 14-day old survivors per hen in the 1000 mg a.s./kg feed treatment was 2. There were no apparent and significant treatment related effects upon eggshell thickness at any Mancozeb concentration. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- not applicable
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The Dunnett’s multiple comparison procedure was used to determine statistically significant differences between parameters measured for control group and each of the treatment groups. Percentage data were analysed using Dunnett’s method following arcsine transformation. Significant differences are indicated in the tables with * p<0.05 and **p<0.01.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- There were no apparent treatment-related effects upon reproductive parameters at concentrations of 10, 5 and 125 ppm a.s. At 1000 ppm a.s. there was a marked effect upon reproductive performance, including decreases in the numbers of eggs laid, embryo viability, embryo survivability, hatchability, the numbers of hatchlings and 14 day old survivors per hen and body weight of offspring at hatch and after 14 days of growth and a related incidence of egg yolk peritonitis in an adult hen at necropsy. Based upon marked effects on reproductive performance at 1000 ppm a.s., the NOEL in this study for mallards exposed to Mancozeb was 125 ppm a.s. Converted to daily dietary dose the 18 wk NOEC is determined to be 18.6 mg a.s./kg bw/d.
- Executive summary:
To evaluate the effects of dietary exposure of Mancozeb to the adult mallard (Anas platvrhvnchos) a one-generation study with adult mallard (Anas platvrhvnchos) was performed in accordance with the principles laid down in the guideline EPA OPPTS 850.2300 (Avian Reproduction Test). Effects on adult health, weight gain and feed consumption were assessed over an period of 18 weeks. In addition, the effects of adult exposure to Mancozeb on the number of eggs laid, normal development of eggs, viability of the embryos, percent hatchability, offspring survival and egg Shell thickness were evaluated. Four groups of adult mallards received diets containing Dithane M-45 at concentrations of 10, 50, 125 and 1000 mg a.s./kg feed (Mancozeb) for 18 weeks: 8 weeks prior to the start of egg production (pre-photostimulation period) and during 10 weeks of egg production. Each treatment group contained 16 replicates with one male and one female per pen. The fifth group of 16 replicates received untreated diet. All dietary concentrations were adjusted for test substance reported purity of 80.1% and are given in a.s. (Mancozeb). The study phases were: acclimation (8 weeks), pre-photostimulation (8 weeks), egg laying period (10 weeks) and post-adult sacrifice (final incubation, hatching and offspring rearing period; 6 weeks). During the acclimation period birds were given untreated basal diet and they were maintained under a photoperiod of 8 hours light. At beginning of test week 9 the photoperiod was increased to 17 hours light and 7 hours darkness. Effects on adult health, weight gain, feed consumption and reproduction were evaluated. Eggs were collected from each pen daily over the 10-week egg production period from the start of week 9 until the end of week 18. Egg shell thickness was measured, broken and cracked eggs were recorded and discarded. Eggs (except those for shell thickness measurements) were incubated for 24 days until fertile eggs were transferred into a hatcher. Effects on egg production, fertility and embryo survival (candling day 14 and 21) as well as hatchling health and survivability were examined. Adult birds which died during and all study and all adult birds after termination of the study were examined post-mortem. Diets for adult birds and their offspring were formulated to Wildlife International Ltd specifications by Agway Inc. Water and food were provided ad libitum throughout acclimation and the test. Hatchlings were housed at 20.9 ± 1.8°C with a photoperiod of 16 hours light/8 hours dark cycle. Adult test diets were prepared once each week. Six homogeneity samples from control and each test concentration were collected on day 0. Stability samples were collected on day 7 and 14. Verification samples of control and each test diet were taken immediately after mixing and stored on the study room for 7 days. On day 7, all samples were placed in a freezer and stored until shipped to the analytical laboratory of Rohm&Haas Company. Samples were taken for the first four weeks and then every fourth week thereafter. As a result, the homogeneity of Mancozeb concentrations varied between 1.6 — 3.8% between top. middle and bottom of the mixed diet. Averaged concentrations between top. middle and bottom were determined to be 9.65 ± 0.21 mg a.s/kg feed (96.5 ± 2.1%), 50.65 ± 1.28 mg a.s./kg feed (101.3 ± 2.5%). 122.25 ± 1.94 mg a.s./kg feed (97.8 ± 1.6%) and 956 ± 36 mg a.s./kg feed (95.6 ± 3.8%). Freshly analysed food had an average of 97.8% target concentration averaged between treatment groups, while food stored frozen for 30 days had an average of 94.0% target concentration averaged between treatment groups. After 7 or 14 days storage at ambient temperature Mancozeb concentrations were 85.5% and 72.2% of target concentrations averaged of treatment groups, respectively. The applied concentrations did not result in treatment-related mortality, overt signs of toxicity or effects upon adultbody weight or feed consumption. There were no apparent treatment-related effects upon reproductive parameters at concentrations of 10, 5 and 125 ppm a.s. At 1000 ppm a.s. there was a marked effect upon reproductive performance, including decreases in the numbers of eggs laid, embryo viability, embryo survivability, hatchability, the numbers of hatchlings and 14 day old survivors per hen and body weight of offspring at hatch and after 14 days of growth and a related incidence of egg yolk peritonitis in an adult hen at necropsy. Based upon marked effects on reproductive performance at 1000 ppm a.s., the NOEL in this study for mallards exposed to Mancozeb was 125 ppm a.s. Converted to the daily dietary dose the 18 wk NOEC is determined to be 18.6 mg a.s./kg bw/d.
Reference
For tabels please refer to section on "Attached background material".
Description of key information
In an one-generation study following the principles of EPA Guideline OPPTS 850.2300 the 18-week NOEC was determined to be 18.6 mg a.s./kg bw/d.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Long-term EC10, LC10 or NOEC for birds:
- 18.6 mg/kg bw/day
Additional information
Key study
A One-Generation Reproduction Study with the Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) Laboratory: Wildlife International Ltd. (Beavers et al. 1991 (Doc. No. 813-002, cross reference to Risk Assessment Report according to Regulation (EU) No 1107/2009: 8.1.1.3)
To evaluate the effects of dietary exposure of Mancozeb to the adult mallard (Anas platvrhvnchos) a one-generation study was performed in accordance with the principles laid down in the guideline EPA OPPTS 850.2300 (Avian Reproduction Test) (Beavers et al., 1991). Effects on adult health, weight gain and feed consumption were assessed over an period of 18 weeks. In addition, the effects of adult exposure to Mancozeb on the number of eggs laid, normal development of eggs, viability of the embryos, percent hatchability, offspring survival and egg Shell thickness were evaluated. Four groups of adult mallards received diets containing Dithane M-45 at concentrations of 10, 50, 125 and 1000 mg a.s./kg feed (Mancozeb) for 18 weeks: 8 weeks prior to the start of egg production (pre-photostimulation period) and during 10 weeks of egg production. Each treatment group contained 16 replicates with one male and one female per pen. The fifth group of 16 replicates received untreated diet. All dietary concentrations were adjusted for test substance reported purity of 80.1% and are given in a.s. (Mancozeb). The study phases were: acclimation (8 weeks), pre-photostimulation (8 weeks), egg laying period (10 weeks) and post-adult sacrifice (final incubation, hatching and offspring rearing period; 6 weeks). During the acclimation period birds were given untreated basal diet and they were maintained under a photoperiod of 8 hours light. At beginning of test week 9 the photoperiod was increased to 17 hours light and 7 hours darkness. Effects on adult health, weight gain, feed consumption and reproduction were evaluated. Eggs were collected from each pen daily over the 10-week egg production period from the start of week 9 until the end of week 18. Egg shell thickness was measured, broken and cracked eggs were recorded and discarded. Eggs (except those for shell thickness measurements) were incubated for 24 days until fertile eggs were transferred into a hatcher. Effects on egg production, fertility and embryo survival (candling day 14 and 21) as well as hatchling health and survivability were examined. Adult birds which died during and all study and all adult birds after termination of the study were examined post-mortem. Diets for adult birds and their offspring were formulated to the test facility's specifications by Agway Inc. Water and food were provided ad libitum throughout acclimation and the test. Hatchlings were housed at 20.9 ± 1.8 °C with a photoperiod of 16 hours light/8 hours dark cycle. Adult test diets were prepared once each week. Six homogeneity samples from control and each test concentration were collected on day 0. Stability samples were collected on day 7 and 14. Verification samples of control and each test diet were taken immediately after mixing and stored on the study room for 7 days. On day 7, all samples were placed in a freezer and stored until shipped to the analytical laboratory of Rohm&Haas Company. Samples were taken for the first four weeks and then every fourth week thereafter. As a result, the homogeneity of Mancozeb concentrations varied between 1.6 — 3.8 % between top. middle and bottom of the mixed diet. Averaged concentrations between top. middle and bottom were determined to be 9.65 ± 0.21 mg a.s/kg feed (96.5 ± 2.1 %), 50.65 ± 1.28 mg a.s./kg feed (101.3 ± 2.5 %). 122.25 ± 1.94 mg a.s./kg feed (97.8 ± 1.6 %) and 956 ± 36 mg a.s./kg feed (95.6 ± 3.8 %). Freshly analysed food had an average of 97.8% target concentration averaged between treatment groups, while food stored frozen for 30 days had an average of 94.0 % target concentration averaged between treatment groups. After 7 or 14 days storage at ambient temperature Mancozeb concentrations were 85.5% and 72.2% of target concentrations averaged of treatment groups, respectively. The applied concentrations did not result in treatment-related mortality, overt signs of toxicity or effects upon adultbody weight or feed consumption. There were no apparent treatment-related effects upon reproductive parameters at concentrations of 10, 5 and 125 ppm a.s. At 1000 ppm a.s. there was a marked effect upon reproductive performance, including decreases in the numbers of eggs laid, embryo viability, embryo survivability, hatchability, the numbers of hatchlings and 14 day old survivors per hen and body weight of offspring at hatch and after 14 days of growth and a related incidence of egg yolk peritonitis in an adult hen at necropsy. Based upon marked effects on reproductive performance at 1000 ppm a.s., the NOEL in this study for mallards exposed to Mancozeb was 125 ppm a.s. Converted to the daily dietary dose the 18 wk NOEC is determined to be 18.6 mg a.s./kg bw/d.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.