Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-448-5 | CAS number: 1469983-46-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 12-Dec-2011 to 31-May-2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 487 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 3-(isodecyloxy)-1-propanamine
- IUPAC Name:
- 3-(isodecyloxy)-1-propanamine
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 3-(isodecyloxy)-1-propanamine
- Substance type: Clear light yellow liquid
- Physical state: Liquid
- Stability under test conditions: Stable
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature in the dark under nitrogen
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human peripheral blood
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media:
Blood samples
Blood samples were collected by venapuncture using the Venoject multiple sample blood collecting system with a suitable size sterile vessel containing sodium heparin. Immediately after blood collection lymphocyte cultures were started.
- Culture medium
Culture medium consisted of RPMI 1640 medium, supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated (56°C; 30 min) foetal calf serum, L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL and 50 µg/mL respectively) and 30 U/mL heparin.
- Lymphocyte cultures
Whole blood (0.4 mL) treated with heparin was added to 5 mL or 4.8 mL culture medium (in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively). Per culture 0.1 ml (9 mg/mL) phytohaemagglutinin was added.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver S9-mix induced by a combination of phenobarbital and ß-naphthoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Dose range finding test:
Without and with S9-mix, 3hr exposure; 27 hr fixation: 3, 10, 33, 100 and 333 µg/mL
With S9-mix, 3hr exposure; 27 hr fixation: 3, 10, 33, 100 and 333 µg/mL
Without S9-mix, 24 exposure; 24 hr fixation: 3, 10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL
First cytogenetic test:
Without S9-mix, 3hr exposure; 27 hr fixation: 10, 48, 51 and 54 µg/mL
With S9-mix, 3hr exposure; 27 hr fixation: 10, 45 and 60 µg/mL
Second cytogenetic test:
Without S9-mix, 24 hr exposure; 24 hr fixation: 5, 15 and 25 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle:
Test compound was stable and soluble in DMSO and DMSO is accepted and approved by authorities and international guidelines
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- without S9 Migrated to IUCLID6: MMC-C 0.25 µg/mL for a 3 hours exposure period and 0.15 µg/mL for a 24 hours exposure period
- Positive control substance:
- other: colchicine: 0.1 µg/mL
- Remarks:
- without S9
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with S9 Migrated to IUCLID6: 15 µg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 48 hr
- Exposure duration:
Short-term treatment
Without and with S9-mix: 3 hr treatment, 24 hr recovery/harvest time
Continuous treatment
Without S9-mix: 24 hr treatment/harvest time
ARREST OF CELL DIVISION: 5 µg/mL Cytochalasine B
STAIN: Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicates
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 1000/culture (mono- and binucleated cells)
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- The cytostasis/cytotoxicity was determined using the cytokinesis-block proliferation index (CPBI index) - Evaluation criteria:
- A test substance was considered positive (clastogenic or aneugenic) in the in vitro micronucleus test if:
a) It induces a dose-related statistically significant (Chi-square test, one-sided, p < 0.05) increase in the number of mono or binucleated cells with micronuclei.
b) A statistically significant and biologically relevant increase is observed in the number of mono or binucleated cells with micronuclei in the absence of a clear dose-response relationship.
A test substance was considered negative (not clastogenic or aneugenic) in the in vitro micronucleus test if:
a) none of the tested concentrations induced a statistically significant (Chi-square test, one-sided, p < 0.05) increase in the number of mono and binucleated cells with micronuclei.
b) The number of mono and binucleated cells with micronuclei was within the laboratory historical control data range. - Statistics:
- The incidence of micronucleated cells (cells with one or more micronuclei) for each exposure group was compared to that of the solvent control using Chi-square statistics:
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human peripheral blood
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: No
- Effects of osmolality: No
- Precipitation: Precipitation in the exposure medium was observed at dose levels of 333 µg/ml and above
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
- Toxicity was observed at dose levels of 33 µg/ml and above in the absence and presence of S9, 3 hr treatment/24 hr fixation and at dose levels of 33 µg/ml and above in the absence of S9 for the continuous treatment of 24 hr
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
- The number of cells with chromosome aberrations found in the solvent and positive control cultures was within the laboratory historical control data range.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- Appropriate toxicity was reached at the dose levels selected for scoring.
Any other information on results incl. tables
In the first cytogenetic assay in the presence of S9-mix the highest concentration used for scoring of micronuclei (60 µg/ml) showed a percentage cytostasis of 38%, whereas the protocol stated about 55±5%. A concentration of 60µg/ml determined by a second scorer showed 46% cytotoxicity (quality control). Moreover the next concentration, which was just above the selected concentration (75 µg/ml) showed 81% cytotoxicity and was therefore too toxic. Therefore this deviation has no effect on the results of the study.
In the second cytogenetic assay the highest concentration used for scoring of micronuclei (25 µg/ml) showed a percentage cytostasis of 61%, whereas the protocol stated about 55±5%.The previous concentration, which was just below the selected concentration (20 µg/ml) showed 36% cytotoxicity and was therefore less suitable. In addition the deviation from the range mentioned in the protocol was only 1%. Therefore this deviation has no effect on the results of the study.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
3-(isodecyloxy)-1-propanamine is not clastogenic or aneugenic in human lymphocytes - Executive summary:
The number of mono- and binucleated cells with micronuclei found in the solvent control cultures was within the acceptability criteria. The positive control chemicals, mitomycin C and cyclophosphamide both produced a statistically significant increase in the number of binucleated cells with micronuclei. The positive control chemical colchicine produced a statistically significant increase in the number of mononucleated cells with micronuclei. In addition colchicine also showed a statistically significant increase in the number of binucleated cells with micronuclei in the first cytogenetic assay. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system (S9-mix) functioned properly.
3-(isodecyloxy)-1-propanamine did not induce a statistically significant or biologically relevant increase in the number of mono- and binucleated cells with micronuclei in the absence and presence of S9-mix, in either of the two independently repeated experiments.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.