Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 938-445-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key in vitro skin irritation and skin corrosion studies showed that the test item was neither irritating nor corrosive under the conditions of the tests.
In vivo eye irritation study was not conducted according to Regulation (EC) No 1906/2007, Annex VIII, Section 8.2.1 Column 2. The substance is classified as irritating to eyes with risk of serious damage to eyes in line with structurally similar alkylsulfates and alkylethersulfates to avoid testing of vertebrate animals.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation / corrosion
- Remarks:
- in vitro
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012 - 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study in accordance with EU method B.40.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Human Skin Model Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.40 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test (TER))
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): DE07_2012_001_PLSW
- Substance type: Alkylsulfate/alkylethersulfate
- Chemical name: Alcohols, C16-18 (even numbered, C18-unsatd.), ethoxylated, and alcohols C20-22 (even numbered), sulfates, ammonium salts
- CAS: n/a
- Physical state: ivory paste-like solid at 20 °C
- Batch No.: PU20740016, PU20740019
- Purity: 100 % (UVCB)
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, protected from light
- Stability: stable under test conditions - Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Vehicle:
- water
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: EpiDermTM
- Vehicle:
- water
- Amount / concentration applied:
- approx. 25 mg + 15 μL H2O
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 min and 60 min experiments
3 h postincubation period - Details on study design:
- This in vitro method is designed to predict and classify the skin corrosivity potential of a chemical by assessment of its effect on EpiDerm, a
reconstituted three-dimensional human epidermis model. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTT after a 3 min. and 60 min. exposure period. The EpiDerm Skin Model is a well established organotypic, threedimensional model of the human epidermis and is used for in vitro experiments since many years. It is known for its similarity to human skin. This in vitromethod allows the identification of corrosive chemical substances and mixtures. It further allows the identification of noncorrosive substances and mixtures when supported by a weight of evidence determination using non-animal methods. - Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Remarks:
- 3 tissues per dose group
- Run / experiment:
- negative control
- Value:
- 100
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- 3 min exposure and 3 h of post-incubation
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Remarks:
- 3 tissues per dose group
- Run / experiment:
- positive control
- Value:
- 12
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- 3 min exposure and 3 h of post-incubation
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Remarks:
- 3 tissues per dose group
- Run / experiment:
- test item
- Value:
- 92
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- 3 min exposure and 3 h of post-incubation
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Remarks:
- 3 tissues per dose group
- Run / experiment:
- negative control
- Value:
- 100
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- 60 min exposure and 3 h of post-incubation
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Remarks:
- 3 tissues per dose group
- Run / experiment:
- positive control
- Value:
- 10
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- 60 min exposure and 3 h of post-incubation
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Remarks:
- 3 tissues per dose group
- Run / experiment:
- test item
- Value:
- 100
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- 60 min exposure and 3 h of post-incubation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- not applicable
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: OECD GHS
- Conclusions:
- In this study under the given conditions the test item showed no corrosive effects. The test item is classified as “non-corrosive“.
- Executive summary:
The potential of the test item to induce skin corrosion was analysed by using the three-dimensional human skin model EpiDerm, comprising a reconstructed epidermis with a functional stratum corneum. In the present study the test item was applied topically to the EpiDerm tissue for 3 min. and 60 min. followed by immediate determination of cytotoxic effects via MTT reduction assay. Corrosivity potential of the test item was predicted from the relative mean tissue viabilities obtained after both treatment periods compared to the corresponding negative control tissues concurrently treated with dest. water. The test item showed no corrosive effects. The mean relative tissue viability (% negative control) was >= 50% (92%) after 3 min. treatment and >= 15% (100%) after 60 min. treatment.
Reference
Pre-Experiment:
The mixture of 25 mg test item per 1 mL MTT medium showed no reduction of MTT as compared to the solvent. The mixture did not turn blue/purple. The mixture of 25 mg test item per 300 μL A. dest. showed no colouring as compared to the solvent.
Experiment:
3 min:
Total mean OD550 of 2 replicate tissues (blank-corrected)
Negative Control: 2.667
Positive Control: 0.330
Test Item: 2.463
SD (OD550)
Negative Control: 0.300 / 0.028
Positive Control: 0.007 / 0.004
Test Item: 0.030 / 0.036
Mean relative tissue viabilities [%]
Negative Control
100
Positive Control
12
Test Item
92
60 min:
Total mean OD550 of 2 replicate tissues (blank-corrected)
Negative Control: 2.671
Positive Control: 0.259
Test Item: 2.667
SD OD550
Negative Control: 0.498 / 0.036
Positive Control: 0.005 / 0.003
Test Item: 0.105 / 0.038
Mean relative tissue viabilities [%]
Negative Control
100
Positive Control
10
Test Item
100
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- the study need not be conducted because the available information indicates that the criteria are met for classification as corrosive to the skin or irritating to eyes
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
It is generally agreed that the EU B.46 (OECD 439) in vitro method for skin irritation represent a full replacement of the respective in vivo method (OECD 404) in a tiered testing strategy and in conjunction with in vitro skin corrosivity tests (Reference: Evaluation under REACH, Progress Report 2010). Both in vitro methods for skin irritation and skin corrosion in accordance with OECD testing guidelines were conducted and showed no positive results. The available data indicates that the criteria for classification as corrosive or irritant (EU GHS) for the skin is not met. Consequently classification of the test item is not required.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion
endpoint:
In a OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Human Skin Model
Test) and a OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation) study no skin
corrosive or skin irritating effects were observed under the conditions
of the tests.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
The study does not need to be conducted according to Regulation (EC)
No 1906/2007, Annex VIII, Section 8.2.1 Column 2. The substance is
classified as irritating to eyes with risk of serious damage to eyes in
line with similar alkylsulfates and alkylethersulfates to avoid testing
of vertebrate animals.
Effects on eye irritation: irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
The test item is not classified as irritating to the skin according to the CLP regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 based on Klimisch 1 GLP in vitro skin irritation and skin corrosion studies. The substance is classified as irritating to eyes with risk of serious damage to eyes in line with structurally similar alkylsulfates and alkylethersulfates to avoid testing of vertebrate animals. According to CLP regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, Category 1 classification is proposed with signal word 'Danger' and hazard statement H318 'Causes serious eye damage'.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.