Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 911-467-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 2012-03-30 to 2013-03-18
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- GLP study, OECD 211 compliant
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- All test solutions were taken from all test solutions at the beginning (0 d), immediately prior to the first renewal of the test solution (3 d) and weekly thereafter (9, 21 d). 10 ml collected water samples passing through the 0.22 µm membrane were analysed by UPLC-MS/MS.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- A stock solution was firstly prepared and the test solutions at different concentrations were diluted by the stock solution.
The stock solution of 10000 mg/L was prepared by adding 1.00 g test substance into 100mL test water. Then the solution was diluted by 100mL Elendt M7 medium to give a concentration of 100 mg/L. The test solutions were prepared by diluting the stock solution with Elendt M7 medium. Details of the solutions prepared were showed as follows:
Concentration of test substance Volume of stock solution Total medium volume
(mg/L) (at 100 mg/L) added (µL) (mL)
Blank control - -
0.63 313 50
1.25 625 50
2.50 1250 50
5.00 2500 50
10.0 5000 50 - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Daphnia magna
- Source: own laboratory breeding
- Age of parental stock (mean and range, SD): not being the first brood progeny, was the test species which were 6 to 24 hours old at the start of the test
- Feeding during test: yes
- Food type: Chlorella vulgaris Beij.
- Amount: 0.2 - 0.4 mg C/Daphnia each time.
- Frequency: once every two days
ACCLIMATION: none, culture conditions during breeding - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Hardness:
- 221 to 232 mg/L as CaCO3
- Test temperature:
- 20 ± 1°C
- pH:
- 7.4 - 7.7
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 92% to 101% of the air saturation at the test temperature
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: 0, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/L
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 100-mL glass beakers. (100-mL, Tianbo Glass Instruments Factory)
- Type (delete if not applicable): open
- Aeration: no
- No. of organisms per vessel: 10
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 0
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 0
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Elendt M7 was used
- Culture medium different from test medium: no
- Intervals of water quality measurement: no data
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 16-hour light and 8-hour dark cycle daily
- Light intensity: 1000 to 1500 lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- Observations: the number of living offspring was counted for each vessel daily. The offspring produced by each parent animal were preferably removed and counted daily from the appearance of the first brood to prevent them consuming food intended for the adult.
- Concentration: all test concentrations were analyzed at the beginning (0 d), immediately prior to the first renewal of the test solution (3 d) and weekly thereafter (9, 21 d). In all cases, determination of test substance concentrations prior to renewal was performed on one seperate vessel at each test concentration.
- Other parameters: including time to production of first brood; number of broods per animal.
Besides, oxygen concentration, temperature, hardness and pH values were measured once a week, in the control(s) and the highest test substance concentration. - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 10 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- analysed concentration: 1.45 mg/L TFAK and 1.76 mg/L TFSK
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 10 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- analysed concentration: 1.45 mg/L TFAK and 1.76 mg/L TFSK
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Details on results:
- Analysis of Test Substance in Test Solutions:
The analytical results showed that the analysed concentrations of TFAK and TFSK are consistent in the test medium throughout the test period (deviation within 20% of the initial concentration). Thus a semi-static method of 72 h-renewal test procedure was reasonable.
Test Conditions:
During the whole test period, the pH values of the control mediums and Test Media were between 7.4 and 7.7, and the Dissolved Oxygen (DO) values varied from 92% to 101% of the air saturation at the test temperature, the hardness values varied from 221 to 232 mg (CaCO3)/L, and the temperature of the Test Media was maintained in the range of 20°C to 21°C.
Reproduction and Mortality:
During the test, all animals in the control were alive and the mean number of live offspring produced per parent animal surviving at the end of the test was > 60. The coefficient of variation around the mean number of living offspring produced per parent animal in the control(s) was<25%.
At the end of the test period, one adult died in 2.50 mg/L, 5.00 mg/L and 10.0 mg/L respectively. The adult died during the 4th day and 7th day. No dead adults were observed in the control.
The effects on mortality of the adult, the time to production of first brood, the number of broods per animal alive were observed daily. Compared with the reproduction of the controls, no significant differences were found in treatments and the control. As a result, the LOEC is greater than 10.0 mg/L (nominal concentration, analysed concentration: 1.45 mg/L TFAK and 1.76 mg/L TFSK) and the NOEC is not less than 10.0 mg/L (nominal concentration, analysed concentration: 1.45 mg/L TFAK and 1.76 mg/L TFSK ). - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- All animals in the control were alive and the mean number of live offspring was > 60. The coefficient of variation around the mean number of living offspring in the control(s) was ≤ 25%.
- Conclusions:
- No statistical significative effect on the reproduction of organisms was observed compared to the control. The results showed that under valid semi-static test conditions (72 h-renewal), the LOEC is greater than 10.0 mg/L (nominal concentration, analysed concentration: 1.45 mg/L TFAK and 1.76 mg/L TFSK) and the NOEC is not less than 10.0 mg/L (nominal concentration, analysed concentration: 1.45 mg/L TFAK and 1.76 mg/L TFSK).
- Executive summary:
Under semi-static conditions of 72 h-renewal, the effect on the reproductive output of Daphnia magna exposed to the test substance (Reaction mass of potassium trifluoromethanesulphinate and potassium trifluoroacetate) for 21 days was conducted according to the OECD Testing Guideline 211.
During the whole test period, the pH values of the control mediums and Test Media were between 7.4 and 7.7, and the Dissolved Oxygen (DO) values varied from 92% to 101% of the air saturation at the test temperature, the hardness values varied from 221 to 232 mg(CaCO3)/L, and the temperature of the Test Media was maintained in the range of 20°C to 21°C.
All animals in the control were alive and the mean number of live offspring produced per parent animal surviving at the end of the test was > 60. The coefficient of variation around the mean number of living offspring produced per parent animal in the control(s) was < 25%. So the study met the acceptability criteria. Therefore the test was considered valid.
As the test substance is a reaction mass containing two constituents in water, the concentration of each constituent, i.e.potassium trifluoroacetate (TFAK) and potassium trifluoromethanesulphinate (TFSK), was determined during the study. The analysed concentration of the test item was therefore expressed by the active matter of TFAK and TFSK. The analytical results showed that the analysed concentrations of TFAK and TFSK are consistent in the test medium throughout the test period (deviation within 20% of the initial concentration)
At the end of the test period, one adult died in 2.50 mg/L, 5.00 mg/L and 10.0 mg/L respectively. The adult died during the 4th day and 7th day. The effects on mortality of the adult, the time to production of first brood, the number of broods per animal alive were observed daily. Compared with the reproduction of the controls, no significant differences were found in treatments and the control. As a result, the LOEC is greater than 10.0 mg/L (nominal concentration, analysed concentration: 1.45 mg/L TFAK and 1.76 mg/L TFSK) and the NOEC is not less than 10.0 mg/L (nominal concentration, analysed concentration: 1.45 mg/L TFAK and 1.76 mg/L TFSK ).
Reference
Reproduction Inhibition Effects
Nominal Conc.(mg/L) |
Initial No.of Adults |
21d |
|
Mean Fecundity (No. live offspring per adult) |
Inhibition rate |
||
0 |
10 |
64 |
— |
0.63 |
10 |
61 |
4.38% |
1.25 |
10 |
61 |
5.16% |
2.50 |
10 |
62 |
3.13% |
5.00 |
10 |
59 |
7.29% |
10.0 |
10 |
60 |
5.56% |
LOEC (by One-Way ANOVA) |
> 10.0 mg/L (nominal concentration) |
||
NOEC (by One-Way ANOVA) |
≥10.0 mg/L (nominal concentration) |
Description of key information
In a long term toxicity study to Daphnia, no statistical significant effect on the reproduction of organisms was observed compared to the control. The NOEC is ≥ 3.21 mg/L of reaction mass (1.45 mg/L TFAK and 1.76 mg/L TFSK).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 3.21 mg/L
Additional information
A long-term toxicity study to Daphnia is available for the reaction mass potassium trifluoroacetate and potassium trifluoromethanesulphinate and is selected as key study. In this study, the effect on the reproductive output of Daphnia magna exposed to the test substance for 21 days was conducted according to the OECD Testing Guideline 211 under semi-static conditions of 72 h-renewal.
The test item was an aqueous solution of the reaction mass of TFSK and TFAK because it is the form under which the substance is manufactured and used. The results were expressed in both test item and active matter (i.e. both dried constituents of the reaction mass). The ecotoxicity profile of the substance has been determined based on the results expressed as active matter and therefore are applicable to the substance described in the section 1.2 of the iuclid.
During the whole test period, the pH values of the control medium and Test Media were between 7.4 and 7.7, and the Dissolved Oxygen (DO) values varied from 92% to 101% of the air saturation at the test temperature, the hardness values varied from 221 to 232 mg(CaCO3)/L, and the temperature of the Test Media was maintained in the range of 20°C to 21°C.
All animals in the control were alive and the mean number of live offspring produced per parent animal surviving at the end of the test was > 60. The coefficient of variation around the mean number of living offspring produced per parent animal in the control(s) was < 25%. So the study met the acceptability criteria. Therefore the test was considered valid.
As the test substance is a reaction mass containing two constituents in water, the concentration of each constituent, i.e.potassium trifluoroacetate (TFAK) and potassium trifluoromethanesulphinate (TFSK), was determined during the study. The analysed concentration of the test item was therefore expressed by the active matter of TFAK and TFSK. The analytical results showed that the analysed concentrations of TFAK and TFSK are consistent in the test medium throughout the test period (deviation within 20% of the initial concentration)
At the end of the test period, one adult died in 2.50 mg/L, 5.00 mg/L and 10.0 mg/L respectively. The adult died during the 4th day and 7th day. The effects on mortality of the adult, the time to production of first brood, the number of broods per animal alive were observed daily. Compared with the reproduction of the controls, no significant differences were found in treatments and the control. As a result, the LOEC is greater than 10.0 mg/L (nominal concentration, analysed concentration: 1.45 mg/L TFAK and 1.76 mg/L TFSK) and the NOEC is not less than 10.0 mg/L (nominal concentration, analysed concentration: 1.45 mg/L TFAK and 1.76 mg/L TFSK ).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.