Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 911-467-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The Reaction mass of TFSK/TFAK did not induce skin sensitization in the Buehler test performed according to OECD Guideline 406 and GLP.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 11 Jul 2018 to 28 Jan 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- GLP Guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The in vivo data have been generated as part of a new substance notification in China for which this test is required.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- 2016-05-30
- Type of study:
- Buehler test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- Prefered method for the legislation for which this study was run.
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Hartley
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd
- Age at study initiation: 5-7 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 280-384 g
- Housing: Plastic cage, < 12 animals
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pellet diet, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Purified water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21.7 - 25.2 °C
- Humidity (%): 41 - 65%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 17 Sep 2018 To: 8 Nov 2018 - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Preliminary irritation test: 0.3 ml were applied to the skin of two animals for 6h and then observed for 24h to verify the irritating potential of the substance.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3
- Exposure period: 6h, residual item removed by cotton wool soaked in water
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1
- Site: left flank
- Frequency of applications: once per week for 3 weeks
- Duration: 3 weeks
- Concentrations: 100%, 0.3 ml
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 28
- Exposure period: 6h, residual item removed by cotton wool soaked in water
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1
- Site: right flank
- Concentrations: 100%, 0.3 ml
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24h and 48h
OTHER:
Body weights were recorded on the day before first dosing and conclusion of the study. - Challenge controls:
- Yes
Animals were dosed with 0.3 ml of the neat test item. - Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2-Dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB)
- Positive control results:
- 16/20 (80%) animals with a positive reaction.
Severity index 1.05 after 24h and 0.85 after 48h. - Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- Treated Group
- No. with + reactions:
- 16
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Remarks:
- 2,4-Dinitrochlorobenzene was used as positive control
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- When applied as a 100% solution, the test item did not induce positive reactions in any of treated animals (0/20) and control animals (0/10) 24 and 48h after exposure.
- Executive summary:
In a GLP-compliant OECD Guideline 406 study, the skin sensitisation properties of the test item Reaction mass of potassium trifluoroacetate and potassium trifluoromethanesulphinate were studied in guinea pig by using the methods of Buehler.
The concentrations of the test item used in the main study were determined on the basis of the results obtained from a preliminary screening test (maximum concentration tested: 100%). The main sensitisation test was undertaken using a test group of 20 animals and a control group of 10 animals. In an attempt to induce sensitisation, test animals were treated by topical application of the undiluted test item. This was repeated at weekly intervals for a total of 3 weeks (Day 0, first induction, Day 7 and Day 14). Animals of the control group were not treated. Two weeks after the third and final induction exposure, animals of the test and control groups were challenged by topical application of the test item at the same concentration used for induction. At challenge no response was observed to the test item, in either test or control group animals.
No evidence was obtained that the test substance had caused skin hypersensitivity in the guinea pig, since no responses were observed in the experimental animals in the challenge phase. Based on these results the test item is not regarded as a skin sensitizer according to the recommendations made in the test guidelines. It does not have to be classified for sensitization by skin contact according to the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labeling and packaging of substances and mixtures.
Reference
- Preliminary test phase: No visible changes were found on the treated skin area of each animal observed.
- Induction phase: No visible changes were found on the treated skin area of each animal observed 24 and 48 hours after the first, second and third induction exposures.
- Body weight: The mean body weight of the treatment and control group showed an increasing trend.
- Mortality: No mortality was observed.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
A reliable skin sensitization study, performed according to OECD Guideline 406 and GLP is available for the Reaction mass of TFSK/TFAK. In this study, the skin sensitisation potential of the Reaction mass of TFSK/TFAK was studied in guinea pig by using the methods of Buehler. The concentrations of the test item used were based on the results of a preliminary study. In the main study, one test group of 20 animals was treated by topical application of the undiluted test substance (30% reaction mass of TFSK/TFAK in water) and a control group of 10 animals remained untreated. The same treatment was repeated at weekly intervals for a total of 3 weeks (Day 0, first induction, Day 7 and Day 14). Two weeks after the third and final induction exposure, animals of the test and control groups were challenged by topical application of the test item at the same concentration used for induction. At challenge no response was observed to the test item, in either test or control group animals. No evidence was obtained that the test substance had caused skin hypersensitivity in the guinea pig, since no responses were observed in the experimental animals in the challenge phase. Based on these results the test item is not considered as a skin sensitizer according to the recommendations made in the test guidelines.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
The Reaction mass of TFSK/TFAK did not show skin sensitising properties in a guinea pig Buehler test. For this reason, the reaction mass is considered not sensitizing, according to the CLP 1272/2008 regulation and GHS criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
