Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-522-0 | CAS number: 61-90-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
No adverse effects were observed upon oral administration of > 3000 mg/kg bw/d of L-leucine to rats for 90 days.
NOAEL: 3330 mg/kg bw/d (males); 3840 mg/kg bw/d (females).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study according to internationally accepted protocol. Study examines a very complete set of parameters and is well documented.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Guidelines for Toxicity Studies Required for Applications for Approval to Manufacture (Import) Drugs (Ordinance N.1, Article N.24; 1989)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 408 (Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Japan
- Age at study initiation: 4 weeks
- Housing: individually in stainless steel hanging cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 2 weeks
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22°C +/- 2°C
- Humidity (%): 55% +/- 10%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12 - Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on oral exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The test substance was mixed into standard diet (CRF-1; Oriental Yeast, Tokyo, Japan).
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): no data
- Mixing appropriate amounts with standard diet CRF-1; Oriental Yeast, Tokyo, Japan
- Storage temperature of food: no data - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- treatment: during 13 weeks
recovery: 5 weeks - Frequency of treatment:
- daily during 13 week treatment period
no treatment during recovery period - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1.25% w/w
Basis:
nominal in diet - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2.50% w/w
Basis:
nominal in diet - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
5.00% w/w
Basis:
nominal in diet - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 12 animals per sex per dose
- Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Positive control:
- No.
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily (morning and afternoon) during treatment, once daily (morning) during recovery.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: twice a week, at a specified time (9:00-12:00).
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Twenty-four hour diet intake was measured twice per week.
- Estimated intake of test substance (mg/kg/d) for each week was calculated from the mean consumption for 1 day for that week.
WATER CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Twenty-four hour water intake was measured once per week.
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: before start of treatment, at week 13 (6 animals per dose group) and at the end of the recovery period (all animals).
- Dose groups that were examined: all
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: on the day following the final administration and at the end of the recovery period.
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes: ether
- Animals fasted: Yes: overnight
- How many animals: all
- Parameters checked: red blood cell count (RBC), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), hemoglobin (Hb), hemoglobin to reticulocyte ratio, platelet and white blood cell count, differential leucocyte count, prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin time (PT and APTT) and fibrinogen. Hematocrit and mean corpuscular hemoglobin were calculated from the above-measured parameters. Additional plasma parameters (GOT, GPT, and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) were obtained from blood samples collected from the abdominal aorta into tubes containing heparin.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes / No / No data
- Time schedule for collection of blood:
- Animals fasted: Yes / No / No data
- How many animals:
- Parameters checked: total cholesterol, triglycerides, phospho-lipids, total bilirubin, blood glucose, urea nitrogen, creatine, uric acid, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, inorganic phosphorus, and total protein
URINALYSIS: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of urine: in weeks 5 and 13 of the treatment period and week 5 of the recovery period
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: Yes
- Animals fasted: partly: animals were fasted during the first 4 hours. Urine samples were collected after 4h. Subsequently the animals were provided with food again and a second urine sample was collected 20h later.
- The following parameters were evaluated only from the 4-h samples: pH, protein, ketone body, glucose, occult blood, bilirubin, urobilinogen, urine color, and sedimentation
- The following parameters were evaluated only from the 24-h samples: volume of urine (volumetry), specific gravity (refractometry), and electrolyte concentration.
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No data - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
Femoral bone marrow samples were collected at autopsy from all rats and May-Giemsa-stained specimen were prepared and examined microscopically. The rats were sacrificed by exsan- guinations from the abdominal aorta and observed for any exter- nal malformations. Then, the organs and tissues in the cephalic, thoratic, and abdominal cavities were examined macroscopically.
The brain, pituitary, salivary, and thyroid glands, heart, lungs (including bronchia), liver, spleen, kidneys, adrenals, testes, prostate, ovaries, and uterus were excised and weighted. The rel- ative organ weights were calculated from the animals' fasting body weights.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
All the organs listed above, plus spinal cord, sciatic nerve, thoratic aorta, trachea, tongue, esophagus, stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, colon, rectum, pancreas, thymus, mesenteric lymph nodes, cervical lymph nodes, epi- didymides, seminal vesicles, vagina, mammary glands, skin, eyes, optic nerve, Harderian glands, sternum (bone marrow), femur (bone marrow), femoral muscle, and gross lesions were excised and fixed in phosphate-buffered formalin solution. Af- ter paraffin embedding, the excised organs and tissues were prepared for microscopic examination by sectioning and staining with hematoxylin and eosin. Representative samples were photographed. - Statistics:
- Data were analyzed for homogeneity of variance using Bartlett's test. Homogenous data observed at the level of 5% (w/w) were analyzed using the parametric one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the significance of differences was assessed using Scheffe's method to compare the values between the control group and each amino acid-administered group. Heterogeneous data converted to rank-sum were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test. Any significant differences observed were further evaluated using the method of distribution free multiple comparison (Gad and Weil 1982).
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- no effects observed
- Ophthalmological findings:
- no effects observed
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Details on results:
- CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
No deaths and no signs related to administration of the amino acid Leu were observed during the administration period.Swelling of the hindlimbs was found in one female in the control group. Mal-occlusion of the incisors was observed in two males (control group, 1.25% Leu-ingesting group). All above changes were incidental. No clinical signs were observed during recovery period.
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN
Body weights of males and females in all tested concentration groups during the administration and re- covery periods were comparable to those recorded in controls (Table 1).
FOOD CONSUMPTION, WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study)
The diet consumption of males fed 2.5% diet increased singularly on days 45 and 59 ofthe administration. No other sig- nificant changes were observed in the total diet consumption at the end of the administration period. Similarly, no group differ- ences in diet intake were observed during the recovery period, and no water intake changes were found throughout the study.
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION
Opacity in the anterior portion (cornea) of the left eye was observed in one male in each ofthe 1.25% and 5.0% concentra- tion groups, and abnormal running of vessels (retina) was found in one male in the control group at the end of the administration period.
HAEMATOLOGY AND CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Examinations at the end of the administration period did not reveal any significant administration-related changes in hemato- logical parameters and blood chemistry. A significant decrease in myeloblasts was found in females in the 1.25% concentration group (controls, 0.2% ± 0.1%; 1.25% group, 0.1% ± 0.1%), and a significantly high value of M/E ratio (controls, 1.2% ± 0.3%; 2.5% group, 1.5% ± 0.2%) was seen in females in the
2.5% concentration group. Those changes were not reproduced at the end of the recovery period.
At the end of the recovery period, a significant increase in the level of inorganic phosphorus (controls, 5.9 ± 0.4 mg/dl; 5.0% group, 6.7 ± 0.3 nmg/dl) and albumin ratio (controls, 43.3% ± 1.4%; 5.0% group, 45.3% ± 1.6%) and a significantly low value of al-globulin ratio (controls, 22.2% ± 2.8%; 5.0% group, 18.9% ± 2.1 %) were noted in males in the 5.0% concen- tration group. In females of this concentration group, significant increases in the levels of creatine (controls, 0.59 ± 0.04 mg/dl; 5.0% group, 0.64 ± 0.03 mg/dl) and total protein (controls, 6.5% ± 0.11 g/dl; 5.0% group, 7.1 ± 0.5 g/dl) were observed. As none of the above changes was seen at the end of the admin- istration period, they were thought to be incidental.
URINALYSIS
No intergroup differences were observed in the quantitative and qualitative parameters.
ORGAN WEIGHTS
See tables.
GROSS PATHOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY
A small number of abnormalities in two organs (kidney and stomach) at the end ofthe administration period were judged to be incidental. At the end ofthe administration period, absolute organ weights recorded are depicted in Tables 3A (males) and 3B (females). A significant increase in the adrenal gland weight was recorded in the 2.5% concentration group; however, the increase was recoverable and dose independent. At the end ofthe recovery period, there were significant increases in the absolute weight of the pituitary (controls, 15.1 ± 1.8 mg; 5.0% group 17.9 ± 1.1 mg) in females in the 5.0% concentration groups. Because these changes were not observed at the end ofthe administration period, they were considered incidental. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 5 other: %
- Based on:
- other: nominal concentration test material in diet
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse effects observed at any tested dose level.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 3 330 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse effects observed at any tested dose level.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 3 840 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse effects observed at any tested dose level.
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- From this 90d repeated dose toxicity study with rats it was estimated that the No Observed Adverse Effect Level for L-leucine is at least 3330 mg/kg bw/d.
- Executive summary:
This study evaluated toxicologicat and behavioral effects of L-Ieucine (Leu) during a 90d repeated dose study with male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. The amino acids was incorporated into a standard diet at doses equal to 1.25%, 2.5%, and 5.0% (wlw). A control group of rats received a standard diet. All diets were administered ad libitum for 13 consecutive weeks. To examine stability of any potential effects, the administration period was followed by a 5-week recovery period, during which only the standard diet was provided to all animals.
No significant, dose-related effects on body weight were found in rats fed a Leu-supplemented diet. We estimate the no-observed- adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for Leu at 5.0% for both genders (males, 3.333 ± 0.101 g/kg/day: females, 3.835 ± 0.257 g/kg/day).
Reference
|
Body weight gain, males (g) |
Body weight gain, females (g) |
||
|
Administration |
Recovery |
Administration |
Recovery |
Standard diet |
381.5 ±49.4 |
41.7 ± 13.7 |
187.4 ±60.3 |
21.5 ± 14 |
+ Leu (1.25%) |
399.8 ± 50.4 |
|
189.7 ±38.5 |
|
+ Leu (2.50%) |
427.7 ± 32.3 |
|
185.7 ±33.9 |
|
+ Leu (5.00%) |
402.6 ± 55.0 |
43.8 ± 8.7 |
181.0 ±26.8 |
14.7 ±5.9 |
Means ± SD of 12 rats (Administration) and 6 rats (Recovery) are shown.
|
Average intake (mg/kg/day) |
|
|
Males |
Females |
Standard diet |
783.0 ± 22.9 |
944.0 ±46.1 |
+ Leu (1.25%) |
832.6 ± 30.6 |
961.0 ±64.2 |
+ Leu (2.50%) |
1660.2 ± 39.5 |
1904.8 ±67.0 |
+ Leu (5.00%) |
3332.9 ±101.0 |
3835.2 ± 257.0 |
Note.Means± SD of ]2rats are shown.
Absolute body and organ weights @ week 13 in male rats |
||||
|
Body weight (g) |
Brain (g) |
Pituitary (mg) |
Salivary gland (both) (mg) |
Standard diet |
539.7 ±48.9 |
2.18 ±0.08 |
14.5 ±1.5 |
807±79 |
+ Leu (1.25%) |
531.8 ±38.2 |
2.13 ±0.08 |
13.8 ±1.1 |
803±108 |
+ Leu (2.50%) |
530.3 ±45.2 |
2.12 ±0.09 |
14.2 ±1.1 |
817±108 |
+ Leu (5.00%) |
521.4 ±57.1 |
2.12 ±0.09 |
14.5 ±1.5 |
806±77 |
|
Thymus (mg) |
Heart (g) |
Lung (g) |
Liver (g) |
Standard diet |
318 ±74 |
1.55 ±0.11 |
1.58 ±0.11 |
13.88±1.62 |
+ Leu (1.25%) |
249±74 |
1.56 ±0.15 |
1.64 ±0.12 |
13.84±1.54 |
+ Leu (2.50%) |
293±63 |
1.51 ±0.17 |
1.60 ±0.13 |
13.23±1.74 |
+ Leu (5.00%) |
263±72 |
1.53 ±0.16 |
L57 ±0.10 |
13.52±2.31 |
|
Spleen (g) |
Kidneys (both) (g) |
Adrenal glands (both) (mg) |
Testis (both) (g) |
Prostate (g) |
Standard diet |
0.80±0.13 |
3.25±0.21 |
66±6 |
3.51±0.15 |
1.31±0.21 |
+ Leu (1.25%) |
0.77±0.11 |
3.25±0.28 |
64±9 |
3.38±0.23 |
1.27±0.25 |
+ Leu (2.50%) |
0.80±0.14 |
3.29±0.46 |
63±10 |
3.36±0.28 |
1.40±0.22 |
+ Leu (5.00%) |
0.82±0.17 |
3.27±0.39 |
69±12 |
3.42±0.27 |
1.24±0.28 |
Note.Means± SD of ]2rats are shown.
Absolute body and organ weights @ week 13 in female rats |
||||
|
Body weight (g) |
Brain (g) |
Pituitary (mg) |
Salivary gland (both) (mg) |
Standard diet |
317.1 ±73.0 |
1,97 ±0.07 |
16.0 ±2.6 |
537±60 |
+ Leu (1.25%) |
326.3 ±45.0 |
2.03 ± 0.09 |
16.1 ±3.4 |
513±25 |
+ Leu (2.50%) |
321.8 ±38.6 2 |
2.01 ± 0.05 |
15.6 ±3.0 |
554±78 |
+ Leu (5.00%) |
314.7 ±32.7. |
1.95 ±0.06 |
14.1 ±2 |
513±61 |
|
Thymus (mg) |
Heart (g) |
Lung (g) |
Liver (g) |
Standard diet |
272±122 |
1.02 ±0.10 |
1.20 ±0,10 |
7,97±1,39 |
+ Leu (1.25%) |
247±46 |
1.07 ±0.14 |
1,20 ±0,09 |
8,34±L53 |
+ Leu (2.50%) |
236±47 |
1,05 ±0,09 |
1,22 ±0,08 |
8.27±1,05 |
+ Leu (5.00%) |
264±45 |
1.04 ±0.08 |
1,15 ±0,08 |
7.59 ±0,60 |
|
Spleen (g) |
Kidneys (both) (g) |
Adrenal glands (both) (mg) |
Ovary (both) (g) |
Uterus (mg) |
Standard diet |
0.60± 0.10 |
2.02 ±0.21 |
75±12 |
93.6 ±18.5 |
617 ±135 |
+ Leu (1.25%) |
0.57± 0.10 |
2.08±0.18 |
79±9 |
85.6±21.7 |
622 ±129 |
+ Leu (2.50%) |
0.59± 0.11 |
2.14±0.18 |
84±10* |
100.9±16,7 |
593 ±110 |
+ Leu (5.00%) |
0.52± 0.08 |
2.02±0.16 |
75±9 |
90.0±16,3 |
595 ±104 |
Note.Means± SD of ]2rats are shown.
*p < .05from control group.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 3 330 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- The available studies are in line with each other, i.e. no adverse effecs are observed in any of the experiments.
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Three reliable repeated dose toxicity studies are available for L-leucine, all three assessing the toxicity of L-leucine via oral administration. In the key study (Tsubuki, S.et al, 2004), Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to 1.25, 2.50 or 5.00% w/w of L-leucine via the diet for a period of 13 weeks. No adverse effects were observed at any tested dose level. Based on the food consumption of the animals, an NOAEL of 3330 mg/kg bw/d (males) and 3840 mg/kg bw/d (females) was calculated.
In the supporting study by Hasegawa, K. (2007), dose levels of up to 15% w/w of L-leucine in the diet were administered to Fisher rats. At the highest dose levels (10-15% w/w L-leucine, corresponding to 8.24 and 12.09 g/kg bw/d, respectively) some effects were observed that suggest a decrease in liver function. However, no organ changes were observed during the gross and histopathological examinations.
In the supporting study by Sebestyen, I. (2007), three batches of L-leucine were administered in doses of 2000 mg/kg bw/day during 28 days. Increased glucose and electrolyte (chloride, sodium) concentrations were noted in both sexes. An increased water consumption in all female groups and occasionally kidney weight increase can be related to the changes in serum electrolyte levels. An increased liver weight was noted as well, however no histopathological changes were observed.
The NOAEL derived in the key study was retained to be used for the hazard assessment and classification and labelling.
As this NOAEL can also be used to derive the relevant dermal and/or inhalatory DNELs, and is sufficient for assessing the classification and labelling, further testing of the dermal and inhalatory routes is not required.
Justification for selection of repeated dose toxicity via oral route - systemic effects endpoint:
K1 study according to GLP and OECD guidelines.
Justification for classification or non-classification
No adverse effects were observed upon oral administration of L-leucine up at doses > 3000 mg/kg bw/d during 90 days. As a consequence, classification of L-leucine for Specific Target Organ Toxicity - Repeated Exposure is not required in accordance with the criteria described in Annex I to regulation 1272/2008 (CLP).
Likewise, classification with risk phrase R48 is not required according to the criteria described in Annex VI to Directive 67/548 (DSD).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.