Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: According to the EU RAR for Sodium Hydroxide (2007; section 4.1.2.3.1), a Klimisch 1 reliability score was assigned since the test procedure is in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail.
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Evaluation of a human patch test for the identification and classification of skin irritation potential
Author:
York M, Griffiths E, Whittle E and Basketter DA
Year:
1996
Bibliographic source:
Contact Dermatitis, 34, 204-212

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Treatment sites were assessed for the presence of irritation using a 4 point scale at 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (20 %) was used as a positive control and is the minimum concentration classified as "irritating to skin" (R38) under EU regulations.
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Sodium hydroxide (NaOH)
- Other: source is Sherman

Test animals

Species:
human
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
HUMAN VOLUNTEERS
- Sex distribution in the individual panels was not standardized
- Age: 18 to 65 years
- Normal healthy volunteers

Test system

Type of coverage:
other: patch - 25 mm Hill Top chamber containing a Webril pad (occluded exposure)
Preparation of test site:
not specified
Vehicle:
not specified
Controls:
other: SDS (20%) was used as positive control
Amount / concentration applied:
Concentration: 0.5 %
Total volume applied: 0.2 ml
Duration of treatment / exposure:
To avoid the production of unacceptably high reactions a cautious approach to testing was adopted. Test materials were applied progressively from 15 and 30 min through 1, 2, 3 and 4 h. The 15 and 30 min exposure periods were omitted if the Study Directors were satisfied that excessive reactions would not occur following the 1 h exposure.
Observation period:
Examination time points: 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal
Number of animals:
Number of volunteers: 33
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: upper outer arm

SCORING SYSTEM: 0 (no reaction)- +++ (strongly positive reaction)

Results and discussion

In vivo

Irritant / corrosive response data:
The total number of "positive" reactions was 20 of the 33 subjects after 1 hour, which is higher than SDS (20 %) after 1 hour (4 of 33 subjects) but less than the 4 hour reaction to SDS (23/33).

Any other information on results incl. tables

Human patch testing with Hill Top chambers for up to 4 h; total reactivity to NaOH (relative to SDS (20%) reference solution) and existing and proposed EU classification:
 Existing EU classification  Total reactivity at 4 h (% reactivity) Comparable 20% SDS reactivity (%) Classification based on human patch test 
 R38  20/33 (61)*  4/33 (12)**  R38
     20/33 (70)***  

R38: Irritating to skin

*: maximum exposure 1 h because of strong level of response

**: 1h exposure

***: 4 h exposure

Similar results for sodium hydroxide (0.5%) are reported in the publication of Griffiths et al.(1997) where the patch test procedure of York et al. was used in an interlaboratory test to validate an alternative (in vivo) method to the Draize skin irritation test involving use of human volunteers to identify skin irritation hazard. The study was performed in three different test facilities (Unilever, proDerm and P&G). The Unilever results are summarised in the table above. Following results were obtained from proDerm and P&G:

 Test group  Dates  No of (+)ve reactions*  No of (+)ve SDS reactions*  HPT Class§
proDerm  Nov/Dec 94  13/31 (42)**  1/31 (3)**  R38
       22/31 (71)  
 P&G  Sep/Oct 95  21/34 (62)**  7/34 (21)**  R38
       32/34 (94)  

*Results are presented as the proportion of the test panel giving an irritant response, with percentages in parentheses

§EC classification based on the results of the human 4 hr patch test (HPT); the substance is not classified if the proportion of the panel reaching to it is not significantly less than that to the concurrent positive control using the Fisher's exact test

**Results at 1 hour of exposure.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information 0.5% NaOH; for exposure up to 1 hour
Conclusions:
NaOH was identified as R38 "Irritating to the skin". The "irritant" classification for NaOH (0.5%) may be an underestimation, based on the intensity of the response in a large proportion of the panel after only 1h of treatment.