Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 230-907-9 | CAS number: 7365-45-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Oral (OECD 407), 28 days, rat: NOAEL (systemic) ≥ 1000 mg/kg bw/day (reference 7.5.1 -1)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Mar 2003 - Dec 2003
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 407 (Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Version / remarks:
- 27th July 1995
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on species / strain selection:
- The rat was chosen because it is a rodent species commonly accepted by regulatory authorities for this type of study and the Sprague-Dawley strain was selected since background data from previous studies are available at the laboratory.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories France, l’Arbresle, France
- Age at study initiation: approximately 6 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: mean of 195 g (range: 178 g to 207 g) for the males and mean of 152 g (range: 138 g to 171 g) for the females
- Fasting period before study: no information
- Housing: suspended wire-mesh cages (43.0 x 21.5 x 18.0 cm) and each cage contained two rats of the same sex and group
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 20
- Air changes (per hr): approximately 12 cycles/hour of filtered, non-recycled air
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12h/12h (7:00 - 19:00) - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Details on route of administration:
- The oral route is selected as it is one anticipated route of secondary human exposure.
- Vehicle:
- water
- Remarks:
- purified
- Details on oral exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The test item was administered as a solution in the vehicle: the test item mixed with the required quantity of vehicle. Fresh test item dosage forms were prepared daily.
VEHICLE
- Amount of vehicle: 5 mL/kg/day (dosage-volume) - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 28 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- once daily (approx. at same time)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: preliminary study
- Fasting period before blood sampling for clinical biochemistry: yes - Positive control:
- none
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: at least twice a day
- Cage side observations: Morbidity and mortality
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: at least once a day
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: on day 27
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No data
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: all
- Parameters examined: Please refer to table 1 under "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables"
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: on day 27
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: all
- Parameters examined: Please refer to table 2 under "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables"
URINALYSIS: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of urine:on day 27
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: Yes
- Animals fasted: No
- Parameters examined: Please refer to table 3 under "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables"
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
Sacrifice
On completion of the treatment period, after at least 14 hours fasting, all animals were asphyxiated by carbon dioxide and killed by exsanguination.
Organ weights
The body weight of all animals killed at the end of the treatment period was recorded before sacrifice, and the organs specified below were weighed wet as soon as possible after dissection. The ratio of organ weight to body weight (recorded immediately before sacrifice) was calculated.
Macroscopic post-mortem examination
A complete macroscopic post-mortem examination was performed on all study animals. This included examination of the external surfaces, all orifices, the cranial cavity, the external surfaces of the brain and spinal cord, the thoracic, abdominal and pelvic cavities with their associated organs and tissues and the neck with its associated organs and tissues.
Preservation of tissues
For all study animals, the tissues specified below were preserved in 10% buffered formalin (except for the eyes and Harderian glands which were fixed in Davidson's fixative, and the testes and epididymides which were preserved in Bouin's fluid).
Microscopic examination
All tissues required for microscopic examination were embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned at a thickness of approximately four microns and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (except testes and epididymides which were stained with hematoxylin/PAS).
A microscopic examination was performed on:
- all tissues listed below for animals of the control and high-dose groups (groups 1 and 4) killed at the end of the treatment period,
- all macroscopic lesions of all the animals of the low- and intermediate-dose groups (groups 2 and 3) killed on completion of the treatment period.
Tissues (preserved, examined microscopically (except *), organ weights (for ** only))
Organs
Macroscopic lesions
Adrenals
Aorta **
Brain (including medulla/pons cerebellar and cerebral cortex)
Cecum
Colon
Duodenum
Epididymides **
Esophagus
Eyes with Harderian glands
Femoral bone with articulation
Heart **
Ileum
Jejunum
Kidneys **
Liver **
Lungs with bronchi
Lymph nodes (mandibular and mesenteric)
Mammary gland area
Ovaries **
Pancreas
Pituitary gland
Prostate
Rectum
Salivary glands (sublingual and submandibular)
Sciatic nerve *
Seminal vesicles *
Skeletal muscle *
Skin *
Spinal cord (cervical, thoracic and lumbar)
Spleen **
Sternum with bone marrow *
Stomach with forestomach
Testes **
Thymus **
Thyroids with parathyroids **
Tongue *
Trachea
Urinary bladder
Uterus (horns and cervix)
Vagina * - Statistics:
- Test for Normality of the distribution of untransformed and log-transformed data: Kolmogorov-Lilliefors test.
Assessment of homogeneity of variances between groups: Bartlett test and Fisher test.
Test for effects: Dunn test; t-test, Dunnett test, Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon test. - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related observations were noted.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- No deaths occurred during the study
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Body weight and body weight changes were unaffected by treatment.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Food consumption was similar in all groups.
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In different treated groups, a few variations were noted but the values for these parameters were very low and inconsistent between sexes (e.g. decreased Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time in males of group 4). These changes were consequently considered not to be related to test item administration but rather to reflect biological variability.
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 1000 mg/kg bw/day, glucose concentration decreased slightly in males (-9%, p<0.05) and calcium concentration increased slightly in females (+3%, p<0.05); all individual values were within laboratory historical control data, not consistent with male or female values and without a clear dose-relationship. In males of the three treated groups, inorganic phosphorus was decreased (p<0.05 and p<0.01) compared to control; as the differences were not dose-related and concerned one sex only, there were not considered to be consecutive to test item administration.
- Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No marked effects were noted in any urine parameters. The decrease in pH values measured in treated animals at 1000 mg/kg bw/day was not ascribed to treatment with the test substance as it was very slight.
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Some differences from the controls in organ weights were observed. However, they were minor, not dose-related and/or without dose-relationship. They were thus considered to be of no toxicological importance.
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The few macroscopic findings were those which are commonly encountered in the laboratory rat of this strain and age and were thus considered to be of no toxicological importance.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Spleen
Marginally higher severity of extramedullary hematopoiesis was observed in the animals given 1000 mg/kg bw/day as summarized in table 4 under "Any other information on results incl. tables". The marginally higher severity of extramedullary hematopoiesis, especially in the females, was the contribution of one female with marked (grade 4) extramedullary hematopoiesis. As this finding was recorded with such severity from time to time in control female rats from this strain and age, the marginally higher severity of extramedullary hematopoiesis was considered to be fortuitous and to bear no relationship to the treatment with the test item.
Other organs
Medio-lobular minimal vacuolated hepatocytes with occasional macro-vacuoles were observed in 4/10 males receiving 1000 mg/kg bw/day vs. 1/10 control males. However peri/medio-lobular vacuolated hepatocytes were also observed in the treated and control females with similar incidence and severity (minimal). This was thus considered to be of no toxicological significance.
Slight osseous metaplasia was observed unilaterally in the adrenal of 1/10 females given 1000 mg/kg bw/day, at the junction of the glomerulosa and the fasciculata. Slight diffuse hyperplasia was noted in the pars distalis of the pituitary gland of 1/10 females given 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Considering the low incidence and severity of the above-mentioned findings in the treated females and their absence from the top-dose group in the males, they were considered to be of spontaneous nature and to bear no relationship to the treatment with the test item.
All the other microscopic findings were those which are commonly recorded spontaneously in the untreated laboratory rat of this strain and age and they were thus considered to be without relationship to the test item treatment. - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse effects observed.
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions of the study, the No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) was established at 1000 mg/kg bw/day in Sprague-Dawley rats.
- Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential toxicity of the test item following daily oral administration (gavage) to rats for 4 weeks (GLP-study according to OECD TG 407). Three treated groups of ten male and ten female Sprague-Dawley rats received the test item by gavage at the dose-levels of 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day for 4 weeks. An additional group of ten males and ten females received the vehicle alone (purified water) under the same experimental conditions and acted as a control group. A constant dosage-volume of 5 mL/kg/day was used. The animals were checked daily for mortality and clinical signs. Body weight was recorded before allocation of animals into the study and once a week thereafter. Food consumption was recorded once a week. Haematology, blood biochemical investigations and urinalysis were performed at the end of the treatment period. On completion of the treatment period, the animals were killed and submitted to a full macroscopic post-mortem examination. Designated organs were weighed and selected tissue specimens were preserved. A microscopic examination was performed on designated tissues from animals of the control and high-dose groups.
No death occurred during the study. No treatment-related clinical signs were noted and no relevant differences from controls were observed in the body weight of the treated animals. The food consumption was unaffected and no overt signs of toxicity were observed in haematological, blood biochemical or urinalysis parameters. Organ weights were unaffected by treatment and no macroscopic or histopathological findings revealed a treatment-related effect.
Under the experimental conditions of the study, the No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) was established at 1000 mg/kg bw/day in Sprague-Dawley rats.
Reference
Table 4 Incidence and severity of extramedullary hematopoiesis in the spleen
Dose-level (mg/kg bw/ day) |
0 |
1000 |
||
Sex |
Male |
Female |
Male |
Female |
Incidence |
10/10 |
10/10 |
10/10 |
10/10 |
Severity |
1.9 |
2.3 |
2.1 |
2.7 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- GLP study according to OECD TG, RL1.
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Results
Mortality: No death occurred during the study.
Clinical signs: No treatment-related clinical signs were noted.
Body weight: No relevant differences from controls were observed in the body weight of the treated animals.
Food consumption: The food consumption was unaffected by the treatment with the test item.
Haematology and blood biochemistry: There were no treatment-related findings.
Organ weights: There were no differences of toxicological importance in the weight of any organ from the treated animals killed at the end of the treatment period which were considered to be of toxicological importance.
Macroscopic post-mortem examination: There were no changes detected in the tissues of any treated animals.
Microscopic examination: No relevant histopathological findings were considered to be treatment-related.
Conclusion
The test item, when administered by gavage to Sprague-Dawley rats at the dose-levels of 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day for 4 weeks, was clinically well tolerated. No overt signs of toxicity were observed in haematological, blood biochemical or urinalysis parameters. Organ weights were unaffected by treatment and no macroscopic or histopathological findings revealed a treatment-related effect. Under the experimental conditions of the study, the No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) was established at 1000 mg/kg bw/day in Sprague-Dawley rats.Justification for classification or non-classification
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Based on available data on repeated dose toxicity, the test item does not need to be classified and labelled according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP), as amended for the twelfth time in Regulation (EU) 2019/521.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.