Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-327-1 | CAS number: 119-47-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Remarks:
- in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP and guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- modification refer to measurement of cell proliferation by cell counting instead of radioactive labeling; in addition the acute inflammatory skin reaction is determined to discriminate specific from non-specific activation of immune competent cells in the
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- modification refer to measurement of cell proliferation by cell counting instead of radioactive labeling; in addition the acute inflammatory skin reaction is determined to discriminate specific from non-specific activation of immune competent in the drai
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- female
- Vehicle:
- acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
- Concentration:
- 0, 2%, 10% 50%
- No. of animals per dose:
- 6 per dose group
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks on result:
- other: neither a non-specific (irritant nor a specific immunostimulating (sensitzing) potential of the test item was revealed; cell count index: vehicle control: 1.00, 2%: 1.17, 10%: 1.16, 50%: 1.22
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- Cell count index
- Value:
- 1
- Test group / Remarks:
- Group 1
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Dose (%) = 0
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- Cell count index
- Value:
- 1.17
- Test group / Remarks:
- Group 2
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Dose (%) = 2
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- Cell count index
- Value:
- 1.16
- Test group / Remarks:
- Group 3
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Dose (%) = 10
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- Cell count index
- Value:
- 1.22
- Test group / Remarks:
- Group 4
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Dose (%) = 50
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
Reference
Groups of female NMRI mice were treated with vehicle, 2%, 10% or 50% test substance in AOO.
The NMRI mice treated with the test substance 6,6’-di-tert-butyl-2,2’-methylendi-p-cresol did not show an increase in the stimulation indices for cell counts or for weights of the draining lymph nodes. The "positive level" which is 1.4 for the cell count index was not reached or exceeded in any dose group (cell count index: 1.0, 1.17, 1.16, 1.22 at 0, 2%, 10% or 50% test substance solution, respectively). The “positive level” of ear swelling, which is 2x 10-2 mm increase, i.e. about 10% of the control values, was not reached or exceeded in any treatment group. In addition, no substance specific effects were determined for ear weights.
no treatment-related effcts on body weights were noted.
Based on the findings of this study, the author suggested that neither a non-specific (irritant) nor a specific immune stimulating (sensitizing) potential of the test substance was indicated.
Table: Direct LLNA (NMRI mice, 6 animals/group) lymph node weight index and cell count index (index mean ± SD in %)
Dose (%) | Weight index (index mean ± SD in %) | Cell count index (index of mean ± in %) |
0 | 1.00 ± 13.89 | 1.00 ±16 .46 |
2 | 1.11 ± 16.92 | 1.17 ± 17.57 |
10 | 1.09 ± 11.56 | 1.16 ± 13.12 |
50 | 1.08 ± 14.16 | 1.22 ± 8.07 |
Table: Ear swelling (NMRI mice, female, 6 animals/group, in 0.01 mm)
Dose (%) | day 1 (mean ± SD in %) | day 4 (mean ± SD in %) | Index day 4 |
0 | 17.42 ± 2.96 | 17.67 ± 2.79 | 1.00 |
2 | 17.25 ± 2.62 | 18.42 ± 4.89 | 1.04 |
10 | 17.58 ± 3.80 | 18.58 ± 8.10 | 1.05 |
50 | 17.67 ± 2.79 | 18.33 ± 3.55 | 1.04 |
Table Ear weight (NMRI mice, female, 6 animals/group, in mg per 8 mm diameter punch)
Dose (%) | day 4 (mean ± SD in %) | Index day 4 |
0 | 12.20 ± 7.11 | 1.00 |
2 | 12.83 ± 8.30 | 1.05 |
10 | 12.90 ± 7.62 | 1.06 |
50 | 12.63 ± 9.88 | 1.04 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
Non-Human information
The skin sensitizing potential of 6,6’-di-tert-butyl-2,2’-methylendi-p-cresol (DBMC) were evaluated in a modified Local Lymph node Assay (LLNA), done under GLP and in accordance with current guidelines (OECD TG 429, OECD TG 406) (Bayer Schering Pharma AG 2010). Female NMRI mice (6 animal/ test substance group and 6 control animals) were evaluated to determine if there is any specific (sensitizing) or non-specific (irritant) stimulating potential of the test substance. The test substance was formulated in acetone/olive oil (4:1) and was administered epicutaneously onto the dorsal part of both ears (25 µl/ear) at concentration of 0, 2%, 10% and 50%. This treatment was repeated on three consecutive days. The animals were scarified one day after the last application and the lymphatic organs (the auricular lymph nodes) were removed and transferred into physiological saline (PBS). The weights of lymph nodes were determined; afterward the lymph nodes were crushed through a sieve and the cell count determined. The stimulation index was calculated by dividing the absolute number of weight or cell counts of the substance treated lymph nodes by the vehicle treated ones. Before the first treatment and before sacrifice the thickness of both auricles of the animals was measured. The ear weight of the sacrificed animals was measured using a punch to take of a piece of every ear with a diameter of 8 mm. The weights were determined on a semiautomatic balance The NMRI mice treated with the test substance 6,6’-di-tert-butyl-2,2’-methylendi-p-cresol did not show an increase in the stimulation indices for cell counts or for weights of the draining lymph nodes. The "positive level" which is 1.4 for the cell count index was not reached or exceeded in any dose group (cell count index: 1.0, 1.17, 1.16, 1.22 at 0, 2%, 10% or 50% test substance solution, respectively). The “positive level” of ear swelling, which is 2x 10-2 mm increase, i.e. about 10% of the control values, was not reached or exceeded in any treatment group. In addition, no substance specific effects were determined for ear weights. Based on the findings of this study, the author suggested that neither a non-specific (irritant) nor a specific immune stimulating (sensitizing) potential of the test substance was indicated.
Human information
In several patch-tests with contact dermatitis patients no or even few positive skin reactions were seen when patch-tested with 6,6’-di-tert-butyl-2,2’-methylendi-p-cresol (DBMC) (Wilson 1960, van Dijk 1968, Kanto 1985 and 1999).
Short description of key information:
The skin sensitizing potential of the test substance 6,6’-di-tert-butyl-2,2’-methylendi-p-cresol (DBMC) was evaluated in a modified Local Lymph node assay (Bayer Scherig Pharma AG 2010). Neither a non-specific (irritant) nor a specific immune stimulating (sensitizing) potential of the test substance was indicated in treated female NMRI mice.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
- Additional information:
No classification is required according to the classification criteria 67/548/EWG and regulation no. 1272/2008 (GHS).
Short description of key information:
No experimental data available; since no skin sensitization was observed in comprehensive studies, no respiratory sensitization is expected.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.