Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro DNA damage and/or repair study
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: DNA damage and/or repair
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Only secondary source.

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Triethylene Glycol and PEG-4
Author:
Anonymous
Year:
2006
Bibliographic source:
International Journal of Toxicology,25(Suppl. 2):121–138
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1986

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Sister-chromatid exchange assay.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of assay:
sister chromatid exchange assay in mammalian cells

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
2,2'-(ethylenedioxy)diethanol
EC Number:
203-953-2
EC Name:
2,2'-(ethylenedioxy)diethanol
Cas Number:
112-27-6
IUPAC Name:
2,2'-[ethane-1,2-diylbis(oxy)]diethanol
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Triethylene Glycol
- Analytical purity: no data

Method

Target gene:
no information available
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
50 mg/mL

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not specified
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: strain/cell type:
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative