Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 259-461-3 | CAS number: 55066-48-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1989-02-06 to 1989-03-20
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The study was performed in compliance with GLP, and to a method equivalent to the standardised guidelines OECD 474 and EU Method B.12 with some limitations were present in the study design. A different sampling regimen was used for the controls and lower dose to that recommended in the guideline, however the top dose used was compliant with the guideline, and no cytogenic effects were noted, the results were therefore considered suitable for assessment. The study was performed on a structural analogue of 3-methyl-5-phenylpentanol, the only difference between the two substances being the position of the methyl group. As such the results are considered to be representative of 3-methyl-5-phenylpentanol an accurate reflection of its cytogenicity.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 989
- Report date:
- 1989
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Sampling time for the lower dose groups and controls were only performed once. The highest dosing group third sample extended past 48 h post dosing.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 25634-93-9
- Cas Number:
- 25634-93-9
- IUPAC Name:
- 25634-93-9
- Reference substance name:
- 2-methyl-5-phenylpentanol
- EC Number:
- 405-890-8
- EC Name:
- 2-methyl-5-phenylpentanol
- IUPAC Name:
- 405-890-8
- Test material form:
- not specified
- Details on test material:
- - Storage condition of test material: Brown screw cap glass bottle
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: SAVO-Ivanovas, 7964 Kisslegg
- Age at study initiation: 6-10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 25-30 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Housing: five per cage in Makrolon cages
- Diet: standard laboratory diet ad libitum
- Water: tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least five days prior to use
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2 °C
- Humidity (%): ca. 55 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Artificial light was provided in a 12/12 h light/dark cycle.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: arachis oil
- Amount of vehicle: 10 mL/kg - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The compound was dissolved in arachis oil. The solution was freshly prepared just prior to use.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- A single exposure
- Frequency of treatment:
- A single exposure
- Post exposure period:
- 24, 48 or 72 h
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg dosed as 10 mL/kg
Basis:
nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Five males and five females per dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene (DMBA) and cyclophosphamide
- Route of administration: DMBA was administered per os in olive oil and cyclophosphamide was dosed via intraperitoneal injection in phosphate buffered saline.
- Doses / concentrations: 50 mg/kg
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow cells
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: An initial toxicity test demonstrated that the maximum tolerate dose was 1000 mg/kg
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields): Please refer to table 1 in the field "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables".
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
The animals were killed by cervical dislocation. Bone marrow was removed from both femurs by rinsing with foetal calf serum. Bone marrow cells were centrifuged at 150 g for 10 minutes and the supernatant discarded. Smears were made from the pellet on slides and air dried according to haematological routine. Two slides were made per animal.
The preparations were stained using the May-Gruenwald-Giemsa method.
- Stained for 3 minutes in undiluted May-Gruenwald solution
- Stain for 2 minutes in May-Gruenwald, diluted with distilled water 1:1
- Rinse briefly in distilled water
- Stain for 10 minutes in Giemsa, diluted with distilled water 1:6
- Rinse thoroughly in distilled water
- Dry in air, clean the back of the slides with methanol
- Clear in xylene for 5 minutes, and mount in Eukitt
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: The slides were observed under a microscope with a 100x oil immersion objective lens at 1250 fold magnification. At least 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes per animal were scored for the incidence of micronuclei. The number of micronucleated normochromatic erythrocytes were also recorded. The ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was determined for each animal by counting a total of 1000 erythrocytes. - Evaluation criteria:
- If the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes is determined and found to be significantly different from the control value, this is taken as an indication of cytotoxicity.
- Statistics:
- Statistical significance was determined according to the methods of Kastenbaum and Bowman (standard tables) (1970)
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- After dosing, the animals of all groups treated with the test substance showed reduced motility. The most pronounced effect in the highest dose group.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay): None of the different treatment times and dose levels studied produced any increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes.
- Ratio of PCE/NCE (for Micronucleus assay): The ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was normal
- Appropriateness of dose levels and route: The maximum tolerated dose was used as determined by the range finder test (details of which were not included as part of the report)
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 2: Results
Dose (mg/kg) |
Sampling time |
Sex |
No. of animals |
Ratio PE/NE |
Micronucleated PE (0/00) |
|
Mean ± S.D. |
(Min/Max) |
|||||
Control |
24 h |
Male |
5 |
1.45 |
1.59 ± 1.02 |
(0.00/3.00) |
Female |
5 |
1.57 |
1.79 ± 0.75 |
(0.99/2.99) |
||
250 |
24 h |
Male |
5 |
1.11 |
1.96 ± 0.62 |
(0.99/2.95) |
Female |
5 |
1.18 |
0.98 ± 0.62 |
(0.00/1.96) |
||
500 |
24 h |
Male |
5 |
1.39 |
1.37 ± 0.50 |
(0.89/1.98) |
Female |
5 |
1.07 |
1.57 ± 0.48 |
(0.99/1.99) |
||
1000 |
24 h |
Male |
5 |
1.61 |
2.38 ± 1.01 |
(0.98/3.96) |
Female |
5 |
2.02 |
1.39 ± 1.01 |
(0.00/2.98) |
||
1000 |
48 h |
Male |
5 |
1.45 |
1.39 ± 1.01 |
(0.00/2.98) |
Female |
5 |
1.57 |
1.39 ± 0.80 |
(0.00/1.99) |
||
1000 |
48 h |
Male |
5 |
1.81 |
1.97 ± 1.09 |
(0.99/3.98) |
Female |
5 |
1.98 |
1.39 ± 1.02 |
(0.00/2.99) |
||
DMBA 50 |
48 h |
Male |
5 |
1.20 |
12.16 ± 1.33 |
(9.98/14.00) |
Female |
5 |
1.06 |
9.55 ± 2.32 |
(6.94/12.90) |
||
CP 50 |
24 h |
Male |
5 |
1.08 |
24.65 ± 3.87 |
(18.88/28.36) |
Female |
5 |
0.99 |
29.98 ± 3.07 |
(25.74/33.46) |
||
DMBA: 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene CP: cyclophosphamide PE: polychromatic erythrocytes NE: normochromatic erythrocytes S.D.: Standard deviation p.o.: Administration per os i.p.: intraperitoneal injection |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Under the conditions of the test, it was concluded that the test substance did not induce chromosomal damage or damage to the mitotic apparatus in bone marrow cells of mice. The study was performed on a structural analogue of 3-methyl-5-phenylpentanol, the only difference between the two substances being the position of the methyl group. As such the results are considered to be representative of 3-methyl-5-phenylpentanol and an accurate reflection of its cytogenicity. - Executive summary:
In a GLP compliant study, conducted using a method similar to standardised guidelines OECD 474 and EU Method B.12 (with some minor deviations), the cytogenicity of the test substance was determined in male and female NMRI mice. The study was performed on a structural analogue of 3-methyl-5-phenylpentanol, the only difference between the two substances being the position of the methyl group. As such the results are considered to be representative of 3-methyl-5-phenylpentanol and an accurate reflection of its cytogenicity. Under the conditions of the test, it was concluded that the test substance did not induce chromosomal damage or damage to the mitotic apparatus.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
