Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-210-2 | CAS number: 7447-39-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 24 mg/kg bw/day
Additional information
- Adverse effects on sexual function and fertility in adult males and females
- Developmental toxicity in the offspring
Non human information
Available public domain studies on the fertility of copper, taken in isolation are of limited value to ascertain the reprotoxic potential copper compounds over multi-generations. These studies have been given lower quality criteria than those summarised above and should not be used for either risk assessment purposes or to classify copper compounds. However, the VRAR, 2008 provides a full review of these studies and the discussion on the unsuitability/unacceptability of these studies.
Method |
Results |
Remarks |
Reference |
rat (Crl:CD®(SD)IGS BR) male/female two-generation study oral: feed 0, 100, 500, 1000, 1500 ppm (nominal in diet) Exposure: Duration of exposure before mating: At least 70 days for both P1 and F1 animals. See Other information - Table 5. EPA OPPTS 870.3800 (Reproduction and Fertility Effects) OECD Guideline 416 (Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity Study) |
LOAEL (P): > 1500 ppm (male) based on: test mat. (No reproductive toxicity was seen at any concentration.) LOAEL (P): 1500 ppm (female) based on: test mat. (Decreased spleen weight in P1 adult females. No reproductive toxicity was seen at any concentration.) LOAEL (F1): 1500 ppm (male) based on: test mat. (Decreased spleen weight in F1 male weanlings. No reproductive toxicity was seen at any concentration.) LOAEL (F1): 1500 ppm (female) based on: test mat. (Decreased spleen weight in F1 female weanlings. No reproductive toxicity was seen at any concentration.) LOAEL (F2): 1500 ppm (male) based on: test mat. (Decreased spleen weight in F2 male weanlings.) LOAEL (F2): 1500 ppm (female) based on: test mat. (Decreased spleen weight in F2 female weanlings.) NOAEL (P): 1500 ppm (male) based on: test mat. (Equivalent to 23.6 mg Cu/kg bw/day for P1 males during premating.) NOAEL (P): 1000 ppm (female) based on: test mat. (No reproductive toxicity was seen at any concentration. Equivalent to 19.1, 17.0 and 33.8 mg Cu/kg bw/day for P1 females during premating, gestation and the first 2 weeks of lactation, respectively.) NOAEL (F1): 1000 ppm (male) based on: test mat. (No reproductive toxicity was seen at any concentration. Effects were seen in F1 weanlings. Equivalent to 23.5 mg Cu/kg bw/day for adults at 1000 ppm.) NOAEL (F1): 1000 ppm (female) based on: test mat. (No reproductive toxicity was seen at any concentration. Effects were seen in F1 weanlings. 1000 ppm is equivalent to 26.7, 17.1 and 35.2 mg Cu/kg bw/day for F1 females during premating, gestation and the first 2 weeks of lactation, respectively.) NOAEL (F2): 1000 ppm (male) based on: test mat. (No reproductive toxicity was seen at any concentration. Effects were seen in F2 weanlings.) NOAEL (F2): 1000 ppm (female) based on: test mat. (No reproductive toxicity was seen at any concentration. Effects were seen in F2 weanlings.) |
1 (reliable without restriction) key study experimental result Test material (common name): Cu2+ ascopper sulphate pentahydrate |
Mylchreest E. (2005) |
The results of Mylchreest, 2005 indicate that under the conditions of this study, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for reproductive toxicity was 1500 ppm, the highest concentration tested. The NOAEL for P1 and F1 rats and F1 and F2 offspring during lactation was 1000 ppm, based on reduced spleen weight in P1 adult females, and F1 and F2 male and female weanlings at 1500 ppm however the transient reduced spleen weights are not considered a reproductive endpoint as it did not affect growth or fertility.
In compliance with the “Definition of reproductive toxicity”, OECD document ENV/JM/MONO(2001)6 the spleen effect cannot be considered a reproductive effect as this must
include:
For a compound to be considered to be a reproductive toxin “data for animal studies ideally should provide clear evidence of specific reproductive toxicity in the absence of other, systemic, toxic effects”. Therefore as the results of this study do not indicate specific reproductive toxicity at the highest dose level tested, it is proposed that copper sulphate and copper are not classified as toxic to reproduction.
Short description of key information:
The two-generation study in the rat indicate that that under the conditions of this study, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for reproductive toxicity was 1500 ppm, the highest concentration tested. The NOAEL for P1 and F1 rats and F1 and F2 offspring during lactation was 1000 ppm, based on reduced spleen weight in P1 adult females, and F1 and F2 male and female weanlings at 1500 ppm however the transient reduced spleen weights are not considered a reproductive endpoint as it did not affect growth or fertility.
In compliance with the “Definition of reproductive toxicity”, OECD document ENV/JM/MONO(2001)6 the spleen effect cannot be considered a reproductive effect as this must include:
- Adverse effects on sexual function and fertility in adult males and females
- Developmental toxicity in the offspring
For a compound to be considered to be a reproductive toxin “data for animal studies ideally should provide clear evidence of specific reproductive toxicity in the absence of other, systemic, toxic effects”. Therefore as the results of this study do not indicate specific reproductive toxicity at the highest dose level tested, it is proposed that copper sulphate and, after read across, copper are not classified as reproductive compounds.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
The existing data base is sufficient to adequately evaluate the developmental toxicity of copper with particular reference to the newly available two-generation study in the rat.
It is therefore considered inappropriate to consider copper and copper compounds as potential teratogenic compounds due to the complex role of copper in regulating normal foetus development in humans at levels considered higher than would be expected to occur through the normal production and use of any copper compound.
Additional information
- Adverse effects on sexual function and fertility in adult males and females
- Developmental toxicity in the offspring
- pups survival, sex ratio, and survival indices during the lactation period, body weights and clinical observations during lactation,
- macroscopic examination of pups that died during the lactation period, of weanlings with external abnormalities or clinical signs and of randomly selected weanlings,
- microscopic observations of any gross findings and of liver and brain from randomly selected high-dose and control weanlings.
- Subchronic and chronic studies show no adverse effects on reproductive organs or endocrine functions,
- Copper salts show no indication of genotoxicity,
Non-human information
Method |
Results |
Remarks |
Reference |
rabbit (New Zealand White) oral: gavage 6, 9, or 18 mg Cu/kg bw/day (analytical conc.) Exposure: Duration of exposure: Day 7–28 of gestation. OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study) EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study) MAFF guideline 59 NohSan Np. 4200 (1985) EU Method B.31 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study) |
Maternal toxicity reported at 9 mg/kg bw/d (inappetance and initial weight loss) and 18 mg/kg bw/d (deaths, weight loss). Effects on fetus (increased incidence of some common skeletal variants and 9 and 18 mg/kg d.
NOAEL maternal toxicity 6 mg/kg bw/day
NOAEL teratogenicity 6 mg/kg bw/day
Results discussed in more detail below. |
1 (reliable without restriction) key study experimental result Test material (Common name): Copper hydroxide |
Munley, S.M. (2003a) |
In the developmental toxicity study (Munley 2003), groups of 22 female NZW rabbits were treated orally by gavage on days 7 to 28 of pregnancy with copper hydroxide (0, 6, 9 or 18 mg Cu/kg/bw/day). A preliminary range-finding test, conducted in non-pregnant rabbits, indicated there were no marked differences between several copper compounds (including copper hydroxide, copper (I) oxide and copper oxychloride) in terms of maternal toxicity. In the main study, maternal toxicity was evident at 9 and 18 mg Cu/kg/bw/day. Initial weight loss and reduced food intake occurred at 9 and 18 mg/kgBW/day, followed by partial recovery during the middle/late pregnancy. At the end of the study, bodyweight gain in these two groups was 31% and 72% lower than controls and total food consumption 17% and 30% lower than controls, respectively. Three deaths and two abortions occurred at 18 mg/kgBW/day which appeared to be related to treatment; necropsy of decedents and one aborted animal showed haemorrhagic and/or ulcerative changes in the stomach lining. No deaths occurred at 9 or 6 mg/kg/bw/day. At 9 mg/kg/bw/day, there were no abortions. At 6 mg/kg/bw/day, there was a single abortion on day 27. This abortion was not considered to be treatment-related in view of the absence of abortions at the higher dose level and earlier occurrence of abortions at 18 mg/kg/bw/day. At 6 mg/kg/bw/day, and bodyweight gain and food intake were only marginally lower than controls. There was no difference between treatment groups and controls in the number of pregnant females, or the number of females showing total resorption or with live offspring. There was no difference between treatment and control groups in the number of corpora lutea, implantations, embryonic deaths, live young or percentage of males in litter. At 18 mg/kg/bw/day, mean fetal weight was slightly lower than in controls (9% less). Four malformed fetuses occurred in the study: one with fused ribs (control group); one with ectopic kidney (6 mg/kg/bw/day); two with hemivertebra (18 mg/kg/bw/day). These malformations were all considered to be unrelated to treatment. With regard to fetal skeletal abnormalities, retarded ossification of pelvis and skull showed a slightly increased incidence at 18 mg/kg/bw/day and occurrence of extra ribs was increased at 9 and 18 mg/kg/bw/day compared to controls. It was noted that the occurrence of extra ribs was a common finding in all treatment groups, including the control group (64%, 67%, 80% and 87% incidence at 0, 6, 9 and 18 mg/kg/bw/d, respectively). With regard to fetal visceral abnormalities, none were recorded for any treatment or control group. In conclusion, this study demonstrated maternal toxicity (initial weight loss and reduced food intake) and effects on the fetus (increased incidence of a common skeletal abnormality) following oral exposure of rabbits to copper hydroxide at 9 mg Cu/kg/bw/day and above during pregnancy. There were no indications of fetal abnormalities associated with treatment at up to maternally toxic levels. The NOAEL for maternal toxicity and developmental effects in rabbits in this study was 6 mg Cu/kg/bw/day. Effects on the fetus were considered to be secondary to maternal toxicity and consequently not a specific effect of copper on reproduction.
Maternal toxicity, reported in this study at 9 mg/kg/bw/day, was represented by initial weight loss. These effects are considered to be local effects on the stomach in rabbits which result from gavage administration of copper hydroxide. Consequently, it is considered inappropriate to use data on maternal toxicity from this study as the basis of a repeat-dose NOAEL for copper.
With the addition of the multi generation study to the existing toxicology data base it is considered that sufficient information is now available to adequately evaluate the developmental toxicity potential of copper. The Mychreest, 2005 study (summarised above) is particularly relevant as the rat is considered the best animal model for evaluating the potential hazard effects on human populations.
The 2 generation oral reproduction study, performed in accordance with OECD test guideline 416, provides information on the effects of repeated exposure to the substance during all phases of the reproductive cycle including gestation. In particular, the study provides information on the reproductive parameters, and on development, growth and survival of offspring.
The NOAEL for reproductive toxicity was 1500 ppm, the highest concentration tested. The NOAEL for P1 and F1 rats and F1 and F2 offspring during lactation was 1000 ppm, based on reduced spleen weight in P1 adult females, and F1 and F2 male and female weanlings at 1500 ppm. However the transient reduced spleen weights were not considered a reproductive endpoint as it did not affect growth and fertility.
In compliance with the “Definition of reproductive toxicity”, OECD document ENV/JM/MONO(2001)6 the spleen effect cannot be considered a reproductive effect as this must include:
For a compound to be considered to be a reproductive toxin “data for animal studies ideally should provide clear evidence of specific reproductive toxicity in the absence of other, systemic, toxic effects”
The dietary concentration of 1000 ppm was equivalent to mean daily intakes of copper of 15.2-23.5 mg/kg body weight/day for male rats during premating and 17.0-35.2 mg/kg body weight/day for female rats during premating, gestation and the first 2 weeks of lactation.
Although the principal aim of this study was to investigate reproduction toxicity it also provides important information on the developmental toxicity potential of the test substance. Notably, investigation of F1 and F2 litters showed no test substance related effects on the following parameters:
It is therefore considered that all major manifestations of developmental toxicity (including mortality, structural abnormality, altered growth and functional deficiency) are adequately investigated in this study.
The results of the multigeneration study should also be interpreted in conjunction with the rest of the toxicology data base for copper. The following findings are considered relevant when evaluating the reproductive and developmental toxicity potential of the test substance:
It is also important to consider that copper is an essential element and many countries recommend an increased dietary intake of copper during pregnancy. This increased recommendation is because a foetus requires copper levels up to 10 times adult levels. The copper is absorbed across the placenta and is required for healthy growth and development, especially in blood maturation, bone development, heart development and function, brain development and function and the function of 20 key enzymes (Ralph & McArdle, 2001).
The existing toxicology data package therefore supports the conclusion that copper has no reproductive or developmental toxicity potential.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.