Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-065-8 | CAS number: 115-10-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 000
- Report date:
- 2000
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- S. typhimurium tester strain TA 97a using ICR 191 as a positive control was used as a substitute for strain(s) TA 97 and/or TA 1537; E.coli WP uvrA (pKM 101) was the only E.coli tester used. (validity of the study not affected-as reported)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: US EPA OPPTS Guidelines (Subpart H, 40CFR Part 799.9510, 1989)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Commission Directive 92/69/EEC, EEC Method B. 12
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Dimethyl ether
- EC Number:
- 204-065-8
- EC Name:
- Dimethyl ether
- Cas Number:
- 115-10-6
- Molecular formula:
- C2H6O
- IUPAC Name:
- dimethyl ether
- Details on test material:
- - Purity: 99.8%
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 1535 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA(pKM101)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First trial: 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 75%
[actual test substance conc: 16%, 22.5%, 31.4%, 35.4% , 40.1% in the absence of S9 and 18.9%, 25.7%, 32.6%, 40.2% , 60.7% in the presence of S9]
Second trial: 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 75% [actual test substance conc: 14.7%, 22.8%, 30.1%,, 42.9%, 61.3% in the absence of S9 and 15.5%, 22.9%, 32.8%, 48.4%, 68.3% in the presence of S9) - Vehicle / solvent:
- Air
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- filtered house-line air
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-nitrofluorene;N-Ethhyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine;sodium azide; ICR 191 Acridine mutagen; 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene; 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: top agar plate incorporation method for gases (2 mL, 0.6% agar w/v, 0.6% NaCl w/v)
DURATION - Exposure duration: 48 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 10E8 (0.1 mL culture)
The study consisted of 2 independent trials with and without a metabolic activation system. A third trial, utilizing S. typhimurium TA98 with S9 was used to confirm the results. Three replicates were plated for each tester strain, test concentration and condition. Treatments with activation were conducted by adding 0.1 mL of positive control (positive control only), 0.5 mL of S9 mix and 0.1 mL (containing 10E8 bacteria) of an overnight culture to 2 mL of top agar supplemented with 0.05 mM L-histidine and 0.05 mM D-biotin for S. typhimurium or 0.05 mM L-tryptophan for the E. coli strain. These components were briefly mixed and poured onto a minimal glucose agar plate. Treatments in the absence of the metabolic activation system were identical to those in the presence of an exogenous metabolic activation system with the exception that 0.5 mL of sterile buffer was used as a replacement for the 0.5 mL volume of the exogenous metabolic activation system.
Plates were exposed to dilutions of the test gas after being placed on stainless steel racks specially designed to fit in 6-L glass chambers. Chambers were equipped with Teflon stopcocks and Viton o-ring gaskets. As gases, the test substance and filtered air flows were regulated using individual rotameters, and mixed prior to entry into chambers. A flow rate of approximately 6 L/minute for 5 minutes was used to create 5 volume changes to occur within the chambers to ensure homogeneous concentrations. Chambers were closed and 2-4 samplings of each chamber were taken and analyzed by GC to determine initial concentration of the test substance. Chambers were placed into an incubator at approximately 37°C for approximately 48 hours. Chambers were again sampled and analyzed to determine the ending test substance concentrations. The chambers were flushed with at least 5 chamber volumes of filtered air. The plates were then removed and refrigerated until evaluation.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
Bacterial background lawns were evaluated for evidence of test substance toxicity and precipitation. - Evaluation criteria:
- Any individual assay must have included a negative and positive control and at least three concentration levels per test substance for each tester strain and condition. A data point was excluded from analysis when acceptability criteria were not met. Such criteria are clearly defined as: tester strain integrity; tester strain titer; positive control values; revertant toxicity; rejection of plates, concentration levels, or assay.
Positive and negative classification are clearly stated in the classification criteria and are based on number of revertants in strains compared to the concurrent negative control. The test substance was classified as positive if the mean number of revertants in any strain (except TA1535) at any test substance concentration was at least two times greater than the mean number of revertants of the concurrent negative control, and there was a concentration-related increase in the mean number of revertants per plate in that same strain. For strain TA1535, there must have been a mean number of revertants that was at least three times greater than the mean of its concurrent negative control and a concentration-related increase in the mean number of revertants per plate. A test substance was classified as negative if all positive classification criteria for all strain were not met. Results not meeting criteria for either positive or negative classification were evaluated using scientific judgment and experience and may have been reported as equivocal. - Statistics:
- Data for each tester strain were evaluated independently: the mean number of revertants and the standard deviation at each concentration in the presence of and absence of metabolic activation were calculated.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 97a
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: no test substance related precipitate was observed at any concentration with any strain in any trial.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Historical control data are reported for tester strains used in the report study. Data reported are based on studies conducted in the period 1996-1998. All control solvents or diluents, metabolic activation based on Aroclor-induced rat liver S9 and all forms of study modification are included. The mean number of revertants observed in the negative control for each strain was within the prescribed acceptable historical control range.
Results:
In the first trial, there was an apparent leakage in one chamber at the high dose without S9. The other chamber concentrations decreased approximately 50% from the mean at 0-hr and 48-hr. Test substance-related toxicity, as evident by a concentration dependent reduction in mean revertant colonies per plate, was observed in all tester strains except S. typhimurium strains TA100 and TA1535 without S9. No evidence of mutagenicity was observed.
In a second trial, test substance related toxicity, as evidenced by a concentration-related reduction in the mean number of revertants per plate, was observed with all tester strains in the presence and absence of the metabolic activation system. The chamber concentrations were again decreased approximately 36% after 48 hours. Due to an equivocal response in S. typhimurium TA98 in the presence of S9 in trial 2, tester strain TA98 with a metabolic activation system was repeated. At one concentration level of strain TA98, a doubling of the mean revertant plate count was observed compared to the mean of the concurrent negative control. There was no concentration-related increase in the tester strain, and therefore the data was judged inconclusive.
A third trial was conducted with only TA98 with S9 at target concentrations of 45%, 55%, and 65%, again with a mean decrease in chamber concentration of 22% with no apparent chamber leakage. As this repeat of trial 2 was negative, again with evidence of toxicity, the conclusion that trial 2 also exhibited no evidence of mutagenicity was affirmed.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Trial #1 (Without Activation)
|
(Histidine) + Revertants Per Plate |
||||
Strain TA97a |
Strain TA98 |
Strain TA100 |
Strain TA1535 |
Strain E. coli pKM101 |
|
DME (target concentration) |
|
|
|
|
|
0 % |
137 |
18 |
123 |
12 |
187 |
20 % |
122 |
16 |
127 |
16 |
136 |
30% |
108 |
14 |
121 |
15 |
146 |
40% |
88 |
10 |
101 |
13 |
68 |
50% |
93 |
4 |
90 |
16 |
79 |
75% |
71 |
8 |
108 |
14 |
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICR 191 (2 ug/plate) |
2208 |
|
|
|
|
2NF(25 ug/plate) |
|
1215 |
|
|
|
NAAZ(2 ug/plate) |
|
|
658 |
588 |
|
ENNG(2 ug/plate) |
|
|
|
|
1493 |
Trial #1 (With Activation)
|
(Histidine) + Revertants Per Plate |
||||
Strain TA97a |
Strain TA98 |
Strain TA100 |
Strain TA1535 |
Strain E. coli pKM101 |
|
DME (target concentration) |
|
|
|
|
|
0 % |
172 |
20 |
167 |
18 |
167 |
20 % |
178 |
18 |
152 |
17 |
179 |
30% |
149 |
15 |
139 |
13 |
146 |
40% |
173 |
13 |
138 |
15 |
98 |
50% |
140 |
12 |
129 |
9 |
83 |
75% |
63 |
4 |
115 |
9 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DMBA(20 ug/plate) |
1076 |
|
|
|
|
2AA(2 ug/plate) |
|
1206 |
1839 |
287 |
1416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trial #2 (Without Activation)
|
(Histidine) + Revertants Per Plate |
||||
Strain TA97a |
Strain TA98 |
Strain TA100 |
Strain TA1535 |
Strain E. coli pKM101 |
|
DME (target concentration) |
|
|
|
|
|
0 % |
145 |
30 |
133 |
23 |
202 |
20 % |
130 |
26 |
136 |
24 |
171 |
30% |
140 |
19 |
133 |
22 |
164 |
40% |
92 |
38 |
112 |
24 |
109 |
50% |
33 |
31 |
100 |
26 |
33 |
75% |
2 |
0 |
31 |
12 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICR 191(2 ug/plate) |
2695 |
|
|
|
|
2NF(25 ug/plate) |
|
1441 |
|
|
|
NAAZ(2 ug/plate) |
|
|
1008 |
872 |
|
ENNG(2 ug/plate) |
|
|
|
|
1714 |
Trial #2 (With Activation)
|
(Histidine) + Revertants Per Plate |
||||
Strain TA97a |
Strain TA98 |
Strain TA100 |
Strain TA1535 |
Strain E. coli pKM101 |
|
DME (target concentration) |
|
|
|
|
|
0 % |
178 |
23 |
152 |
21 |
210 |
20 % |
194 |
23 |
151 |
17 |
207 |
30% |
148 |
25 |
144 |
33 |
159 |
40% |
161 |
25 |
133 |
16 |
102 |
50% |
32 |
48 |
110 |
37 |
26 |
75% |
0 |
13 |
45 |
12 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DMBA(20 ug/plate) |
1503 |
|
|
|
|
2AA(2 ug/plate) |
|
1192 |
1778 |
265 |
1798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trial #3 (With Activation)
|
|
|
Strain TA98 |
|
|
DME |
|
|
0 % |
25 |
|
45% |
15 |
|
55% |
8 |
|
65% |
4 |
|
|
|
|
2AA |
|
|
25 ug/plate |
1043 |
|
|
|
|
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the study, no evidence of mutagenic activity was detected in either trial with the substance. Based on the findings, the test substance was concluded to be negative for the induction of mutagenicity in the bacterial reverse mutation test in Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli, with and without metabolic activation. The study and the conclusions fulfil the quality criteria (validity, reliability, repeatability).
- Executive summary:
The test substance was evaluated in the bacterial reverse mutation test using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA1535, and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA (pKM101) in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system at target concentrations of 0, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 75%.
Under the conditions of the study, no evidence of mutagenic activity was detected in either trial with the substance. Based on the findings, the test substance was concluded to be negative for the induction of mutagenicity in the bacterial reverse mutation test in Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli, with and without metabolic activation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
