Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-275-7 | CAS number: 105-16-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 4.41 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: ECHA REACH Guidance and ECETOC Technical Report No. 110
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 10
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 44.08 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- There are no relevant experimental data on repeated exposure by inhalation. The recommended approach using oral data and assuming the same absorption for inhalation and oral route is used.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- The default extrapolation factor for exposure duration is used: subchronic (starting point) to chronic (end point).
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Respiratory interspecies differences are fully covered by the factors used for route to route extrapolation.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- The effects observed at the next higher dose of 150 mg/kg were slight and without histological correlate
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Intraspecies differences of worker are considered to be fully covered by the selected factor.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 12.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: ECHA REACH Guidance and ECETOC Technical Report No. 110
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 40
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No route to route extrapolation is necessary since a repeated dose dermal toxicity study is available.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- The default extrapolation factor for exposure duration is used: subchronic starting point) to chronic (end point).
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- The default allometric scaling factor for the differences between rats and humans is used.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- The effects observed at the next higher dose of 150 mg/kg were slight and without histological correlate
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Intraspecies differences of worker are considered to be fully covered by the selected factor.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
General
DNEL derivation for the test substance is performed under consideration of the recommendations of ECHA REACH Guidance (2012) and ECETOC (2010). In view of the data used for evaluation, the "quality of whole database factors" and "dose-response factors" are considered to amount each to a value of 1, and are thus not shown in the calculations presented below.
Long-term exposure – systemic effects, Inhalation exposure:
In order to derive a long-term inhalation DNEL, an inhalation NOEC was derived from NOEL oral value (determined in a combined repeated dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity test with rats), as no repeated dose inhalation study was available. Oral NOEL of 50 mg/kg bw/day was converted to an inhalation NOEC, assuming 100% absorption via the lung and 50 % absorption via the oral route.
The oral NO(A)EL was converted into an inhalation NO(A)EC according to the following formula assuming a daily exposure period of 8 hours during light activity:
- Modification of the starting point
Relevant dose descriptor (NOAEL): 50 mg/kg bw/day
Standard respiratory volume of the rat (sRVrat) for 8 hours: 0.38 m³/kg bw/day
Oral absorption of the rat / inhalation absorption of humans (ABSoral-rat / ABSinh-human): 0.5
Standard respiratory volume of humans (sRVhuman) for 8 hours: 6.7 m³
Worker respiratory volume (wRV) for 8 hours with light physical activity: 10 m³
Corrected inhalatory NOAEC for workers
= 50 mg/kg bw/day × (1 / 0.38 m³/kg bw/day) × 0.5 × (6.7 m³/10 m³)
= 44.08 mg/m³
- Calculation of the worker DNEL
Corrected inhalatory NOAEC for workers: 44.08 mg/m³
Assessment factor for exposure duration (subchronic to chronic): 2
Assessment factor for other interspecies differences: 1 (The effects observed at the next higher dose of 150 mg/kg were slight and without histological correlate)
Assessment factor for intraspecies differences (worker): 5
Worker DNEL (long-term inhalation exposure) 4.41 mg/m³
Long-term exposure – systemic effects, dermal exposure:
In order to derive a long-term dermal DNEL, an dermal NOEL was derived from NOEL oral value (determined in a combined repeated dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity test with rats), as no repeated dose dermal study was available. Oral NOEL of 50 mg/kg bw/day was converted to an dermal NOEL, considering a conservative 10 % absorption through the skin (ECHA document R.7C, 2008, 7.12)
NOEL (long-term dermal) = 50 mg/kg bw /d x 100 : 10 = 500 mg/kg bw/d
Taking in account the appropriate modification and assessment factors, the worker DNEL (long-term dermal exposure) is calculated as follows:
Relevant dose descriptor (NOAEL): 500 mg/kg bw/day
Exposure duration factor (subchronic to chronic): 2
Allometric scaling factor (rat-to-human): 4
Assessment factor for other interspecies differences: 1 (The effects observed at the next higher dose of 150 mg/kg were slight and without histological correlate)
Assessment factor for intraspecies differences (worker): 5
Worker DNEL (long-term dermal exposure): 12.5 mg/kg bw/day
References
- ECHA (2012). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.09 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: ECHA REACH Guidance and ECETOC Technical Report No. 110
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 20
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 21.74 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- There are no relevant experimental data on repeated exposure by inhalation. The recommended approach using oral data and assuming the same absorption for inhalation and oral route is used.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- The default extrapolation factor for exposure duration is used: subchronic (starting point) to chronic (end point).
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Respiratory interspecies differences are fully covered by the factors used for route to route extrapolation.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- The effects observed at the next higher dose of 150 mg/kg were slight and without histological correlate
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Intraspecies differences of general population are considered to be fully covered by the selected factor.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 6.25 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: ECHA REACH Guidance and ECETOC Technical Report No. 110
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 80
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No route to route extrapolation is necessary since a repeated dose dermal toxicity study is available.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- The default extrapolation factor for exposure duration is used: subchronic (starting point) to chronic (end point).
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- The default allometric scaling factor for the differences between rats and humans is used.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- The effects observed at the next higher dose of 150 mg/kg were slight and without histological correlate
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Intraspecies differences of general population are considered to be fully covered by the selected factor.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.625 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: ECHA REACH Guidance and ECETOC Technical Report No. 110
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 80
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No route to route extrapolation is necessary since a combined repeat dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test is available.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- The default extrapolation factor for exposure duration is used: subchronic (starting point) to chronic (end point).
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- The default allometric scaling factor for the differences between rats and humans is used.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- The effects observed at the next higher dose of 150 mg/kg were slight and without histological correlate
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Intraspecies differences of general population are considered to be fully covered by the selected factor.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - General Population
General
DNEL derivation for the test substance is performed under consideration of the recommendations of ECHA REACH Guidance (2012) and ECETOC (2010). In view of the data used for evaluation, the "quality of whole database factors" and "dose-response factors" are considered to amount each to a value of 1, and are thus not shown in the calculations presented below.
Long-term exposure – systemic effects, inhalation exposure:
In order to derive the general population DNEL (long-term inhalation exposure), the NOEL assessed in combined repeated dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity test with rats was identified as the relevant dose descriptor (NOEL = 50 mg/kg bw/d). Considering the appropriate modification and assessment factors, the general population DNEL (long-term, inhalation exposure) is calculated as follows:
- Modification of the starting point
Relevant dose descriptor (NOEL): 50 mg/kg bw/ day
Standard respiratory volume of the rat (sRVrat) for 24 hours: 1.15 m³/kg bw/day
Oral absorption of the rat / inhalation absorption of humans (ABSoral-rat / ABSinh-human): 0.5
Corrected inhalatory LOAEC for the general population
= 50 mg/kg bw/day x (1 / 1.15 m³/kg bw/day) x 0.5 = 21.74 mg/m³
- Calculation of the general population DNEL
Corrected inhalatory NOEC for general population: 21.74 mg/m³
Assessment factor for other interspecies differences: 1 (The effects observed at the next higher dose of 150 mg/kg were slight and without histological correlate)
Assessment factor for intraspecies differences (general population): 10
Assessment factor for duration of exposure (subchronic to chronic): 2
General Population DNEL (long-term inhalation exposure) : 1.09 mg/m3
Long-term exposure – systemic effects, dermal exposure:
In order to derive a long-term dermal DNEL, an dermal NOEL was derived from NOEL oral value (determined in a combined repeated dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity test with rats), as no repeated dose dermal study was available. Oral NOEL of 50 mg/kg bw/day was converted to an dermal NOEL,considering a conservative 10 % absorption through the skin (ECHA document R.7C, 2008, 7.12)
NOEL (long-term dermal) = 50 mg/kg bw/d x 100 : 10 = 500 mg/kg bw/d
Taking in account the appropriate modification and assessment factors, the worker DNEL (long-term dermal exposure) is calculated as follows:
Relevant dose descriptor (NOAEL): 500 mg/kg bw/day
Exposure duration factor (subchronic to chronic): 2
Allometric scaling factor (rat-to-human): 4
Assessment factor for other interspecies differences: 1 (The effects observed at the next higher dose of 150 mg/kg were slight and without histological correlate)
Assessment factor for intraspecies differences (general population): 10
General Population DNEL (long-term dermal exposure) : 6.25 mg/kg
Long-term exposure – systemic effects, oral exposure:
In order to derive the general population DNEL (long-term oral exposure), the NOEL assessed in a combined repeated dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity test with rats was identified as the relevant dose descriptor (NOEL = 50 mg/kg bw/day). Considering the appropriate modification and assessment factors, the general population DNEL (long-term dermal exposure) is calculated as follows: .
Dose descriptor of relevant study: 50 mg/kg bw/day (NOEL)
Assessment factor of duration of exposure (subchronic to chronic): 2
Assessment factor for interspecies (allometric scaling): 4
Assessment factor for other interspecies differences: 1 (The effects observed at the next higher dose of 150 mg/kg were slight and without histological correlate)
Assessment factor for intraspecies differences (general population): 10
General Population DNEL (long-term dermal exposure) 0.625 mg/kg
References
- ECHA (2012). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.