Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-528-7 | CAS number: 142-22-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- March 25 - April 29, 1993
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- minor deviations from standard test guidelines and minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant result.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 D (Ready Biodegradability: Closed Bottle Test)
- Version / remarks:
- A minor deviation of the test procedures described in the guidelines was introduced: instead of an effluent/extract/mixture, activated sludge was used as an inoculum. The activated sludge was preconditioned to reduce the endogenous respiration rates. To this end, the sludge (200 mg Dry Weight (DW/l) was aerated for one week. The sludge was diluted to a concentration of 2 mg DW/l in the BOD bottles. This method was described in a proposal for harmonizing ready biodegradability test protocols [J. Blok, A. de Morsier, P. Gerike, L. Reynolds and H. Wellens: 'Harmonisation of ready biodegradability tests'. Chemosphere 14 (1985) 1805-1820)].
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- please refer to 'Version/remarks'
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.6 (Degradation: Chemical Oxygen Demand)
- Version / remarks:
- A minor deviation of the test procedures described in the guidelines was introduced: instead of an effluent/extract/mixture, activated sludge was used as an inoculum. The activated sludge was preconditioned to reduce the endogenous respiration rates. To this end, the sludge (200 mg Dry Weight (DW/l) was aerated for one week. The sludge was diluted to a concentration of 2 mg DW/l in the BOD bottles. This method was described in a proposal for harmonizing ready biodegradability test protocols [J. Blok, A. de Morsier, P. Gerike, L. Reynolds and H. Wellens: 'Harmonisation of ready biodegradability tests'. Chemosphere 14 (1985) 1805-1820)].
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- please refer to 'Version/remarks'
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ISO/TC 147/SC 5WG 4N152; German proposal for an ISO-standard. Water quality evaluation in an aqueous medium of the 'ultimate' aerobic biodegradability of organic compounds. Method by analysis of biochemical oxygen demand (closed bottle test).
- Version / remarks:
- A minor deviation of the test procedures described in the guidelines was introduced: instead of an effluent/extract/mixture, activated sludge was used as an inoculum. The activated sludge was preconditioned to reduce the endogenous respiration rates. To this end, the sludge (200 mg Dry Weight (DW/l) was aerated for one week. The sludge was diluted to a concentration of 2 mg DW/l in the BOD bottles. This method was described in a proposal for harmonizing ready biodegradability test protocols [J. Blok, A. de Morsier, P. Gerike, L. Reynolds and H. Wellens: 'Harmonisation of ready biodegradability tests'. Chemosphere 14 (1985) 1805-1820)].
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- please refer to 'Version/remarks'
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Akzo Research Laboratories Arnhem
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic, adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge (e.g. location, sampling depth, contamination history, procedure): WWTP Nieuwgraaf in Duiven, Netherlands; the WWTP Nieuwgraaf is an activated sludge plant treating predominantly domestic waste water.
- Laboratory culture: not applicable
- Method of cultivation: no data
- Storage conditions: no data
- Storage length: no data
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: instead of an effluent/extract/mixture, activated sludge was used as an inoculum. The activated sludge was preconditioned to reduce the endogenous respiration rates.
- Pretreatment: the sludge (200 mg Dry Weight (DWJ/l) was aerated for one week
- Concentration of sludge: the sludge was diluted to a concentration of 2 mg DW/l in the BOD bottles.
- Water filtered: no - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 2 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- O2 consumption
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: 8.5 mg KH2PO4 21.75 mg K2HPO4 33.3 mg Na2HP04»2H20, 22.5 mg MgSO4x7H20, 27.5 mg CaCl2, 0.25 mg FeCl3x6H20; ammonium chloride was omitted from the medium to prevent nitrification.
- Additional substrate: no
- Solubilising agent (type and concentration if used): no
- Test temperature: 21°C ± 1°C
- pH: The pH of the media was 6.9 at the start of the test. The pH of the medium at day 28 is 6.4 to 6.5.
- pH adjusted: no
- CEC (meq/100 g): no data
- Aeration of dilution water: 24h
- Suspended solids concentration: 2 mg DW/l (inoculum)
- Continuous darkness: yes
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: BOD flasks
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: 10 bottles containing only inoculum, 10 bottles containing test substance and inoculum, and 6 bottles
containing sodium acetate and inoculum.
- Method used to create aerobic conditions: aeration of test water
- Measuring equipment: for determination of dissolved oxygen concentration oxygen electrode (WTW Trioxmatic EO 200) and meter (WTW OXI 530);
the pH was measured using a pH meter (Consort P207); the temperature was measured and recorded with a Control One (IBT, Rotterdam,
Netherlands).
- Test performed in closed vessels: yes
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: day 7, 14,21, and 28
- Sampling method: two duplicate bottles of all series were withdrawn for analyses of the dissolved oxygen concentration
- Sample storage before analysis: no data
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: yes
- Abiotic sterile control: not measured
- Toxicity control: not measured
STATISTICAL METHODS: none - Reference substance:
- acetic acid, sodium salt
- Preliminary study:
- not performed
- Test performance:
- The test was performed in 250 to 300 ml BOD (biological oxygen demand) bottles with glass stoppers. Use was made of 10 bottles containing only inoculum, 10 bottles containing test substance and inoculum, and 6 bottles containing sodium acetate and inoculum. The concentrations of the test compound and sodium acetate in the bottles were 2.0 and 6.7 mg/l, respectively. The inoculum was diluted to 2 mg DW/l in the closed bottles. Each of the prepared solutions was dispensed into the respective group of BOD bottles so that all bottles were completely filled without air bubbles. The zero time bottles were immediately analysed for dissolved oxygen using an oxygen electrode. The remaining bottles were closed and incubated at 21°C ± 1°C in the dark. Two duplicate bottles of all series were withdrawn for analyses of the dissolved oxygen concentration at day 7, 14,21, and 28.
- Parameter:
- % degradation (O2 consumption)
- Value:
- 86
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- The validity of the test is demonstrated by an endogenous respiration of 1.1 mg/l at day 28 (Table I). Furthermore, the differences of the replicate values of the control at day 28 were less than 20%. The biodegradation percentage of the reference compound, sodium acetate, at day 14 was 81. Finally, the validity of the test is shown by oxygen concentrations >0.5 mg/l in all bottles during the test period.
- Results with reference substance:
- The biodegradation percentage of the reference compound, sodium acetate, at day 14 was 81.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test substance is biodegraded 86% at day 28 in the closed bottle test and should therefore be classified as readily biodegradable.
- Executive summary:
The ready biodegradability was determined in the closed bottle test performed according to slightly modified OECD (301D), EEC (C.6) and ISO Test Guidelines.
The test substance caused no reduction in the endogenous respiration. Therefore, Nouryset 200 is considered to be non-inhibitory to the inoculum.
Nouryset 200 was biodegraded 86% at day 28 in the closed bottle test. Hence this compound should be classified as readily biodegradable.
The test is valid as shown by an endogenous respiration of 1.1 mg/1 and by the total mineralization of the reference compound, sodium acetate. Sodium acetate was degraded 81% of its theoretical oxygen demand after 14 days. Finally, the most important criterion was met by oxygen concentrations >0.5 mg/l in all bottles during the test period.
Reference
Description of key information
readily biodegradable: 86 % in 28 days (OECD 301D) and 73.2 % in 28 days (OECD 301D), respectively
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- readily biodegradable
- Type of water:
- freshwater
Additional information
This endpoint is filled from data from two adequate ready biodegradability closed bottle tests (van Cinkel, 1993; unknown, 1994). Results of these two OECD guideline studies (OECD 301D) indicate that 'diallyl 2,2'-oxydiethyl dicarbonate' is readily biodegradable. The biodegradability of the test material on day 28 was 86 % and 73.2 %, respectively.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.