Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 240-957-3 | CAS number: 16909-22-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2016-05-19 to 2016-06-01
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 016
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
- Version / remarks:
- adpted July 26, 2013
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
- Version / remarks:
- December 09, 2010
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Tetraethylammonium benzoate
- EC Number:
- 240-957-3
- EC Name:
- Tetraethylammonium benzoate
- Cas Number:
- 16909-22-1
- Molecular formula:
- C8H20N.C7H5O2
- IUPAC Name:
- tetraethylazanium benzoate
- Test material form:
- other: liquid (solution)
- Details on test material:
- tetraethylammonium benzoate manufactured by Evonik Degussa GmbH, batch BRA 1434, purity 94.4 w/w (excluding solvent)
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- The test item was suspended in a 0.9% sodium chloride solution with a final concentration of 20% (w/v).
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- cattle
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Bovine eyes from cattle in the age range of 6 to 12 months were obtained from a slaughterhouse. To minimize deterioration and bacterial
contamination, on collection the eyes were completely submerged in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution2 (HBSS) containing penicillin at 100 IU/mL and streptomycin at 100 µg/mL . Upon arrival at the laboratory, the eyes were examined for defects such as but not limited to increased opacity, scratches, and neovascularisation.
Only corneas from eyes free of defects were used.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- physiological saline
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 750 µl test item, 20% suspension in 0.9% sodium chloride solution (w/v)
750 µl solvent control item, 0.9% sodium chloride solution
750 µl positive control item, 20% Imidazole (CAS no. 288-32-4) in 0.9% sodium chloride solution - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Exposure period: 240 minutes
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- After rinsing the corneas were incubated at 32°C ± 1°C for 90 ± 5 minutes. After this post incubation period, the corneas were examined.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Three corneas were used for each treatment group (test item, solvent control and positive control).
- Details on study design:
- PREPARATION OF BOVINE EYES
- Corneas were dissected with a 2 to 3 mm rim of sclera and mounted in corneal holders with anterior (epithelium) and posterior (endothelium)
chambers
- The chambers were filled to excess with pre-warmed Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM)
- Corneal holder was equilibrated at 32 ± 1°C for at least one hour
- After equilibration period, fresh pre-warmed EMEM was added to both chambers
- Baseline opacity readings were taken for each cornea. Corneas exhibiting macroscopic tissue damage (e.g. scratches, pigmentation,
neovascularisation) or an opacity >7 opacity units were discarded
- Mean opacity of all equilibrated corneas was calculated by use of an opacitometer
- A minimum of three corneas with opacity values close to the median value for all corneas were selected as negative control corneas
- The remaining corneas were then distributed into treatment, solvent and positive control groups
ADMINISTRATION
- Three corneas were used for each treatment group
Negative control item: 0.9% sodium chloride solution
Positive control item: 20% Imidazole (CAS no. 288-32-4) in 0.9% sodium chloride solution
Test item: 20% suspension in 0.9% sodium chloride solution (w/v)
- Exposure period: 240 minutes
- After the exposure period of 240 minutes (the recommended exposure time for non-surfactant solids) the test item, the solvent control, the negative and positive controls, were removed from each chamber.
- Subsequently, the epithelium was washed with EMEM containing phenol red at least three times.
- Washing was repeated until no test item or discolouration (yellow or purple) of phenol red was visible.
- The corneas were rinsed a final time with EMEM only to remove any remaining phenol red from the chamber.
- The chamber was then filled with EMEM without phenol red.
EXAMINATION
- Corneal injury was assessed by evaluating the opacity and permeability of the cornea
- Corneal opacity was determined by the amount of light transmission through the cornea measured quantitatively with the aid of an opacitometer
resulting in opacity values measured on a continuous scale
- To determine the corneal permeability 1 mL sodium fluorescein solution (5 mg/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride solution) was added to the anterior
chamber (epithelial surface) while the posterior chamber (endothelial surface) was refilled with fresh EMEM
- The holder was incubated in a horizontal position at 32 ± 1°C for 90 ± 5 minutes
- Amount of sodium fluorescein that crossed from the anterior to the posterior chamber was measured quantitatively using a microplate reader
(Tecan Sunrise Magellan Version 6.412).
- Measurements at 490 nm were recorded as optical density (OD490).
- The fluorescein permeability values were determined using OD490 values based upon a visible light spectrophotometer (Tecan Sunrise) using a standard 1 cm path length.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- BOVINE CORNEAL OPACITY AND PERMEABILITY TEST
- Value:
- 0.302
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for solvent control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes
- Range of historical values if different from the ones specified in the test guideline: yes
Any other information on results incl. tables
Opacity Values
|
Cornea No. |
Opacity [Opacity Units] |
Corrected Opacity |
||
|
Mean of group |
Standard deviation |
|||
0.9% NaCl |
1 |
-0.877 |
-0.824 |
-0.824 |
0.092 |
2 |
-0.718 |
||||
3 |
-0.876 |
||||
20% Imidazol
|
4 |
88.566 |
89.390 |
78.354 |
20.510 |
5 |
53.865 |
54.689 |
|||
6 |
90.160 |
90.984 |
|||
20% Test item |
7 |
-0.518 |
0.306 |
0.452 |
0.476 |
8 |
0.160 |
0.984 |
|||
9 |
-0.757 |
0.067 |
Permeability OD Values (490 nm)
|
Cornea no. |
Permeability
|
Mean of Tripli- cates |
Corrected Permeability [OD] |
||||
|
Per Cornea |
Per Group |
||||||
|
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
||||
0.9% NaCl |
1 |
0.030 |
0.030 |
- |
|
|
0.025 |
0.010 |
0.029 |
- |
|
|
|||||
0.030 |
- |
0.030 |
0.001 |
|||||
2 |
0.013 |
0.013 |
- |
0.013 |
0.001 |
|||
0.013 |
- |
|||||||
0.012 |
- |
|||||||
3 |
0.030 |
0.032 |
- |
0.032 |
0.002 |
|||
0.033 |
- |
|||||||
0.033 |
- |
|||||||
20% Imidazol
|
4 |
1.582 |
1.601 |
1.557 |
1.576 |
0.017 |
1.736 |
0.139 |
1.604 |
1.579 |
|||||||
1.616 |
1.591 |
|||||||
5 |
1.840 |
1.835 |
1.815 |
1.810 |
0.014 |
|||
1.820 |
1.795 |
|||||||
1.846 |
1.821 |
|||||||
6 |
1.832 |
1.847 |
1.807 |
1.822 |
0.022 |
|||
1.838 |
1.813 |
|||||||
1.872 |
1.847 |
|||||||
20% Test item |
7 |
0.007 |
0.006 |
-0.018 |
-0.019 |
0.001 |
-0.010 |
0.017 |
0.006 |
-0.019 |
|||||||
0.005 |
-0.020 |
|||||||
8 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
-0.021 |
-0.021 |
0.001 |
|||
0.005 |
-0.020 |
|||||||
0.003 |
-0.022 |
|||||||
9 |
0.036 |
0.035 |
0.011 |
0.010 |
0.002 |
|||
0.036 |
0.011 |
|||||||
0.032 |
0.007 |
SD : standard deviation
OD : optical density
In vitro irritancy score (IVIS)
|
Cornea No. |
Opacity |
Permeability |
IVIS |
||
Per Cornea |
Per Group |
|||||
Mean |
SD |
|||||
0.9% NaCl |
1 |
-0.877 |
0.030 |
-0.427 |
-0.449 |
0.066 |
2 |
-0.718 |
0.013 |
-0.523 |
|||
3 |
-0.876 |
0.032 |
-0.396 |
|||
20% Imidazol |
4 |
89.390 |
1.576 |
113.030 |
104.394 |
19.711 |
5 |
54.689 |
1.810 |
81.839 |
|||
6 |
90.984 |
1.822 |
118.314 |
|||
20% Test item |
7 |
0.306 |
-0.019 |
0.021 |
0.302 |
0.332 |
8 |
0.984 |
-0.021 |
0.669 |
|||
9 |
0.067 |
0.010 |
0.217 |
SD : standard deviation
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the present test conditions test item, tested in the in vitro BCOP test method, had an IVIS value of 0.302, which is below the cut-off value of 3 (UN GHS no category) and consequently it is not classified as a severe irritant and is not corrosive according to UN GHS classification.
- Executive summary:
The purpose of this study was to determinea possible potency of test item of being'ocular corrosive and severe irritant'employing an in vitro system.
The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Assay (BCOP) test method is an organotypic model that provides short-term maintenance of normal physiological and biochemical function of the bovine corneain vitro. In this test method, possible damage by the test item was assessed by quantitative measurements of changes in corneal opacity and permeability inisolated corneas from bovine eyes.
Corneal opacity was measured quantitatively as the amount of light transmission through the cornea. Permeability was measured quantitatively as the amount of sodium fluorescein dye that passes across the full thickness of the cornea, as detected in the medium in the posterior chamber.The measurements were used to calculate an in vitro irritancy score (IVIS), which was used to assign an in vitro irritancy hazard classification category for prediction of the in vivo ocular irritation potential of the test item.
Three corneas were used for each treatment group (test item, solvent control and positive control). The solid test item was dissolved in a 0.9% sodium chloride solution with a final concentration of 20% test item as recommended in the test guideline 437 for non-surfactant solids. 0.9% NaCl solution was used as the solvent control and 20% Imidazole in 0.9% NaCl solution as the positive control item.
The test item and the controls were applied to the epithelial surface of the cornea by addition to the anterior chamber of the corneal holder. The exposure time for the test item and the controls was240 minutes. The optical density (OD) was measured at a wavelength of 490 nm.
The acceptance criteria of validity were fulfilled in this test.
Following treatment with test item a mean opacity of 0.452 ± 0.476 and a mean permeability value of <0.01 compared to the negative control were determined. The calculated IVIS of 0.302 ± 0.332 is below the cut-off value of 3 (UN GHS no category). Hence,the test item did not show severely irritant or corrosive properties andconsequently it is not classified as a severe irritant and is not corrosive according to UN GHS classification.
Conclusion
Under the present test conditions test item, tested in the in vitro BCOP test method, had an IVIS value of 0.302, which is below the cut-off value of 3 (UN GHS no category) and consequently it is not classified as a severe irritant and is not corrosive according to UN GHS classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.