Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
21 Apr - 11 May 2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
(1997)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Version / remarks:
(2008)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Fatty acids, C18-unsatd., dimers, hydrogenated, 2-ethylhexyl esters
EC Number:
500-214-9
EC Name:
Fatty acids, C18-unsatd., dimers, hydrogenated, 2-ethylhexyl esters
Cas Number:
68440-06-2
Molecular formula:
C44H84O4
IUPAC Name:
Fatty acids, C18-unsatd., dimers, hydrogenated, 2-ethylhexyl esters
Test material form:
other: liquid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): only trade name given
- Physical state: yellow liquid
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature in the dark
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 05 May 2016

Method

Target gene:
his/trp operon
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: All TA strains carry a mutation of the uvr B gene coding for the DNA excision repair system (uvr B) and the deep rough mutation (rfa), TA100 and TA98 contain the R-factor plasmid (pkM101) to detect weak mutagens.
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: The E.coli tester strain contains an uvr A DNA repair deficiency which enhances its sensitivity to some mutagenic compounds.
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9-mix), prepared from the livers of rats induced with phenobarbitone/β-naphthoflavone
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment I:
- 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg/plate (with and without metabolic activation)
Experiment II:
- 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg/plate (with and without metabolic activation)
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test item was immiscible in sterile distilled water and DMSO at 50 mg/mL, but was fully miscible in acetone at 100 mg/mL in solubility checks performed in-house. Acetone was therefore selected as the vehicle.
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
9-aminoacridine
N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
benzo(a)pyrene
other: 2-Aminoanthracene
Remarks:
- S9: ENNG: 2 µg/plate (WP2uvr A), 3 µg/plate (TA100), 5 µg/plate (TA1535); 9AA: 80 µg/plate (TA1537); 4NQO: 0.2 µg/plate (TA98); +S9: 2AA: 1 µg/plate (TA100), 2 µg/plate (TA1535, TA1537), 10 µg/plate (WP2uvr A); BP: 5 µg/plate (TA98)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: plate incorporation, pre-incubation

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates for each test concentration

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: The condition of the bacterial background lawn was evaluated for evidence of test article toxicity (relative total growth) and precipitate by using a dissecting microscope.
Evaluation criteria:
A test system is considered as mutagenic if there is
- a dose-related increase in mutant frequency over the dose range tested (De Serres and Shelby, 1979)
- a reproducible increase at one or more concentrations
- biological relevance against in-house historical control ranges
- statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS (Mahon et. al., 1989)
- a fold increase greater than two times the concurrent solvent control for any tester strain (especially if accompanied by an out-of-historical range response (Cariello and Piegorsch, 1996).
A test item will be considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
Statistics:
For each replicate plating, the mean and standard deviation of the number of revertants per plate were calculated and are reported.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
other: S. typhimurium TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TESTSPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS: Precipitation of the test material was recorded at concentrations equal or greater than 1500 μg/plate in both independent experiments (with and without metabolic activation).

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: The results were within range of historical control data.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: The test material did not induce cytotoxicity in any of the tested strains at any tested concentration.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Test results: Experiment 1 – Plate incorporation

With or without S9-Mix

Test substance concentration

(μg/plate)

Mean number of revertant colonies per plate

(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation)

Base-pair substitution type

Frameshift type

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA

TA98

TA1537

0

124 ± 5.5

17 ± 2.1

32 ± 6.1

21 ± 2.5

11 ± 2.6

1.5

126 ± 13.1

17 ± 0.6

24 ± 5.8

21 ± 4.7

12 ± 3.0

5

130 ± 12.1

14 ± 2.3

24 ± 11.5

24 ± 6.1

14 ± 1.2

15

115 ± 3.1

17 ± 3.8

25 ± 1.7

21 ± 9.5

14 ± 2.6

50

126 ± 13.1

15 ± 3.5

23 ± 2.5

23 ± 2.5

16 ± 0.0

150

123 ± 4.0

13 ± 5.6

24 ± 5.0

23 ± 9.5

16 ± 0.6

500

125 ± 9.5

15 ± 6.0

20 ± 3.5

22 ± 1.2

13 ± 2.0

1500 P

121 ± 11.0

17 ± 4.9

24 ± 3.5

20 ± 0.6

13 ± 5.3

5000 P

121 ± 9.5

11 ± 1.7

24 ± 5.1

23 ± 7.6

12 ± 4.0

Positive controls, –S9

Name

ENNG

ENNG

ENNG

4NQO

9AA

Concentrations

(μg/plate)

3

5

2

0.2

80

Mean No. of colonies/plate

(average of 3 ± SD)

983 ± 56.6

271 ± 9.5

1220 ± 41.7

192 ± 14.6

1719 ± 200.1

+

0

119 ± 8.5

15 ± 3.5

24 ± 4.6

24 ± 7.5

15 ± 3.5

+

1.5

115 ± 3.6

17 ± 6.7

32 ± 5.9

21 ± 1.7

15 ± 5.1

+

5

122 ± 7.9

9 ± 1.5

34 ± 6.0

29 ± 5.3

12 ± 1.0

+

15

140 ± 7.2

11 ± 1.5

24 ± 2.3

23 ± 2.1

15 ± 3.5

+

50

126 ± 8.0

10 ± 3.1

29 ± 10.5

23 ± 8.2

13 ± 3.5

+

150

133 ± 8.7

16 ± 4.2

24 ± 3.6

24 ± 8.1

9 ± 3.8

+

500

133 ± 2.1

11 ± 3.5

20 ± 1.0

27 ± 4.7

15 ± 3.5

+

1500 P

121 ± 14.9

12 ± 4.5

28 ± 6.1

24 ± 7.0

15 ± 2.1

+

5000 P

118 ± 20.4

10 ± 2.0

27 ± 5.0

26 ± 7.4

13 ± 6.1

Positive controls, +S9

Name

2AA

2AA

2AA

BP

2AA

Concentrations

(μg/plate)

1

2

10

5

2

Mean No. of colonies/plate

(average of 3 ± SD)

1878 ± 130.8

330 ± 12.2

331 ± 24.2

239 ± 14.4

406 ± 10.4

ENNG: N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine

4NQO: 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide

9AA: 9-aminoacridine

2AA: 2-aminoanthracene

BP: Benzo(a)pyrene

P: Precipitate

Table 2: Test results: Experiment 2 – Pre-incubation

With or without S9-Mix

Test substance concentration

(μg/plate)

Mean number of revertant colonies per plate

(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation)

Base-pair substitution type

Frameshift type

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA

TA98

TA1537

0

138 ± 28.6

18 ± 4.2

29 ± 2.5

30 ± 7.0

20 ± 3.5

15

137 ± 24.9

15 ± 5.3

29 ± 3.2

29 ± 5.3

28 ± 2.3

50

119 ± 3.6

22 ± 4.2

33 ± 5.5

29 ± 4.0

24 ± 4.0

150

138 ± 24.9

16 ± 3.5

24 ± 6.4

29 ± 7.6

21 ± 5.5

500

136 ± 9.3

21 ± 6.4

27 ± 5.9

28 ± 4.2

20 ± 8.0

1500 P

131 ± 17.9

22 ± 6.1

26 ± 4.9

27 ± 4.5

22 ± 9.5

5000 P

135 ± 12.5

17 ± 4.0

33 ± 4.9

29 ± 6.4

20 ± 2.3

Positive controls, –S9

Name

ENNG

ENNG

ENNG

4NQO

9AA

Concentrations

(μg/plate)

3

5

2

0.2

80

Mean No. of colonies/plate

(average of 3 ± SD)

1094 ± 52.9

1087 ± 103.1

1277 ± 159.0

258 ± 24.7

1318 ± 75.5

+

0

146 ± 15.8

17 ± 2.3

42 ± 6.6

29 ± 5.0

27 ± 3.5

+

15

134 ± 13.5

16 ± 5.3

28 ± 6.1

33 ± 2.9

25 ± 1.5

+

50

132 ± 1.5

13 ± 2.1

34 ± 8.3

29 ± 9.8

18 ± 2.1

+

150

126 ± 10.1

14 ± 2.5

35 ± 5.7

33 ± 3.8

18 ± 4.0

+

500

118 ± 12.7

16 ± 3.1

31 ± 9.2

30 ± 7.5

19 ± 5.0

+

1500 P

117 ± 21.7

15 ± 6.4

33 ± 0.6

34 ± 6.2

19 ± 6.4

+

5000 P

117 ± 23.9

12 ± 5.0

36 ± 8.3

36 ± 3.8

21 ± 4.4

Positive controls, +S9

Name

2AA

2AA

2AA

BP

2AA

Concentrations

(μg/plate)

1

2

10

5

2

Mean No. of colonies/plate

(average of 3 ± SD)

921 ± 86.1

297 ± 6.7

210 ± 54.3

462 ± 58.0

556 ± 28.2

ENNG: N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine

4NQO: 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide

9AA: 9-aminoacridine

2AA: 2-aminoanthracene

BP: Benzo(a)pyrene

P: Precipitate

Applicant's summary and conclusion