Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 930-859-5 | CAS number: -
Toxicological Summary
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.93 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 75
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 220 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
250 x 1/0.38 x 6.7/10 x 0.5 [50% oral absorption rat / 100% inhalation absorption human].
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- NOAEL derived
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Subacute study
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- corrected starting point
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Systemic
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.83 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 300
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
As stated in ECHA guidance R8, it is assumed that dermal absorption will not be higher than oral absorpion, therefore no default factor should be used when oral-to-dermal extrapolation.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- subacute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- rat species
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- systemic effects
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.72 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 150
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 109 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
250 x 1/1.15 x 0.5 [50% oral absorption rat / 100% inhalation absorption human].
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Dose response
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- subacute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- modified starting point
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- For effects on skin, eye and GI tract via local metabolism, for effects on respiratory tract.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.42 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
As stated in ECHA guidance R8, dermal absorption will not be higher than oral absorption, no default factor (i.e. factor 1) should be introduced when performing oral-to-dermal extrapolation.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- dose response
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- subacute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- rat species
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- systemic effects
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.42 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
As this is an oral study, no modification of the starting point is needed.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- dose response
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- subacute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- rat species
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- systemic effects
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - General Population
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
