Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Explosiveness

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
explosive properties of explosives
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The test is performed according to EC guideline with some small deviations. However, there is no information on purity of the substance.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1984

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.14 (Explosive properties)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
1)The weight of the falling hammer is 5 kg and dropped from 0.8 m, however, the energy applied is the same as guideline, 40 J or 40 Nm. 2) In contrast to the EC guideline aluminium foil is used to pack the substance. 3) Ten tests are performed.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
not applicable
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1-benzhydrylpiperazine
EC Number:
212-667-7
EC Name:
1-benzhydrylpiperazine
Cas Number:
841-77-0
Molecular formula:
C17H20N2
IUPAC Name:
1-(DIPHENYLMETHYL)PIPERAZINE
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study reports): JNJ-130806-AAA (T000750)
- Physical state: solid (powder)
- Appearance: white to slight beige powder

Results and discussion

Small-scale preliminary tests
Parameter:
other: More sensitive to shock than m-dinitrobenzene
Remarks on result:
negative (not further specified)
Remarks:
If all tests according to Lütolf method are negative, powder can be considered not shock sensitive as reference substance meta-dinitrobenzene is not shock sensitive in similar conditions (although not tested simultaneously in this study)

Any other information on results incl. tables

RESULTS:

-10 times negative, not shock sensitive (sensitivity > 39.2 Nm)

.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test substance is not shock sensitive ( sensitivity > 39.2n Nm)