Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-034-6 | CAS number: 7417-99-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
In vitro gene mutation study in bacteria. Key study. Method according to OECD guideline 471, GLP study. The test item was found to be mutagenic with or without metabolic activation in the Salmonella typhimurium tested strains TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 98.
In vitro micronucleus study in mammalian cells. Key study. Method according to OECD guideline 487, GLP study. The test item was found as non aneugenic and non clastogenic in human lymphocytes up to the concentration of 0.0625 mg/mL both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation under the test conditions.
In vitro gene mutation study in mamalian cells. Data waiving (study scientifically not necessary/other information available): According to the column 1 of REACH Annex VIII, the study does not to be conducted since a positive result was found in the in vitro gene mutation test in bacteria.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 22 October 2015 - 20 November 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine-requiring gene in Salmonella thyphimurium
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix from rat liver
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate.
The test item concentrations to be applied in the main experiment were chosen according to the results of the pre-experiment. 5000 µg/plate was selected as the maximum concentration. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO (AppliChem Lot No. 410131997).
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was compatible with the survival of the bacteria and the S9 activity. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (A. dest.)
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (DMSO)
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine (10 µg/plate for TA 98 and 40 µg/plate for TA 1537 without metabolic activation); 2-Aminoanthracene (2.5 μg/plate for TA1537, TA1535, TA98 and TA100, and 10 µg/plate for TA102 with metabolic activation)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): 1 x10^9 bacteria/mL
DURATION
- Preincubation period: Samples of each tester strain were grown by culturing for 12 h at 37ºC in Nutrient Broth to the late exponential or early stationary phase of growth (approx. 10e9 cells/mL).
- Exposure duration: 48 h incubation period at 37ºC in the dark.
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): All Salmonella strains contain mutations in the histidine operon, thereby imposing a requirement for histidine in the growth medium.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Cytotoxicity was characterised by a clearing or rather diminution of the background lawn or a reduction in the number of revertants down to a mutation factor of approximately ≤ 0.5 in relation to the solvent control. - Rationale for test conditions:
- According to OECD TG 471
- Evaluation criteria:
- The Mutation Factor is calculated by dividing the mean value of the revertant counts by the mean values of the solvent control (the exact and not the rounded values are used for calculation).
A test item is considered as mutagenic if:
- a clear and dose-related increase in the number of revertants occurs and/or a biologically relevant positive response for at least one of the dose groups occurs in at least one tester strain with or without metabolic activation.
A biologically relevant increase is described as follows:
- if in tester strains TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 the number of reversions is at least twice as high, and if in tester strains TA 1535 and TA 1537 the number of reversions is at least three times higher than the reversion rate of the solvent control. - Statistics:
- According to OECD guidelines, the biological relevance of the results is the criterion for the interpretation of results, a statistical evaluation of the results is not regarded as necessary.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Remarks:
- (Biologically relevant increases of revertant colony numbers observed at concentrations of 316 µg/plate and higher (-S9) and at concentrations of 2500 µg/plate (+S9))
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Remarks:
- (Biologically relevant increases of revertant colony numbers observed at concentrations of 31.6 µg/plate and higher (±S9))
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Remarks:
- (biologically relevant increases of revertant colony numbers observed at concentrations of 10 µg/plate and higher (-S9) and in all concentrations tested (+S9))
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: No precipitation of the test item was observed at any concentration or tester strain used.
- Other: No toxic effects of the test item were noted in any of the five tester strains used up to the highest dose group evaluated (with and without metabolic activation).
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The toxicity of the test item was determined with the tester strains TA98 and TA100 in a pre-experiment. Eight concentrations were tested (3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate ) for toxicity and induction mutations with three plates each. The experimental conditions in this pre-experiment were the same as described for the main experiment.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: see tables 4 and 6 in "any other information on results incl. tables"
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: see tables 3 and 5 in "any other information on results incl. tables"
- Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions reported, the test substance caused gene mutations in the tester strains TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 98. Therefore, the test substance is considered to be mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay.
- Executive summary:
The test item was tested for potential mutagenic activity using the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay according to OECD Guideline 471 (GLP study). The experiments were carried out using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1537, TA1535, TA98, TA100 and TA102 in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix prepared from the livers of rats). The test item was dissolved in DMSO and diluted prior to treatment. In the initial toxicity-mutation test the bacterial cultures were exposed to test item at 8 concentrations (three plates/concentration) between 3.16 and 5000 µg/plate. No toxic effects of the test item were noted in any of the five tester strains used up to the highest dose group evaluated (with and without metabolic activation). In the main test, the cultures were exposed to test item at 8 concentrations (three plates/concentration) between 3.16 and 5000 µg/plate both in the absence and presence (S9 mix) of metabolic activation. All the values for the negative control were within historical control ranges of the laboratory and positive controls showed an increase in the number of revertant colonies. All validity criteria were met. Under the experimental conditions reported, the test substance caused gene mutations by base pair changes in the genome of the tester strains TA 100 and TA 1535 and frameshifts in the genome of the tester strain TA 98. Therefore, the test substance is considered to be mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 09 January 2020 - 06 March 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Test method according OECD Guideline 487. GLP study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Type and source of cells: peripheral blood lymphocytes from human donors.
- Suitability of cells: healthy, young, non-smoking donors with no known recent exposure to genotoxic chemicals or radiation were used. Blood from individual was collected in sodium heparin vacutainer and analyzed using Advia 2120. All the parameters were within the acceptable range.
- Normal cell cycle time (negative control): 12 to 15 hours.
For lymphocytes:
- Sex, age and number of blood donors: One male of 28 and one female of 24 years old were used, one for the initial cytotoxicity and the other for the micronucleus test.
- Whether whole blood or separated lymphocytes were used: whole blood
- Whether blood from different donors were pooled or not: No
- Mitogen used for lymphocytes: Phytohemagglutinin (PHA)
MEDIA USED
- Type and composition of media, CO2 concentration, humidity level, temperature, if applicable: RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) and antibiotics (1% Penicillin-Streptomycin), 5±1% CO2, 37±1ºC. - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- Cytochalasin B (CytoB)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9 : liver of male Wistar rat induced with sodium phenobarbtone and β-naphthoflavone at 16 mg/mL and 20 mg/mL respectively.
- method of preparation of S9 mix: 1 mL of S9 homogenate was thawed immediately before use and mixed with 9 mL of co-factor solution containing 4 mM Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate (NADP), 5 mM Glucose-6-phosphate, 8 mM MgCl2 and 33 mM KCl in Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) at pH 7.3.
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium: 0.5 mL (10% v/v) of S9 mix and 0.05 mL (1% v/v) of S9 homogenate.
- quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability): Batch of S9 homogenate was assessed for sterility, protein content and for its ability to metabolize the promutagens 2-Aminoanthracene and Benzo(a)pyrene to mutagens using Salmonella typhimurium TA100 tester strain. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.015625, 0.03125 and 0.0625 mg/mL.
Justification for top dose: Based on the results of solubility, precipitation, osmolality and pH tests, the initial cytotoxicity test was conducted at concentrations of 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/mL. The average cytotoxicity (CBPI) ranged from 74.58% to 100% at 0.125 mg/mL to 0.5 mg/mL and from 51.67% to 52.54% at 0.0625 mg/mL. As the only dose in the range of 55 ± 5% cytotoxicity was 0.0625 mg/mL, this was selected as the highest concentration for the micronucleus test. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: N, N-dimethyl formamide.
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: A solubility test was conducted to determine the maximum concentration or workable solution/suspension of the test item in the vehicle compatible with the test system at 200 mg/mL using distilled water, dimethyl Sulphoxide, acetone and N, N-dimethyl formamide. The test item was found soluble in N, N-dimethyl formamide at 200 mg/mL. Precipitation, osmolality and pH test was conducted at 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/mL. Post incubation, heavy precipitation was observed at 1 and 2 mg/mL and mild and moderate precipitation and no change in pH were observed at 0.25 and 0.5 mg/mL. No precipitation was observed in any other concentrations tested. No change in pH and osmolality was observed in any of the concentrations tested. Untreated controls were inlcuded in the test in order to demonstrate that no deleterious or chromosomal effects were induced by this solvent.
- Justification for percentage of solvent in the final culture medium: 50 µL of test item solutions were used for each concentration and the final volume in the test tubes was made up to 5 mL with culture media. Thus, percentage of solvent in the final culture medium was 1% (v/v), that is, not higher than 1% (v/v) as recommended by OECD TG 487 for organic solvents. In any case, untreated controls were inlcuded in the test in order to assure that this solvent had no adverse effect. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- N, N-dimethyl formamide
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- colchicine
- Remarks:
- 3 h treatment, without metabolic activation (0.03 µg/mL)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- N, N-dimethyl formamide
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- 24 h treatment, without metabolic activation (0.075 µg/mL)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- N, N-dimethyl formamide
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- 3 h treatment, with metabolic activation (10 µg/mL)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration (single, duplicate, triplicate): duplicate
- Number of independent experiments: 1
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Test substance added in medium.
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period, if applicable: 44 to 48 hours, with phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) to induce cell division prior to exposure.
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 3 h (short term treatment, +S9 and -S9); 24 h (long term treatment, -S9).
- Harvest time after the end of treatment (sampling/recovery times): 20 to 24 hours (1.5- 2 cell cycle length).
FOR CHROMOSOME ABERRATION AND MICRONUCLEUS:
- Cytokinesis was blocked using Cytochalasin B at 6 µg/mL. For the short treatment, cytoB was added at the end of treatment and incubated for 20-24 h. For the long treatment, cytoB was added at the beggining of the treatment.
- Methods of slide preparation and staining technique used including the stain used (for cytogenetic assays): After treatment, cell suspension was mixed with 3 mL of freshly prepared warm 0.56% Potassium chloride. Cell suspension was incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature and later it was centrifuged at 1800 rpm for 10 minutes. Supernatant was discarded and cell pellet was mixed with 3 mL of freshly prepared cold acetic acid:methanol fixative (1:3). Cell suspension was incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature and later suspension was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 minutes. The procedure was repeated twice by adding 4 mL of cold acetic acid: methanol fixative (1:3). Clean slides were stored in a beaker with distilled water and kept in the refrigerator for at least 1 hour before use. The cell suspension was mixed using a pipette and few drops of the suspension were aspirated and dropped onto the chilled slide pre labeled with study number, with (+S9) or without metabolic activation (-S9), treatment/group and slide number. The slides were air dried. Minimum of 3 slides were prepared for each treatment replicate. Smear was stained using Acridine Orange stain by allowing the stain to retain for 5 minutes.
- Criteria for scoring micronucleated cells (selection of analysable cells and micronucleus identification): Measurement of the relative frequencies of mononucleate, binucleate and multi-nucleate cells in the culture was made to determine cell proliferation and the cytostatic activity of the treatment to ensure that only cells that divided during or after treatment were scored. Slides were evaluated for the presence of micronuclei in at least 2000 binucleates per concentration (at least 1000 per culture).
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cytokinesis-block proliferation index (CBPI)
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: CBPI was determined from 500 cells per culture. - Evaluation criteria:
- Positive result if, in any of the experimental conditions examined:
a. At least one of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control.
b. The increase is dose-related in at least one experimental condition when evaluated with an appropriate trend test.
c. Any of the results are outside the distribution of the historical negative control data.
Negative result if, in all experimental conditions examined:
a. None of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control.
b. There is no concentration-related increase when evaluated with an appropriate trend test.
c. All results are inside the distribution of the historical negative control data. - Statistics:
- Data was analyzed using SPSS Software version 22 for differences among solvent/vehicle control, positive control and test item groups using ANOVA following Dunnett’s test at a 95% level of confidence (p<0.05).
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: Human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- In the initial cytotoxicity test, the test item induced cytotoxicity at 0.0625 mg/mL (51.67 to 52.54%) when compared to vehicle control and thus this was selected as the top concentration.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In an initial cytotoxicity test, the test item was tested at the concentrations of 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/mL. The average % cytotoxicity ranged from 74.58 to 100 at 0.125 mg/mL to 0.5 mg/mL and the average cytotoxicity ranged from 51.67 to 52.54 at 0.0625 mg/mL. As the % cytotoxicity of test item was in the range of 55 ± 5% at 0.0625 mg/mL, this was selected as the highest concentration for the micronucleus test. The other concentrations selected were 0.015625 and 0.03125 mg/mL as low and mid concentrations respectively.
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data:
Vehicle control: average percentage of micronucleus of 0.24% (short treatment +S9 and -S9, and long treatment).
Negative control: average percentage of micronucleus of 0.25% (short treatment +S9), 0.19% (short treatment -S9 and long treatment)
Positive controls: average percentage of micronucleus of 1.06% (short treatment +S9), 1.03% (short treatment -S9 and 1.15% (long treatment)
Micronucleus test in mammalian cells:
- Results from cytotoxicity measurements:
o CBPI and distribution of mono-, bi- and multi-nucleated cells: see table XXX below
- Genotoxicity results
o Number of cells with micronuclei separately for each treated and control culture from binucleated cells: see table XXX below
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation, and 95% control limits for the distribution as well as the number of data)
- Positive historical control data: see table XXX below. Values obtained with concurrent positive controls were within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the laboratory’s historical positive controls database.
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: see table XXX below. The concurrent vehicle control values were within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the laboratory’s historical vehicle control database. - Conclusions:
- In an in vitro micronucleus test, the test item was found as non aneugenic and non clastogenic in human lymphocytes up to the concentration of 0.0625 mg/mL both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation under the test conditions.
- Executive summary:
The test item was evaluated for formation of micronuclei in human lymphocytes according to OECD Guideline 487, following the Principles of GLP. Based on the results of the solubility and precipitation tests, the test item was formulated in N, N-dimethyl formamide as vehicle and 0.5 mg/mL was selected as the highest concentration in the Initial Cytotoxicity Test. This test was conducted at concentrations of 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/mL. The average cytotoxicity ranged from 74.58% to 100% at 0.125 mg/mL to 0.5 mg/mL and from 51.67% to 52.54% at 0.0625 mg/mL. As the cytotoxicity of the test item was in the range of 55 ± 5% at 0.0625 mg/mL, this value was selected as the highest concentration for the main test. Cytochalasin B (cytoB) was used as cytokinesis blocker. Cytotoxicity was assessed by Cytokinesis-Block Proliferation Index (CBPI). Cultured human peripheral blood lymphocytes previously incubated for 44 -48 h with PHA in RPMI medium were treated with test item in N, N-dimethyl formamide at the concentrations of 0.015625, 0.03125 and 0.0625 mg/mL. The treatment was carried out in duplicates for the short term period (3 h) both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix) and for the long term period (24 h) in the absence of metabolic activation. The presence of micronuclei was evaluated in at least 2000 binucleate cells per concentration (at least 1000 per culture). Cyclophosphamide Monohydrate (+S9 for short term) at 10 µg/mL, Colchicine (-S9 for short term) at 0.03 µg/mL and Mytomycin C at 0.075 µg/mL (-S9 long term) were used as positive controls. In the micronucleus test the test item induced cytotoxicity at 0.0625 mg/mL (50.82 to 51.67%) when compared to vehicle control. There was no statistically significant increase in the percentage of micronuclei in binucleated cells observed in any of the tested concentrations when compared to the vehicle control. Values obtained with concurrent vehicle and positive controls were within the 95% control limits of the distribution of their respective laboratory’s historical control databases. All acceptability criteria were met. Based on these results, it is concluded that the test item is non clastogenic and non aneugenic in cultured human lymphocytes at and up to 0.0625 mg/mL both in short term and long term treatments (presence and absence of metabolic activation).
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells does not need to be conducted because a positive result was found in in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Justification for type of information:
- JUSTIFICATION FOR DATA WAIVING
According to the column 1 of REACH Annex VIII, the study does not to be conducted since a positive result was found in the in vitro gene mutation test in bacteria.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 3: Historical Laboratory Control Data of the Negative Control (in 2012 - 2014) without S9 (-S9)
|
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 102 |
Mean |
22.3 |
95.5 |
10.9 |
7.5 |
230.5 |
SD |
4.8 |
18.1 |
5.1 |
2.4 |
47.8 |
Min |
13 |
61 |
4 |
2 |
136 |
Max |
48 |
182 |
35 |
27 |
415 |
RSD [%] |
21.6 |
18.9 |
46.8 |
31.4 |
20.8 |
n |
1159 |
1281 |
1043 |
1043 |
684 |
Table 4: Historical Laboratory Control Data of the Positive Control (in 2012 - 2014) without S9 (-S9)
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 102 |
|
Substance Conc./plate |
4-NOPD 10 µg |
NaN3 10 µg |
NaN3 10 µg |
4-NOPD 40 µg |
MMS 1 µL |
Mean |
443.7 |
704.8 |
858.3 |
93.2 |
1733.5 |
SD |
183.1 |
272.7 |
320.2 |
27.3 |
408.3 |
Min |
192 |
132 |
34 |
30 |
162 |
Max |
2213 |
1498 |
1472 |
273 |
3181 |
RSD [%] |
41.3 |
38.7 |
37.3 |
29.3 |
23.6 |
n |
1172 |
1285 |
1042 |
1054 |
688 |
Table 5: Historical Laboratory Control Data of the Negative Control (in 2012 - 2014) with S9 (+S9)
|
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 102 |
Mean |
29.9 |
103.4 |
9.1 |
7.6 |
290.9 |
SD |
6.2 |
17.4 |
3.3 |
2.7 |
65.3 |
Min |
13 |
68 |
4 |
3 |
91 |
Max |
61 |
194 |
34 |
31 |
495 |
RSD [%] |
20.9 |
16.8 |
36.1 |
35.3 |
22.4 |
n |
1157 |
1286 |
1042 |
1040 |
683 |
Table 6: Historical Laboratory Control Data of the Positive Control (in 2012 - 2014) with S9 (+S9)
|
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 102 |
Substance Conc./plate |
2-AA 2.5 µg |
2-AA 2.5 µg |
2-AA 2.5 µg |
2-AA 2.5 µg |
2-AA 10 µg |
Mean |
2318.0 |
1839.6 |
100.0 |
218.6 |
663.9 |
SD |
573.6 |
455.1 |
60.6 |
85.2 |
176.6 |
Min |
128 |
169 |
19 |
28 |
137 |
Max |
3606 |
3132 |
1011 |
489 |
2001 |
RSD [%] |
24.7 |
24.7 |
60.6 |
39.0 |
26.6 |
n |
1156 |
1284 |
1041 |
1039 |
688 |
S9: metabolic activation
Conc.: concentration
Mean: mean of revertants/plate
Min.: minimum of revertants/plate
Max.: maximum of revertants/plate
SD: Standard Deviation
RSD: Relative Standard Deviation
n: Number of control values
Table 1. Summary of Cytokinesis Block Proliferation Index and cytotoxicity
Treatment |
Metabolic Activation |
Concentration (mg/mL) |
Duration (hours) |
Replicates No. |
Total Number of Cells |
CBPI |
Mean CBPI |
% of Cytotoxicity |
Vehicle Control |
With S9 |
0 |
3 to 6 |
1 |
536 |
1.61 |
1.61 |
NA |
2 |
534 |
1.61 |
||||||
Negative Control |
0 |
1 |
536 |
1.57 |
1.60 |
1.64 |
||
2 |
525 |
1.63 |
||||||
POLY-U |
0.0625 |
1 |
508 |
1.29 |
1.29 |
52.46 |
||
2 |
517 |
1.28 |
||||||
0.125 |
1 |
556 |
1.15 |
1.15 |
75.41 |
|||
2 |
552 |
1.15 |
||||||
0.25 |
1 |
522 |
1.05 |
1.05 |
91.80 |
|||
2 |
526 |
1.04 |
||||||
0.50 |
1 |
526 |
1.00 |
1.01 |
98.36 |
|||
2 |
519 |
1.01 |
||||||
Vehicle Control |
Without S9 |
0 |
3 to 6 |
1 |
553 |
1.58 |
1.59 |
NA |
2 |
588 |
1.60 |
||||||
Negative Control |
0 |
1 |
537 |
1.59 |
1.58 |
1.69 |
||
2 |
547 |
1.57 |
||||||
POLY-U |
0.0625 |
1 |
519 |
1.28 |
1.28 |
52.54 |
||
2 |
527 |
1.28 |
||||||
0.125 |
1 |
554 |
1.14 |
1.15 |
74.58 |
|||
2 |
569 |
1.16 |
||||||
0.25 |
1 |
536 |
1.04 |
1.04 |
93.22 |
|||
2 |
538 |
1.04 |
||||||
0.50 |
1 |
513 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
100.00 |
|||
2 |
526 |
1.01 |
||||||
Vehicle Control |
Without S9 |
0 |
20 to 24 |
1 |
573 |
1.59 |
1.60 |
NA |
2 |
573 |
1.60 |
||||||
Negative Control |
0 |
1 |
571 |
1.59 |
1.59 |
1.67 |
||
2 |
567 |
1.58 |
||||||
POLY-U |
0.0625 |
1 |
528 |
1.29 |
1.29 |
51.67 |
||
2 |
515 |
1.30 |
||||||
0.125 |
1 |
550 |
1.15 |
1.15 |
75.00 |
|||
2 |
536 |
1.16 |
||||||
0.25 |
1 |
544 |
1.05 |
1.04 |
93.33 |
|||
2 |
524 |
1.04 |
||||||
0.50 |
1 |
516 |
1.01 |
1.01 |
98.33 |
|||
2 |
523 |
1.01 |
Table 2. Summary of micronuclei incidence with metabolic activation for 3 to 6 hours
Treatment |
Concentration (mg/mL) |
Replicate No. |
Average CBPI |
Average % of Cytotoxicity |
Total No. of Binucleates |
Total No. of Micronucleus |
Average Percentage of Micronucleus |
Vehicle Control |
0 |
1 |
1.61 |
1.61 |
2062 |
5 |
0.24 |
2 |
|||||||
Negative Control |
0 |
1 |
1.62 |
0.00 |
2011 |
5 |
0.25 |
2 |
|||||||
POLY-U |
0.015625 |
1 |
1.46 |
24.59 |
2141 |
5 |
0.24 |
2 |
|||||||
0.03125 |
1 |
1.39 |
36.07 |
2021 |
4 |
0.20 |
|
2 |
|||||||
0.0625 |
1 |
1.30 |
50.82 |
2026 |
5 |
0.25 |
|
2 |
|||||||
Cyclophosphamide Monohydrate |
10 µg/mL |
1 |
1.55 |
9.84 |
2079 |
22 |
1.06* |
2 |
* Statistically significant.
Table 3. Summary of micronuclei incidence without metabolic activation for 3 to 6 hoursx
Treatment |
Concentration (mg/mL) |
Replicate No. |
Average CBPI |
Average % of Cytotoxicity |
Total No. of Binucleates |
Total No. of Micronucleus |
Average Percentage of Micronucleus |
Vehicle Control |
0 |
1 |
1.59 |
1.67 |
2080 |
5 |
0.24 |
2 |
|||||||
Negative Control |
0 |
1 |
1.60 |
0.00 |
2078 |
4 |
0.19 |
2 |
|||||||
POLY-U |
0.015625 |
1 |
1.44 |
25.42 |
2103 |
3 |
0.14 |
2 |
|||||||
0.03125 |
1 |
1.38 |
35.59 |
2034 |
5 |
0.25 |
|
2 |
|||||||
0.0625 |
1 |
1.29 |
50.85 |
2036 |
4 |
0.20 |
|
2 |
|||||||
Colchicine |
0.03 µg/mL |
1 |
1.54 |
8.47 |
2048 |
21 |
1.03* |
2 |
* Statistically significant.
Table 4. Summary of micronuclei incidence without metabolic activation for 20 to 24 hours
Treatment |
Concentration (mg/mL) |
Replicate No. |
Average CBPI |
Average % of Cytotoxicity |
Total No. of Binucleates |
Total No. of Micronucleus |
Average Percentage of Micronucleus |
Vehicle Control |
0 |
1 |
1.60 |
3.23 |
2089 |
5 |
0.24 |
2 |
|||||||
Negative Control |
0 |
1 |
1.62 |
0.00 |
2090 |
4 |
0.19 |
2 |
|||||||
POLY-U |
0.015625 |
1 |
1.44 |
26.67 |
2085 |
5 |
0.24 |
2 |
|||||||
0.03125 |
1 |
1.39 |
35.00 |
2006 |
5 |
0.25 |
|
2 |
|||||||
0.0625 |
1 |
1.29 |
51.67 |
2030 |
4 |
0.20 |
|
2 |
|||||||
Mitomycin C |
0.075 µg/mL |
1 |
1.53 |
11.67 |
2007 |
23 |
1.15* |
2 |
* Statistically significant.
Table 5. Individual data of Cytokinesis Block Proliferation Index and cytotoxicity
Metabolic Activation and Duration |
Treatment |
Concentration (mg/mL) |
Replicate No. |
No. ofMononucleates |
No. ofBinucleates |
No. ofMultinucleates |
With S9 and 3 to 6 hours |
Vehicle Control |
0 |
1 |
255 |
235 |
46 |
2 |
258 |
228 |
48 |
|||
Negative Control |
0 |
1 |
275 |
216 |
45 |
|
2 |
245 |
230 |
50 |
|||
POLY-U |
0.0625 |
1 |
380 |
108 |
20 |
|
2 |
392 |
106 |
19 |
|||
0.125 |
1 |
487 |
53 |
16 |
||
2 |
485 |
52 |
15 |
|||
0.25 |
1 |
500 |
20 |
2 |
||
2 |
506 |
19 |
1 |
|||
0.5 |
1 |
524 |
2 |
0 |
||
2 |
516 |
3 |
0 |
|||
Without S9 and 3 to 6 hours |
Vehicle Control |
0 |
1 |
276 |
232 |
45 |
2 |
285 |
256 |
47 |
|||
Negative Control |
0 |
1 |
265 |
226 |
46 |
|
2 |
276 |
231 |
40 |
|||
POLY-U |
0.0625 |
1 |
395 |
101 |
23 |
|
2 |
399 |
106 |
22 |
|||
0.125 |
1 |
488 |
52 |
14 |
||
2 |
496 |
56 |
17 |
|||
0.25 |
1 |
516 |
18 |
2 |
||
2 |
520 |
16 |
2 |
|||
0.5 |
1 |
513 |
0 |
0 |
||
2 |
522 |
2 |
1 |
|||
Without S9 and 20 to 24 hours |
Vehicle Control |
0 |
1 |
284 |
240 |
49 |
2 |
275 |
252 |
46 |
|||
Negative Control |
0 |
1 |
279 |
246 |
46 |
|
2 |
286 |
234 |
47 |
|||
POLY-U |
0.0625 |
1 |
398 |
105 |
25 |
|
2 |
385 |
108 |
22 |
|||
0.125 |
1 |
485 |
50 |
15 |
||
2 |
466 |
56 |
14 |
|||
0.25 |
1 |
522 |
19 |
3 |
||
2 |
506 |
17 |
1 |
|||
0.5 |
1 |
514 |
0 |
2 |
||
2 |
520 |
2 |
1 |
Table 6. Individual data of micronuclei incidence with metabolic activation (+S9, 3 to 6 hours)
Treatment |
Concentration(mg/mL) |
Replicate No. |
No. of Mononucleates |
No. of Binucleates |
No. of Multinucleates |
No. of Binucleates (MN Scoring) |
CBPI |
No. of Micronucleus |
Vehicle Control |
0 |
1 |
250 |
231 |
44 |
1032 |
1.61 |
2 |
2 |
255 |
230 |
46 |
1030 |
1.61 |
3 |
||
Negative Control |
0 |
1 |
245 |
240 |
45 |
1009 |
1.62 |
3 |
2 |
250 |
244 |
47 |
1002 |
1.62 |
2 |
||
POLY-U |
0.015625 |
1 |
310 |
160 |
35 |
1064 |
1.46 |
3 |
2 |
310 |
165 |
32 |
1077 |
1.45 |
2 |
||
0.03125 |
1 |
340 |
145 |
25 |
1012 |
1.38 |
2 |
|
2 |
335 |
140 |
27 |
1009 |
1.39 |
2 |
||
0.0625 |
1 |
386 |
115 |
20 |
1016 |
1.30 |
3 |
|
2 |
380 |
110 |
22 |
1010 |
1.29 |
2 |
||
Cyclophosphamide Monohydrate |
10 µg/mL |
1 |
265 |
230 |
28 |
1034 |
1.55 |
10 |
2 |
270 |
224 |
28 |
1045 |
1.54 |
12 |
Table 7. Individual data of micronuclei incidence without metabolic activation (-S9, 3 to 6 hours)
Treatment |
Concentration(mg/mL) |
Replicate No. |
No. of Mononucleates |
No. of Binucleates |
No. of Multinucleates |
No. of Binucleates (MN Scoring) |
CBPI |
No. of Micronucleus |
Vehicle Control |
0 |
1 |
276 |
228 |
42 |
1034 |
1.57 |
3 |
2 |
270 |
258 |
45 |
1046 |
1.61 |
2 |
||
Negative Control |
0 |
1 |
270 |
230 |
45 |
1036 |
1.59 |
2 |
2 |
265 |
254 |
41 |
1042 |
1.60 |
2 |
||
POLY-U |
0.015625 |
1 |
328 |
159 |
35 |
1054 |
1.44 |
1 |
2 |
320 |
164 |
33 |
1049 |
1.44 |
2 |
||
0.03125 |
1 |
350 |
135 |
28 |
1020 |
1.37 |
2 |
|
2 |
348 |
145 |
30 |
1014 |
1.39 |
3 |
||
0.0625 |
1 |
408 |
105 |
25 |
1017 |
1.29 |
2 |
|
2 |
400 |
105 |
25 |
1019 |
1.29 |
2 |
||
Colchicine |
0.03 µg/mL |
1 |
275 |
210 |
32 |
1011 |
1.53 |
10 |
2 |
280 |
225 |
33 |
1037 |
1.54 |
11 |
Table 8. Individual data of micronuclei incidence without metabolic activation (-S9, 20 to 24 hours)
Treatment |
Concentration(mg/mL) |
Replicate No. |
No. of Mononucleates |
No. of Binucleates |
No. of Multinucleates |
No. of Binucleates (MN Scoring) |
CBPI |
No. of Micronucleus |
Vehicle Control |
0 |
1 |
286 |
244 |
50 |
1030 |
1.59 |
3 |
2 |
274 |
253 |
47 |
1059 |
1.60 |
2 |
||
Negative Control |
0 |
1 |
270 |
250 |
49 |
1036 |
1.61 |
2 |
2 |
265 |
248 |
50 |
1054 |
1.62 |
2 |
||
POLY-U |
0.015625 |
1 |
325 |
155 |
35 |
1029 |
1.44 |
2 |
2 |
330 |
159 |
36 |
1056 |
1.44 |
3 |
||
0.03125 |
1 |
350 |
130 |
31 |
1005 |
1.38 |
3 |
|
2 |
356 |
145 |
30 |
1001 |
1.39 |
2 |
||
0.0625 |
1 |
400 |
110 |
23 |
1015 |
1.29 |
2 |
|
2 |
386 |
105 |
23 |
1015 |
1.29 |
2 |
||
Mitomycin C |
0.075 µg/mL |
1 |
270 |
201 |
30 |
1006 |
1.52 |
11 |
2 |
268 |
201 |
31 |
1001 |
1.53 |
12 |
Table 9. Historical data
Positive control
Frequency of Micronucleated Binucleates (%) |
||||
95% Confidence level |
||||
|
With S9 (3 to 6 hours) 10 µg/mL of Cyclophosphamide |
Without S9 (3 to 6 hours) |
Without S9 (20 to 24 hours) 0.075 µg/mL of Mitomycin C |
|
0.075 µg/mL of Mitomycin C |
0.03 µg/mL of Colchicine |
|||
Average |
0.91 |
0.88 |
0.95 |
0.98 |
Standard Deviation |
0.31 |
0.26 |
0.32 |
0.35 |
Sample Size |
19 |
16 |
20 |
20 |
Margin of Error |
0.14 |
0.13 |
0.14 |
0.15 |
Upper Bound |
1.05 |
1.01 |
1.09 |
1.14 |
Lower Bound |
0.77 |
0.76 |
0.81 |
0.83 |
95% Confidence Level |
1.96 |
1.96 |
1.96 |
1.96 |
Max |
1.52 |
1.40 |
1.47 |
1.73 |
Min |
0.44 |
0.56 |
0.45 |
0.49 |
Vehicle control
Frequency of Micronucleated Binucleates (%) |
|||
95% Confidence level |
|||
|
With S9 (3 to 6 hours) |
Without S9 (3 to 6 hours) |
Without S9 (20 to 24 hours) |
Average |
0.16 |
0.19 |
0.18 |
Standard Deviation |
0.05 |
0.09 |
0.06 |
Sample Size |
14 |
14 |
14 |
Margin of Error |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
Upper Bound |
0.19 |
0.24 |
0.21 |
Lower Bound |
0.13 |
0.14 |
0.15 |
95% Confidence Level |
1.96 |
1.96 |
1.96 |
Max |
0.24 |
0.33 |
0.30 |
Min |
0.09 |
0.00 |
0.10 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (positive)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
Data waiving (study scientifically not necessary): It is possible to make a conclusive hazard assessment in accordance with Annex I of REACH without additional testing on the basis of structure-activity relationship with a known mutagen.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- genetic toxicity in vivo, other
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
- Justification for type of information:
- JUSTIFICATION FOR DATA WAIVING
Based on the document "Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.7a: Endpoint specific guidance" (Version 6.0-July 2017), page 566, since the substance shares structural characteristics with known mutagens (harmonised CLP classification of analogue CAS 52234-82-9: Mutagen Category 2) it is possible to make a conclusive hazard assessment in accordance with Annex I of REACH without additional testing on the basis of structure-activity relationship alone. Furthermore, a justification is provided below on the basis of point 1.5 of Annex XI for adaptation of the standard testing regime in order to demonstrate that the information used is adequate for the purpose of classification and labelling.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available information, the substance is classified as Mutagen Category 2 in accordance with CLP Regulation (EC) no 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.