Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 616-436-5 | CAS number: 77098-07-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to soil microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil microorganisms
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2020-10-16 - 2020-12-21
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 216 (Soil Microorganisms: Nitrogen Transformation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 21st January 2000
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The temperature was between 22 and 23°C for 16 hours and microbial biomass and nitrate content was not measured prior to pre-incubation. This does not impact the results of the study.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Analytical method validation, Sneckenberger et al. 2020
- Details on sampling:
- - Collection: Day 0 and 28
- Sampling method: A single sample of approximately 5.5 grams (5.0 grams dry soil) was removed from each test chamber at each sampling interval.
An analytical method was validated independently to determine the concentrations of the test material in acetone stock solutions as used in the present study. Acetone stock solutions samples were prepared by weighing the appropriate mass of test substance and bringing to a final volume with acetone. - Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- All test chambers were incubated under aerobic conditions in the dark in a temperature-controlled room set at approximately 20°C for five days prior to application of the test substance.
AMENDMENT OF SOIL
- Type of organic substrate: Alfalfa
ground and sieved to ≤710 μm, and dried in an oven. C/N ratio is 14.5 : 1, stored under ambient conditions.
APPLICATION OF TEST SUBSTANCE TO SOIL
- Method: Quartz sand was used as carrier. After dosing, soils were thoroughly homogenised using stainless steel spatulas.
VEHICLE:
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent, emulsifier or dispersant): Acetone
- Concentration of vehicle in test medium (stock solution and final test solution): stock solution: 20.37 mg/mL.
The dose mixes for control were prepared by mixing 1 g of quartz sand with 5 mL of acetone in glass vials. The dose mixes for treatment were prepared by mixing 1 g of quartz sand with 5 mL of SAYTEX RB-79 stock solution (ID: 15864-102720-1).
- Evaporation of vehicle before use: yes. The solvent was removed under nitrogen flow in a fume hood at room temperature.
The final concentration of dose mixes for treatment (IDs: 15864-102720-mix Rep A, 15864-102720-mix Rep B and 15864-102720-mix Rep C) was 101.6 mg SAYTEX RB-79 per gram of quartz sand. This method was used due to the low water solubility and the physical-chemical properties (highly viscous) of the test item and considered suitable based on the results obtained in the non-GLP DRF study - Test organisms (inoculum):
- soil
- Total exposure duration:
- 28 d
- Test temperature:
- 20°C
- Moisture:
- The measured moisture contents of the soil samples ranged from 10.0% to 11.7%, and were equivalent to 47.5% to 55.4% of the maximum water holding capacity (WHC) during the test.
- Organic carbon content (% dry weight):
- 1
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Testing facility: Eurofins EAG Agroscience, LLC
- Test container (type, material, size): 8-ounce French-square glass bottles with perforated aluminum foil lids.
- Amount of soil: ~ 108.0 g moist soil (equivalent to 100 g dry soil)
- No. of replicates per concentration: 3
- No. of replicates per control: 3
SOIL INCUBATION
- Method: bulk / series of individual subsamples
Following direct addition of the test substance, the test chambers with treated and untreated (control) soils were covered with perforated aluminum foil lids and incubated in the dark at a temperature of 20 ± 2°C for 28 days.
SOURCE AND PROPERTIES OF SUBSTRATE
- Geographical reference of sampling site: Greensboro, Maryland, outdoor soil plot
- History of site: The original collection area has not been actively farmed for at least 5 years.
- Vegetation cover: covered by grasses
- Treatments with pesticides or fertilisers: Approximately 15 meters from a farmed area. No known treatment with crop protection product or fertiliser has occurred in the past five years.
- Accidental contamination: Not likely, the soil has been maintained in this outdoor soil plot since 2012.
- Other: The soil for this study was collected from this plot on October 23, 2020.
- Soil texture
- % sand: 71.4
- % silt: 18.1
- % clay: 10.5
- Soil taxonomic classification: sandy loam
- Soil classification system: USDA classification
- pH (in water): 7.4
- Bulk density: 1.32 g/cc
- Initial nitrate concentration for nitrogen transformation test: 2.48 mg/kg
- Maximum water holding capacity (in % dry weigth): 21.1
- Cation exchange capacity (mmol/kg): 4.2 meq/100 g
- Pretreatment of soil: sieved through a 2-mm screen
- Initial microbial biomass as % of total organic C: 239.9 µg/g; The microbial biomass was greater than 1% of the organic carbon content.
DETAILS OF PREINCUBATION OF SOIL: Water was added to adjust the moisture content to approximately 50% of the maximum water holding capacity, and test chambers were acclimated to test conditions for five days. Test chambers were amended with dried, ground alfalfa at 5.0 g/kg of dry soil as a source of nitrogen. The concentration of test substance added was calculated assuming uniform incorporation to a depth of 5 cm and a nominal soil bulk density of 1.3 g/cm³.
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
Day 0 and 28, soil nitrate analysis
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: no
RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Test concentrations: 0, 5.0, 10.0, 50.0, 100, 500 and 1000 mg/kg
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: An increase in nitrate formation was detected, but no inhibition of the nitrate formation > 25 % at any test concentrations by SAYTEX RB-79 within 0 – 1000 mg/kg. - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- 0 and 1000 mg/kg dry soil (nominal)
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- nitrate formation rate
- Details on results:
- Soil Moisture Measurements
The measured moisture contents of the soil for Day 0 and Day 28 samples ranged from 10.0% to 11.7%, and were equivalent to 47.5% to 55.4% of the maximum water holding capacity (WHC) during the test. The soil moisture contents were within the range specified in the protocol (40 to 60% WHC).
Soil pH Measurements
Before the study the batch of soil had a pH of 7.4 (Agvise). Throughout the test, the soil pH ranged from 5.54 to 5.81.
Soil Nitrate Analyses
The mean nitrate concentrations in the control soil were 162.8 and 359.7 mg NO3/kg on Day 0 and 28, respectively.
The mean nitrate concentrations in soils treated with SAYTEX RB-79 at 1000 mg/kg dry soil were 161.5 and 434.5 mg NO3/kg on Day 0 and 28, respectively.
The mean nitrate formation rate in control soils was 7.033 mg NO3/kg/day after 28 days. The mean nitrate formation rates in soils treated with SAYTEX RB-79 at 1000 mg/kg dry soil was 9.749 mg NO3/kg/day after 28 days. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Statistical comparisons of measured nitrate concentrations were made at each sample interval in Microsoft Excel using Analysis of variance (ANOVA).
The coefficient of variation (CV) among control replicates at all sampling intervals was <15% and therefore, the test is considered valid. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The study was conducted under GLP according to OECD Guideline 216 on the registered substance itself. The method is to be considered scientifically reasonable with no deficiencies in documentation or deviations from the guidelines, the validity criteria were met. Hence, the results can be considered as reliable to assess the long-term toxicity of the test substance towards soil microorganisms.
After 28 days, the difference of nitrogen transformation rates between soils treated with SAYTEX RB-79 at 1000 mg/kg dry soil and controls was 38.61% indicating stimulation by the test substance. Therefore, the EC50 value for inhibition of nitrate formation by SAYTEX RB-79 was greater than 1000 mg/kg dry soil (the highest concentration tested) and SAYTEX RB-79 at the concentrations tested can be evaluated as having no long-term adverse effect on nitrogen transformation in soils. - Executive summary:
This study was conducted to assess the effects of SAYTEX RB-79 on the nitrogen transformation activity of soil microorganisms in aerobic surface soils and meets the conditions set in OECD Guideline 216 and conforms to GLP requirements. The study was conducted using a single soil type (sandy loam). Test systems were dosed with SAYTEX RB-79 at nominal concentrations of 0 and 1000 mg/kg dry soil based on the results obtained in a non-GLP dose range finding (DRF) study, and incubated at approximately 20ºC for 28 days. Soil samples were collected on Days 0 and 28, and extracted with 25 mL of water. Extracts were centrifuged and the supernatants were analysed to determine nitrate concentration using ion chromatography. The mean nitrate concentrations in the control soil were 162.8 and 359.7 mg NO3/kg on Day 0 and 28, respectively. The mean nitrate concentrations in soils treated with SAYTEX RB-79 at 1000 mg/kg dry soil were 161.5 and 434.5 mg NO3/kg on Day 0 and 28, respectively. Mean nitrate formation rates were calculated, and are presented in units of mg NO3/kg dry soil per day. The difference in nitrate formation rates between treatments and untreated controls, was calculated for each treatment and resulted in a mean formation rate of 7.033 mg NO3/kg dry soil/day for the control and 9.749 mg NO3/kg dry soil/day for the 1000 mg/kg dry soil treatment,
The EC50 value for inhibition of nitrate formation after 28 days was greater than 1000 mg/kg dry soil. SAYTEX RB-79 at the concentrations tested can be evaluated as having no long-term adverse effect on nitrogen transformation in soils. As noted in the non-GLP DRF study, an increase in nitrate formation was detected, but no inhibition of the nitrate formation by SAYTEX RB-79 was observed.
Reference
Description of key information
Nitrogen transformation test, OECD 216, GLP, aerobic surface soil, sandy loam, 0 and 1000 mg/kg dry soil, 28 days: EC50 > 1000 mg/kg dry soil
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Long-term EC10 or NOEC for soil microorganisms:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
Additional information
This study was conducted to assess the effects of SAYTEX RB-79 on the nitrogen transformation activity of soil microorganisms in aerobic surface soils and meets the conditions set in OECD Guideline 216 and conforms to GLP requirements. The study was conducted using a single soil type (sandy loam). Test systems were dosed with SAYTEX RB-79 at nominal concentrations of 0, and 1000 mg/kg dry soil based on the results obtained in a non-GLP dose range finding (DRF) study, and incubated at approximately 20º C for 28 days. Soil samples were collected on Days 0 and 28, and extracted with 25 mL of water. Extracts were centrifuged and the supernatants were analysed to determine nitrate concentration using ion chromatography. The mean nitrate concentrations in the control soil were 162.8 and 359.7 mg NO3/kg on Day 0 and 28, respectively.The mean nitrate concentrations in soils treated with SAYTEX RB-79 at 1000 mg/kg dry soil were 161.5 and 434.5 mg NO3/kg on Day 0 and 28, respectively. Mean nitrate formation rates were calculated, and are presented in units of mg NO3/kg dry soil per day. The difference in nitrate formation rates between treatments and untreated controls, was calculated for each treatment and resulted in a rate of 7.033 mg NO3/kg dry soil/day for the control and 9.749 mg NO3/kg dry soil/day for the 1000 mg/kg dry soil treatment.
The EC50 value for inhibition of nitrate formation after 28 days was greater than 1000 mg/kg dry soil. SAYTEX RB-79 at the concentrations tested can be evaluated as having no long-term adverse effect on nitrogen transformation in soils. As noted in the non-GLP DRF study, an increase in nitrate formation was detected, but no inhibition of the nitrate formation by SAYTEX RB-79 was observed.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.