Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
25. February - 03. May 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1-phenyl-3-(phenylsulfamoyl)urea
EC Number:
813-358-5
Cas Number:
4886-26-4
Molecular formula:
C13H13N3O3S
IUPAC Name:
1-phenyl-3-(phenylsulfamoyl)urea
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
- State of aggregation:
- Particle size distribution:
- Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD):
- Geometric standard deviation (GSD):
- Shape of particles:
- Surface area of particles:
- Crystal structure:
- Coating:
- Surface properties:
- Density:
- Moisture content:
- Residual solvent:
- Activation:
- Stabilisation:
- Other:

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Cell source:
other: Adult human-derived epidermal keratinocytes
Source strain:
other: not applicable
Details on animal used as source of test system:
not applicable
Justification for test system used:
The EPISKINTM–(SM) model has been validated for irritation testing in an international validation study [9] and its use is recommended by the relevant OECD guideline for irritation testing (OECD No. 439); therefore, it was considered to be suitable for this study.
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
EPISKINTM –(SM) (Manufacturer: SkinEthic, France, Batch No.:16-EKIN-009, Expiry Date: 07 March 2016)

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 23.1-25.7°C
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation (if applicable): 37°C

REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
After the 15 minutes incubation time, the EPISKINTM –(SM) units were removed and rinsed thoroughly with PBS to remove any remaining material from the epidermal surface as much as possible. The rest of the PBS was removed from the epidermal surface with a pipette (without touching the epidermis).

MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
After the 42 hours incubation, all EPISKINTM –(SM) units (except of two colour control units) were transferred into the MTT working solution filled wells (2 mL of 0.3 mg/mL MTT per well). Then, all transferred EPISKINTM –(SM) units were incubated for 3 hours (± 5 min) at 37°C in an incubator with 5% CO2 protected from light.

FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
- Viability:
- Barrier function:
- Morphology:
- Contamination:
- Reproducibility:

NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES:
In this assay, three replicates were used for the test item. Three negative controls and three positive controls were also run in the assay. As the test item was coloured, two additional test item-treated tissues were used for the non specific OD evaluation.

CONTROL TISSUES USED IN CASE OF MTT DIRECT INTERFERENCE
Approximately 10 mg of test item was added to 2 mL MTT working solution and mixed. The mixture was incubated at 37°C in a shaking water bath for 3 hours protected from light, and then any colour change was recorded:
-Test items which do not react with MTT: yellow
-Test items reacting with MTT: blue or purple
After three hours incubation, yellow colour of the mixture was detected in the test tube. Thus, the test items did not react with MTT and therefore the use of additional controls was not necessary.

NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION:
one

PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA (choose relevant statement)
according to TG 439:
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
10 mg of the test item
Duration of treatment / exposure:
15 minutes
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
42 hours
Number of replicates:
3

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
Experiment 1 of 1
Value:
98.8
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
After receipt, the two indicators of the delivered kit were checked. Based on the observed colours, the epidermis units were in proper conditions.
The mean OD value of the three negative control tissues was in the recommended range (0.858). Standard deviation of the viability results for negative control samples was 7.6.
The positive control treated tissues showed 4.2 % viability demonstrating the proper performance of the assay. The standard deviation of the viability results for positive control samples was 1.1.
The standard deviation of viability values of the three test item-treated tissue samples in the MTT assay was 7.9.
The mean OD value of the blank samples (acidified isopropanol) was 0.049.
All these parameters met the acceptability criteria, therefore the study was considered to be valid.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In conclusion, in this in vitro EPISKIN model test with N-phenyl-N'[(phenylamino)sulfonyl]urea (Batch number: 150204), the results indicate that the test item is non-irritant to skin.
Executive summary:

An in vitro skin irritation test of N-phenyl-N'[(phenylamino)sulfonyl]urea was performed in a reconstructed human epidermis model. EPISKINTM –(SM)is designed to predict and classify the irritation potential of chemicals by measuring its cytotoxic effect as reflected in the MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay (detailed in 3.6. section). The irritation potential of the test item was evaluated according to the OECD No. 439 guideline [1].

Disks of EPISKINTM –(SM) (three units) were treated with the test item and incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature. Exposure of the test item was terminated by rinsing with Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS). The epidermis units were then incubated at 37 °C for 42 hours in an incubator with 5% CO2. The viability of each disk was assessed by incubating the tissues for 3 hours with MTT solution at 37 °C in an incubator with 5 % CO2 protected from light. The precipitated formazan crystals were then extracted using acidified isopropanol and quantified spectrophotometrically.

PBS and 5 % (w/v) Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate (SDS) solution treated epidermis were used as negative and positive controls, respectively (three units / control). Two additional disks were used to provide an estimate of colour contribution from the test item. For each treated tissue, the viability was expressed as a % relative to the negative control. If the mean relative viability after 15 minutes exposure and 42 hours post incubation is less or equal (≤) to 50 % of the negative control, the test item is considered to be irritant to skin.

Following exposure with N-phenyl-N'[(phenylamino)sulfonyl]urea, the mean cell viability was 98.8 % compared to the negative control. This is above the threshold of 50 %, therefore the test item was considered as being non-irritant to skin. The experiment met the validity criteria, therefore the study was considered to be valid.