Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2019-08-30 to 2019-09-27
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2019
Report date:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
Version / remarks:
October 9, 2017
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-{[1,1,2-trifluoro-2-(1,1,2,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropoxy)ethyl]sulfanyl}ethyl prop-2-enoate
EC Number:
864-951-0
Cas Number:
2170099-74-6
Molecular formula:
C10H8F10O3S
IUPAC Name:
2-{[1,1,2-trifluoro-2-(1,1,2,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropoxy)ethyl]sulfanyl}ethyl prop-2-enoate
Test material form:
liquid

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
cattle
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: Odenwaldschlachthof Brensbach, 64395 Brensbach, Germany
- Characteristics of donor animals (age): 17-58 months
- Storage, temperature and transport conditions of ocular tissue: in transport medium cooled on ice
- Indication of any existing defects or lesions in ocular tissue samples: No
- Indication of any antibiotics used: No
- Quality check of the isolated corneas: Corneal diameter ca. 25-27 mm

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 750 µL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
10 min
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
NUMBER OF REPLICATES: 3

NEGATIVE CONTROL USED: 0.9% sodium chloride Solution

POSITIVE CONTROL USED: N,N-dimethylformamide (undiluted)

APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME: 750 µL for 10 min

TREATMENT METHOD: closed chamber

POST-INCUBATION PERIOD: yes, 120 min

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Number of washing steps after exposure period: at least 3 times

METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: The opacity value of each individual cornea was corrected for background opacity by subtracting the initial baseline opacity reading from the post treatment opacity reading. In addition, the opacity values of both the treatment and positive control groups were corrected for the mean negative control opacity values.
- Corneal permeability: passage of sodium fluorescein dye measured with the aid of microtiter plate reader (OD490)

SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)

DECISION CRITERIA: The decision criteria as indicated in the OECD TG 437 were used.

IVIS
<3 No Category
>3<55 No prediction can be made
>55 Category 1

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
mean
Value:
-2
Vehicle controls validity:
not examined
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: no

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes (IVIS = 3.3)
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes (IVIS = 93.1)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the present study, the test item did not show an eye hazard potential. The test item is not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage.
Executive summary:

To determine the eye hazard potential the induced opacity and increased permeability was investigated in isolated bovine corneas after exposure to the test item according to OECD TG 437. As negative control 0.9% sodium chloride solution and as positive control N,N-dimethylformamide was used. Three corneas were used per group (negative control, positive control or test item group). After a first opacity measurement of the untreated bovine corneas, 750 µL of the test item, positive or negative control were applied on the corneas and incubated for 10 minutes. After the incubation phase the test item, the positive, and the negative control were rinsed from the corneas and the opacity was measured again. After the opacity measurements, the permeability of the corneas was determined by application of a fluorescein solution for 90 minutes. The amount of fluorescein solution that crossed the cornea was measured spectrophotometrically. The opacity and permeability assessments were combined to determine an In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS). After treatment with the negative control (0.9% sodium chloride solution) the calculated IVIS was 3.3 (study acceptance criteria range: -1.4 - 5.4). Treatment with the positive control (N,N-dimethylformamide) revealed an IVIS of 93.1 (study acceptance criteria range: 78.0 -118.0). Therefore, the study fulfilled the acceptance criteria. The IVIS obtained after treatment with the test item was -2.0 and, thus, lower than 3, i.e. according to OECD 437 the test item is not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage (UN GHS: No Category).