Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Acute oral toxicity (males and female rats): LD50 = 2330 mg/kg bw
Acute dermal toxicity (male and female rats): LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1978
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: A 2 page study report is available. The study was performed pre-GLP. The study was performed according to a method similar to OECD401. No data on substance identity or composition.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Very high dose volume. Animals were only observed for signs of intoxication and necropsy was performed on surviving animals.
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
pre-GLP
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
propylene glycol
Doses:
8.3, 10.0, 12.0, 14.4, 17.3 ml/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
no
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
2 330 mg/kg bw
95% CL:
2 080 - 2 600

Results:

Within a few hours after dosing the rats showed sluggishness, followed by loss of consciousness. Death occurred between 4 and 50 hours after dosing. Later on the survivors recovered gradually and looked quite healthy again at the end of the observation period. Macroscopic examination of the survivors at autopsy revealed dark discolouration of the liver in the rats of all dose groups. Some of the rats showed mottled kidneys. No other signs of treatment-related gross alterations were seen.

Dose

Mortality

Suspension ml/kg

Test substance g/kg

males

females

%

8.3

2.08

1/5

3/5

40

10.0

2.50

1/5

4/5

50

12.0

3.00

4/5

5/5

90

14.4

3.60

3/5

5/5

80

17.3

4.33

5/5

5/5

100

Interpretation of results:
Category 5 based on GHS criteria
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
From the mortality-figures the LD50 of para-toluene sulphonamide was calculated to be 2.33 g per kg body weight, with 2.08 and 2.60 as the 95% confidence limits. Therefore, the test substance does not need to be classified for Acute Oral Toxicity in accordance with the criteria outlined in Annex VI of 67/548/EEC and Annex I of 1272/2008/EC.
Executive summary:

An acute oral toxicity study was performed according to a method similar to OECD401 and pre-GLP. 5 male and 5 female rats were dosed with 8.3, 10.0, 1.20, 14.4 or 17.3 ml/kg bw. The animals were observed for signs of intoxication during a 14-day period, after which autopsies were carried out on the survivors. Within a few hours after dosing the rats showed sluggishness, followed by loss of consciousness. Death occurred between 4 and 50 hours after dosing. Later on the survivors recovered gradually and looked quite healthy again at the end of the observation period. Macroscopic examination of the survivors at autopsy revealed dark discolouration of the liver in the rats of all dose groups. Some of the rats showed mottled kidneys. No other signs of treatment-related gross alterations were seen. From the mortality-figures the LD50 of para-toluene sulphonamide was calculated to be 2.33 g per kg body weight, with 2.08 and 2.60 as the 95% confidence limits. Therefore, the test substance does not need to be classified for Acute Oral Toxicity in accordance with the criteria outlined in Annex VI of 67/548/EEC and Annex I of 1272/2008/EC.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
2 330 mg/kg bw

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From October 2012 to December 2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study is performed in accordance with GLP and OECD guideline 402.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Not relevant
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: at least 200 g
- Fasting period before study:
- Housing: animals were housed in suspended solid floor polypropene cages furnished with woodflakes. Animals were housed individually during the 24-hour exposure period and in groups of 4, by sex, for the remainder of the study
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum (2014C Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 25
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): at least 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours dark / 12 hours light

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 07 November 2012 To: 28 November 2012
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Vehicle:
other: Distilled water and dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)
Details on dermal exposure:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: back and flanks
- % coverage: approximately 10% of the total body surface area
- Type of wrap if used: surgical gauze semi-occluded with a piece of self-adhesive bandage

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): residual test substance was removed by wiping the treated skin and surrounding hair with cotton wool moistened with distilled water and dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)
- Time after start of exposure: 24 hours after application of test substance

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 2000 mg/kg bodyweight
- Concentration (if solution): no information available
- Constant volume or concentration used: yes
- For solids, paste formed: yes

VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): no information available
- Concentration (if solution): no information available
- Lot/batch no. (if required): no information available
- Purity: no information available
Duration of exposure:
24 hours
Doses:
2000 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Individual bodyweights prior to dosing and 7 and 14 days after treatment. Mortality and clinical observations at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently once daily for 14 days
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight
Statistics:
not relevant
Preliminary study:
Not applicable
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: 0/10 deaths
Mortality:
No mortality was observed
Clinical signs:
other: No signs of systemic toxicity were observed
Gross pathology:
One male showed thickened non-glandular epithelium of the stomach at necropsy. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy of the other animals.
Other findings:
There were no signs of dermal irritation

Not relevant

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this test, the acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the Wistar strain rat was found to be greater then 2000 mg/kg bw. The test material does not meet the criteria for classification and will not require labelling for dermal toxicity in accordance with according to the criteria outlined in Annex I of 1272/2008/EC (CLP) and Annex VI of 67/548/EEC (DSD).
Executive summary:

An acute dermal toxicity test (limit test) was performed with p-Toluenesulphonamide as testing material. The test was performed according to OECD guideline 402 (Acute dermal toxicity) in a group of 10 rats (5 males, 5 females). The rats were dermally exposed to the substance at 2000 mg/kg bw for 24 hours. The substance was applied to a shorn skin (approximately 10% of body surface). A piece of surgical gauze was placed over the treatment area and semi-occluded with a piece of self-adhesive bandage.

No mortality was observed in the 14 days period after exposure. No signs of systemic toxicity were observed during clinical observation. No signs of dermal irritation were noted in the animals. One male showed thickened non-glandular epithelium of the stomach at necropsy. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy of the other animals. Overall body weight of all animals increased during study.

The acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the Wistar strain rat, was found to be >2000 mg/kg bw. The test material does not meet the criteria for classification and will not require labelling for dermal toxicity in accordance with the criteria outlined in Annex I of 1272/2008/EC (CLP) and Annex VI of 67/548/EEC (DSD).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
discriminating dose
Value:
2 000 mg/kg bw

Additional information

The results of PTSA are read across to PTSI. This is considered justified because PTSI is extremely reactive with water and reacts instantaneously into the source substance PTSA.This will occur on the skin and also inside the body. Thus, in practice, exposure will be to PTSA and not PTSI. Due to this extreme reactivity it is considered ethically not appropriate to perform the acute toxicity studies with PTSI.

 

An acute oral toxicity study with PTSA was performed according to a method similar to OECD401 and pre-GLP. 5 male and 5 female rats were dosed with 8.3, 10.0, 1.20, 14.4 or 17.3 ml/kg bw. The animals were observed for signs of intoxication during a 14-day period, after which autopsies were carried out on the survivors. Sluggishness and loss of conscience were observed. Mortality was observed between 4 and 50 hours after dosing. The LD50 of PTSA was calculated to be 2.33 g per kg body weight, with 2.08 and 2.60 as the 95% confidence limits.

 

An acute dermal toxicity test (limit test) was performed with PTSA as testing material. The test was performed according to OECD guideline 402 (Acute dermal toxicity). 5 male and 5 female rats were dermally exposed to the substance at 2000 mg/kg bw for 24 hours. No mortality was observed in the 14 days period after exposure. No signs of systemic toxicity were observed during clinical observation. No signs of dermal irritation were noted in the animals. Overall body weight of all animals increased during study. In conclusion, the acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) was found to be >2000 mg/kg bw.


Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
One pre-GLP study available which was performed similar to the OECD guideline 401.

Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
Reliable GLP study according to OECD Guideline 402

Justification for classification or non-classification

The test material does not meet the criteria for classification and will not require labelling for acute toxicity in accordance with the criteria outlined in Annex I of 1272/2008/EC (CLP) and Annex VI of 67/548/EEC (DSD).