Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 211-560-2 | CAS number: 665-66-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions: testing in single sex, limited documentation.
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- DNA damage in brain cells and behavioral deficits in mice after treatment with high doses of amantadine.
- Author:
- Kaefer V, Semedo JG, Silva Kahl VF, Von Borowsky RG, Gianesini J, Ledur Kist TB, Pereira P, Picada JN
- Year:
- 2 010
- Bibliographic source:
- J Appl Toxicol.; 30(8):745-53
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- In vivo rodent erythrocyte micronucleus assay.
- Author:
- Hayashi M, Tice RR, Macgregor JT, Anderson D, Blakey DH, Kirsch-Volders M, Oleson FB Jr, Pacchierotti F, Romagna F, Shimada H, Sutou S, Vannier B
- Year:
- 1 994
- Bibliographic source:
- Mutat. Res. 312: 293–304.
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- only male mice were used as test animals, limited documentation
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Amantadine hydrochloride
- EC Number:
- 211-560-2
- EC Name:
- Amantadine hydrochloride
- Cas Number:
- 665-66-7
- Molecular formula:
- C10H17N.ClH
- IUPAC Name:
- adamantan-1-amine hydrochloride
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Amantadine (hydrochloride-1-adamantanamine)
- Analytical purity: no data, purchased from Acros Organics (Belgium).
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CF-1
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Lutheran University of Brazil (ULBRA)
- Weight at study initiation: 38–47 g
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 23 ± 2
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: physiol. saline;
- Amount: 10 mL/kg bw - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Post exposure period:
- On the fourth day the animals were sacrificed.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
15, 30 or 60 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 7 males
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide: 25 mg/kg bw
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow from both femurs
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: The highest dose tested (60 mg/kg bw) was previously established as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), following the recommendations described by Mavournin et al., 1990 (Mutat. Res. 239: 29–80) and Hartmann et al., 2003 (Mutagenesis 18: 45–51), and the other doses used were 50 and 25% of MTD. All solutions were prepared immediately prior to administration.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES (in addition to information in specific fields): Male mice were treated i.p. once a day with saline solution, or the test item (15, 30 or 60 mg/kg bw) for three consecutive days. The genotoxic activities were evaluated using seven animals per group. On the fourth day the animals were sacrificed and for the micronucleus assay, samples of the bone marrow were collected from the femurs.
A positive control group with N = 5 animals was treated with 25 mg/kg bw cyclophosphamide and sacrificed after 24 h, to evaluate mutagenic activity.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: Bone marrow from both femurs was suspended in fetal calf serum and smears on clean glass slides were prepared. Slides were air-dried, fixed in methanol, stained in 10% Giemsa and coded for a blind analysis.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: Polychromatic erythrocytes: normochromatic erythrocytes (PCE/NCE) ratio was scored in 1000 cells. The incidence of micronuclei (MN) was observed in 2000 PCE per animal. - Statistics:
- The statistical evaluation of data from micronucleus assay was carried out using Tukey’s test.
In all comparisons, P ≤ 0.05 was considered as indicating statistical significance.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 3: Results of the in vivo micronucleus assay.
Treatment group |
Dose [mg/kg] |
PCE/NCE ratio |
Micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in 2000 PCE per animal |
Vehicle control |
0 |
2.79 ± 0.86 |
1.14± 0.37 |
Test substance |
15 |
2.16 ± 0.84 |
1.28± 0.48 |
|
30 |
3.50 ± 1.13 |
1.43±0.53 |
|
60 |
2.58 ± 0.95 |
1.71± 0.76 |
Positive control (Cyclophosphamide) |
25 |
1.16 ± 0.80* |
11.6± 2.07** |
Significant difference: *P≤0.05; **P≤0.01 (ANOVA, Tukey’s test) in comparison with the saline group.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.