Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 911-616-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Data on the main component and on the reaction mass itself according to OECD test guidelines and GLP principles:
C16MES Ames: negative
C16MES CAT: negative
Reaction mass Mouse Lymphoma: negative
Supporting studies on similar substances:
C14MES: Ames: negative
C14MES CAT: negative
Although no data is available on the C18MES component, good quality results on the main component C16MES and a similar component with lower C-chain length (C14MES) were available and an in vitro Mouse Lymphoma test on the reaction mass of C16/C18MES. Based on the absence of genotoxic potential in these tests, it can be concluded that there is no indication that the reaction mass has a genotoxic potential.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 19 February - 22 June 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- In the second mutagenicity test in the absence of S9-mix, only five dose levels could be analyzed for expression of the TK mutation.
Evaluation: Too many dose levels showed a toxic response to the treatment. The two highest tested dose levels showed appropriate toxicity: a RTG 75 and 89%, the testing of lower dose levels would have given limited additional information; therefore the use of only five dose levels has no effect on the integrity of the study. - GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- thymidine kinase (TK) locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- L5178Y/TK+/--3.7.2C mouse lymphoma cells.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbital and ß-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First mutagenicity test:
Without S9-mix: 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 15, 30, 40, and 50 μg/ml exposure medium.
With 8% (v/v) S9-mix: 1, 10, 33, 66, 100, 110, 115 and 120 μg/ml exposure medium.
Second mutagenicity study:
Without S9-mix: 0.3, 3, 30, 50, and 55 µg/ml exposure medium.
With 12% (v/v) S9-mix: 1, 10, 33, 100, 110, 115, 120, and 130 μg/ml exposure medium. - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
The final concentration of the solvent in the exposure medium was 0.8% (v/v) - Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- for the 3 and 24 hrs treatment -S9 mix; at 15 and 5 µg/ml in DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- for + S9-mix treatments; at 7.5 µg/ml in Hanks' balanced salt solution (- Ca and -Mg)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: Prior to dose range finding and mutagenicity testing, the mouse lymphoma cells were grown for
1 day in R10 medium containing 10-4 M hypoxanthine, 2 x 10-7 M aminopterine and 1.6 x 10-5 M thymidine to reduce the amount of spontaneous mutants, followed by a recovery period of 2 days on R10 medium containing hypoxanthine and thymidine only. After this period cells were returned to R10 medium for at least 1 day before starting the experiment.
- Exposure duration: 3 and 24 hrs (+ and - 8% (v/v) S9 mix
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days after the end of the treatment
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 11 to 12 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): trifluoro thymidine (TFT)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 8 x 10^6 cells (10^6 cells/ml for 3 hours treatment) or 5 x 10^6 cells (1.25 x 10^5 cells/ml for 24 hours treatment)
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- A mutation assay was considered acceptable if it met the following criteria:
a) The absolute cloning efficiency of the solvent controls (CEday2) is between 65 and 120%. An acceptable number of surviving cells (106) could be analysed for expression of the TK mutation.
b) The spontaneous mutation frequency in the solvent control is ≥ 50 x 10-6 and ≤ 170 x 10-6.
c) The growth rate (GR) over the 2-day expression period for the negative controls should be between 8 and 32 (3 hours treatment) and between 32-180 (24 hours treatment).
d) The mutation frequency of MMS should not be below 500 x 10-6, and for CP not below 700 x 10-6. - Statistics:
- The global evaluation factor (GEF) has been defined by the IWTG as the mean of the negative/solvent MF distribution plus one standard deviation. For the micro well version of the assay the GEF is 126.
A test substance is considered positive (mutagenic) in the mutation assay if it induces a MF of more then MF(controls) + 126 in a dose-dependent manner. An observed increase should be biologically relevant and will be compared with the historical control data range.
A test substance is considered equivocal (questionable) in the mutation assay if no clear conclusion for positive or negative result can be made after an additional confirmation study.
A test substance is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the mutation assay if:
a) None of the tested concentrations reaches a mutation frequency of MF(controls) + 126.
b) The results are confirmed in an independently repeated test. - Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility and precipitation: MIZULAN FL-80 precipitated in the exposure medium at concentrations of 333 μg/ml and above. MIZULAN FL-80 was tested beyond the limit of the solubility to obtain adequate cytotoxicity data, the concentration used as the highest test substance concentration for the dose range finding test was 1000 μg/ml.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In the dose range finding test, L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells were treated with a test substance concentration range of 10 to 1000 µg/ml in the absence of S9-mix with a 3 and 24 hour treatment period and in the presence of S9-mix with a 3 hour treatment period.
In the absence of S9-mix, the relative suspension growth was 46% at the test substance concentration of 33 μg/ml compared to the relative suspension growth of the solvent control. No cell survival was observed at test substance concentrations of 100 μg/ml and above.
In the presence of S9-mix, the relative suspension growth was 48% at the test substance concentration of 100 μg/ml compared to the relative suspension growth of the solvent control. No cell survival was observed at test substance concentrations of 333 μg/ml and above.
In the absence of S9-mix, no toxicity in the relative suspension growth was observed up to concentrations of 10 μg/ml compared to the relative suspension growth of the solvent control. No cell survival was observed at test substance concentrations of 33 μg/ml and above.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: The spontaneous mutation frequencies in the solvent-treated control cultures were between the minimum and maximum value of the historical control data range. The observed mutation frequencies of the positive control substances were within the acceptability criteria of this assay
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
First test: In the absence of S9-mix, the relative total growth of the highest test substance concentration was reduced by 89% compared to the total growth of the solvent controls. In the presence of S9-mix, the relative total growth of the highest test substance concentration was reduced by 89% compared to the total growth of the solvent controls.
Second test: In the absence of S9-mix, the relative total growth of the highest test substance was reduced by 90% compared to the total growth of the solvent controls. In the presence of S9-mix, the relative total growth of the highest test substance concentration was reduced by 82% compared to the total growth of the solvent controls. - Conclusions:
- In the absence of S9-mix, MIZULAN FL-80 did not induce a significant increase in the mutation frequency in the first experiment. This result was confirmed in a repeat experiment with modifications in the duration of treatment time.
In the presence of S9-mix, MIZULAN FL-80 did not induce a significant increase in the mutation frequency in the first experiment. This result was confirmed in an independent experiment with modifications in the composition of the S9 concentration for metabolic activation.
In conclusion, MIZULAN FL-80 is not mutagenic in the TK mutation test system under the experimental conditions described in this report.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Ames test: In a study performed according to OECD test guidelines, the species S. typhimurium TA1535, 1537, 98 and 100 and the species E. coli WP2 uvr A were tested up to cytotoxic and/or precipitating concentrations of C16 MES with and without metabolic activation. All bacterial strains showed negative responses over the entire dose range with and without metabolic activation, i.e. no significant dose-related increase in the number of revertants in two independently repeated experiments. Based on the results of this study it is concluded that C16MES is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay. In a supporting study performed with C14MES, also negative results were derived.
Chromosome aberration test: In a study performed according to OECD test guidelines, chinese hamster lung fibroblasts were exposed to C16MES up to 250 microg/ml with and without metabolic activation, concentrations at which the substance was cytotoxic. C16MES did not induce a statistically significant or biologically relevant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations in the absence and presence of S9-mix, in either of the two independently repeated experiments. Therefore it was concluded that the substance is not clastogenic in fibroblasts under the experimental conditions chosen. In a supporting study with C14MES, also negative results were derived.
Mouse lymphoma test:In a study performed according to OECD and EC test guidelines, L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells were exposed to the reaction mass C16/C18MES up to cytotoxic concentrations with and without metabolic activation. In the absence or presence of S9-mix, the substance did not induce a significant increase in the mutation frequency. Based on the results of the test it was concluded that the reaction mass is not mutagenic in the mouse lymphoma L5178Y test system under the experimental conditions chosen.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data, the reaction mass does not have to be classified for genetic toxicity according to CLP Regulation 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.