Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 244-005-8 | CAS number: 20748-72-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to a guideline study
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Evaluation of the developmental toxicity of dermally applied Monoethanolamine in rats and rabbits
- Author:
- Liberacki AB, Neeper-Bradley TL, Breslin WJ and Zielke GJ
- Year:
- 1 996
- Bibliographic source:
- Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 31: 117-123
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 993
- Report date:
- 1993
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.31 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Pregnant New Zealand White rabbits were exposed dermally to 10, 25 or 75 mg/kg bw/day of the test substance for approximately 6 hours/day on days 6 through 18 of gestation.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-aminoethanol
- EC Number:
- 205-483-3
- EC Name:
- 2-aminoethanol
- Cas Number:
- 141-43-5
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-aminoethanol
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material: Monoethanolamine (2-Aminoethanol)
- Analytical purity: 100 % pure as analyzed gas chromotography using flame ionization detection
- supplier: The Dow Chemical Company
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hazelton Research Products, Inc. (Denver, PA), U.S.A.
- Weight at study initiation: 3.0-4.0 kg
- Fasting period before study: none
- Housing: in wire-bottom cages
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 2 weeks
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 20 °C
- Humidity: 40-60 %
- Photoperiod: 12 hours dark / 12 hours light
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- dermal
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: shaved skin of the back
- Type of wrap: sterile gauze held in place by Lycra-Spandex jacket
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: water-dampened towel was used to wipe remaining test material off.
- Time after start of exposure: 6 hours
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 2 mL/kg bw
- Constant volume or concentration used: no - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- M/F ratio per cage: 2/1
- Length of cohabitation: over night
- Verification of same strain and source of both sexes: yes
- Proof of pregnancy: copulation referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- days 6-18 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- 6 hours/day, daily
- Duration of test:
- up to day 29 of gestation
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
10, 25, 75 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
other: received dermal dose
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 15 dams/group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: dose levels selected for these studies were chosen based upon the results of dermal range-finding and teratology probe studies conducted in rabbits.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
- Time schedule: daily
BODY WEIGHT
- Time schedule: gestation days 0, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24 and 29
FOOD CONSUMPTION
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
WATER CONSUMPTION: No
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS
- Sacrifice on gestation day 29
- Organs examined: weights of liver and kidneys
OTHER
Blood analysis prior to Caesarian section; skin irritation was evaluated once daily during the postdosing period - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination.
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- Other: Uteri with no visible implantations were stained with a 10 % sulfide solution. - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: yes, all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: yes, all per litter
- Skeletal examinations: yes, half per litter
- Head examinations: yes, half per litter
All fetuses were weighed and examined for evidence of external alterations and palate closure. All of the rabbit fetuses in each litter were examined for visceral alterations (Staples, 1974). The sex of all live fetuses was determined. The heads of one half of the rabbit fetuses not selected for skeletal examination were removed, placed in Bouin's solution, and subsequently sectioned and examined for craniofacial defects (Wilson, 1965 ; Van Julsingha and Bennet, 1977). All fetuses were eviscerated and stained with Alizarin red-S ( Dawson, 1926; Crary, 1962). Skeletal examinations were conducted only on the rat fetuses not selected for Bouin's examination.
References
- Crary DD (1962). Modified Benzyl alcohol clearing of Alizarin-stained specimens withut loss of flexibility. Stain Technol. 37: 124-125.
- Dawson AB (1926). A note on the staining of the skeletons of cleared specimens with Alizarin-red S. Stain Technol. 1: 123-124.
- Staples RE (1974). Detection of visceral alterations in mammalian fetuses. Teratology 9: 37 [Abstract].
- Van Julsingha EB and Bennet CG (1977). A dissecting procedure for the detection of anomalies in the foetal head. In: Methods in prenatal toxicology (Neubert D, Merker HJ and Kwasigroch TE, editors) PSG, Littleton MA, U.S.A.: 126-144.
- Wilson JG (1965). Method for administering agents and detecting malformations in experimental animals. In: Teratology: principles and techniques (Wilson JG and Warkany J, editors) Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, U.S.A. - Statistics:
- Continuous data were evaluated for homogeneity of variance using Levene's test (Levene, 1960). Based upon the outcome of this test, a parametric or nonparametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed. If the ANOVA was significant, analysis by Dunnett's test (Steel and Torrie, 1960), the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test with Bonferroni's correction (Miller, 1966), or a pooled t-test was performed as appropriate. The level of statistical significance was set a priori at a = 0.05. Nonparametric data were compared using Fischer's exact probability test (Siegel, 1956).
References
- Levene H (1960). Robust tests for equality of variance. In: Contributions to probability and statistics (Olkin I et al., editors). Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford CA, U.S.A..
- Miller RG Jr. (1966). Simultaneous statistical inference. McGraw-Hill, New York, U.S.A..
- Siegel S (1956). Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, U.S.A..
- Steel RGD and Torrie JH (1960). Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York, U.S.A..
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
Details on maternal toxic effects:
Rabbits administered 75 mg/kg bw/day exhibited severe skin irritation (erythema, edema, ecchymosis, necrosis, exfoliation, and crusting) at the site of exposure. Subsequent to the dosing period, exfoliation, crusting, and areas of necrosis persisted. The skin of the majority of these rabbits began to heal as evidenced by scab formation late in the gestation period. Crusting, transient erythema, and edema were noted in a few rabbits administered 25 mg/kg bw/day. No significant dermal irritation or lesions were observed among rabbits administered 10 mg/kg bw/day.
No females died, aborted, delivered early or were removed from the test during the study. There were also no significant treatment-related effects observed on feed consumption, hematologic parameters or kidney and liver weights of exposed rabbits at any dose level tested.
No statistically identified changes were observed in body weight and body weight gain, the average body weight gain of high dose rabbits over the course of gestation was decreased when compared to that of the control and other dose groups, mainly due to weight loss or very little weight gain during the treatment period.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 75 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
No treatment-related effects were observed on reproductive parameters including pregnancy rate, number of corpora lutea, number of implantations, resorptions, litter size, number of dead fetuses, fetal sex ratio, fetal body weight or gravid uterine weight among exposed rabbits at any dose level when compared to controls. There were no statistically or biologically significant treatment-related differences in the incidence of any fetal variation or malformation, or in the number of malformed fetuses in any dose group. Among control litters the following types of malformations were noted: ventricular septal defect, common opening at entry of the vessels of the heart, missing lung lobe, missing gallbladder, and extra lumbar centrum and arches.
Malformations observed in litters from rabbits given 10 mg/kg bw/day included dilated lateral cerebral ventricle with tissue depression, missing lung lobe, missing gallbladder, misaligned or fused thoracic centra, extra lumbar centrum and arches, and fused ribs. Limited numbers of malformations noted at 25 mg/kg bw/day included dilated lateral cerebral ventricle with tissue depression and missing lung lobe. Malformations observed in fetuses from the 75 mg/kg bw/day group litters included the following: dilated lateral cerebral ventricle with tissue depression, missing lung lobe, diagonally displaced thoracic centra, missing thoracic arch, and a single missing rib.
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.