Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 234-277-6 | CAS number: 11059-65-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 7.34 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 30
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 617.8 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 12.5
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 4.17 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 300
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 299 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
- Descriptor: Acute dermal study, NOAEL is 25600 mg/kg in rats
- AF:
- Correct for concentration of 58.4%
- Descriptor: the acute oral NOAEL of 7500 mg/kg
- Corrected descriptor: 1.76((1/sRVrat(0.38) x (ABSoral-rat(100)/ABSinh-rat(100)) x (sRVhuman (0.67)/wRV (10))) to give a corrected acute inhalation NOAEC of 13,200 mg/m3
- AF:1 for allometric scale,2.5 for remaining differen5 for intraspecies difference (workers),
- Correct for concentration of 58.4%
- Repeat dose toxicity study is not available for phenol, tetrapropenyl-, hydrogen phosphorodithioate, zinc, but an OECD 407 (NOAEL = 125 mg/kg/d) and OECD 422 (NOAEL = 160 mg/kg/d) toxicity study in rats were available for category substances EC 224-235-5 and EC270-608-0, respectively. These substances show similarities in structure and chemistry, presumably toxicological effects. Therefore the lowest NOAEL from the two studies were used to derive DNEL for the current registration substance. See the repeat dose data waiver for read across justifications.
- The DNEL for tetrapropenyl phenol (TPP) is based on the NOAEL from a two generation reproductive toxicity study with TPP (the most sensitive endpoint). As the zinc salt as manufactured contains 8.27% TPP, a dose of 181.4 mg/kg/day (15 mg/kg bw/day divided by 8.27%) would be the projected NOAEL since it would deliver no more than 15 mg/kg/day of TPP. This correction is also used to calculate the inhalation DNEL. The assessment factors used in the calculation of the DNEL are based on the properties of TPP.
- The long-term DNELs for both chemicals are then applied to the chemical safety assessment to calculate the risk characterization ratios (see CSR).
Composition
This substance is of complex composition by process that meets the criteria of a UVCB. It contains
i. multiple Phenol, tetrapropenyl-, hydrogen phosphorodithioate, zinc species (neutral dimeric, trimeric, and tetrameric dithiophosphate forms)
ii. their basic salt compliments,
iii. Tetrapropenyl phenol (residual starting material),
iv. base oil (solvent).
Dermal Absorption:
Justification for 10% dermal absorption correction forphenol, tetrapropenyl-, hydrogen phosphorodithioate, zin
Physicochemical properties:
MW: 1301
Measured water solubility: <5mg/L
Measured Log Kow:> 2.59 (the upper limit is estimated to be < 3.6 by read across to an analog substance, EC 224-235-5)
Vapor pressure: 4.1 x10-3Pa at 25oC
No ADME, toxicokinetic, or repeat dose dermal toxicity data are available for the substance. However, the physicochemical properties in combination with the available toxicity studies in animals provide strong support in determining the expected dermal absorption of this substance.
This substanceis not expected to be absorbed via the GI tract or through the skin.This substancehas relatively high molecular weight, low water solubility, low Log Kow, and low vapor pressure, suggested low absorption via dermal, oral or inhalative administration routes. Low bioavailability is supported by the low systemic toxicity observed following oral and dermal administration. Based on this information as a whole and theGuidance Document on Dermal Absorption by the European Commission (2004), a default value of 10% for dermal absorption is considered appropriate (details see Toxicokinetic).
Justification for 100% dermal absorption for TPP
Physicochemical properties:
MW: <500
Measured water solubility: 1.54 mg/L
Measured Log Kow:7.73
Vapor pressure: 1.1 x10-2Pa at 25oC
Based on discussion on TPP toxicokinetic (reference: CSR for CAS 121158-58-5, EC 310-154-3), dermal penetration is expected for this substance due to its small molecular weight/size and lipophilicity and 100% dermal absorption was assumed for DNEL derivation. Therefore, same parameters were used in the current communication.
DNEL - short term local effect
Exposure based waiver.
DNEL - short term, systemic effect
Dermal route:
4 for allometric scale,
2.5 for remaining difference,
5 for intraspecies difference (workers)
Inhalation route:
DNEL - long term local effect:
Exposure based waiver.
DNEL - long term, systemic effect
The substance as a whole does not have repeat dose test data to calculate the long-term systemic derived no effect levels (DNEL). However, a DNEL for the material as a whole can be derived by calculating the DNEL for the main constituents as follows:
DNEL calculation is present in Table 1.
DNEL calculation is present in Table 2.
Table 1. The long-term systemic DNELs for Phenol, tetrapropenyl-, hydrogen phosphorodithioate, zinc are calculated as follows (workers):
Route |
Dose descriptor |
Corrected dose descriptor |
Most sensitive endpoint |
DNEL |
Justification |
Dermal |
NOAEL: 125.0 mg/kg bw/day, oral study |
1250 mg/kg bw/day (corrected for 10% dermal absorption) |
Repeated dose toxicity |
4.17 mg/kg bw/day |
An assessment factor of 300 is based on the following: 4 for allometric scale, 2.5 for remaining difference, 5 for intraspecies difference (workers), 6 for duration extrapolation (subacute to chronic exposure), 1 for quality of the data (a reliable study).
|
Inhalation |
NOAEL: 125.0 mg/kg bw/day |
220 mg/m3 |
Repeated dose toxicity |
7.34 mg/m3 |
Using a correction factor of 1.7621((1/sRVrat(0.38))x(ABSoral-rat(100)/ABSinh-human(100))x(sRVhuman(6.7)/wRV(10))) giving a corrected inhalation NOAEC value of 220.4mg/m3.
An assessment factor of 30 is based on the following: 1 for interspecies difference, 5 for intraspecies difference (workers), 6 for duration extrapolation (subacute to chronic exposure), 1 for quality of the data (a reliable study). |
Table 2. The long-term systemic DNELs for tetrapropenyl phenol are calculated as follows (worker):
Route |
Dose descriptor |
Corrected dose descriptor |
Most sensitive endpoint |
DNEL |
Justification |
Dermal |
NOAEL: 15.0 mg/kg bw/day |
181.4 mg/kg bw/day
(concentration in the registered substance is 8.27%) |
Reproductive toxicity |
1.81 mg/kg bw/day |
Ø The NOAEL of 15 mg/kg bw/day is divided by 8.27% to correct for the amount of TPP to obtain the corrected dose descriptor. Ø An assessment factor of 100 is based on: 4 for allometric scale, 2.5 for remaining difference, 5 for intraspecies difference (workers), 2 for duration extrapolation (subchronic to chronic exposure), 1 for quality of the data (a reliable study). |
Inhalation |
NOAEL: 15.0 mg/kg bw/day |
290 mg/m3 |
Reproductive toxicity |
12.7 mg/m3 |
Ø The NOAEL of 15 mg/kg bw/day is divided by 8.27% to correct for the amount of TPP to obtain the corrected dose descriptor. Ø Using a correction factor of 181.4 mg/kg/d((1/sRVrat(0.38))x(ABSoral-rat(100)/ABSinh-human(100))x(sRVhuman(6.7)/wRV(10))) giving a corrected inhalation NOAEC value of 319.8 mg/m3/d. Ø An assessment factor of 25 is based on 2.5 for interspecies difference (remaining difference), 5 for intraspecies difference (workers), 2 for duration extrapolation (subchronic to chronic exposure), 1 for quality of the data (a reliable study). |
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.81 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 60
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 152.3 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.1 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 149.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.21 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 43.8 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
- Descriptor: Acute dermal study, NOAEL is 25600 mg/kg in rats
- AF:
- Correct for concentration of 58.4%
- Descriptor: the acute oral NOAEL of 7500 mg/kg
- Corrected descriptor: 1.76((1/sRVrat(0.38) x (ABSoral-rat(100)/ABSinh-rat(100)) x (sRVhuman (0.67)/wRV (10))) to give a corrected acute inhalation NOAEC of 13,200 mg/m3
- AF: 1 for allometric scale, 2.5 for remaining different 10 for intraspecies difference (general populations),
- Correct for concentration of 58.4%
- Descriptor: the acute oral NOAEL of 7500 mg/kg
- AF: 4 for allometric scale, 2.5 for remaining different 10 for intraspecies difference (general populations),
- Correct for concentration of 58.4%
- Repeat dose toxicity study is not available for phenol, tetrapropenyl-, hydrogen phosphorodithioate, zinc, but an OECD 407 (NOAEL = 125 mg/kg/d) and OECD 422 (NOAEL = 160 mg/kg/d) toxicity study in rats were available for category substances EC 224-235-5 and EC270-608-0, respectively. These substances show similarities in structure and chemistry, presumably toxicological effects. Therefore the lowest NOAEL from the two studies were used to derive DNEL for the current registration substance. See the repeat dose data waiver for read across justifications.
- The DNEL for tetrapropenyl phenol (TPP) is based on the NOAEL from a two generation reproductive toxicity study with TPP (the most sensitive endpoint). As the zinc salt as manufactured contains 8.27% TPP, a dose of 1181.4 mg/kg/day (15 mg/kg bw/day divided by 8.27%) would be the projected NOAEL since it would deliver no more than 15 mg/kg/day of TPP. This correction is also used to calculate the inhalation DNEL. The assessment factors used in the calculation of the DNEL are based on the properties of TPP.
- The long-term DNELs for both chemicals are then applied to the chemical safety assessment to calculate the risk characterization ratios (see CSR).
Composition
This substance is of complex composition by process that meets the criteria of a UVCB. It contains
i. multiple Phenol, tetrapropenyl-, hydrogen phosphorodithioate, zinc species (neutral dimeric, trimeric, and tetrameric dithiophosphate forms)
ii. their basic salt compliments,
iii. Tetrapropenyl phenol (residual starting material),
iv. base oil (solvent).
Dermal Absorption:
Justification for 10% dermal absorption correction for phenol, tetrapropenyl-, hydrogen phosphorodithioate, zinc
Physicochemical properties:
MW: 1301
Measured water solubility: <5mg/L
Measured Log Kow:> 2.59 (the upper limit is estimated to be < 3.6 by read across to an analog substance, EC 224-235-5)
Vapor pressure: 4.1 x10-3Pa at 25oC
No ADME, toxicokinetic, or repeat dose dermal toxicity data are available for the substance. However, the physicochemical properties in combination with the available toxicity studies in animals provide strong support in determining the expected dermal absorption of this substance.
This substanceis not expected to be absorbed via the GI tract or through the skin.This substancehas relatively high molecular weight, low water solubility, low Log Kow, and low vapor pressure, suggested low absorption via dermal, oral or inhalative administration routes. Low bioavailability is supported by the low systemic toxicity observed following oral and dermal administration. Based on this information as a whole and theGuidance Document on Dermal Absorption by the European Commission (2004), a default value of 10% for dermal absorption is considered appropriate (details see Toxicokinetic).
Justification for 100% dermal absorption for TPP
Physicochemical properties:
MW: <500
Measured water solubility: 1.54 mg/L
Measured Log Kow:7.73
Vapor pressure: 1.1 x10-2Pa at 25oC
Based on discussion on TPP toxicokinetic (reference: CSR for CAS 121158-58-5, EC 310-154-3), dermal penetration is expected for this substance due to its small molecular weight/size and lipophilicity and 100% dermal absorption was assumed for DNEL derivation. Therefore, same parameters were used in the current communication.
DNEL - short term local effect
Exposure based waiver.
DNEL - short term, systemic effect
Dermal route:
4 for allometric scale,
2.5 for remaining difference,
10 for intraspecies difference (general populations)
Inhalation route:
Oral route:
DNEL - long term local effect:
Exposure based waiver.
DNEL - long term, systemic effect
The substance as a whole does not have repeat dose test data to calculate the long-term systemic derived no effect levels (DNEL). However, a DNEL for the material as a whole can be derived by calculating the DNEL for the main constituents as follows:
DNEL calculation is present in Table 1.
DNEL calculation is present in Table 2.
Table 1. The long-term systemic DNELs for Phenol, tetrapropenyl-, hydrogen phosphorodithioate, zinc are calculated as follows (general populations):
Route |
Dose descriptor |
Corrected dose descriptor |
Most sensitive endpoint |
DNEL |
Justification |
Dermal |
NOAEL: 125.0 mg/kg bw/day, oral study |
1250 mg/kg bw/day (corrected for 10% dermal absorption) |
Repeated dose toxicity |
2.1 mg/kg bw/day |
An assessment factor of 600 is based on the following: 4 for allometric scale, 2.5 for remaining difference, 10 for intraspecies difference (general populations), 6 for duration extrapolation (subacute to chronic exposure), 1 for quality of the data (a reliable study).
Corrected for concentration: 58.4% |
Inhalation |
NOAEL: 125.0 mg/kg bw/day |
108.7 mg/m3 |
Repeated dose toxicity |
1.81 mg/m3 |
Using a correction factor of 0.87((1/sRVrat(1.15))x(ABSoral-rat(100)/ABSinh-human(100))) giving a corrected inhalation NOAEC value of 108.7mg/m3.
An assessment factor of 60 is based on the following: 1 for interspecies difference, 10 for intraspecies difference (general populations), 6 for duration extrapolation (subacute to chronic exposure), 1 for quality of the data (a reliable study). |
Oral |
NOAEL: 125.0 mg/kg bw/day |
NOAEL: 125.0 mg/kg bw/day |
Repeated dose toxicity |
0.21 mg/kg bw/day |
An assessment factor of 600 is based on the following: 4 for allometric scale, 2.5 for remaining difference since QSAR modeling predicated no metabolic activities occurred in the skin, 10 for intraspecies difference (general populations), 6 for duration extrapolation (subacute to chronic exposure), 1 for quality of the data (a reliable study).
Corrected for concentration: 58.4% |
Table 2. The long-term systemic DNELs for tetrapropenyl phenol are calculated as follows (general population):
Route |
Dose descriptor |
Corrected dose descriptor |
Most sensitive endpoint |
DNEL |
Justification |
Dermal |
NOAEL: 15.0 mg/kg bw/day |
181.4 mg/kg bw/day
(concentration in the registered substance is 8.27%) |
Reproductive toxicity |
0.907 mg/kg bw/day |
The NOAEL of 15 mg/kg bw/day is divided by 8.27% to correct for the amount of TPP to obtain the corrected dose descriptor.
An assessment factor of 200 is based on: 4 for allometric scale, 2.5 for remaining difference, 5 for intraspecies difference (general populations), 2 for duration extrapolation (subchronic to chronic exposure), 1 for quality of the data (a reliable study). |
Inhalation |
NOAEL: 15.0 mg/kg bw/day |
108.7 mg/m3 |
Reproductive toxicity |
3.154 mg/m3 |
The NOAEL of 15 mg/kg bw/day is divided by 8.27% to correct for the amount of TPP to obtain the corrected dose descriptor of 181.4 mg/kg/d.
Using a correction factor 0.87((1/sRVrat(1.15))x(ABSoral-rat(100)/ABSinh-human(100))) giving a corrected inhalation NOAEC value of 108.7 mg/m3/d.
An assessment factor of 50 is based on 2.5 for interspecies difference (remaining difference), 10 for intraspecies difference (general populations), 2 for duration extrapolation (subchronic to chronic exposure), 1 for quality of the data (a reliable study). |
Oral |
NOAEL: 15.0 mg/kg bw/day |
181.4 mg/kg bw/day
(concentration in the registered substance is 8.27%) |
Reproductive toxicity |
0.907 mg/kg bw/day |
The NOAEL of 15 mg/kg bw/day is divided by 8.27% to correct for the amount of TPP to obtain the corrected dose descriptor.
An assessment factor of 200 is based on: 4 for allometric scale, 2.5 for remaining difference, 10 for intraspecies difference (general populations), 2 for duration extrapolation (subchronic to chronic exposure), 1 for quality of the data (a reliable study). |
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.