Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 297-648-1 | CAS number: 93685-99-5 Oil shale waste is produced by thermal processing in a fluidized bed process at 800°C from mining exhausted oil shale. Oil shale waste consists essentially of Al2O3, CaO, CaSO4, Fe2O3 and SiO2.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation in vivo, rabbit: Burnt Oil Shale(BOS)-P.1082 and Burnt Oil Shale(BOS)-P.-1183: not irritating
Eye irritation in vitro: Burnt Oil Shale(BOS)-P.1082: irritating; Burnt Oil Shale(BOS)-P.1183: not irritating
Read across with Fluidized Bed Combustion (FBC) Fly Ash for Burnt Oil Shale(BOS)-P.1183 in vivo eye irritation, rabbit: not irritating
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2010-03-09 - 2010-07-05
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP - Guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2500 (Acute Dermal Irritation)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008, L 142, Annex Part B, 30 May 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland, D-97633 Sulzfeld
- Age at study initiation: approximately 15 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: > 2 kg
- Housing: Semi-barrier in an air-conditioned room, housed in ABS - plastic rabbit cages, floor 4200 cm²
- Diet: Free access to autoclaved hay and toAltromin 2123 maintenance diet for rabbits (lot no. 0748), rich in crude fibre
- Water: Free access to tap water (drinking water, municipal residue control, microbiol. controlled periodically)
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 ± 3°C
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 10%
- Air changes (per hr): at least 10 x / hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Artificial light, sequence being 12 hours light, 12 hours dark - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- other: test item was moistened with aqua ad injectionem (B. Braun Melsungen, lot no. 7494A191, expiry date: 11/2010)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): A dose of 0.5 g of the test item was applied to each test site. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The test item was held in contact with the skin throughout a 4-hour period.
- Observation period:
- All animals were observed for 72 hours after the patch removal.
- Number of animals:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: small skin area (approx. 6 cm²) on the left side of the dorsal area
- Type of wrap if used: gauze was held in place with non-irritating tape
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): not reported
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize system
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3/3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3/3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The test item showed neither irritant nor corrosive effects on the intact skin of 3 female rabbits (strain NZW) after a contact time of 4 hours.
Neither mortalities nor significant clinical signs of toxicity were observed. - Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Executive summary:
A GLP - guideline study according to OECD 404 was performed. Under the conditions of the present study, single dermal application of the test item Oil shale, thermal processing waste to rabbits at a dose of 0.5 g showed neither irritant nor corrosive effects. Neither mortalities nor significant clinical signs of toxicity were observed. In conformity with the EC criteria for classification and labelling requirements for dangerous substances and preparations according to Annex VI of Commission Directive 2001/59/EC and Annex I of Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, the test item Oil shale, thermal processing waste does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for skin irritation.
Reference
Absolute body weights in kg
Animal number |
Start of study (weight kg) |
End of study (weight kg) |
1 |
2.9 |
3.0 |
2 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
3 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2010-03-09 - 2010-04-12
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP - Guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- other: isolated corneas from bovine
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- not applicable
- Vehicle:
- physiological saline
- Controls:
- other: 3 corneas as negative controls treated with physiological saline 0.9% NaCl; 3 corneas as positive control treated with Imidazole 20%
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 750 µL
- Concentration (if solution): 20%
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 750 µL
- Concentration (if solution): 0.9%
- Lot/batch no. (if required): 9271A123
- Expiry date: 05-2012 - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period (in vivo):
- not required
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- other:
3 corneas for the test item were used - Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): After 4 hours incubation at 3 times with MEM (containing phenol red). Once the media was free of the test substance, the cornea was finally rinsed with Complete RPMI (without phenol red)
- Time after start of exposure: after 4 hours ± 5 min
SCORING SYSTEM:
- The following formula was used to determine the in vitro score:
In vitro score = Mean Opacity Value + (15 x Mean OD490 Value)
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE:
1.) After removing the test substance, the opacity measurement was performed
2.) After opacity measurement the medium was removed from the chambers of the holder. The posterior chamber was refilled with fresh Complete RPMI and 1 mL of 5 mg/mL sodium fluorescein was added to the anterior chamber and the corneas were incubated for 90 min at 32 ± 1°C. Then the medium was removed from the posterior chamber and its optical density at 490 nm (OD490) determined, using a spectrophotometer.
Evaluation of the BCOP assay:
Mean score Evaluation
0 – 3 Non irritant
3.1 – 25 Mild irritant
25.1 – 55 Moderate irritant
55.1 – 80 Severe irritant
> 80.1 Very severe irritant - Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3/3
- Score:
- 480
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Other effects:
- no data
- Interpretation of results:
- other: severe irritant
- Conclusions:
- According to the evaluation criteria the test item Oil shale, thermal processing waste is classified as very severe irritant to eye.
- Executive summary:
The eye irritancy potential of Oil shale, thermal processing waste was investigated in the bovine corneal opacity and permeability assay according to OECD guideline 437.
The test item was diluted in NaCl 0.9% to gain a 20% concentration. A mean in vitro score of 480.40 was calculated. Therefore the test item is classified as very severe irritant.
Reference
Individual data: Opacity
Cornea-No. |
Test item |
Opacity blank value |
Opacity post dose |
Change of opacity values |
Corrected opacity values |
1 2 3 MV |
Negative Control |
3 3 3 3.00 |
2 1 2 1.67 |
-1 -2 -1 -1.33 |
|
4 5 6 MV |
Positive Control Imidazole |
6 7 5 6.00 |
172 158 203 177.67 |
166 151 198 171.67 |
167.33 152.33 199.33 173.00 |
7 8 9 MV |
Test Item, Oil shale, thermal processing waste |
2 4 0 2.00 |
456 457 456 456.33 |
454 453 456 454.33 |
455.33 454.33 457.33 455.67 |
Individual data: Permeability
Cornea-No. |
Test Item |
OD490 |
Corrected OD490 values |
1 2 3 MV |
Negative Control |
0.013 0.009 0.033 0.018 |
|
4 5 6 MV |
Positive Control Imidazole |
2.097 2.113 1.306 1.839 |
2.079 2.095 1.288 1.820 |
7 8 9 MV |
Test Item, Oil shale, thermal processing waste |
2.132 1.839 1.030 1.667 |
2.114 1.821 1.012 1.649 |
In vitro overall irritation score
Cornea-No. |
Test item |
Corrected opacity value |
Corrected OD490 value |
In vitro Score |
1 2 3 MV |
Negative Control |
-1 -2 -1 -1.33 |
0.013 0.009 0.033 0.018 |
-1.06 |
4 5 6 MV |
Positive Control Imidazole |
167.33 152.33 199.33 173.00 |
2.079 2.095 1.288 1.820 |
200.31 |
7 8 9 MV |
Test Item, Oil shale, thermal processing waste |
455.33 454.33 457.33 455.67 |
2.114 1.821 1.012 1.649 |
480.40 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation:
A skin irritation study according to OECD 404 was performed with Burnt Oil Shale(BOS)-P.1082 on New Zealand White rabbits (Holcim, 2010a). Under the conditions of the studies, single dermal application of the test item BOS-P.1082 to rabbits showed neither irritant nor corrosive effects.
A skin irritation study according to OECD 404 was performed with Burnt Oil Shale(BOS)-P.1183 on New Zealand White rabbits (ICL, 2010a). Under the conditions of the studies, single dermal application of the test item BOS-P.1183 to rabbits showed neither irritant nor corrosive effects.
A skin irritation study according to OECD guideline 431 was performed on a three-dimensional human skin model EpiDerm, comprising a reconstructed epidermis with a functional stratum corneum with Burnt Oil Shale(BOS)-P.1082 (Holcim 2010b). The test item showed no corrosive effects.
According to the OECD guideline 431, the potential of the test item, Burnt Oil shale(BOS)-P.1183 to induce skin corrosion was analysed by using the three-dimensional human skin model EpiDerm, comprising a reconstructed epidermis with a functional stratum corneum (ICL, 2010b). The test item showed no corrosive effects.
Eye irritation:
Testing of Burnt Oil Shale(BOS)-P.1082 on isolated corneas from bovine was performed according to OECD guideline 437 in the bovine corneal opacity and permeability assay (Holcim, 2010c). A mean in vitro score of 480.40 was calculated. The negative control resulted in a mean in vitro score of -1.06 and the positive control, imidazol, revealed a mean in vitro score of 200.31. Therefore the test item is classified as very severe irritant.
Testing of Burnt Oil Shale(BOS)-P.1183 on isolated corneas from bovine was performed according to OECD guideline 437 in the bovine corneal opacity and permeability assay (ICL, 2010c). Calculations revealed a mean in vitro irritation score of 3.58. The negative control resulted in a mean in vitro score of -1.02 and the positive control Imidazol revealed a mean in vitro score of 200.31. In the in vitro study BOS-P.1183 showed no irritating potential.
To confirm the negative results with BOS-P.1183 of the in vitro study an in vivo eye irritation study according to OECD guideline 405 with the read across substance Fluidized Bed Combustion (FBC) Fly Ash on New Zealand White rabbits was evaluated (Koryntova, 2009). No corrosive effects or any clinical signs were observed during the study schedule. FBC induced only slight irritation in rabbit eyes after a single application that was fully reversible within 12 days. As FBC has a similar composition and appearance as BOS-P.1183 this study confirms the results of the in vitro study that BOS-P.1183 is not or only slight irritating and has not to be classified for eye irritation.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
The reliable GLP compliant OECD Guideline study was chosen.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
The reliable GLP compliant OECD Guideline study was chosen, based on a worst case scenario assumption.
Effects on eye irritation: corrosive
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to DSD and CLP the test item Burnt Oil Shale, thermal processing residue-P.1183 has not to be classified for corrosive or irritant potential to skin or eyes.
As no information about reversibility of the observed effects in eyes is available, the test item Burnt Oil Shale, thermal processing residue-P.1082 has to be classified according to:
DSD: Xi, R41: Risk of serious damage to eyes and
CLP: Category 1, H318: Causes serious eye damage.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.