Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 271-091-4 | CAS number: 68515-49-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Additional information
DIDP is readily biodegradable (74% biodegradation in 28 days), and does meet the 10-day window based on results from a standard OECD ready biodegradation test guideline (EMBSI, 2009). The principle transformation products would be mono-isodecyl phthalate (MIDP) and isodecyl alcohol (IDA) (Stapleset al., 1997b). Data are available to assess the potential biodegradability of these two transformation products. Biodegradation data are available for a mono ester that is a mixture containing approximately equal amounts of monoesters with normal octyl (n-C8) and normal decyl (n-C10) side chains. Results show that show that this mixture is readily biodegradable (Scholz, 2003) and data also show that IDA is readily biodegradable, meeting the 10-day window (ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., 2012). The n-C8/n-C10 mono ester biodegraded to 94% after 28 days, while IDA biodegraded to 83% after 28 days.
Studies are not available to assess the biodegradability of DIDP under simulated conditions (i.e., wastewater treatment). However, there are data for di-n-decyl phthalate (CAS No. 84-77-5; DnDP), an analog to DIDP, using treated wastewater that suggest DIDP would demonstrate a high extent of biodegradation under wastewater conditions (Furtmann, 1993). DnDP biodegraded 82% after 7 days based on the disappearance of the parent compound from the test system. The initial DnDP concentration was 7.8 μg/l and the DT50 was 1 day.
The elimination of DIDP in a sewage treatment plant (STP) through biodegradation and distribution, as reported by the European Commission (2003), was estimated using the SIMPLETREAT model. The model calculated that 91.9% of DIDP would be eliminated in a STP, which is consistent with the high loss reported by Furtmann (1993). The measured data for DnDP and the modeled data suggest that DIDP will be largely eliminated in a STP.
Studies are not available to assess the biodegradability of DIDP in sediment. Although there are no data specifically for the diester, there are biodegradation data for the monoester of DIDP (mono-isodecyl phthalate, MIDP) that showed an average half-life of 25 hours in marine sediments under aerobic conditions based on results from two studies (Otton et al., 2008). Research suggests that the formation of the monoester occurs as the first step in the biotic degradation of DIDP (Staples et al., 1997b). Because this step does not appear to be rate limiting, as evidenced by the high extent of biodegradation demonstrated by DIDP in a ready test, the aerobic degradation of the diester in sediment is expected to occur at a similar rate.
Studies are not available to assess the biodegradability of DIDP specifically in soil. However, data for an analog substance di-isononyl phthalate (CAS No. 68515-48-0; DINP) can be used to estimate the loss rate of DIDP in soil. DINP exhibited a half-life in soil of approximately 51 days, based on the loss of parent substance (ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., 2009). These data were developed in an earthworm toxicity test conducted in soil in which the concentration of DINP was monitored over a 56-day period. During that period DINP concentration decreased from 982 to 441 mg/kg soil (wet weight). Because DIDP and DINP exhibited similar extents of biodegradation in ready biodegradability tests, 67 and 71% respectively, they would be expected to biodegrade in soil at similar rates and to similar extents.
DINP is appropriate to use as an analog to DIDP on the principle that substances of similar structure have similar properties. The two substances are structurally similar; each is a diester containing two alkyl chains differing in length by one carbon, C9 for DINP and C10 for DIDP. The similarities in physical structure result in similar physico-chemical properties as well. DINP and DIDP have similar water solubilities (0.61 and 0.17 ug/L), and partition coefficients (both 8.8), and demonstrate similar results in ready biodegradibility tests and environmental toxicity tests. Given that both substances would be expected to act similarly, and do act similarly it is reasonable to use DINP as an analog for DIDP.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.