Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
21.11.1983 - 22.12.1983
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: - A pilot study was routinely performed in the test laboratory, but results are not reported.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1984
Report date:
1984

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Valid test data with guinea pigs are available, no further studies are required.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl) sebacate
EC Number:
258-207-9
EC Name:
Bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl) sebacate
Cas Number:
52829-07-9
Molecular formula:
C28H52N2O4
IUPAC Name:
bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl) sebacate
Details on test material:
- Physical state: solid
- Analytical purity: 99.7%
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Pirbright-Hartley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: in-house bred
- Age at study initiation: ca. 10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 332-478 g
- Housing: individually in Macrolon cages (type 3)
- Diet: ad libitum standard guinea pig pellets - NAFAG No. 846, Gossau SG - supplemented with fresh carrots.
- Water: ad libitum)
- Acclimation period: 18 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21±2
- Humidity (%): 50±10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 10/14

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
other: sesame oil for intradermal and vaseline for epidermal
Concentration / amount:
- Concentrations used for induction: 1% in sesame oil for intradermal and 10% in vaseline for epidermal induction
- Concentrations used for challenge: 1% in vaseline
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: sesame oil for intradermal and vaseline for epidermal
Concentration / amount:
- Concentrations used for induction: 1% in sesame oil for intradermal and 10% in vaseline for epidermal induction
- Concentrations used for challenge: 1% in vaseline
No. of animals per dose:
10/sex
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS
The concentrations of the test compound for induction and challenge period were determined on separate animals.

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
Two intradermal injections (0.1 ml per injection) were made into the neck of the guinea pigs with a mixture of adjuvant and saline, with the test compound in sesame oil and with the test compound in the adjuvant saline mixture. One week later test material was incorporated in vaseline and applied on a filterpaper patch to the neck of the animals (occlusive administration for 48 hours).
- Control group: treated with adjuvant and the vehicle during the induction period
- Concentrations: 1% for intradermal and 10% for epidermal induction

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
Two weeks after the epidermal induction application the animals were tested on the flank with 1% test material in vaseline and the vehicle alone (24 h occlusive application). Twenty four hours after removing the dressings the challenge reactions were graded according the Draize scoring scale. The application sites were chemically depilated 3 hours before examination (Veet, 5 minutes). A second evaluation is made 48 hours after removing the
dressings. During the challenge period
the group was
- Control group: treated with the vehicle as well as with the test compound to control the maximal subirritant concentration of the test compound in adjuvant treated animals.
- Concentrations: 1%
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
p-phenylenediamine

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
The sensitivity of the strain is controlled every six month with p-phenylenediamine, but the results are not reported.

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
1%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 1%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
1%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 1%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

ADDITIONAL RESULTS OF TEST

- Body weight gain: no treatment-related effects

- Clinical signs: none reported

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
No animal showed a sensitization reaction (0/20) and the test article is considered as not sensitizing.