Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 918-139-9 | CAS number: 1228577-90-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 008
- Report date:
- 2008
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,2-Diaminotoluene, propoxylated
- EC Number:
- 918-139-9
- Cas Number:
- 1228577-90-9
- Molecular formula:
- (C3H6O)n (C3H6O)n (C3H6O)n (C3H6O)n C7H10N2 sum of n: >1 - <8.5
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,2-Diaminotoluene, propoxylated
- Details on test material:
- purity not indicated by the sponsor
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- HPRT locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: PAA Ready Mix (2 % FBS)
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254 induced male rat liver S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- initial assay: 300, 600, 900, 1200, 1500, 1800, 2100 µg/ml (+/-S9);
independent repeat assay: 150, 300, 600, 900, 1200, 1500, 1800 µg/ml (-S9) and 300, 600, 900, 1200, 1500, 1800, 2100 µg/ml (+S9) - Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: ethylmethanesulfonate (EMS, 900 µg/ml, -S9); dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA, 20 µg/ml, +S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 5 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 6-8 days
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: at least 2
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency
- Evaluation criteria:
- - Mutant frequencies will only be used for assessment, if at least 5 dishes per culture were available and relative survival to treatment, relative population growth and absolute cloning efficiency were 10% or greater.
- A trial will be considered positive if a concentration-related and in parallel cultures reproducible increase in mutant frequencies is observed. To be relevant, the increase in mutant frequencies should be at least two to three times that of the highest negative or negative control value observed in the respective trial. If this result can be reproduced in a second trial, the test substance is considered to be mutagenic.
- Despite these criteria, a positive result will only be considered relevant, if no significant change in osmolality compared to the negative control can be observed. Otherwise, unphysiological culture conditions may be the reason for the positive result (Scott et al, 1991).
- A test substance will be judged as equivocal if there is no strictly concentration related increase in mutation frequencies but if one or more concentrations induce a reproducible and biologically relevant increase in mutant frequencies in all trials.
- An assay will be considered negative if no reproducible and relevant increases of mutant frequencies were observed. - Statistics:
- All acceptable groups are included in the weighted analysis of variance followed by pairwise comparisons to the negative control on a nominal significance level of a =0.05 using the Dunnett test (Dunnett, 1955). The regression analysis part is performed on the basis of the actual concentrations thereby omitting the positive, untreated and negative controls. If there is a significant concentration related increase of the mutant frequency (a = 0.05) in the main analysis the highest concentration will be dropped and the analysis will be repeated. This procedure will be repeated until p > 0.05.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- test substance induced a significant concentration-related cytotoxicity of up to 100 % with and without S9 mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Tercarol 5903 (NLP #10) was evaluated for point mutagenic effects at the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase locus (forward mutation assay) in V79 cell cultures after treatment with concentrations of up to and including 2100 µg/ml, both with and without S9 mix. Without and with S9 mix Tercarol 5903 (NLP #10) induced decreases in survival to treatment and decreases in relative population growth. These results revealed a significant concentration-related cytotoxicity of Tercarol 5903 (NLP #10). Without S9 mix precipitation of Tercarol 5903 (NLP #10) in the culture medium was observed at 2100 µg/ml. With S9 mix no precipitation was observed. Without and with S9 mix there was no biologically relevant increase in mutant frequency above that of the negative controls. Ethylmethanesulfonate and dimethylbenzanthracene induced clear mutagenic effects and demonstrated the sensitivity of the test system and the activity of the S9 mix. Based on these results, Tercarol 5903 (NLP #10) is considered to be non-mutagenic in the V79/HPRT forward mutation assay, both with and without metabolic activation.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- non-mutagenic
- Executive summary:
Tercarol 5903 (NLP #10) did not induce mutagenic effects in the in vitro gene mutation assay (HPRT test) with Chinese hamster V79 cells in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.