Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 931-274-8 | CAS number: 28182-81-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions: no analysis on stability of test substance in the vehicle reported, instead of at least 2000 immature erythrocytes per animal 1000 were scored for the incidence of micronuclei
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 986
- Report date:
- 1986
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- References in report: Matter & Schmid, Mutation Res., 1971, 417-425 and on the modification of Heddle, Salomone and others, e.g. Salamone et.al. in Proceedings of the International Program for the evaluation of short-term tests for carcinogenicity (Ashby and Serres, Eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1980, 686-697.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 28182-81-2
- Cas Number:
- 28182-81-2
- IUPAC Name:
- 28182-81-2
- Reference substance name:
- HDI oligomers, isocyanurate
- EC Number:
- 931-274-8
- Cas Number:
- 28182-81-2
- Molecular formula:
- (C8H12N2O2)n
- IUPAC Name:
- HDI oligomers, isocyanurate
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (U.K.) Limited, Manston, Kent, UK
- Age at study initiation: 6-8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: males 27-35 g, females 21-28 g
- Housing: individual in polypropylene and stainless steel cages; non-SPF conditions
- Diet and water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 (18-23)
- Humidity (%): 37 (31-46)
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: unspecified
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Immediately prior to dosing, the test compound formulation was prepared. The dose volume used for both vehicle control and test compound treated animals was 10mL/kg bw.
DETAILS ON STUDY DESIGN:
Dose-finding: Prior to micronucleus test a dose finding (1 animal/sex and dose group) and a main toxicity test (5 animals/sex at 5 g/kg) was undertaken. As no mortalities of clinical signs were observed, especially in the 9-day observation period of the main toxicity test, the standard maximum dose of 5 g/kg was selected for the micronucleus study.
In the micronucleus test, 3 groups of male and female mice were dosed once orally with test or control agents, then marrow samples were taken at the following time intervals: 24, 48, and 72 hours (each 5 animals/sex) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Marrow samples were taken at 24, 48, and 72 hours.
- Frequency of treatment:
- once
- Post exposure period:
- 24, 48, or 72 hours; 9 days for the previously conducted toxicity test
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
5000 mg/kg
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 15 test animals/15 controls (at each sampling time 24, 48 and 72 hours 5 animals/sex were used)
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Cyclophosphamide; it was prepared fresh as a 8 mg/mL solution in water and administered to the positive control animals in standard dose volumes of 10 mL/kg.
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow of the femora was prepared 24, 48, and 72 hours after administration. After staining of the preparations, 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes were evaluated per animal and investigated for micronuclei. The normocytes occurring per 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes were also recorded.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- The mice were killed by cervical dislocation. The femora were quickly dissected out and freed of adherent tissue. A small hole was made in the neck of one femur and the marrow flushed, using a 1 ml syringe fitted with a gauge 25 needle, into a heparinised centrifuge tube containing 3 ml of a 1:1 mixture of foetal calf serum and 0.8 % tri-sodium citrate in Sorensen's buffer, pH 6.8. (This mildly hypotonic treatment served to make the micronuclei clearly visible and to distinguish them from surrounding artefacts.) The contents of the tubes were briefly agitated on a vortex mixer to allow separation of the cells.
The centrifuge tubes had previously been given computer generated random numbers unrelated to the original animal numbers, i.e. from this stage onwards the operators were unaware of the dose group from which the samples were taken.
The contents of the tube were centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 r.p.m. and the supernatant fluid discarded, leaving a few drops in the tube. The cells were then resuspended on a vortex mixer in this remaining amount of serum.
Clean slides were assigned numbers corresponding to the tube numbers. A drop of the suspension was placed at one end of the slide and a smear made by drawing the tip of a Pasteur pipette horizontally along the slide. Two slides were prepared from each tube and animal. The smear was left to air dry, fixed in methanol for 15 min and stained 3-5 days later as follows: 1 % May Grunwald in methanol - 5 min., 10 % Giemsa in distilled water - 10 min.
The stained smears were rinsed in 3 changes of distilled water for approximately 1 min. Slides were then briefly dipped in methanol, air dried and cleared in xylene. Permanent slide preparations were obtained by sealing glass coverslips onto the microscopic slides.
The better of the 2 prepared slides was selected for examination and the coded slides read "blind" in a random manner by the same operator. One thousand (1000) polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) per animal were scored for micronuclei. As a control against inclusion of artefacts, or action of a mutagen on the G2 and/or mitotic phase of the cell cycle, the number of micronucleated normochromatic erythrocyte" (NCE) was also recorded. The PCE/NCE ratio was determined for each animal by counting the number of immature (PCE) per mature (NCE) erythrocytes in a minimum total of 333 erythroblasts (PCE + NCE). - Evaluation criteria:
- According to Bruce & Heddle, Can. J. Genet: Cytol., 21, 1979, 319-334; Salamone et.al., in Ashby and de Serres (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Program for the Evaluation of Short-Term Tests for Carcinogenicity, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1980, 686-697.)
- Statistics:
- no data
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The numbers of micronuclei in animals dosed with the vehicle were within the historical control range throughout the study.
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay): There was no increase in the frequency of micronuclei.
- Ratio of PCE/NCE (for Micronucleus assay): There was also no appreciable suppression of marrow proliferation as indicated by shifts in the PCE/NCE ratios. The slightly reduced number of PCE recorded in the 48 h samples was taken to indicate that the test compound had reached the target organ.
Any other information on results incl. tables
The only clinical sign was some subdued animals and one mouse with a severed tail, but otherwise no abnormalities were apparent.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Executive summary:
The substance was tested in a Mammalian Bone Marrow Micronucleus Test similar to OECD TG 474. Based on dose finding and prior toxicity study (observation period 9 days) 5 mice/sex were treated orally with a single limit dose of 5 g/kg of the formulated substance (vehicle: corn oil; no stability testing in the vehicle was reported). Bone marrow of the femora was sampled after 24, 48 and 72 hours. After staining of the preparations, 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes were evaluated per animal and investigated for micronuclei. The normocytes occurring per 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes were also recorded.
No increase in the frequencies of micronuclei were observed after treatment, therefore it was concluded that the test substance was devoid of mutagenic activity.
No substance-related toxic symptoms were observed in the study or in the previously conducted toxicity study. There was also no appreciable suppression of marrow proliferation as indicated by shifts in the PCE/NCE ratios. The slightly reduced number of PCE recorded in the 48 h samples was taken to indicate that the test compound had reached the target organ. Under the experimental conditions chosen here, no indications were found for a genotoxic potential in vivo.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.