Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-291-6 | CAS number: 56-84-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 206 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: ECETOC
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 6
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 1 234 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- It can be anticipated that no different toxic effects will be produced by the different routes of dosing because L-aspartic acid will be metabolised in each cell, where it enters the Krebs cycle and the urea cycle and where it is rapidly metabolised to CO2.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- covered by route to route extrapolation
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- covered by route to route extrapolation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- covered by route to route extrapolation
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 3
- Justification:
- ECETOC TR 110 Guidance on Assessment Factors to Derive a DNEL, October 2010, page 34
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- most sensitive endpoint is reliable without restriction, and supported by other experimental data
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not applicable
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 29 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 24
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 700 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- It can be anticipated that no different toxic effects will be produced by the different routes of dosing because L-aspartic acid will be metabolised in each cell, where it enters the Krebs cycle and the urea cycle and where it is rapidly metabolised to CO2.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- covered by route to route extrapolation
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- sub-chronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- covered by route to route extrapolation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 4
- Justification:
- rat - human
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 3
- Justification:
- ECETOC TR 110 Guidance on Assessment Factors to Derive a DNEL, October 2010, page 34
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- most sensitive endpoint is reliable without restriction, and supported by other experimental data
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not applicable
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
- DNEL extrapolated from long term DNEL
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 61 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: ECETOC
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 10
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 609 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- It can be anticipated that no different toxic effects will be produced by the different routes of dosing because L-aspartic acid will be metabolised in each cell, where it enters the Krebs cycle and the urea cycle and where it is rapidly metabolised to CO2.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- covered by route to route extrapolation
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- sub-chronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- covered by route to route extrapolation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- covered by route to route extrapolation
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- ECETOC TR 110 Guidance on Assessment Factors to Derive a DNEL, October 2010, page 34
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- most sensitive endpoint is reliable without restriction, and supported by other experimental data
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not applicable
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 18 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 40
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 700 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- It can be anticipated that no different toxic effects will be produced by the different routes of dosing because L-aspartic acid will be metabolised in each cell, where it enters the Krebs cycle and the urea cycle and where it is rapidly metabolised to CO2.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- covered by route to route extrapolation
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- sub-chronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- covered by route to route extrapolation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 4
- Justification:
- rat - human
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- ECETOC TR 110 Guidance on Assessment Factors to Derive a DNEL, October 2010, page 34
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- most sensitive endpoint is reliable without restriction, and supported by other experimental data
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not applicable
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 18 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 40
- DNEL extrapolated from long term DNEL
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- It can be anticipated that no different toxic effects will be produced by the different routes of dosing because L-aspartic acid will be metabolised in each cell, where it enters the Krebs cycle and the urea cycle and where it is rapidly metabolised to CO2.
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
L-aspartic acid is a naturally occurring substance. It is a basic component of proteins, together with L-glutamic acid they account for approximately 20-25 % of the total amino acid composition of dietary protein, including those found in human breast milk. L-aspartic acid enters the citric acid cycle and the urea cycle and is metabolised there.
Protein digestion results mainly in free amino acids and small peptides in the intestinal lumen which were absorbed leading finally to blood plasma levels of L-aspartic acid between 1-25 µmol/L. Cells contain a considerable quantity of free L-aspartate. Considerable quantities of these amino acids are also found in human brain and liver.
It is obvious that human cells handle large quantities of L-aspartate / L-aspartic acid and that this amino acid is an essential component of normal cellular function.
It is therefore highly improbable that L-aspartic acid possesses any relevant toxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
