Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-039-8 | CAS number: 77-58-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.02 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 0.77 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- 0.62 x 1/0.38 x 6.7/10 x 0.5 [50% oral abs rat / 100% inhalation abs hum]); = 0.77 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- ECHA Default subchronic - chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- ECHA Default workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.059 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 12.5
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 0.593 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 0.732 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- according to ECHA Guidance
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default factor
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default factor rat - human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- default factor worker
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- default factor inhalation
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default factor
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default factor
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.43 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 43.4 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- 0.62 x 50 [oral abs rat 50/dermal abs hum 1] * 7/5 [experimental exposure conditions]
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- ECHA Default for 90 days study
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- ECHA Default for workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.08 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- immunotoxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA Default rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- ECHA Default worker
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
For the organotins as a group, SCPFC/EFSA (2004) have concluded a group NOAEL for organotins at 0.025 mg/kg bw based on immunological changes in a chronic study of tributyltin oxide (TBTO). SCPFC/EFSA comment: "Short term experiments however demonstrate that TBT-induced thymus atrophy and hepatotoxicity is preferentially generated by its metabolite DBT with a lower activity of TBT itself. From this it is concluded that DBT is at least as potent as TBT. In addition in comparative toxicity studies investigating the structure activity relationship regarding thymus toxicity in the rat, DBT were the most potent compounds producing dose-related thymus atrophy in similar extents". It therefore follows that a robust study of DBT is entirely appropriate for DNEL setting. SCPFC/EFSA identified no NOAEL, but a LEL for DBT-Cl, at 2.5 mg/kg bw/day based on a 2-week study; these data remain consistent with data used to derive DNELs in this CSR. An in vitro study simulating gastric condition indicate that DBT-Cl is an appropriate anchor compound when exposure occurs by the oral route, because the substance quickly hydrolised to DBT-Cl. A critical study, not included in the SCPFC/EFSA review, is the OECD 421 study with DBT-Cl (Waalkens-Berendsen, 2003) with a NOAEL at 0.3 mg/kg bw/day for thymus effects in female rats following dietary exposure. The thymus effects are critical toassessment of organotin toxicity; this study evaluates the critical effect in an appropriate study design. The OECD 421 NOAEL is supported by results of a teratogenicity study in rats (Osterburg 1993), and by studies of immune function showing an absence of effect at doses up to 2.5 mg/kg bw/day in adult rats and in pups exposed in utero and throughout lactation (DeWitt 2005, 2006) also not included in the EFSA/SPCFC review. As proposed classification for Annex I inclusion included Xn; R22, acute systemic DNELs have been derived on the basis of the maternal NOAEL of 1 mg/kg bw/day, obtained in a teratogenicity study in rats (Osterburg 1993) in which thymus weight was included among the evaluated parameters. These data for DBT-Cl are more robust (longer duration, more informative dose levels, more modern and GLP-compliant) than the data on which EFSA/SPCFC conclusions are based, and considered sufficiently robust that they can be used for the substance in preference to the SPCFC/EFSA group NOAEL for organotins. The NOAEL of the OECD 421 study by Waalkens et al (2003) is supported by the results of a subchronic study, and is therefore considered as a subchronic (not subacute) NOAEL for purposes of assessment factors used for deriving chronic DNELs. Consequences of exceeding the DNEL: The DNELs calculated in this CSR compare to published occupational hygiene limits for the organotins, expressed at OEL, TLV or STELs, at 0.2 mg/m3 (for very short term exposures equivalent to “acute” in this CSR) or 0.1 mg/m3 for longer-term exposures. Exceedance of DNELs by as much as 10-fold would remain within acceptable limits in most jurisdictions. At higher concentrations, workplace complaints of irritancy to the respiratory tract have been reported. Irritancy to the respiratory system is likely to be the most sensitive endpoint for the organotins, and likely to occur at levels below those at risk of causing systemic toxicities (e.g. immunotoxicity). Since affected workers are likely to adopt behaviour to reduce unpleasant irritancy, e.g. to remove themselves from the workplace, minor exceedances of the DNEL are unlikely to be cause for significant concern.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.005 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 0.23 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- 0.23 mg/m3 (0.62 * 1/1.35 x 0.5 [rat oral abs 50%/human inhalation abs 100%/]); Most sensitive endpoint: NOAEL 0.3 mg/kg bw/day (oral) thymus effects, OECD 421 rat Correction factor DBTC to DBTL = 0.48 (different content of DBT)
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- ECHA Default subchronic -chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA Default general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.04 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 0.37 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- Corrected dose descriptor: 0.37 mg/m3 (1 * 1/1.15 x 0.5 [rat oral abs 50%/human inhalation abs 100%]); Most sensitive endpoint: 1 mg/kg bw/day NOAEL for maternal toxicity (thymus weight) obtained in a teratogenicity study in rats (Osterburg, I., 1993) Correction factor DBTC to DBTL = 0.48 (different content of DBT)
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA Default general popuplation
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.16 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 31 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- 0.62 x 50 [oral abs rat 50/dermal abs hum 1] = 31 mg/kg DBTL bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- ECHA Default subchronic - chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA Default rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA Default general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- immunotoxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- Corrected dose descriptor: 50 mg/kg bw (1 mg/kg bw/day x 50 [Oral abs rat 50%/ dermal abs human 1%; Most sensitve endpoint: 1 mg/kg bw/day NOAEL for maternal toxicity (thymus weight) obtained in a teratogenicity study in rats (Osterburg, I., 1993) Correction factor DBTC to DBTL = 0.48 (different content of DBT
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA Default rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA Default general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.003 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 0.62 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- ECHA Default subchronic - chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA Default rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA Default general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.02 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 2.08 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- Most sensitive endpoint: 1 mg/kg bw/day NOAEL for maternal toxicity (thymus weight) obtained in a teratogenicity study in rats (Osterburg, I., 1993) Correction factor DBTC to DBTL = 0.48 (different content of DBT)
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- ECHA Default rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA Default general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA Default
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
The same toxicological endpoints chosen for setting the DNELs for workers have been used for setting DNELs for the general population. The increased assessment factor for interspecies sensitivity is considered sufficiently protective. Furthermore the same correction factor from DBTC to DBTL has been used.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.