Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to terrestrial arthropods

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

toxicity to non-target arthropods on natural substrate (NTA other than pollinators)
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

In accordance with Column 2 of REACH Annex IX, there is no need to further investigate the effects of this substance in a long or short-term terrestrial toxicity to invertebrates/higher plants study because, as indicated in guidance R.7.11.6 (ECHA 2017), the quantitative chemical safety assessment (conducted according to Annex I of REACH) indicates that the Risk Characterisation Ratio is below 1 and therefore the risk is already adequately controlled and further testing is not justifiable.


The substance is highly water soluble and is not readily biodegradable but has low bioavailability and low potential for adsorption (based on log Kow <3 (-4) and log Koc -0.7). Low toxicity was observed in short-term aquatic tests and the occurrence of more severe toxic effects in the terrestrial compartment that were not expressed in the aquatic studies would be considered unlikely.


N-(3-(Trihydroxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine is classed as hazard category 3 for the terrestrial environment (Table R.7.11-2 of ECHA guidance R7.c, 2017) based on potential for high persistence (DT50> 180 days), lack of ready biodegradability and low toxicity to aquatic organisms (EC/LC50 not <1 mg/l).


In this situation, a screening approach is applied: a confirmatory long-term terrestrial test is usually appropriate, in addition to the equilibrium partitioning approach with an extra factor of ten in order to determine whether further full tests are necessary.


In the event that terrestrial invertebrate and plant studies need to be conducted, the definitive terrestrial risk characterisation would use a PNECsoil based on the lower of the two test results with an assessment factor of 50 (unless soil microorganism data are available as well, in which case, the assessment factor would be 10).


A confirmatory test would be conducted with the most sensitive organism group based on short-term aquatic testing. For this substance, algae were the most sensitive organisms in the long-term tests, indicating a preference to conduct a confirmatory test with terrestrial plants.

The PNECscreen(EQPM) for N-(3-(trihydroxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine is derived from the long-term test results with algae and has a value of 0.00687 mg/kg dwt. For the purpose of the screening assessment comparison only, an extra factor of ten is applied (PECx10/PNECscreen(EQPM)). Based on the exposure assessment, the highest agricultural soil RCR available for the silanol hydrolysis product, N-(3-(trihydroxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine is 0.959, with a corresponding Predicted Environmental Concentration (PEC) of 0.00659 mg/kg dwt. The (PECx10)/PNECscreen(EQPM) for N-(3-(trihydroxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine is (0.00659*10)/ 0.00687 = screening RCR 9.59.


A confirmatory long-term terrestrial toxicity test is therefore required in accordance with the recommendations for hazard category 3 substances. If a confirmatory long-term terrestrial test were to be conducted, an assessment factor of 100 would be applied to derive PNECsoil from one long-term test. A confirmatory test with either terrestrial plants or invertebrates would result in a new value for PNECsoil. This value could only be more conservative than the value of PNECscreen(EQPM) in the situation that standard testing in terrestrial plants or invertebrates exhibited a dose response with a NOEC/EC10 ≤ 0.687 mg/kg dw (and applying an assessment factor of 100). There is no basis to expect such toxicity for N-(3-(trihydroxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine based on the absence of significant toxicity observed in aquatic tests.


In the case of N-(3-(trihydroxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine, the registrants consider that a long-term terrestrial study is unlikely to affect the outcomes of the chemical safety assessment. As such the registrants propose that further testing (including the confirmatory study) is not necessary.


Additionally, no toxicity was observed in a short-term toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods study for the effects of the registration substance on the mortality of Eisenia fetida (14-day LC50 >810 mg/kg dry weight, expressed in terms of the concentration of the silanol hydrolysis product, N-(3-(trihydroxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine).

Overall, it is concluded that the risk characterisation conclusion is sufficiently conservative and therefore further testing is not considered necessary.

Details on how the PNEC and the risk characterisation ratio have been derived can be found in IUCLID Section 6.0, CSR Section 7, and Chapters 9 and 10 of the Chemical Safety Report, respectively.