Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 236-068-5 | CAS number: 13138-45-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
There is little data on the in vitro genotoxicity of nickel nitrate. The two studies of gene mutation in S. typhimurium show the same negative effects normally seen for other nickel compounds. The two other tests provide little evidence on the in vitro genotoxicity of nickel nitrate in mammalian cells.
The in vivo genotoxicity of both nickel chloride and nickel sulphate has been studied more extensively than nickel nitrate. The evidence from the different studies has been discussed in the risk assessment reports for nickel chloride and nickel sulphate.
There is little evidence concerning hereditable effects on germ cells. Whilst there is evidence that nickel ions reach the testes, the effects seen in the Deknudt & Léonard (1982) dominant lethal study may reflect toxic effects on germ cells rather than chromosomal damage.
There are two studies on micronucleus induction in peripheral lymphocytes of mice after oral exposure to nickel nitrate. Oller and Erexson (2007) examined the protocols used in these studies compared to current accepted guidelines for this kind of in vivo studies. According to Oller and Erexson (2007), the studies by Sharma et al (1987) and Sobti and Gill (1989) had design issues that made the results equivocal, even if they were considered to be positive by their authors. A guidance-compliant oral study of micronucleus in bone marrow of rats repeatedly exposed to nickel sulphate hexaydrate yielded negative results even though elevated Ni levels were measured in blood and bone marrow of exposed animals and even though absorbed doses were calculated to be higher than in the previously conducted studies in mice (Oller and Erexson, 2007). This guideline compliant study can be read across to nickel nitrate and adds to the weight of evidence for in vivo mutagenicity. Similarly a repeated dose inhalation study with nickel sulphate hexahydrate in rats can be read across to nickel dinitrate (Benson et al., 2002). This study found that inhalation exposures to soluble nickel at toxic levels can cause genotoxicity in the respiratory tract in vivo.
The opinion of the EU Specialised Experts was sought in 2004 with regard to the classification of nickel nitrate for mutagenicity. The Specialised Experts concluded that nickel sulphate, nickel chloride and nickel nitrate should be classified as Muta. Cat. 3; R68 (European Commission, 2004). This conclusion was based on evidence of in vivo genotoxicity in somatic cells, after systemic exposure. Hence the possibility that the germ cells are affected cannot be excluded. The Specialised Experts did not consider that further testing of effects on germ cells was practicable (European Commission, 2004).
The following information is taken into account for any hazard / risk assessment:
The Specialised Experts concluded that nickel sulphate, nickel chloride and nickel nitrate should be classified as Muta. Cat. 3; R68 (European Commission, 2004). This conclusion is based on evidence of in vivo genotoxicity in somatic cells, after systemic exposure. Hence the possibility that the germ cells are affected cannot be excluded. The Specialised Experts did not consider that further testing of effects on germ cells was practicable (European Commission, 2004).
Value used for CSA:Genetic toxicity: positive
Justification for classification or non-classification
Ni nitrate is classified as Muta. 2; H341 according to the 1st ATP to the CLP Regulation. Background information can be found in the discussion section. Recently, nickel compounds have been recognized as genotoxic carcinogens with threshold mode of action by ECHA RAC opinion on nickel and nickel compounds OELs (see ECHA 2018 report discussion inAppendix C2).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.