Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 264-513-3 | CAS number: 63843-89-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP and OECD guideline compliant study
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2015
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidyl) [[3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]methyl]butylmalonate
- EC Number:
- 264-513-3
- EC Name:
- Bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidyl) [[3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]methyl]butylmalonate
- Cas Number:
- 63843-89-0
- Molecular formula:
- C42H72N2O5
- IUPAC Name:
- bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethylpiperidin-4-yl) 2-butyl-2-[(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]propanedioate
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Propanedioic acid, [[3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4- hydroxyphenyl]methyl]butyl-, bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4- piperidinyl) ester
- Physical state: solid
- Analytical purity: 99.8%
- Lot/batch No.: 0005039980
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 21 August 2015
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, 97633 Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 6 - 10 weeks (beginning of treatment)
- Weight at study initiation: mean value (before treatment) 34.5 g (SD +/- 1.9 g) mean value (before sacrifice) 33.7 g (SD +/- 2.6 g)
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Fasting period before study: none
- Housing: single
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days prior to the start of dosing
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 + 2°C
- Humidity (%): 45-65%
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 6.00 a.m. - 6.00 p.m
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 2015-01-28 To: 2015-03-03
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- Corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Grinding of the test item in a mortar was used to formulate the test item. Homogeneity of the test item in vehicle was maintained during treatment using a magnetic stirrer. The preparations were made freshly before each dosing occasion.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- one gavage dose
- Frequency of treatment:
- once
- Post exposure period:
- 24 and 48 hours
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 7
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- 40 mg CPA/kg b.w.; 24 h sacrifice
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) of bone marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: Two dose-range finding study with each 2 males and 2 females
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields): Sampling of the bone marrow was done 24 and 48 hours after treatment, respectively.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: The animals were sacrificed using CO2 followed by bleeding. The femora were removed, the epiphyses were cut off and the marrow was flushed out with foetal calf serum using a syringe. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 1500 rpm (390 x g) for 10 minutes and the supernatant was discarded. A small drop of the re-suspended cell pellet was spread on a slide. The smear was air-dried and then stained with May-Grünwald/Giemsa. Cover slips were mounted with EUKITT. At least one slide was made from each bone marrow sample.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: Evaluation of the slides was performed using NIKON microscopes with 100x oil immersion objectives. Per animal 4000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) were analysed for micronuclei. To describe a cytotoxic effect the ratio between polychromatic and normochromatic erythrocytes was determined in the same sample and expressed in polychromatic erythrocytes per total erythrocytes. The analysis was performed with coded slides.
Seven males per test group were evaluated for the occurrence of micronuclei except for the negative and positive control groups with five animals each. Per animal 4000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) were scored for micronuclei.
OTHER: The animals of all dose groups, except the positive control, were examined for acute toxic symptoms at intervals of around 0-1 h, 2-4 h, 5-6 h, 24 h, and/or 48 h after administration of the test item.
For determination of the substance in plasma, blood samples (~0.5 mL each) of additional satellite animals were taken. For this purpose, blood sampling was performed 1 h and 4 h after a single oral application of the highest test item dose. 3 animals for each sampling time were used, resulting in 6 samples. Additionally, 3 animals were dosed with the negative control item once and their blood were withdrawn 1 h after application.
These satellite animals were allocated as follows: vehicle group: animal numbers 44 – 46, high dose group 1 h sampling: animal numbers 47 – 49, high dose group 4 h sampling: animal numbers 50 – 52.
The blood of the animals was collected in tubes containing K3-EDTA. The blood samples were centrifuged at 10’000 rpm for about 5 minutes to obtain plasma samples. The plasma samples were stored at - 65°C and were sent to the sponsor for further analysis . - Evaluation criteria:
- The study is considered valid as the following criteria are met:
- at least 5 animals per group could be evaluated.
- PCE to erythrocyte ratio was not less than 20 % of the negative control.
- the positive control shows a statistically significant and biological relevant increase of micronucleated PCEs compared to the vehicle control.
A test item is classified as mutagenic if it induces either a dose-related increase or a clear increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in a single dose group above the laboratory’s historical solvent control data range. Statistical methods (nonparametric Mann-Whitney test) were used as an aid in evaluating the results, if necessary. However, the primary point of consideration is the biological relevance of the results.
A test item that fails to produce a biological relevant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes is considered non-mutagenic in this system. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance at the five per cent level (p < 0.05) was evaluated by means of the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: 2000 mg/kg bw
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: yes
- Rationale for exposure: Acute oral toxicity data in rats
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay): see table 2
- Ratio of PCE/NCE (for Micronucleus assay): not affected
- Appropriateness of dose levels and route: appropriate
- Statistical evaluation: yes
The observed systemic toxicity at the tested doses is indicative for a systemic distribution of the test item. Thus, bioavailability of the test item under the tested conditions is assumed. This was additionally confirmed by analytical detection of the test item in the plasma.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Clinical symptoms observed during the study
|
hours post-treatment (males) |
||||
Clinical symptoms |
0-1 |
2-4 |
5-6 |
24 |
48 |
High dose: 2000 mg/kg b.w. (14 males at 1 to 24 h; 7 males at 48 h) |
|||||
Eyelid closure (partially) |
1 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
Ruffled fur |
7 |
10 |
14 |
14 |
7 |
Reduction of spontaneous activity |
2 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
4 |
Diarrhoea |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
Medium dose: 1000 mg/kg b.w. (7 males) |
|||||
Eyelid closure (partially) |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
- |
Ruffled fur |
3 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
- |
Reduction of spontaneous activity |
2 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
- |
Diarrhoea |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
- |
Low dose: 500 mg/kg b.w.(7 males) |
|||||
Ruffled fur |
3 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
- |
The animals treated with the vehicle control (corn oil) did not express any clinical symptoms.
Table 2: Summary of the micronucleus test results
Test |
Dose |
Sampling |
Mean MN/4000 PCE |
SD MN/4000 PCE |
Mean |
Range |
Ratio |
% ratio |
|
min |
max |
||||||||
Vehicle |
0 |
24 |
6.8 |
3.8 |
0.2 |
4 |
13 |
0.590 |
100.00 |
Dose 1 |
500 |
24 |
5.4 |
2.4 |
0.1 |
3 |
10 |
0.591 |
100.17 |
Dose 2 |
1000 |
24 |
4.6 |
1.1 |
0.1 |
3 |
6 |
0.585 |
99.15 |
Dose 3 |
2000 |
24 |
6.4 |
2.4 |
0.2 |
3 |
11 |
0.585 |
99.15 |
CPA |
40 |
24 |
66.0 |
28.9 |
1.7 |
46 |
116 |
0.583 |
98.81 |
Vehicle |
0 |
48 |
3.8 |
1.6 |
0.1 |
2 |
6 |
0.594 |
100.00 |
Dose 3 |
2000 |
48 |
4.6 |
4.0 |
0.1 |
0 |
11 |
0.515 |
86.70 |
Table 3: Biomentry
Negative control versus test group |
Significance |
p |
Dose 1 - 500 mg Tinuvin 144/kg b.w.; 24 h |
no |
0.617 |
Dose 2 - 1000 mg Tinuvin 144/kg b.w.; 24 h |
no |
0.353 |
Dose 3 - 2000 mg Tinuvin 144/kg b.w.; 24 h |
no |
0.935 |
Positive Control - 40 mg CPA/kg b.w.; 24 h |
yes |
0.012 |
Dose 3 - 2000 mg Tinuvin 144/kg b.w.; 48 h |
no |
1.000 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
- Executive summary:
In comparison to the corresponding vehicle controls there was no statistically significant or biologically relevant enhancement in the frequency of the detected micronuclei at any preparation interval and dose level after administration of the test item. The mean values of micronuclei observed after treatment with the test substance were below or near to the value of the vehicle control group. 40 mg/kg b.w. cyclophosphamide administered orally was used as positive control which showed a statistically significant increase of induced micronucleus frequency.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.