Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Endpoint summary

Administrative data

Description of key information

Additional information

One study (Stahl Europe B.V.) was performed on Acid Black 210 sodium salt following EU C3 with a EC 50 at 72 based on grow rate of 13.7 mg/l. It was not possible to recover the original report of the study and the few available details are reported

Another study (Dirk Scheerbaum, 2011) was performed on Acid Black 210 following a modified version of OECD. The EC0 is equal to 1 mg/l and EC50 is between 10 and 100 mg/l (nominal)

No effect on the algae toxicity is due to the counter ion and it is mainly due to the shadowing effect of the substance in the tested medium.

Several studies on algae conducted on dark dyes, including those with a modified test system for dye-stuffs, showed that the growth inhibition is not due to a toxic effect of the dye, but due to the light absorption of the stained water. Modified test system is usually conducted putting the dye above the algae testing solution, in a different vessel and not into contact with the alga. The same toxicity expressed as grow rate and yield inhibition has been observed like when in the same condition the algae is into contact with the dye. It has been deduced that the observed toxicity was related to the shading effect of the dye. This method has some limitation because it focuses on the shadow effect but gives no information on the real potential toxicity for algae of the tested substance.

One test has been conducted following OECD 221 on Acid Black 210 using Lemna minor as aquatic plant (Alexa Caduff , 2012) showing no effect up to the highest testing concentration of 2000 mg/L.

Lemna is an aquatic plant that develops his leaves on the surface of the water, while nourishing substances are taken from the water solution. With this test the observed effect is only related to the potential toxicity of the substance and not to the potential shading effect of a classical Alga study. A deviation to the protocol has been applied to the test recommended for dyes (Michael Cleuvers, Hans-Toni Ratte, Phytotoxicity of coloured substances: is Lemna Duckweed an alternative to the algal growth inhibition test? Chemosphere 49 (2002) 9–15): "Beakers will be incubated on a black non-reflecting surface. Additionally, the walls of the incubation chambers will also be covered with black fabric in order to avoid reflection". This study does not refer specifically to the substance assessed within the dossier, but it support the changes that have been made to the protocol of the test on Lemna presented by the registrant (Alexa Caduff , 2012).

It was mentioned method C26 ( Lemna sp. Growth inhibition test) of the European Commission Regulation No 761/2009 of 23 July 2009 . The introduction to the method reads: "This method is equivalent to OECD TG 221 (2006). There has been broad agreement by EU Authorities That the Lemna test is a suitable alternative to an algal test for strongly colored substances"

The EU authorities’ agreement refers to the Manual of Decision (EU Manual of Decisions dated July 2006, at 13.5.3 Alternatives to the algae growth inhibition test with coloured substances.)“where it can be demonstrated in the case of highly coloured substances that algal growth is inhibited solely as a result of a reduction in light intensity, then the 72h EC50 for algae should not be used as a basis for classification.” In order to make a distinction between shading and toxic inhibition effects, in 1994 some modifications to the algae growth inhibition test, known as the ETAD (Ecological and Toxicological Association of Dyes and Organic Pigments Manufacturers) method (also known as the double flask method), were suggested. Advanced insights revealed that the ETAD method is too simplistic to allow evaluation of both toxic and light absorption effects of the coloured substances and should not be used any more.

For highly light absorbing substances, the modified standard algae growth inhibition test is not recommended. With these particular substances, a modified standard Lemna-test (draft OECD guideline 221) is recommended. The following modification to the standard Lemna test has to be applied: the test has to be performed on a black, non-reflecting surface.

While for the same substance the “classical alga” test has provided a result of EC50 of 45.3 mg/l, with Lemna no toxicity up to the maximum tested level of 2000 mg/l on the active substance has been observed.

Therefore the toxicity of the substance for Algae can be assessed at 2000 mg/l and the already performed studies can be disregarded.

Acute toxicity on Fish has been performed both on the substance and on the potassium salt and both the studies don't reveal any toxicity at high levels of dosing.

A limit test on Daphnia Magna has been performed on the substance, showing no mortality at the tested concentration of 180 mg/L. Since the sample concentration is 83% of the nominal concentration, the EC50 has been set at 150 mg/L

Furthermore, a long term reproductive study on daphnia has been performed on Acid Black 210, sodium salt. The result is indicating that the substance has a NOEC long term > 1 mg/l, therefore the study confirms that no classification for the environment is warranted.

A long term reproductive study on Daphnia magna has been performed on Acid Black 210, sodium salt (Stahl, 1996). The result shows that Acid Black 210 has a NOEC long term, reproduction and growth > 1 mg/l, therefore based on Regulation 1272/2008 the study confirms that no classification is warranted.