Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 223-437-0 | CAS number: 3891-33-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation: with 20 h exposure time well-defined erythema and edema (Grade 2) were observed after 24 h; after 8 days only scaling was reported
Eye irritation: slight reddening of conjunctivae (Grade 1) was observed after 24 h (fully reversible within 8 days)
Not to be classified as skin or eye irritating.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1973-12-18 to 1975-03-06
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Scientifically acceptable, method eqivalent or similar to guideline study.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- method applied according to BASF-internal standard
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Gaukler, 6050 Offenbach/Main, Germany
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: 2.7 - 3.0 kg
- Housing: no data
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: no data
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): no data
- Humidity (%): no data
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): no data
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1973-12-18 To: 1973-12-27 - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: untreated skin of the same animal
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: ca. 1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The test substance was applied for 1 min, 5 min, 15 min and 20 h
- Observation period:
- 8 days
- Number of animals:
- 2
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm
- Type of wrap if used:
Application to ear: a cotton ball soaked with test item was fixed to the ear
Application to back: a small piece of cloth was fixed to the back with the help of a gauze patch
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: After the short-term applications the test substance was washed off with Lutrol; after the 20-hour application the test substance was not washed off.
- Time after start of exposure: 1 min, 5 min and 15 min
SCORING SYSTEM: observed were the parameters erythema, edema, scaling, and necrosis
Grading system:
"reizlos" Ø: considered as equivalent to Grade 0 (no irritating effect) according to OECD Guideline 404
"fraglich" (+): considered as equivalent to Grade 1 (very slight erythema (barely perceptible)) according to OECD Guideline 404
"leicht" +: considered as equivalent to Grade 2 (well-defined effect) according to OECD Guideline 404
"stark" ++: considered as equivalent to Grade 3 (moderate (to severe)) effect according to OECD Guideline 404
"sehr stark" +++: considered as equivalent to Grade 4 (severe effect) according to OECD Guideline 404 - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: incipient scaling after 8 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: 20-hour application to back
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: incipient scaling after 8 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: 20-hour application to back
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: incipient scaling after 8 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: 20-hour application to back
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: incipient scaling after 8 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: 20-hour application to back
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: incipient scaling after 8 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: 20-hour application to back
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: incipient scaling after 8 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: 20-hour application to back
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Application to ear for 20 hours resulted in Grade 3 erythema and edema after 24 hours. Erythema and edema not reported on day 8, however eschar was observed.
- Interpretation of results:
- slightly irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
Reference
Table of results (20 h application of test item) based on grading system as applied in the study report
time |
animal 1 |
animal 2 |
|
erythema |
24 h |
+ |
+ |
8 d |
Ø |
Ø |
|
edema |
24 h |
+ |
+ |
8 d |
Ø |
Ø |
|
scaling |
24 h |
Ø |
Ø |
8 d |
+ |
+ |
Table of results (20 h application of test item) translated into the grading system as applied in OECD Guideline 404
time |
animal 1 |
animal 2 |
|
erythema |
24 h |
2 |
2 |
8 d |
0 |
0 |
|
edema |
24 h |
2 |
2 |
8 d |
0 |
0 |
|
scaling |
24 h |
0 |
0 |
8 d |
2 |
2 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1973-12-18 to 1975-03-06
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Scientifically acceptable, method equivalent or similar to guideline study.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- method applied according to BASF-internal standard
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Gaukler, 6050 Offenbach/Main, Germany
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: 3.11 - 3.32 kg
- Housing: no data
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: no data
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): no data
- Humidity (%): no data
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): no data
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1973-12-18 To: 1973-12-27 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: 0.05 mL of a NaCl solution was applied into the other eye of the same animal
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.05 mL
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single instillation into the conjunctival sac of the right eyelid
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 8 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 2
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: the test substance was not washed out
SCORING SYSTEM: observed were the parameters redness conjunctivae, chemosis, cornea opacity, and necrosis
Grading system for cornea and chemosis:
"reizlos" Ø: considered as equivalent to Grade 0 according to OECD Guideline 405
"fraglich" (+): considered as equivalent to Grade 1 according to OECD Guideline 405
"leicht" +: considered as equivalent to Grade 2 according to OECD Guideline 405
"stark" ++: considered as equivalent to Grade 3 effect according to OECD Guideline 405
"sehr stark" +++: considered as equivalent to Grade 4 according to OECD Guideline 405
Grading system for conjunctivae:
"reizlos" Ø: considered as equivalent to Grade 0 according to OECD Guideline 405
"leicht" +: considered as equivalent to Grade 1 according to OECD Guideline 405
"stark" ++: considered as equivalent to Grade 2 effect according to OECD Guideline 405
"sehr stark" +++: considered as equivalent to Grade 3 according to OECD Guideline 405
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein - Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: no irritating effects observed
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: no irritating effects observed
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: no irritating effects observed
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: no irritating effects observed
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: no irritating effects observed
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: no irritating effects observed
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- After 1 h the treated eye was covered by a smeary layer (reversible after 8 days)
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation:
The skin irritation was tested in 1973 by a study equivalent or similar to OECD Guideline 404. The test substance was applied in a single dose (occlusive) to the clipped skin (back and ear) of an experimental animal; untreated skin areas of the test animal served as the control. The degree of irritation was read and scored at 1 min, 5 min, and 15 min (treated skin was washed). In addition skin was treated for 20 hours and not washed; these observations were recorded after 24 hours and 8 days. With 20 hours treatment the test item exhibited well-defined erythema and edema (Grade 2) after 24 hours. On day 8 these effects were reversed, with scaling still being reported.
Eye irritation:
The eye irritation was tested in 1973 with a study equivalent or similar to OECD Guideline 405. The test substance was applied in a single dose to one of the eyes of the experimental animal; the untreated eye served as the control. The degree of eye irritation was evaluated by scoring lesions of conjunctiva and cornea at 24 hours and 8 days. A slight reddening of the conjunctivae (Grade 1) was observed after 24 hours, which proved to be fully reversible within the 8 days observation period.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Applicable to endpoint study, method equivalent or similar to guideline study.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Applicable to endpoint study, method equivalent or similar to guideline study.
Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: slightly irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation
Dangerous Substance Directive
(67/548/EEC)
The available studies are considered reliable and suitable for
classification purposes under Directive 67/548/EEC. As a result the
substance has to be classified for skin irritation (R38) under Directive
67/548/EEC, as amended for the 31st time in Directive 2009/2/EG.
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The reported effects were less severe than the classification criteria as set out in EC Regulation 1272/2008 (mean value of ≥ 2.3 - ≤ 4.0 for erythema/ eschar or for oedema in at least 2 of 3 tested animals from gradings at 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal). The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for skin irritation under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the sixth time in Regulation (EC) No 605/2014.
Eye irritation
Dangerous Substance Directive
(67/548/EEC)
The available studies are considered reliable and suitable for
classification purposes under Directive 67/548/EEC.As a result
and according to the harmonised Annex I classification the substance is
not considered to be classified for eye irritation under Directive
67/548/EEC, as amended for the 31st time in Directive 2009/2/EG.
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging
Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The reported effects were less severe than the minimum
classification criteria for conjunctival redness >=2 as set out in EC
Regulation 1272/2008. No further eye irritating effect observed. The
available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for
classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. As a result
the substance is considered not to be classified for eye irritation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.