Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-890-2 | CAS number: 75-66-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 14.5 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 721 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 362.3 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
One key study (Ulrich, 1982; Klimisch score = 2) was available for 2-methylpropane-2-thiol. In this 90-day inhalation study, the repeated dose toxicity of 2-methylpropane-2-thiol was investigated in Sprague Dawley rats. The NOAEC was identified to be 0.721 mg/L (196 ppm or 721 mg/m³) based on the absence of systemic toxicity effects at the highest concentration tested (0.721 mg/L or 196 ppm).
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor
NOAEC6h/rat: 0.721 mg/L
Step 2) Modification of starting point
Conversion for units:0.721 mg/L x 1000 = 721 mg/m³
Correction of exposure duration in study
(6 hrs/day, 5 days/week) to default worker exposure (8 hrs/day, 5 days/ week)
Correction for activity driven differences of respiratory volumes in workers compared to workers in rest
6.7 mg/m³ /10 m³ Corrected NOAEC = 362.3 mg/m³ (= 721 x 6/8 x 6.7/10)
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default sub-chronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default systemic effects
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 18.6 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 10
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 370 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- For sub-chronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- For local effects
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- For workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.06 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 721 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 205.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
No key dermal repeat dose toxicity data was available for 2 -methylpropane-2-thiol. One key oral study (MHLW, 2006; Klimisch score = 2) of 2 -methylpropane-2-thiol has been performed but not used in the derivation of this DNEL because a reliable 90 -day inhalation study was available. Therefore, in the absence of oral data, key inhalation data (Ulrich, 1982; Klimisch score = 2) was used by performing a route-to-route extrapolation. The NOAEC used was 0.721 mg/L (196 ppm or 721 mg/m3).
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor
NOAEC6h/rat: 0.721 mg/L
Step 2) Modification of starting point
Conversion for units:
0.721 mg/L x 1000 = 721 mg/m3
Correction of rat inhalation NOAEC to rat dermal NOAEL – correction for respiratory volume and for difference in absorption rates
NOAELrat: 274 mg/kg bw/day
(= 721 x 0.38 x 1)
Assumption: Based on ECHA guidance (Chapter R.8) no default factor was applied for differences in absorption in rats and humans and therefore absorption was assumed to be 100% via the dermal and inhalation route
Correction of exposure duration in study
(6 hrs/day, 5 days/week) to default worker exposure (8 hrs/day, 5 days/ week)
Corrected NOAEL = 205.5 mg/kg bw/day
(=274 x 6/8)
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- For sub-chronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- For systemic effect
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- For worker population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.57 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 721 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 128.7 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
One key study (Ulrich, 1982; Klimisch score = 2) was available for 2-methylpropane-2-thiol. In this 90-day inhalation study, the repeated dose toxicity of 2-methylpropane-2-thiol was investigated in Sprague Dawley rats. The NOAEC was identified to be 0.721 mg/L (196 ppm or 721 mg/m³) based on the absence of systemic toxicity effects at the highest concentration tested (0.721 mg/L or 196 ppm).
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor
NOAEC 6h/rat: 0.721 mg/L
Step 2) Modification of starting point
Conversion for units:0.721 mg/L x 1000 = 721 mg/m³
Correction of exposure duration in study
(6 hrs/day, 5 days/week) to default general population exposure (24 hrs/day, 7 days/ week)Corrected NOAEC = 128.7 mg/m³ (= 721 x 6/24 x 5/7)
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Sub-chronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- For systemic effect
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- For general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 3.3 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 20
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 370 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- For sub-chronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- For local effects
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- For general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 3 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 721 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 592 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
A 90-day inhalation repeated dose toxicity study (Ulrich, 1982; Klimisch score = 2) has been performed and is used as the starting point for this DNEL. The NOAEC was identified to be 0.721 mg/L (196 ppm or 721 mg/m³) based on the absence of systemic toxicity effects at the highest concentration tested (0.721 mg/L or 196 ppm).
The following correction was made to the NOAEC (inhaled): Correction respiratory volume rat (24 hour) = 1.15 m³/kg bw. Correction for dosing frequency: 5 days/7 days. Therefore, the corrected NOAEL for repeat-dose systemic effects via the dermal/oral route is: 721*1.15*(5/7) = 592 mg/kg bw/day.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default, subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default, general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default, the NOAEL is from a reliable study on 2-methylpropane-2-thiol.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 83.3 µg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
A 28-day oral repeated dose toxicity study (MHLW, 2006; Klimisch score = 1) of 2-methylpropane-2-thiol has been performed and is used in the derivation of this DNEL. The NOAEL used was 50 mg/kg bw/day. No modification of the dose descriptor starting point is required.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Default, subacute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default, Rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default, general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default, the NOAEL is from a reliable study on 2-methylpropane-2-thiol.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.