Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 825-356-1 | CAS number: 2097729-23-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 19 March 1990 - 3 April 1990
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The study was performed under GLP and accoding to OECD/EC guidelines. In the current study the guidelines was not updated yet and this test does not contains: E. coli WP2 uvrA, or E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101), or S. typhimurium TA102. These strains are preferred to detect cross-linking mutagens.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 990
- Report date:
- 1990
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- In the current study the guidelines was not updated yet and this test does not contains: E. coli WP2 uvrA, or E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101), or S. typhimurium TA102. These strains are preferred to detect cross-linking mutagens.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2,2'-(Z)-octadec-9-en-1-ylimino)bisethanol N-oxide
- EC Number:
- 300-699-5
- EC Name:
- 2,2'-(Z)-octadec-9-en-1-ylimino)bisethanol N-oxide
- Cas Number:
- 93962-62-0
- Molecular formula:
- C22H45NO3
- Details on test material:
- Chemical name: Oleylbis(2-hydroxyethyl)amine oxide
Description: Light yellow liquid
Batch/Lot number: RCD/HJ-173
Purity: 58%
Instructions for test substance storage: In the original container at room temperature in the dark.
Stability under storage conditions: Stable
Expiry date: 09 March 1991
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Genes involved in histidine synthesis.
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: see remarks section
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- preliminary toxicity test (with and without S9-mix): 1.0, 3.3, 10.0, 33.3, 100, 333, 1000, 3330, 5000 µg/plate
experiment 1 without S9-mix: 0.33, 1.0, 3.3, 10.0, 33.3 µg/plate
experiment 1 with S9-mix: 1.0, 3.3, 10.0, 33.3, 100.0 µg/plate
experiment 2 without S9-mix: 0.33, 1.0, 3.3, 10.0, 33.3 µg/plate
experiment 2 with S9-mix: 1.0, 3.3, 10.0, 33.3, 100.0 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: not given, common solvent for this type of test.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- dimtehylsulfoxide (DMSO)
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: see remarks section for details
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Preincubation period: none
- Exposure duration: 48 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: each dose is tested in triplicate in each strain.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: all colonies were counted.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: Selection of an adequate range of doses was based on a preliminary toxicity test with strain TA100, both with and without S9-mix. Nine concentrations have been tested in duplicate for toxicity. The highest concentration of test article used in the subsequent mutagenesis assay was that which gave a reduced survival on the non-selective plates. - Evaluation criteria:
- An Ames test was considered acceptable if it met the following criteria:
a) The negative control data (number of spontaneous revertants per plate) should reasonably fall within the laboratory background historical range
for each tester strain.
b) The positive control chemicals should produce responses in all tester strains which also reasonably fall within the laboratory historical range documented for each positive control substance. Furthermore, the mean plate count should be a t least two times the concurrent vehicle control group mean.
c) The selected dose range should include a clearly toxic concentration as demonstrated by the preliminary toxicity range-finding test with strain
TA100 or should extend to 5 mg/plate. - Statistics:
- No formal hypothesis testing has been done.
A test substance was considered negative (not mutagenic) in the Ames test if:
a) The total number of revertants in any tester strain at any concentration was not greater than two times the solvent control value, with or
without metabolic activation.
b) The negative response should be reproducible in at least one independently repeated experiment.
A test substance was considered positive (mutagenic) in the Ames test if:
a) It induced at least a 2-fold, dose related increase in the number of revertants with respect to the number induced by the solvent control in any of the tester strains, either with or without metabolic activation. However, any mean plate count of less than 20 was considered to be not significant. If the test substance showed in the first test only a positive response at one or two concentrations, the assay was repeated with doses just below and exceeding those showing positive effects in the first test.
b) The positive response should be reproducible in at least one independently repeated experiment.
The preceding criteria were not absolute and other extenuating factors might enter into the final evaluation decision.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Without S9-mix 33.3µg/plate gives a moderate reduction and elimination at 100µg/plate. WithS9-mix with S9-mix 100µg/plate gives a moderate reduction and elimination at 333µg/plate.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: no data
- Effects of osmolality: no data
- Evaporation from medium: no data
- Water solubility: no data
- Precipitation: not observed
- Other confounding effects: no data
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: The survival of the TA100culture i s determined by comparing the number of colonies on the plates containing the test substance with those on the solvent control plate. In the absence of S9-mix the survival of strain TA100 is moderately reduced at a test substance concentration of 33.3 µg/plate and eliminated at and above 100 µg/plate. In the presence o f S9-mix the survival of strain TA100 is moderately reduced at a test substance concentration of 100 µg/plate and eliminated at and above 333 µg/plate. Based on these data, the test substance was tested up to a concentration of 33.3 µg/plate i n the absence of S9-mix and up to 100 µg/plate in the presence of S9-mix.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: The negative and strain-specific positive control values fell within laboratory background historical ranges indicating that the test conditions were optimal and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The test substance did not induce a dose-related increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in each of the four tester strains (TA1535; TA1537; TA98 and TA100) therefore from the results of this study it can be concluded that AROMOX O/12 is not mutagenic in the ames test. - Executive summary:
The test item was tested in the Ames Salmonella/microsome plate test up to 33.3 µg/plate in the absence o f S9 -mix and up to 100 µg/plate in the presence of S9 -mix. The test substance did not induce a dose-related increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in each of the four tester strains (TA1535; TA1537; TA98 and TA100). These results were confirmed in an independently repeated experiment. The test item can, therefore, be considered as not mutagenic in this test system.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
