Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 236-759-1 | CAS number: 13476-99-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Reference
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: peer-reviewed data
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10, and 30 mg/plate. Test concentrations were chosen based on preliminary cytotoxicity testing in strain TA100 (data not given in publication).
- Vehicle / solvent:
- distilled water
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- water
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- other: without S9: 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine (TA98, TA1538), with S9: 2-aminoanthracene (all 5 strains)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION: Exposure duration: 48-72 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3/dose group/strain/treatment set - Evaluation criteria:
- Number of revertant colonies.
- Statistics:
- Mean revertant colony count and standard deviation were determined for each dose point.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- the test substance was cytotoxic at 10 mg/plate to strain TA1538, and cytotoxic to all strains at 30 mg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The acetylacetonate test substance was cytotoxic to all Salmonella strains, both in the absence and in the presence of S9 at 30 mg/plate, and also at 10 mg/plate to strain TA1538 (-S9). No dose-related increases in the number of mutant colonies were observed in Salmonella strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, or TA1538, either in the absence or in the presence S9 metabolic activation system. Solvent and positive control cultures demonstrated appropriate activity in the test system.
- Conclusions:
- The study was conducted scientifically reasonable equivalent to OECD 471. Positive and negative controls gave the appropriate response. Hence, the results are considered sufficiently reliable to assess the mutagenic potential of the test item in bacteria.
The acetylacetonate test material was not mutagenic to Salmonella and E. Coli strains with and without metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria, strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA 1537 and TA1538 of S. typhimurium were exposed to acetylacetonate at concentrations of 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0 and 30.0 mg/plate in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation (Ames Test according to OECD 471). A dose range-finding study was conducted using tester strain TA100, and dose levels of the acetylacetonate test material ranging from 0.3 to 10 mg/plate were used. In the main study there were two treatment sets for each tester strain, with (+S9) and without (-S9) metabolic activation. Each of the tester strains was dosed with five concentrations of test substance, vehicle controls, and a positive control. Three plates/dose group/strain/treatment set were evaluated. Plates were incubated for 48 -72 hours at 37°C.
The acetylacetonate test material was cytotoxic to all tester strains at 30 mg/plate, and at 10 mg/plate to strain TA1538 in the absence of the metabolic activation system (-S9). No dose-related increase in the number of mutant colonies were observed in all tester strains, either in the absence or in the presence of S9 metabolic activation system. The positive control for each respective test strain exhibited at least a 3-fold increase (with or without S9) over the mean value of the vehicle control for a given strain, confirming the expected positive control response.
Therefore, the acetylacetonate test substance was considered to be non-mutagenic without and with S9 mix in the bacterial reverse mutation test.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Reference
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: peer-reviewed data
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- other: in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HPRT
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CHO-K1-BH4, obtained from Abraham Hsie, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/ml with and without S9 metabolic activation system, and 1.5 mg/ml without S9 metabolic activation system.
Test concentration 1.0 mg/ml reduced relative survival to <10 % in the absence of S9 and to <50 % in the presence of S9.
The top dose 1.5 mg/ml was cytotoxic to CHO cells. - Vehicle / solvent:
- distilled water
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- water
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-dimethylnitrosamine
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Cultured CHO cells (CHO-K1-BH4, Abraham Hsie, Oak Ridge, TN, USA) were treated in duplicate, both in the absence and in the presence of S9, with the vehicle control substance (water), an appropriate positive control substance, and various concentrations of the acetylacetonate test substance.
- Evaluation criteria:
- Number of mutant colonies/plate.
- Statistics:
- Data were analyzed by the method of Irr and Snee (1979, Proc. Cold Spring Harbor-Bamburg Conf. vol II, pp. 263-274) after Box-Cox transformation (Box & Cox, 1964, J. R. Stat. Soc. 26:211-252).
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Acetylacetonate treatment at 1.0 mg/ml reduced relative survival to <10 % in the absence of S9 and to <50 % in the presence of S9.
Corrected mutation frequencies were 2-3.9 x 10^-6 for solvent controls, 6.0 x 10^-6 for medium controls, and 0-17.3 x 10^-6 for acetylacetonate-treated cultures in the absence of S9. In the presence of S9, corrected mutation frequencies were 0-1.4 x 10^-6, 0, and 0-3.0 x 10^-6 for vehicle, medium, and acetylacetonate-treated cultures.
There was no significant increase in gene mutation in CHO cells treated with acetylacetonate, either in the absence or in the presence of S9.
Increased mutation frequencies were obtained in the test system on treatment with positive control substances. - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
The acetylacetonate test material was not genotoxic under the conditions of the test. - Executive summary:
In a mammalian cell gene mutation assay conducted according to OECD Guideline 476, cultured CHO cells were exposed to the test substance acetylacetonate at concentrations of 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 mg/ml in the presence and absence of a mammalian metabolic activation system. The positive controls induced the appropriate response. There was no evidence of induced mutant colonies over background, therefore the acetylacetonate test material was not genotoxic under the conditions of the test.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Reference
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- sister chromatid exchange
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: peer-reviewed data
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 479 (Genetic Toxicology: In Vitro Sister Chromatid Exchange Assay in Mammalian Cells)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- sister chromatid exchange assay in mammalian cells
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- no details given
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CHO-K1-BH4 cells were obtained from Abraham Hsie, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 mg/L
- Vehicle / solvent:
- distilled water
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- water
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-dimethylnitrosamine
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period:
- Exposure duration: 5 h (without S9), 2 h (with S9)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 24 - 28 h
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent):
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 28 - 33 (without S9), 31 - 36 (with S9)
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): treatment with colchichin (0.5 µg/mL) for 2 - 3 h
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Hoechst 33258, Gurr's Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 replicates
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: cells were harvested, fixed, and spread on microscope slides. After staining with Hoechst 33258, slides were rinsed i n Sorenson's buffer and exposed to a sunlamp for 15-30 min. Slides were then stained in Gurr's Giemsa and coded to prevent scoring bias.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: min 25 cells/culture
NUMBER OF METAPHASE SPREADS ANALYSED PER DOSE (if in vitro cytogenicity study in mammalian cells): Only metaphases with 20 ± 2 chromosomes were scored - Rationale for test conditions:
- Test concentrations were selected on the basis of a preliminary cytotoxicity study
- Evaluation criteria:
- A minimum of 25 cells/culture was scored. Only metaphases with 20 ± 2 chromosomes were scored. Centromeric switch of label was not scored as an SCE.
- Statistics:
- The SCE data were analyzed statistically after Box-Cox transformation (Box & Cox, 1964). Data for treatment and solvent control groups were intercompared for equality of variance by Levene's test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and t tests. The t tests were used when the F value from ANOVA was significant. When Levene's test indicated similar variances and the ANOVA was significant, a pooled t test was used for pairwise comparisons. When Levene's test indicated heterogeneous variances, all groups were compared by ANOVA for unequal variances, followed when necessary by a separate variance t test for pairwise comparisons; p < 0.05 (two-tailed) was used as the critical level of significance.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Acetylacetone was positive in vitro in Sister Chromatide Exchange Assay in CHO cells.
- Executive summary:
Acetylacetone was tested in Sister Chromatid Exchange Assay similar to OECD 479. Significant increases in the frequencies of SCE were observed both in the absence and in the presence of S9 activation. In the absence of S9, the increases were 1.2-fold at the low dose (0.02 mg/ml), 1.4-fold at the middose (0.03 mg/ml), and 4.2-fold at the high dose (0.10 mg/ml). In the presence of S9 activation, the increases were 1.2-fold at the low dose (0.03 mg/ml), 1.3-fold at the mid-dose (0.10 mg/ml), and 1.5-fold at the high dose (0.3 mg/ml).
Significant increases in the frequencies of SCE were observed both in the absence and in the presence of S9 activation. In the absence of S9, the increases were 1.2-fold at the low dose (0.02 mg/ml), 1.4-fold at the middose (0.03 mg/ml), and 4.2-fold at the high dose (0.10 mg/ml). In the presence of S9 activation, the increases were 1.2-fold at the low dose (0.03 mg/ml), 1.3-fold at the mid-dose (0.10 mg/ml), and 1.5-fold at the high dose (0.3 mg/ml).
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Reference
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- 2,4-PD samples from several production lots were provided by Union Carbide Corporation (South Charleston, WV, USA) between 1985 and 1994 for use in these studies. Compositional analyses indicated that the samples were greater than 99 % pure.
- Species:
- other: Sprague-Dawley rats and ND4 Swiss Webster mice
- Strain:
- other: Sprague-Dawley rats and ND4 Swiss Webster mice
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: ND4 Swiss Webster mice were purchased from Harlan Sprague Dawley (Indianapolis, IN, USA) or Charles River Laboratories (Portage, MI, USA).
- Age at study initiation: 6 to 8 weeks (mice), 7 weeks (rats)
- Housing: The animals were housed individually in stainless steel, wire mesh cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): pelleted, certified AGWAY® PRO LAB® animal Diet, Rat, Mouse, Hamster 3000 was available ad libitum, except during treatment.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water was available ad libitum, except during treatment.
- Acclimation period: 1 week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 - 25
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- inhalation: vapour
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: air
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The 0 (control), 100, 400, and 600 ppm target concentrations were chosen because mortalities occurred at 800 ppm in the bone marrow chromosomal aberrations study in the rat.
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: 0 (control), 100, 400, 600 ppm - Details on exposure:
- TYPE OF INHALATION EXPOSURE: whole body
GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: Stainless steel inhalation chambers with glass windows for animal observation were used.
Liquid 2,4-PD was metered from a piston pump (Fluid Metering, Oyster Bay, NY, USA) into a heated glass evaporator. The temperature in the evaporator was maintained at the level sufficient to vaporize the liquid 2,4-PD. The evaporator temperature ranged from 32-47°C. The oxygen content of each chamber was measured using an MSA Oxygen Indicator (Mine Safety Appliance, Pittsburgh, PA, USA).
TEST ATMOSPHERE
- Brief description of analytical method used: Each exposure chamber atmosphere was analyzed for 2,4-PD a minimum of once each hour by flame ionization gas chromatography. Chamber temperature and relative humidity were recorded approximately 2 times each hour using a Fisherbrand® dial type thermometer (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and an Airguide humidity indicator (Airguide Instrument, Chicago, IL, USA) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 6 h per day for 5 consecutive days
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Post exposure period:
- Bone marrow was collected 24 hr after the final vapor
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- rats and mice
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- rats and mice
- Dose / conc.:
- 400 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- rats and mice
- Dose / conc.:
- 600 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- rats and mice
- Dose / conc.:
- 800 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- only rats
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- triethylenemelamine
- Route of administration: i.p.
- Doses / concentrations: 0.3 mg/kg - Tissues and cell types examined:
- bone marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Rat bone marrow cells were passed over a cellulose column to remove nucleated cells. Bone marrow cells were pelleted by centrifugation of either the column eluate (rat) or the whole aspirated marrow sample (mouse). Bone marrow cells were smeared on a microscope slide and then stained with Gurr's R-66 Giemsa diluted in phosphate buffer. The proportion of PCE in a total of 1000 cells/animal was determined.
- Evaluation criteria:
- A minimum of 2000 PCE/animal was scored for the presence of micronuclei.
- Statistics:
- Micronucleus data were evaluated statistically using the Mann-Whitney U-test; p < 0.05 (two-tailed) was used as the critical level of significance.
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- please refer to 'Any other information on results'
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No significant differences i n the proportion of PCE were observed i n any exposure group. The mean PCE/1000 erythrocytes ranged from a low of 418.4 for the 400 ppm male mice to a high of 612.4 for the 400 ppm female mice. The mean PCE/1000 erythrocytes ranged from a low of 258.6 for the air-exposed male rats to a high of 420.4 for the 100 ppm female rats. The mean percentages of MNPCE in mice were 0.34 ± 0.20, 0.28 ± 0.18, 0.20 ± 0.10, 0.20 ± 0.16, and 2.66 ± 0.54 for males and 0.14 ± 0.11, 0.10 ± 0, 0.22 ± 0.08, 0.20 ± 0.14, and 3.18 ± 1.50 for females for the air-exposed, low, mid, high, and positive control groups. The mean percentages of MNPCE in rats were 0.30 ± 0.16, 0.38 ± 0.13, 0.24 ± 0.25, 0.46 ± 0.15, and 3.92 ± 1.50 for males and 0.34 ± 0.29, 0.24 ± 0.23,0.11 ± 0.07,0.20 ± 0.07, and 2.86 ± 1.20 for females for the air-exposed, low, mid, high, and positive control groups. 2,4-PD did not produce significant exposurerelated increases in the incidence of MNPCE in bone marrow samples taken 24 hr after the 5th day of exposure in either species.
- Conclusions:
- 2,4-pentanedione was not clastogenic in rat and mouse bone marrow cells in micronucleus assay after inhalation exposure for 5 days at 6h/day.
- Executive summary:
The study was similar to OECD Guideline 474. When rats and mice were exposed to 2,4-PD vapour for 6 h/day for 5 consecutive days at target concentrations up to 600 ppm, there were no significant exposure-related increases in the incidences of micronucleated PCE in bone marrow samples taken 24 h after the 5th day of exposure in either species.
Toxicity
mice
There were no noteworthy signs of toxicity at 100 or 400 ppm in either male or female mice. Of 5 female mice in the 600 ppm exposure group, 3 died on exposure days 3 or 4. Prior to death, hypoactivity, prostration gasping, slow respiration, and blepharospasm were observed in one or more of the mice. There were no significant body weight changes in mice during the study.
rats
There were no noteworthy clinical signs of toxicity in male or female rats exposed to 100 or 400 ppm 2,4-PD. Of 5 female rats in the 600 ppm group, 3 died on exposure days 2—4. Significant body weight losses were observed in male and female rats at 600 ppm. Females also had significant body weight losses at 400 ppm, whereas males had significantly lowered body weight gains.
Table 11 Effects of 2,4-PD on micronucleus frequencies in the bone marrow of Swiss Webster mice and Sprague Dawley® rats (whole body vapor exposure)
2,4-PD (ppm) |
Sex |
Mean PCE/1000 erythrocytes |
#PCE evaluated |
#MNPCE |
Mean %MNPCE (±S.D.) |
|
|
||||||
24-Hr sample—Mice |
|
|||||
0 |
M |
486.0±150.08 |
5,000 |
17 |
0.34±0.20 |
|
F |
559.8±54.22 |
5,000 |
7 |
0.14±0.11 |
|
|
100 |
M |
518.6±110.42 |
5,000 |
14 |
0.28±0.18 |
|
F |
624.0 ±66.19 |
5,000 |
5 |
0.10±0 |
|
|
400 |
M |
418.4±91.25 |
5,000 |
10 |
0.20±0.10 |
|
F |
612.4±63.28 |
5,000 |
11 |
0.22±0.08 |
||
600 |
M |
433.0±106.56 |
5,000 |
10 |
0.20±0.16 |
|
F |
543.0±111.72 |
2,000 |
4 |
0.20±0.14 |
|
|
TEMa(0.3mg/kg) |
M |
283.4±73.94 |
5,000 |
133 |
2.66± 0.54b |
|
F |
456.0±69.59 |
5,000 |
159 |
3.18±1.50b |
|
|
24-Hr sample—Rats |
|
|||||
0 |
M |
258.6±2.17 |
5,000 |
15 |
0.30±0.16 |
|
F |
319.4±69.31 |
5,000 |
17 |
0.34±0.29 |
|
|
100 |
M |
379.4±99.60 |
5,000 |
19 |
0.38±0.13 |
|
F |
420.4±104.06 |
5,000 |
12 |
0.24±0.23 |
|
|
400 |
M |
381.2±52.69 |
5,000 |
12 |
0.24±0.25 |
|
F |
248.8±118.07 |
4,536 |
5 |
0.11 ±0.07 |
|
|
600 |
M |
419.6±95.66 |
5,000 |
23 |
0.46±0.15 |
|
F |
308.0±74.95 |
2,000 |
4 |
0.20±0 |
|
|
TEMa(0.3mg/kg) |
M |
307.0 ±86.33 |
5,000 |
196 |
3.92± 1.50b |
|
F |
335.0±65.80 |
5,000 |
143 |
2.86± 1.20b |
|
b significant at p < 0.01
aTEM-triethylenemelamine
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- 2,4-Pentanedione: Evaluation of the genotoxic potential in vitro and in vivo
- Author:
- Vergnes JS
- Year:
- 2 000
- Bibliographic source:
- Toxic Substance Mechanisms, 19:151-175
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 475 (Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- According to OECD 475 Test substances are preferably administered as a single treatment. Test substances may also be administered as a split dose, i.e. two treatments on the same day separated by no more than a few hours, to facilitate administering a large volume of material. Other dose regimens should be scientifically justified. Here dose is administered daily for five consecutive days.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- please refer to 'Remarks'
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- mammalian bone marrow chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Pentane-2,4-dione
- EC Number:
- 204-634-0
- EC Name:
- Pentane-2,4-dione
- Cas Number:
- 123-54-6
- Molecular formula:
- C5H8O2
- IUPAC Name:
- pentane-2,4-dione
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- 2,4-PD samples from several production lots were provided by Union Carbide Corporation (South Charleston, WV, USA) between 1985 and 1994 for use in these studies. Compositional analyses indicated that the samples were greater than 99 % pure.
Test animals
- Species:
- other: Sprague-Dawley rats and ND4 Swiss Webster mice
- Strain:
- other: Sprague-Dawley rats and ND4 Swiss Webster mice
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: ND4 Swiss Webster mice were purchased from Harlan Sprague Dawley (Indianapolis, IN, USA) or Charles River Laboratories (Portage, MI, USA).
- Age at study initiation: 6 to 8 weeks (mice), 7 weeks (rats)
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes, under following basis: Only those animals with body weights ± 20 % of the population mean for each sex were included in the randomization.
- Housing: The animals were housed individually in stainless steel, wire mesh cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): pelleted, certified AGWAY® PRO LAB® animal Diet, Rat, Mouse, Hamster 3000 was available ad libitum, except during treatment.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water was available ad libitum, except during treatment.
- Acclimation period: 1 week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 - 25
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- inhalation: vapour
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: air
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: concentrations were chosen on the basis of previous acute toxicity (Ballantyne et aL, 1986) and repeated exposure studies (Dodd et al., 1986) in the rat.
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: 0 (control), 100, 400, 600 and 800 ppm
Due to unexpected mortalities in both male and female rats exposed at the 800 ppm target concentration, an additional target concentration of 600 ppm was added. - Details on exposure:
- TYPE OF INHALATION EXPOSURE: whole body
GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: Stainless steel inhalation chambers with glass windows for animal observation were used.
Liquid 2,4-PD was metered from a piston pump (Fluid Metering, Oyster Bay, NY, USA) into a heated glass evaporator. The temperature in the evaporator was maintained at the level sufficient to vaporize the liquid 2,4-PD. The evaporator temperature ranged from 32-47°C. The oxygen content of each chamber was measured using an MSA Oxygen Indicator (Mine Safety Appliance, Pittsburgh, PA, USA).
TEST ATMOSPHERE
- Brief description of analytical method used: Each exposure chamber atmosphere was analyzed for 2,4-PD a minimum of once each hour by flame ionization gas chromatography. Chamber temperature and relative humidity were recorded approximately 2 times each hour using a Fisherbrand® dial type thermometer (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and an Airguide humidity indicator (Airguide Instrument, Chicago, IL, USA) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 6 h per day for 5 consecutive days
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Post exposure period:
- 6 h and 24 h
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- rats and mice
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- rats and mice
- Dose / conc.:
- 400 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- rats and mice
- Dose / conc.:
- 600 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- rats and mice
- Dose / conc.:
- 800 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- only rats
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide
- Route of administration: i.p.
- Doses / concentrations: 30 mg/kg bw
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: The 0 (control), 100, 400, and 800 ppm target concentrations were chosen on the basis of previous acute toxicity (Ballantyne et aL, 1986) and repeated exposure studies (Dodd et al., 1986) in the rat. Due to unexpected mortalities in both male and female rats exposed at the 800 ppm target concentration, an additional target concentration of 600 ppm was added.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: Bone marrow was flushed from a femur into a centrifuge tube containing 10-15 ml Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (pH 7.0). Cells were collected by centrifu-gation, fixed, spread on clean microscope slides, and stained with dilute Giemsa. Slides were coded to prevent scoring bias. Whenever possible, 50 metaphase cells/animal were scored.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: Both chromosome and chromatid aberrations were scored, including breaks, fragments, rings, minutes, quadriradi-als, triradials, translocations, and dicentrics. Gaps were scored but not included as aberrations in calculations. Severely damaged cells (>10 breaks) and pulverized cells were recorded as severely damaged and scored as 10 breaks/cell without classifying the nature of the damage.
- Statistics:
- Chromosomal aberrations data were statistically evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U-test (Kliesch et al., 1981); p < 0.05 (two-tailed) was used as the critical level of significance.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Significant body weight losses were observed among the males exposed at 800 ppm and both males and females exposed at 600 ppm. Both males and females in the 400 ppm group had depressed body weight gains over the 5-day exposure period
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: rats
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: mice
- Additional information on results:
- rats
The only noteworthy clinical signs observed prior to death were ataxia and/or prostration. Significant body weight losses were observed among the males exposed at 800 ppm and both males and females exposed at 600 ppm. Both males and females in the 400 ppm group had depressed body weight gains over the 5-day exposure period.
2,4-PD did not produce significant exposure-related increases in the incidence of chromosomal aberrations in the bone marrow of Sprague Dawley® rats exposed, whole body, to 2,4-PD vapour 6 hr/day for 5 consecutive days at target concentrations of 0, 100, 400, and 800 ppm.
The mean percentages of aberrant cells were 1.6 ± 2.6, 5.2 ± 4.6, 1.2 ± 1.8, 2.4 ± 3.3, and 4.4 ± 2.6 for the air-exposed, 100, 400, 600, and 800 ppm males; and 2.4 ± 1.7, 1.6 ± 1.7, 2.0 ± 1.4, and 3.0 ± 3.3 for the air-exposed, 100, 400, and 600 ppm females sampled 6 hr after the 5th exposure. At the 24-hr sampling time, the mean percentages of aberrant cells were 7.6 ± 12.8, 4.0 ± 3.7, 2.0 ± 2.0, 0.4 ± 0.9, 1.2 ± 1.8, and 19.2 ± 3.0 for the air-exposed, 100, 400, 600, 800, and positive control males; and 2.4 ± 2.6, 2.4 ± 0.9, 1.1 ± 1.6, 1.6 ± 0.9, and 28.0 ± 7.9 for the air-exposed, 100, 400, 600, and positive control females.
mice
2,4-PD did not produce significant exposure-related increases in the incidence of chromosomal aberrations in the bone marrow of Swiss Webster mice exposed, whole body, to 2,4-PD vapor 6 hr/day for 5 consecutive days at target concentrations of 0, 100, 400, and 600 ppm. The mean percentages of aberrant cells were 3.6 ± 2.6, 1.6 ± 0.9, 2.0 ± 2.8, and 1.4 ± 2.2 for the air-exposed, 100, 400, 600, and 800 ppm males; and 0.8 ± 1.1, 0, 0.8 ± 1.1, and 0 for the air-exposed, 100, 400, and 600 ppm females sampled 6 hr after the 5th exposure. At the 24-hr sampling time, the mean percentages of aberrant cells were 1.2 ± 1.1, 1.6 ± 1.7, 0.4 ± 0.9, 1.1 ± 1.6, and 28.4 ± 13.0 for the air-exposed, 100, 400, 600, 800, and positive control males; and 2.0 ± 1.4, 0.4 ± 0.9, 1.2 ± 1.8, 1.0 ± 1.4, and 22.8 ± 10.4 for the air-exposed, 100, 400, 600, and positive control females.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 12 Effects of 2,4-PD on chromosomal aberration frequencies in the bone marrow of Sprague Dawley® rats (whole body vapour exposure)
2,4-PD (ppm) |
Sex |
# Cells evaluated |
Total* aberrantcells |
Mean % aberrant cells ±S.D.) |
|
6-Hr sample |
|||||
0 |
M |
250 |
4 |
1.6±2.6 |
|
F |
250 |
6 |
2.4±1.7 |
||
100 |
M |
250 |
13 |
5.2±4.6c |
|
F |
250 |
4 |
1.6±1.7 |
||
400 |
M |
250 |
3 |
1.2±1.8 |
|
F |
250 |
5 |
2.0±1.4 |
||
600 |
M |
250 |
6 |
2.4±3.3 |
|
F |
232 |
7 |
3.0±3.3 |
||
800a |
M |
250 |
11 |
4.4±2.6 |
|
24-Hr sample |
|||||
0 |
M |
250 |
19 |
7.6±12.8 |
|
F |
250 |
6 |
2.4±2.6 |
||
100 |
M |
250 |
10 |
4.0±3.7 |
|
F |
250 |
6 |
2.4±0.9 |
||
400 |
M |
250 |
5 |
2.0±2.0 |
|
F |
228 |
2 |
1.1±1.6 |
||
600 |
M |
250 |
1 |
0.4±0.9 |
|
F |
250 |
4 |
1.6±0.9 |
||
800a |
M |
250 |
3 |
1.2±1.8 |
|
CPb(30mg/kg) |
M |
250 |
48 |
19.2±3.0d |
|
F |
250 |
70 |
28.0± 7.9d |
aTarget concentration was lowered to 650 ppm after 2nd exposure day due to unexpected mortalities.
bCP = cyclophosphamide monohydrate.
cSignificant at p<0.05.
dSignificant at p <0.01.
Table 13 Effects of 2,4-PD on chromosomal aberration frequencies in the bone marrow of SwissWebster mice (whole body vapour exposure)
2,4-PD (ppm) |
Sex |
# Cells evaluated |
Total # aberrant cells |
Mean % aberrant cells (±S.D.) |
|
|
|||||
6-Hr sample |
|
||||
0 |
M |
250 |
9 |
3.6±2.6 |
|
F |
250 |
2 |
0.8±1.1 |
|
|
100 |
M |
250 |
4 |
1.6±0.9 |
|
F |
250 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
400 |
M |
250 |
5 |
2.0 ±2.8 |
|
F |
250 |
2 |
0.8±1.1 |
|
|
600 |
M |
350 |
5 |
1.4±2.2 |
|
F |
100 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
24-Hr sample |
|
||||
0 |
M |
250 |
3 |
1.2±1.1 |
|
F |
250 |
5 |
2.0±1.4 |
|
|
100 |
M |
250 |
4 |
1.6±1.7 |
|
F |
250 |
1 |
0.4±0.9 |
|
|
400 |
M |
250 |
1 |
0.4±0.9 |
|
F |
250 |
3 |
1.2±1.8 |
|
|
600 |
M |
350 |
4 |
1.1 ±1.6 |
|
F |
100 |
1 |
1.0±1.4 |
|
|
CPa(40mg/kg) |
M |
214 |
53 |
28.4± 13.0b |
|
F |
250 |
57 |
22.8± 10.4b |
|
aCP=cyclophosphamidemonohydrate.
bSignificant at p < 0.01.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- 2,4-pentanedione was not clastogenic in rat and mouse bone marrow cells in chromosome aberration assay after inhalation exposure for 5 days at 6h/day
- Executive summary:
The study was similar to OECD Guideline 475. When rats and mice were exposed to 2,4-PD vapour for 6 h/day for 5 consecutive days at target concentrations up to 800 ppm, there were no significant exposure-related increases in the incidences of chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow samples taken 6 and 24 h after the 5th day of exposure in either species.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.