Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 223-578-8 | CAS number: 3965-55-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
In vitro bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test)
Sodium dimethyl 5 -sulphonatoisophthalate (SIM-Ester) was tested in the Samonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay (BioReliance, 2004, OECD 471, GLP compliance) in Salmonella typhimurium (TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100) and Escherichia coli (WP2 uvr A) in the absence and presence of Arochlor-induced rat liver S9. The plate incorporation method was used. Concurrent positive and solvent (water) controls were included. They revealed the expected results, indicating the suitability and sensitivity of the test system. All test concentrations were plated in triplicate. In the initial experiment, performed as toxicity-mutation test, the dose levels tested were 2.5, 7.5, 25, 75, 200, 600, 1800 and 5000 µg per plate. Since neither precipitate nor appreciable toxicity was observed 75, 200, 600, 1800 and 5000 µg/plate were tested in the confirmatory experiment. Again, neither precipitate nor toxicity was seen. In both experiments no positive mutagenic response was observed. The results of the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay indicate that, under the conditions of this study, the test item did not cause a positive mutagenic response in either the presence or absence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9.
In vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
In a chromosome aberration assay (Toxi-Coop Zrt (f), 2012, OECD 473, GLP compliance) Sodium dimethyl 5-sulphonatoisophthalate (SIM-Ester) was tested in concentrations of 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL in Chinese Hamster V79 cells. In the two independent experiments of the Chromosome Aberration Assay (Experiment A and B, both run in duplicate) at least 200 well-spread metaphase cells were analysed. Experiment A was performed with a 3/20 hour treatment/sampling time in the absence and presence of an induced rat liver S9 mix. Experiment B was run with a 20/20 hour and 20/28 hour treatment/sampling time in the absence of S9 and with a 3/28 hour treatment/sampling time in the presence of S9. In Experiments A and B, there were no biologically and/or statistically significant increases in the number of cells showing structural chromosome aberrations, either in the absence or in the presence of metabolic activation, as compared with concurrent solvent controls. No dose-response relationships were noted. The observed chromosome aberration rates were within the ranges of the historical control data. There were no biologically relevant increases in the rate of polyploid or endoreduplicated metaphases in either experiment in the presence or absence of metabolic activation. There was no precipitation of the test item at any dose level tested. No biologically relevant changes in pH or osmolality of the test system were noted at the dose levels tested. Cytotoxicity was observed in Experiment B at concentrations of 1250 μg/mL, 2500 μg/mL and 5000 μg/mL. Experiment A indicated no cytotoxicity. The validity of the test was shown using Ethyl methanesulphonate (0.4 or 1.0 μL/mL) and Cyclophosphamide (5.0 μg/mL) as concurrent positive controls, which induced biologically and statistically significant increases in the number of cells with chromosome aberration(s) over background. In conclusion, SIM Ester tested up to the maximum recommended concentration of 5000 μg/mL, both with and without mammalian metabolic activation system, did not induce structural chromosome aberrations in Chinese Hamster lung cells, and is thus considered as not clastogenic in this system.
In vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test
In a mammalian gene mutation test (Toxi-Coop Zrt. (g), 2012, OECD 476, GLP compliance) Sodium dimethyl 5-sulphonatoisophthalate (SIM-Ester) was dissolved in Ham's F12 medium in concentrations of 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL. Two independent experiments (both run in duplicate) were performed. In Experiment 1, where the treatment period lasted for 5 hours, there were no biologically or statistically significant increases in mutation frequency at any concentration tested compared to the concurrent control, either in the absence or in the presence of metabolic activation.
In Experiment 2, the mutant frequency of the cells did not show biologically or statistically significant alterations compared to the concurrent control, when the test item was tested without S9 mix over a prolonged treatment period (20 hours) as well as in the presence of S9 mix over a five-hour treatment period.
The concurrent solvent and positive controls revealed the expected results, indicating the reliability and sensitivity of the test system.
In conclusion, SIM-Ester tested both without and with metabolic activation (S9 mix), did not induce increases in mutant frequency over the background (negative solvent control) in this in vitro test in Chinese Hamster ovary cells. Thus, SIM-Ester was not mutagenic under the conditions of this study.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
No study was selected because all in vitro studies were negative.
Short description of key information:
Sodium dimethyl 5-sulphonatoisophthalate did not cause a positive mutagenic response in the Samonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay, did not induce structural chromosome aberrations in Chinese Hamster lung cells and was not mutagenic in the HPRT assay.
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the results obtained in the in vitro genotoxicity tests, Sodium dimethyl 5-sulphonatoisophthalate
is considered to be non-genotoxic/mutagenic according to Directive 67/548/EEC and according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.