Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 608-209-4 | CAS number: 284461-73-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to terrestrial plants
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to terrestrial plants: long-term
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Jul - Aug 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Sorafenib tosylate was used as an analogue.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 208 (Terrestrial Plants Test: Seedling Emergence and Seedling Growth Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not relevant
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Species:
- Lactuca sativa
- Plant group:
- Monocotyledonae (monocots)
- Details on test organisms:
- - Common name: lettuce
- Variety: Attraktion
- Source of seed: - Species:
- Beta vulgaris
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Details on test organisms:
- - Common name: sugar beet
- Variety: Evelina
- Source of seed: Landi, Goldach, Switzerland - Species:
- Hordeum vulgare
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Details on test organisms:
- - Common name: barley
- Variety: Eunova
- Source of seed: Landi, Goldach, Switzerland - Test type:
- seedling emergence toxicity test
- Study type:
- laboratory study
- Substrate type:
- artificial soil
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Remarks:
- after 50% control emergence.
- Species:
- Hordeum vulgare
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- seedling emergence
- Species:
- Hordeum vulgare
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 10 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Species:
- Beta vulgaris
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- seedling emergence
- Species:
- Beta vulgaris
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 10 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Species:
- Lactuca sativa
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- seedling emergence
- Species:
- Lactuca sativa
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 10 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- For all species, effects on the shoot dry weight data were statistically significant at the 100 mg/kg dry soil treatment level. The NOEC and LOEC for shoot dry weight were 10 and 100 mga.i./kg dry soil for all species, respectively. For all species, the NOEC and LOEC values were calculated to be 100 and >100 mg a.i./kg dry soil for percent emergence, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The purpose of this study was to estimate the potential effects of BAY 54-9085 on the emergence and seedling growth of three non-target plants species. The methods described in this study plan meet the requirements specified in the OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals #208, Terrestrial plant test, Seedling emergence and seedling growth test (OECD, 2006).
Barley ¿ Hordeum vulgare Seedling emergence: Fourteen and twenty-one days after at least 50% of the seedlings emerged, 90.0, 83.3, 91.7 and 87.5% emergence was observed in the control, the 1.0, 10 and 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatments respectively. This was equivalent to 7.4, -1.9 and 2.8% in the 1.0, 10 and 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatments respectively, compared to the control. No statistically significant effects compared to the control were observed at any of the treatment levels (Dunn¿s multiple comparison-Kruskal-Wallis, p > 0.05) Survival was 100% in the control and the three test item treatments. Dry weight: Mean dry weight was 127, 127, 131 and 98.1 mg in the control, the 1.0, 10 and 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatments respectively. This was equivalent to a reduction when compared to the control of 0, -2.99 and 22.9% in the 1.0, 10 and 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatments respectively. Statistically significant effects compared to the control were observed at 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil (Bonferroni t-test, p <0.05). No effects on plant development (e.g. growth stage) were observed during the test. Any variations in colouring etc were deemed to be within the normal ranges for the plant species tested.
Sugar beet ¿ Beta vulgaris Seedling emergence: Twenty-one days after at least 50% of the seedlings emerged, 87.5, 100, 91.7 and 100% emergence was observed in the control, the 1.0, 10 and 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatments respectively. This was equivalent to -14.3, -4.8 and -14.3% in the 1.0, 10 and 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatments respectively, compared to the control.. No statistically significant effects compared to the control were observed at any of the treatment levels (Dunn¿s multiple comparison-Kruskal-Wallis, p > 0.05) Survival was 100% in the control and the three test item treatments Dry weight: Mean dry weight was 73.7, 57.1, 64.2 and 34.6 mg in the control, the 1.0, 10 and 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatments respectively. This was equivalent to a reduction when compared to the control of 22.5, 12.9 and 53.1% in the 1.0, 10 and 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatments respectively.
Statistically significant effects compared to the control were observed at 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil (Bonferroni t-test, p < 0.05). No effects on plant development (e.g. growth stage) were observed during the test. Any variations in colouring etc were deemed to be within the normal ranges for the plant species tested.
Lettuce ¿ Lactuca sativa Seedling emergence: Twenty-one days after at least 50% of the seedlings emerged, 60.0, 50.0, 75.0 and 85.0% emergence was observed in the control, the 1.0, 10 and 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatments respectively. This was equivalent to 16.7, -25.0 and -41.7% in the 1.0, 10 and 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatments respectively, compared to the control. No statistically significant effects compared to the control were observed at any of the treatment levels (Bonferroni ttest, p > 0.05) Survival was 100% in the control and the three test item treatments. Dry weight: Mean dry weight was 72.4, 63.5, 53.8 and 47.3 mg in the control, the 1.0, 10 and 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatments respectively. This was equivalent to a reduction when compared to the control of 12.3, 28.6 and 34.7% in the 1.0, 10 and 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatments respectively.
Statistically significant effects compared to the control were observed at 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil (Bonferroni t-test, p < 0.05). No effects on plant development (e.g. growth stage) were observed during the test. Any variations in colouring etc were deemed to be within the normal ranges for the plant species tested.
Reference
No effects on plant development were observed during the test. No phytotoxic effects were observed, the mean survival of the emerged plants was more than 90%.
Description of key information
A guideline study according to OECD Guideline 208 (Terrestrial Plants Test: Seedling Emergence and Seedling Growth Test) was performed under GLP to assess the acute toxicity of BAY 54-9085 to terrestrial plants Hordeum vulgare (barley), Beta vulgaris (sugar beet), and Lactuca sativa (lettuce) over 21 days. The test substance was applied at 1.0, 10 and 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil. Additionally, an untreated control was performed. No effects on plant development were observed during the test. No phytotoxic effects were observed, the mean survival of the emerged plants was more than 90%. Any variations in colouring etc were deemed to be within the normal ranges for the plant species tested. For all species, effects on the shoot dry weight data were statistically significant at the 100 mg/kg dry soil treatment level. The NOEC and LOEC for shoot dry weight were 10 and 100 mg a.i./kg dry soil for all species, respectively. The the NOEC and LOEC for seedling emergence were 100 and >100 mg a.i./kg dry soil for all species, respectively.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Long-term EC10, LC10 or NOEC for terrestrial plants:
- 100 mg/kg soil dw
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.